M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
LHCb: status and perspectives
Laurence Carson, University of Edinburgh on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond EW 2014 Constraining the CKM Angle γ at LHCb.
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38 Recent CP violation measurements.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
LHCb Strategies for  from B→DK Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh for the LHCb Collaboration ADS with B + →DK + and B 0 → DK* 0 Dalitz with B + →DK +
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
LHCb status of CKM  from tree-level decays Stefania Ricciardi, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Stefania Ricciardi,
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
B→DK strategies in LHCb (Part I) Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 6 th February 2006 FLAVOUR IN THE ERA OF THE LHC.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
1 Trees, penguins and boxes at LHCb Prospects for CP violation measurements at LHCb Tristan du Pree (Nikhef) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration 14 th.
M.N MinardAspen Winter Meeting LHCb Physics Program On behalf of LHCb collaboration M.N Minard (LAPP) Status LHCb ( R.Jacobson) Single arm spectrometer.
LHCb  Extraction with B s →D s K and B d →D (*)  Guy Wilkinson University of Oxford March 17,2005 Physics Motivation and Observables Experimental Essentials.
Lake Louise Winter Institute Outlook:  Introduction  LHCb performance  Radiative decays: CP violation Bs  Φγ  Backward-forward Asymmetry B 
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
Mauro Donega’ - CDF collaboration meeting February 3, 2006 B d,s ->h 1 h 2 : BR, CP asymmetries, and lifetimes S. Budroni, S. Donati, M. Donega’, S. Giagu,
Hadronic B→DX Decays at LHCb and CDF Laurence Carson, Imperial College on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CIPANP 2012, St. Petersburg,FL.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
Reaching for  (present and future)
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
Charm Mixing, CPV and Rare D0 decays at BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
B physics prospects at LHCb
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Potential for precise Unitarity Triangle angles measurements in LHC
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
清华大学高能物理研究中心 Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University
Presentation transcript:

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi University of Bristol On behalf of the LHCb collaboration

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol2/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Introduction LHCb is a 2 nd generation precision experiment following Tevatron and the B-factories b -> c transitions: extensively studied and in good agreement with SM b -> s transitions: limited knowledge, room for NP effects Precision measurements available for CKM parameters, allowing strong constraints on SM, but  still poorly measured. Collection of large sample of b (c) hadrons at LHC allows extensive study in a wide set of channels. Rare decays - see Hugo Ruiz presentation Early LHCb results - see Abraham Gallas presentation B s mixing  with trees  with loops Mixing and CPV in charm

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol3/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 LHCb in a nutshell Real beam gas event High statistics:  L ~ 2 x cm -2 s-1  bb ~ 500  b at 14 TeV ~ bb year (2 fb -1 ) B ±, B 0, B s, B c,  b … Tracking: Mass resolution:  B(D) ~ 15(7) MeV B vertex resolution:  z ~ 200  m Proper time resolution:   ~ 40 fs Particle identification:  /K separation over 2 GeV < p < 100 GeV Trigger: First level (L0) High p T hadron trigger

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol4/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 B s phase  s B s -> J/Ψ  dominated by tree NP can enter through mixing B s ->  dominated by a penguin NP can enter through mixing and/or penguin In presence of NP the mixing phase Is modified and can probe NP in the mixing (  M NP ) and/or the penguin (  D NP ). Tevatron results: D0  s =  with 2.8 fb -1 CDF  s = 68%CL with 1.35 fb -1 The observable is  s =  SM +  NP In SM  S (B s -> J/Ψ  ) = -2  s = ±   s (B s ->  ) = 0

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol5/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 B s phase  s (2)  s can be extracted from CP time-dependent asymmetry in decay rates : with n f = ±1 CP eigenstate Would like to use pure CP eigenstates such as B s  J/Ψ η, B s  J/Ψ η’, B s  η c Φ, B d  D s + D s - But low yield and high background B s -> J/Ψ  has a nice signature and large yield small background but is a mixture of CP = +1 and CP = -1 states requires an angular analysis to disentangle the two states Combined D0 and CDF 2.2  from SM (ICHEP08)

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol6/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 B s phase  s (3) Similar analysis yields 3.4k events (2 fb -1 ) with an expected sensitivity on  s B s ->   (  s ) ~ k 0.03

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol7/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Angle   plays a unique role in flavour physics Can be measured through tree diagrams and those involving loops Trees Benchmark for SM Time integrated (GLW, ADS, Dalitz/GGSZ) and/or time dependent strategies Loops Sensitive to NP Measured at B factories A full test of SM and unitarity requires:   ~ a few degrees measurement in B ±, B 0 and B s  = 77° + 30° - 32°

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol8/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 GLW method: f D is a CP eigenstate common to D 0 and D 0 : f D = K + K -,  +  -,… Measure: B → D 0 K, B → D 0 K, B → D 1 K Large event rate; small interference Measurement r B difficult  from trees: B -> DK B–B– D0K–D0K– D0K–D0K– fDK–fDK– b  c favoured b  u suppressed Decay time independent analysis Cabibbo supp. Cabibbo allowed. Interfere decays b  c with b  u to final states common to D 0 and D 0 color suppression ADS method: Use common flavour state f D =(K +  – ) Note: decay D 0 → K +  – is double Cabibbo suppressed Lower event rate; large interference 8

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol9/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008  from trees: B ± -> D(hh) K ± ChannelYield (2 fb -1 )B/S B + → D(K  ) K + Favoured 28 k0.6 B + → D(K  ) K + Suppressed B + → D(KK) K + Favoured3k1.2 B + → D(  ) K + Suppressed 1k3.6 ADS and GLW 6 rates, 5 unknown parameters Assuming:  = 60° r B = 0.10  B = 130° (PDG) r D = (PDG)  D centered at 158° (ADS requires -180 shift w.r.t. published  D from CLEO-c)   = 10.8° – 12.7° depending on  D

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol10/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008  from trees: Combining all ADS - GLW   = 7° – 9.5°

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol11/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008  from trees: B ± -> D(K s  +  - ) K ± K s  +  - Dalitz plot contain a CP-violating contribution from the decay path sensitive to  Two different method of analysis Unbinned fit based on amplitude model Model independent binned fit using ψ(3770) results on D decays. Background suppressed with RICH and momentum cut Yield ~ 5k per year Statistical uncertainty   = 9.8° Amplitude model   = 12.8° Binned fit Amplitude model also affected by uncertainty due to the model. Latest BaBar analysis estimate 7° Binned fit affected by finite statistics in Ψ sample, estimated 2°.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol12/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008  from trees: B s -> D s K Interference between tree decays via mixing Insensitive to NP Measures  +  s (  s measured from B s ->J/Ψ  ) Include B s ->D s  to determine  m s and tagging dilution Simultaneous fit to both decays Assuming  = 60° and  m s = 17.5 ps -1 B s → D s - K + ChannelYield (2 fb -1 )B/S B s → D s K6.2 k0.7 B s → D s  140 k0.2    = 10.3°

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol13/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008  from loops: B -> hh B d/s  /K B d/s Interference between tree and penguin diagrams Measure time-dependent CP asymmetries for B 0     and B s      Assume U-spin flavour symmetry (d  s) d = d’ and  =  ’ Take  d from B d  J/  K s and  s from B S  J/  solve for  4 observables, 3 unknowns

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol14/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008  from loops: B -> hh (2) Bs  K+K- BG     2 fb -1  ms=20 Time  14 ChannelYield (2 fb -1 )B/S B s → KK36 k< 0.06 B 0 →  36 k0.5 WITH RICH PID NO PID

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol15/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Different ways to measure  B modeD modeMethodParameter Bs→DsKBs→DsK KK  tagged, A CP (t) -s-s B + → D K + K ,KK/  counting, ADS+GLW  B + → D K + K s  Dalitz, GGSZ  B + → D K + KK  4 body Dalitz  B 0 → D K *0 K ,KK,  counting, ADS+GLW  B → ,KK -tagged, A CP (t)  /  d /  s   2fb -1 9°-12° 11º-13º 10º-13º 18º 5º-12° 4º  B ° (°) Combined B + /B 0 (ADS+GLW) 4.6°7.6°6.3°7.1°4.6° + model independent Dalitz4.1°5.1°4.8°5.1°3.9°   2fb -1 Combining with time dependent measurements a global sensitivity with tree decays only in 2 fb -1   ~ 4°

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol16/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Charm physics – Trigger and yields Dedicated D* -> D 0 (hh)  trigger stream Loose cuts on hadrons pt, IP, D0 mass, D* - D0 mass difference RICH information not used in the trigger Present selection favours D* coming from B decays Estimated yields for secondary D 0 for 2 fb -1 D 0 -> K -  + (right sign) 12.4 M D 0 -> K +  - (wrong sign) 46.5 K D 0 -> K + K M D 0 ->  +  M Similar amounts expected for prompt production.

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol17/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Charm physics - D 0 mixing Sensitive to NP in the box diagram loop Recently observed at BaBar Belle and CDF x = 0.89± % y = 0.75± % Time-dependent D0 mixing with wrong-sign D 0  K +  – decays  stat (x’ 2 ) ~0.14 x10 –3,  stat (y’) ~2 x10 –3 with 2 fb –1 D unambiguously tagged at production by the sign of the slow  in the D* decay

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol18/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Charm physics – Direct CP violation Direct CP violation can be measured in D 0  KK lifetime asymmetry ACP<10 -3 in SM, up to 1% with New Physics current HFAG (average Belle, BaBar, CDF): ACP = ± 0.23 Expect  stat (ACP) ~ with 2 fb –1

M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol19/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 Conclusions LHCb is a heavy flavour precision experiment searching for New Physics in CP Violation and rare decays CP Violation: 2 fb -1 (1 year)  from trees: 4 o  from loops:  10 o  B s mixing phase: 0.023