Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Dr. Pamela J. Buffington Education Development Center maine.edc.orgedc.org Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
PORTFOLIO.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
1 Maine’s Impact Study of Technology in Mathematics (MISTM) David L. Silvernail, Director Maine Education Policy Research Institute University of Southern.
Providing On-going Support for STEM Teachers Joan D. Pasley Horizon Research, Inc.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
SLAs – MAKING THE SHIFT. Session Goals Deepen understanding of Inspiring Education, Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks (embedded in Curriculum Redesign)
Introduction 1.How do you use technology now? 2.What helps? 3.What hinders? Definition of Technology Computers Software Internet Digital cameras and camcorders.
Algebra I Model Course Background. Education Reform Act signed into law by Governor Rell May 26, 2010 Includes many recommendations of the ad hoc committee.
Introduction to Workshop 10 Choosing Learning and Teaching Approaches and Strategies.
Jefferson County Public Schools University of Louisville.
Introduction to Using Precise Math Language
Understanding Rational Numbers (Fractions, Decimals, Percents, Ratios) Offered by: Looney Math Consulting
Introduction to Using Visual Representations in Math.
Effects of Technology on Learning and Teaching: What the research tells us.
Mathematics the Preschool Way
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
The Arkansas Department of Education teamed up with Teacher Created Materials to design rigorous teaching sessions to address the seven STEM individual.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE SESSION STEM Education: Communication Tools and Collaboration Opportunities May 20, /20/11Superintendents Community of Practice.
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Parent Math Information Night December 6, 2011 Rebecca Fleming & Noreen Haus.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Poll Everywhere
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) Title IID Enhancing Education through Technology Initiative 2 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Competitive.
Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice for teachers with ICT? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter: Margaret Cox King’s College.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
CNA REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB ~ APPALACHIA The Effects of Kentucky Virtual High School’s Hybrid Course in Algebra I on Teaching Practices, Classroom Quality,
Empowering a Learning Community Transforming Our Adult Education World NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Goals: Empower a professional.
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Bricks and Clicks: Training Teachers Online Barbara Treacy, Director, EdTech Leaders Online OSEP Project Directors Meeting July 20, 2010.
1 Assessing Student Understanding David Niemi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards,
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Mathematics Framework Technology in Teaching of Mathematics and Instructional Strategies.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Asking the Right K-12 Questions How to Answer Them to Evaluate K-12 STEM Outreach and Engagement Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Research Scientist.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Curricular Design and Academic Expectations
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
GeoGebra Conference First International July 14, 2009
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Dr. Pamela J. Buffington Education Development Center maine.edc.orgedc.org Technology in Mathematics Key Learning from Research & Practice

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Session Goals Increase knowledge of research specific to using interactive technologies for mathematics learning and teaching Increase awareness of targeted technology tools & strategies for mathematics learning and teaching

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Overview Foundational Research Background Research Based Benefits Maine Studies & Research Based Professional Learning Projects Ways Technology Can Support Mathematics Learning Examples of Research Based Use of Tools

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Overview of Research Interactive Technologies Provide Benefits to Mathematics Learning & Teaching When: Technologies Specific & Appropriate to Mathematics Systematically Integrated into Classroom Practice Supported by Sustained Professional Learning (Ongoing, Embedded, Immersion) Part of an Integrated System (Heid & Blume, 2008)

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Research Based Benefits Increased Conceptual Understanding representing, generalizing, abstracting, modeling, working with symbols Better Problem Solving More Engagement, Broader Participation Increased Interactivity Immediate Feedback to Learners/Teachers Access to More Important & Deeper Mathematical Thinking (Bransford, Brophy, & Williams, 2000; Heid & Blume, 2008; Kaput, 1992, 1994; Roschelle, Pea, Hoadley, Gordin & Means, 2000)

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Ways Technology Can Support Mathematics Learning By Enabling Dynamic Representation and Interaction with Mathematical Concepts & Ideas By Supporting Formative Assessment Practices By Supporting Shared Analysis & Discussion of Mathematical Thinking & Approaches (Student Work) By Enhancing Student and Teacher Collaboration

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Maine Studies & Projects Maine Impact Study of Technology in Mathematics (MISTM) USDOE Access to Algebra Using Interactive Technologies (Access IT - ME MSP) Reducing Barriers by Addressing Misconceptions in Mathematics (RBAMM -ME MSP) OER in Mathematics Professional Development Project (ARRA Grant) Maine Learning Technology Initiative – Mathematics PD Support

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice MISTM Maine Impact Study of Technology in Mathematics (MISTM) Funded by the U.S. Department of Education Office of elementary Secondary Education School support and Technology Program (#5318A03005) Randomized Control Trial– Delayed Treatment 2 Years – Ongoing, Embedded Professional Development Lowest Performing Middle Schools

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice MISTM Research Question Can middle school mathematics test scores be improved by providing high quality, technology- infused professional development to middle school mathematics teachers in rural districts? A1 – Numbers and Operations, which includes Numbers and Number Sense, and Computation. G1/K2 – Patterns, which includes patterns, relations & functions, algebra concepts, and mathematical communication.

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 10 Randomized Control Group Design Experimental Group Control Group Receive Professional Development Receive No PD Impact on Student Mathematics Performance Qualifying Rural Schools

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 11 Logic Model for MISTM Research Pre-Treatment: Teachers’ math content knowledge Teachers’ math pedagogical skills and practices Teachers’ technology integration knowledge and skills Teachers’ general and mathematics efficacy beliefs Teachers’ background and experience PD Intervention: Teacher professional development in math content and pedagogy using applets and delivered through:  Face-to-face workshops  Online workshops  Peer coaching and mentoring  Site visits Process Outcomes: Teachers’ math content knowledge Teachers’ pedagogical and technology integration knowledge and skills Teachers’ mathematics instructional practices especially using technology Teachers’ teaching beliefs Achievement Outcomes: Higher math test scores for students

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 12 Professional Development Intervention Content Knowledge  Deepen teacher content knowledge in targeted areas Pedagogy  Improve teacher pedagogical practice in technology infused mathematics classrooms Technology Integration  Develop and apply strategies that support the integration of technology for the teaching, learning and assessment of mathematics Professional Learning Community  Engage teachers in meaningful interaction and dialogue about mathematics through face-to-face and online environments A multi-faceted two-year program which included:  Face-to-Face Activities (60 hours)  Online Learning Component (100 hours)  Peer Coaching/Staff Mentoring/Site Visits (48 hours)  208 hours total over two years

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice MISTM Website

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Critical Aspects of PD Suite of tools Interactive, flexible, open Linked representation Graphs, expressions, tables, sliders

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Desmos Graphing Calculator Graphing calculator: in-browser, interactive, free, connected to global community of users, numerous support resources provided, free iPad app  Desmos Website  Modeling Example Demo TeacherDemoTeacher  Graphing Simulation CarnivalCarnival

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Formative Assessment Immediate Feedback from the Interactive Tool - Applets Online Tools that Provide Feedback, Summary – That Quiz / Google Forms Screencasting Software – Student Explanation (Making & Sharing)

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Explain Everything (iPad)

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 18 Results Summary Research Question: Can middle school mathematics test scores be improved by providing high quality, technology-infused professional development to middle school mathematics teachers in rural districts? Answer: Qualified “yes”

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 19 Results Summary  When teachers actively participated in the PD intervention activities for two years, their content knowledge increased as did their use of technology in teaching mathematics.  Student knowledge of mathematics patterns and relationships did increase (G1/K2), but knowledge of numbers and operations (A1) did not.

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 20 Reflections / Next Steps “ Of all the topics in the school curriculum, fractions, ratios, and proportions arguably hold the distinction of being the most protracted in terms of development, the most difficult to teach, the most mathematically complex, the most cognitively challenging, the most essential to success in higher mathematics and science, and one of the most compelling research sites” (Lamon, 2007, p. 629).

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 21 Reflections / Next Steps  Teachers need more explicit strategies and tools to develop student’s conceptual understanding and target misconceptions in rational number concepts  Student’s also have research-based misconceptions in early algebra that need to be explicitly targeted.

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice 22 Next Steps  Build upon the potential of technology to provide multiple forms of immediate feedback  Enhance Formative Assessment Practices  Explicitly Target Research Based Student Misconceptions

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Maine Studies Access to Algebra Using Interactive Technologies (Access IT - ME MSP) Reducing Barriers by Addressing Misconceptions in Mathematics (RBAMM -ME MSP) Use of Formative Assessment Targeted Use of Interactive Applets Aligned with Misconceptions 2 Years – Ongoing, Embedded PD Middle School /High School

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice RBAMM/ACCESS IT

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice RBAMM/ACCESS IT

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Rational Number Students overgeneralize from whole number understandings Need to explicitly confront misconceptions

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Rational Number

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Equivalent Expressions

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Findings Increased Awareness of Student Misconceptions & Targeted Intervention Tools (Applets) Increased Use of Formative Assessment Practices Increases in Student Learning in Targeted Content

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Maine Studies OER in Math Professional Development Project Funded by the ME Department of Education Use of Open Educational Resources 2 Years – Ongoing, Embedded Professional Development MS/HS Focus on Formative Assessment

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Logic Model

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Critical Features Use of Open Educational Resources - GeoGebra (GeoGebraTube) Heavy Focus on Formative Assessment Practices (Student Role, Pre/Post ) Focus on Formative Assessment Involved Local Teacher Leaders in Resource Development / Capacity Building

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice TPACK For Mathematics Make TPACK explicit Creation & use of video, screencasts, and shared products Create ongoing PLC s Involve students in the formative assessment process

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Findings Increased and sustained student achievement in targeted topics Increased teacher knowledge of student misconceptions, increased frequency of use of formative assessment strategies, increased use of technology to support a cycle of inquiry, increased competency with integration strategies (esp for development group "Culture eats strategy for breakfast" – Peter Drucker

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Findings Increased and sustained student achievement Enhanced culture of learning "Culture eats strategy for breakfast" – Peter Drucker

Technology in Mathematics –Key Learning from Research & Practice Non Routine Problems