Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2 November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Probe Request and Response in TGai Date: 2011-11-02 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /1523r4 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4 January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r1 Submission May 2012 Huawei Slide 1 Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0537r0 Submission May 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Passive and Active Scanning Mixture Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Phillip BarberHuawei Technologies Co., Ltd Alma Rd, Ste 500 Plano,
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, Intel, Qcomm Slide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning.
Doc.: IEEE /1169r1 Submission January 2012 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 FILS Association Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /933r6 Submission July 2012 Fang Xie (CMCC)Slide 1 Access Control Mechanism for FILS Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1042r3 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /1042 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Doc.: IEEE /0249r0 Submission March 2012 Slide 1Lin Cai et al,Huawei. Differentiated Association Service Provisioning in WiFi Networks Date: 03/02/2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0257r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /0067r0 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Active Scanning Time Notification Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE ai March 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, IntelSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning Improvement.
Doc.:IEEE /0259r4 Submission March 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: March 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission Nov 2011 Huawei Technologies Co. LtdSlide 1 Broadcast Probe Response in TGai Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0547r1 Submission May 2012 Dapeng Liu, China MobileSlide 1 Extend 802.1X for higher layer configuration in FILS Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0158r2 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Proposed Additions to SFD Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1052r2 Response considerations in Active Scanning September 2012 HTC Corp.1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Phillip BarberHuawei Technologies Co., Ltd Alma Rd, Ste 500 Plano,
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0258r7 Submission May 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: May 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1233r3 Submission Sep 2011 Slide 1 Passive Scanning Improvement Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai September 2012 Lei Wang, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Ad Hoc Discussions of ai Passive Scanning during.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 Lei Wang, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai AP/STA Initiated FILS Optimizations.
Doc.: IEEE /1042r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /0977r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Hitoshi MORIOKA ROOT INC Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka JAPAN
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/0761r0 July 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Operating Channels Information Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0080r0 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 AP Admission Control in TGai Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission May 2012 Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei Slide 1 AP Discovery Information Broadcasting Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0263r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Spec Framework Proposal: Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1 March 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital Slide 1 Passive Scanning Improvement Ad Hoc Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0896r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Request Filtering Criteria Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0042r1 Submission January 2013 Yongho Seok, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Fast Moving Scan Channel Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.:IEEE /1523r1 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0059r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0158r0 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Proposed Additions to SFD Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission Nov Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Rapid Scanning Procedure Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0206r1 March 2012 Slide 1 Necessity of Probe Reduction Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0258r6 Submission May 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: May 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0269r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone ChengYan FengZTE Corporation No.800, Middle Tianfu Avenue, Hi-tech District, Chengdu,
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
AP discovery with FILS beacon
AP Discovery Information Broadcasting
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Response considerations in Active Scanning
Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
AP discovery with FILS beacon
Probe Request and Response in TGai
AP discovery with FILS beacon
AP discovery with FILS beacon
Reducing the Probe Response transmission
Listen to Probe Request from other STAs
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
AP Status Broadcast Date: Authors: November 2011
Access Control Mechanism for FILS
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Cooperative AP Discovery
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Scanning from Specific Channel
Fast passive scan for FILS
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2 November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Probe Request and Response in TGai Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2 November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 2 Abstract This document describes a technical proposal for TGai which addresses the following phase. AP Discovery

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 3 Conformance w/ TGai PAR & 5C Conformance QuestionResponse Does the proposal degrade the security offered by Robust Security Network Association (RSNA) already defined in ? No Does the proposal change the MAC SAP interface?No Does the proposal require or introduce a change to the architecture?No Does the proposal introduce a change in the channel access mechanism?No Does the proposal introduce a change in the PHY?No Which of the following link set-up phases is addressed by the proposal? (1) AP Discovery (2) Network Discovery (3) Link (re-)establishment / exchange of security related messages (4) Higher layer aspects, e.g. IP address assignment 1

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 4 Time occupied situation in the real case was presented in Doc /1413r0. The time occupied rate will become higher and higher because of Smartphone increasing. Thus, we have to consider reducing needless packet exchanges which occur packet collisions and bigger latency in order to obtain the FILS advantages effectively. Background

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 5 Probe Request / Response In order to search the surrounding APs, a STA receives Beacon and transmit Probe Request in Broadcast. APs transmit Probe Response for responding received Probe Requests in unicast. AP1STAAP2AP3AP4 Probe Request (wildcard) Probe Response

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 6 Example of Probe Request This STA transmits multiple “Probe Request” about every 15 seconds. 5 Probe Requests were observed around time stamp of 104 seconds. * Source MAC address was modified. NoTimesourcedestinationInfo :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2207, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2208, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2209, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2210, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2211, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2212, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2229, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2231, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2232, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2233, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2251, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2252, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2253, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2254, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2255, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2273, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2274, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2275, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2276, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2277, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast :XX:bc:bc:a3:X X BroadcastProbe Request, SN=2278, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 7 Example of Probe Response 3 SSID were responded for probe requests. 26 probe responses were observed for 5 probe requests in Slide 7. NoTime stampsourcedestinationInto Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1983, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1984, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1984, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1984, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c6 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1985, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID=CCC Matsushi_c5:XX:c6 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1985, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID=CCC Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1989, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1990, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c6 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1991, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID=CCC Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1992, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1992, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1992, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1993, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c6 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1994, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID=CCC Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1995, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1995, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1995, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1995, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1996, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1996, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1996, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c1 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1996, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=BBB Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1998, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1998, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1998, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA Matsushi_c5:XX:c0 48:XX:bc:bc:XX:2 b Probe Response, SN=1998, FN=0, Flags=..m.R...C, BI=100, SSID=AAA

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 8 Considerations “Probe Request / Response” cause packet flooding even if the STA doesn’t have any connecting capabilities to surrounding APs. Transmitting “Probe Request” every 15 seconds doesn’t help the fast AP discovery. As mentioned in Doc /1413r1, probe responses existed 5 times more than probe requests at that monitored public space. Avoiding needless packets may bring clearer WLAN air circumstances.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 9 Probe exchanges Assumption-1 If 5 APs are installed in public space, 5 probe responses will be transmitted for a probe request with wildcard SSID. STAAP1AP2AP3AP4AP5 Probe Req. (wildcard SSID) Probe Res. (unicast)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 10 Probe exchanges Assumption-2 If 5 STAs enter into the same place, 25 probe responses will be transmitted. AP1AP2AP3AP4AP5 STA1STA2STA3STA4STA5

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 11 Probe exchanges Assumption-3 What happens when a crowded train enter into the same place? AP1AP2AP3AP4AP5 STA How many probes will be exchanged???

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 12 Why not use Beacons for AP discovery? Beacon is including the almost same IEs as Probe Response. Beacon is transmitted in every 100 milliseconds. A STA can receive 150 Beacons during transmitting 1 Probe Request, if it would transmit Probe Request in every 15 seconds. It would be sufficient for a STA to discover AP with the target SSID by Beacons. Mobile devices (Smart-phones) are battery consumption critical. So it is preferable for mobile devices not to transmit “Probe Requests”, if possible.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 13 Is Probe Request with wildcard SSID necessary for AP discovery? Why so? I’m thinking that even Probe Request with a specific target SSID isn’t necessary for AP discovery of public Wi-Fi hotspots. Stealth APs should be discovered by Probe Request/Response exchanges. But it isn’t by Probe Request with wildcard SSID. Open discussion

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 14 I’d like to propose that: TGai compliant STAs shall not use the wildcard SSID in SSID element of “Probe Request”. TGai compliant APs shall not transmit “Probe Response” for “Probe Request” with the wildcard SSID. More TGai compliant devices would be deployed, clearer WLAN circumstances might be realized!! Proposal

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 15 References doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r0