XMML – a standards-conformant XML language for geology features Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observations, Features, Coverages, SOS Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 9 September 2006.
Advertisements

Information Modelling MOLES Metadata Objects for Linking Environmental Sciences S. Ventouras Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
® Hosted and Sponsored by ESA/ESRIN Progress towards a standard WMO Hydrologic Metadata Model 86th OGC Technical Committee Frascati, Italy Irina Dornblut,
Community semantics and interoperability: the ISO/TC 211 framework and the “Hollow World” Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 6 September.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Information modelling – tools Simon Cox.
GeoSciML borehole data exchange and applications Christian Bellier (BRGM), John Laxton (BGS)
Copyright © 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The OGC and Emergency Services: GML for Location Transport & Formats & Mapping.
Domain Modelling and Implementation From model to implementation Simon Cox Research Scientist Sydney - December, 3 rd 2010.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Information modelling – standards context Simon Cox.
Domain Modelling and Implementation Canonical modelling approach Simon Cox Research Scientist Sydney - December, 3 rd 2010.
© NERC All rights reserved BGS Linked Data Pilot – aims & objectives DNF Expert Group Meeting London, 18/11/10 John Laxton.
Preparation of Geological Data Standards of Turkey Based on INSPIRE Directives A joint project completed by General Directorate of Geographical Information.
ALKIS-ATKIS modelling using ISO standards Workshop “Standards in action” – Lisbon – Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Trierer.
Interoperability A simple case for standards Kim Finney JCADM – Rome 2007.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
GeoSciML cool logo. GeoSciML v3.0 – the CGI-IUGS geoscience data model I nternational U nion of G eological S ciences C ommission for the Management and.
GeoSciML An international (IUGS) GML3 standard for sharing geologic map information, with examples from Canada and the U.S. Boyan BrodaricGeological Survey.
GeoSciML An XML markup language to enable geoinformatics CGI Interoperability Working Group Data Model Design Task Group.
Deploying OGC Web Services GeoScience Victoria’s Experience Alistair Ritchie, Senior Information Geologist GeoScience Victoria.
Enterprise Viewpoint Tim Mackey Web Systems Manager Geoscience Australia.
Interoperability and architectures Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 23 May 2006.
Geology, mining, groundwater, landscape and soils The ‘Earth Science’ domains Bruce Simons Spatial Information Modelling Community of Practice workshop,
® GeoSciML The History and Future of an International Geoscience Data Transfer Standard Ollie Raymond GeoSciML Standards Working Group, Open Geospatial.
UML Diagrams: Class Diagrams The Static Analysis Model Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
How do you want that data? Spatial information models and web interfaces Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 7 September 2005.
Information Viewpoints and Geoscience Service Architectures Simon Cox Research Scientist 13 December 2007.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
® Sponsored by GroundWater ML 2 IE (GW2IE) GroundWater ML 2 IE (GW2IE) Progress Report 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA Bruce Simons.
Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel © NERC All rights reserved Developing a generic Geoscience Markup Language: GeoSciML.
Serving North American Geologic Map Information using Open Geospatial Web Services Eric BoisvertGeological Survey of Canada Bruce JohnsonU.S. Geological.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
Designing GML application schemas for Observations and Measurements Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 22 March 2006.
The IUGS/CGI Data Model and Interchange Collaboration John Laxton BGS.
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Ben Caradoc-Davies CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Free and Open Source.
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Testbed 2: Demonstrating Geoscience Web Services Bruce Simons & Alistair Ritchie GeoScience Victoria, Minerals & Petroleum.
Workshop WSS-03: Delivery of Geoscience Information using Web Services IGC August 2008.
Harmonisation of Grid and Geospatial Services Standards in the Earth and Environmental Sciences Simon Cox 1, Lesley Wyborn 2, Andrew Woolf.
Managing different views of data Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 29 November 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A Consideration of Geospatial Feature Formation in Linked Open Vocabularies Workshop on Linked Open.
Web Services and Geologic Data Interchange Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining
1/19 Oct 05 Standardization unit DT.TN/ Content Management using the ISO/TC 211 standards ESDI Workshop on CSL and Tools (on.
Standards-based methodology for developing a geoscience markup language Simon Cox Research Scientist 9 August 2008.
® Sponsored by G eo S ci ML : v4 Modularization OGC TC Crystal City March 24, 2014.
Introduction to GeoSciML: standard encoding for transfer of geoscience information Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining 11 September 2006.
International Association for Mathematical Geology XIth International Congress Universite de Liege, Belgium Tuesday 5 th September 2006 The IUGS-CGI international.
Some international collaborations in geoscience informatics: IUGS GeoSciML testbed, & AUKEGGS forum Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration and Mining.
ESDI Workshop on Conceptual Schema Languages and Tools
© 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. The OGC Sensor Web Enablement framework Simon CoxMike Botts CSIRO Exploration & MiningNational Space Science &
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
GeoSciML 4 The OGC/CGI Geoscience Data Transfer Standard Ollie Raymond
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM The NCRIS AuScope Community Earth Model Bruce Simons.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation AIXM UML to XSD AIXM XML Developers' Seminar.
Geography Markup Language (GML). GML What is GML? – Scope  The Geography Markup Language is  a modeling language for geographic information  an encoding.
AIXM 5 UML Modelling Conventions. AIXM is GML AIXM is an XML exchange standard based on a subset of GML. Essentially: –AIXM Features are GML features.
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Demonstrating delivery of Geological Data using Web Feature and Web Mapping Services based on international standards.
GeoSciML: Enabling the exchange of geological map data DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES GeoSciML: a geoscience exchange language GeoSciML: enabling the.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
Leverage and Delegation in Developing an Information Model for Geology Simon Cox Research Scientist 14 December 2007.
Implementing distributed geoscience information systems using Open GIS Web Services Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WaterML Presentation to FGDC SWG Nate Booth January 30, 2013.
OGP Seabed Survey Data Model (SSDM)
UML Diagrams: Class Diagrams The Static Analysis Model
AIXM 5.1 XML Developers' Seminar #2 – Dec 2009
UML to XSD.
COURSE OBJECTIVE: Both geological and mining programsGEMS modelling mine closer planning  equip the students with knowledge in general fuctionable mine.
GeoSciML v rd OGC Technical Committee Meeting
Session 3: Information Modelling and Information Communities
AIXM 5 UML Modelling Conventions
Presentation transcript:

XMML – a standards-conformant XML language for geology features Simon Cox CSIRO Exploration & Mining

27/10/ Outline  Information communities  Information models and GML  XMML

Information Communities Meaningful discourse requires shared information models

27/10/ “Feature Model”  “Features” is a useful meta-model for geospatial data  Feature == item of interest in the real world, or a digital representation of one  geospatial context with “identity” a description of which you might want to transport  Feature-type – fixes the set of properties  ISO/TC 211 – Geographic Information  ISO – Rules for Application Schema  ISO – Feature Cataloguing Methodology

27/10/ Feature Types Borehole  collar location  shape  collar diameter  length  operator  logs … Fault  Surface trace  Dip  Displacement  Age  … Ore-body  Commodity  Deposit type  Host formation  Shell (3-D outline)  Resource estimate  …

27/10/ Community language  … based on the Feature model requires  catalogue of feature-types  fault, rock-unit  natural phenomena  borehole, gravity measurement  artefacts of exploration activity  mineral occurrence  intersection of geology & economics  descriptors, classifications (vocabularies, etc)  lithologies, commodities, stratigraphic units, …  Formalised description of this language  structure of feature types defined in XML Schema  constraints on values of properties defined in  schema  external dictionaries  “GML Application Language”

27/10/ GML 3  Open GIS Consortium  XML implementation of ISO Feature model  Provides a set of components for building Application Languages  Geometry/topology temporal coordinate reference systems (ISO 19107, 19108, 19111)  Coverages & grids (ISO 19123), Observations, Dynamic features, Definitions, Units of measure, essential basic datatypes  v3.1 imminent  N.B. You can’t use GML directly  it must be packaged in an Application Language

Feature Model and GML … and the relationship with UML and table models

27/10/ Feature model in UML  Basic feature model  to be extended for specific applications  class name = feature-type  e.g. borehole  attribute & association names = properties of this feature-type  Strong typing  consequence of defining feature-type by “set of properties”

27/10/ Information transport  Serialised form  Based on Geography Markup Language  element name == feature-type  sub-elements == properties of this feature-type Exploration hole north_r_ Lithology log … <xmml:categoryList property="#lith" codeSpace="#unitcodes“> CANIS FH PL2 PL3 AQ AQL T1 T2 C1 C2 GCWS...

27/10/ Exploration borehole north_r_ Exploration borehole north_r_ UML GML

27/10/ UML profile required for GML  UML Classes == GML Features/Objects  things with identity  UML Associations/attributes == GML properties  name indicates relationship between object and value  Associations must be labelled  rolename == property name  rolename must be unique for a class  content model for property is fixed

27/10/ Table GML  There is no unique table xml mapping  Similar problem in Object-Relational mapping

27/10/ Mapping XML table iddescriptionname collarDiameter mm collarLocationshape logs R456 Exploration hole north_r_ #c679 #s679? Exploration hole north_r_ codelabel diam in wellHeadsurvey data commentupdateByupdateDateaccess R456 north_r_679 6 #c679 #s679? Exploration hole RobidaF open

27/10/ Mapping XML table iddescriptionname R456 Exploration hole north_r_679 featurepropertyvaluescale R456 collarDiameter 150mm R456collarLocation#c679 R456shape#s679 Exploration hole north_r_ Yes - schema mapping is required to generate GML that accords to the community model

eXploration & Mining Markup Language A GML Application Language

27/10/ XMML Feature Catalogue  Borehole  Observation (OGC SensorWeb)  Gravity measurement (GA)  Geochemistry/Assay result (ADX)  Geological material (NORTON)  Geological timescale (IUGS)  Mineral occurrence (GA, GSC)  Procedure, Project, Station, Specimen, Tenement, Instrument (GGIPAC, etc)  Point, Curve, Surface, Solid with properties, some structural geology elements (Fractal, pmd*CRC)  Time-series (ASEG)  Mine components?  Finite element model (FLAC, FastFlo)  Simulation/model state (pmd*CRC)  [General “coverage”, including tensor fields, directly from GML]

27/10/ XMML Borehole model

27/10/ XMML Assay Report

27/10/ XMML Mineral Occurence

27/10/ Design method  Iterate between XML instances, XML Schema, UML model, harmonising with current state of suite of schemas  Adapt existing standard  e.g. GGIPAC, ASEG  Private model from dominant data provider  e.g. Geoscience Australia  Sponsor requirements  e.g. Fractal Technologies, CSIRO/pmd*CRC, BGS, Snowdens/WMC/Newmont  Consultation with stakeholders  TWiki

27/10/

27/10/ Project schedule  Commenced at CSIRO 2000  Sponsors joined progressively  MERIWA funded phase concluded June 2003  Follow-ups through GGIPAC, pmd*CRC, AcQuire, AusIndustry  ADX (assay data exchange) to be widely deployed in mining industry  XMML for Australian surveys and mines depts as part of ASDI – 2004  WFS Pilot planned for 2004  AusIndustry, Minerals Council of Australia  CSIRO, SCO, GA, PirSA  Harmonisation meeting Edinburgh /21  BGS, GSC, USGS, GA, BRGM, BGM  XMML vs NADM/NORTON vs ESRI “domain model”  Maintenance  Schema repository?  CSIRO is not stable enough  Maintenance agency  OGC – requires volunteers  IUGS??  ISO 19135

27/10/ Alternatives  See also  ESML, GeoSciML, …

27/10/ Take-home  ISO “Feature Model” is a useful basis for a community language  UML XML mapping straightforward  but requires use of a simple UML profile  table XML mapping not unique  Community language will require community agreement and governance …

27/10/ Questions? 

27/10/

27/10/ Subsets  Different sections through data required for different purposes

27/10/ Different views of information SpecimenAu (ppm) Cu-a (%)Cu-b (%)As (ppm)Sb (ppm) ABC  Result/observation view: Each Cell gives the result of a single analysis  Database insertion and update  Feature view: Each Row gives all properties of one specimen or target  Object description  Assembled from multiple getResult/getTarget  Coverage view: Each Column = variation of a single property across locations  Pattern/anomaly detection  Assembled from multiple getResult/getLocation

27/10/

27/10/ The UML metamodel and XML schema  UML class diagrams  classes  associations  composition  aggregation  attributes == composition  rolename == attribute name  inheritance  polymorphism/substitutability  specialisation == add attributes/associations  cardinality  stereotypes  >  XML Schema  elements  content models == types  Complex Types  sub-elements  attributes  sequence, choice  derivation - types  extension  restriction  substitution groups - elements  content models must be derivation relationship  Simple Types  literal content  complexType/simpleContent

27/10/ GML metamodel  Feature/Object == element  element name == feature-type  UpperCamelCase  Prepend “_” if abstract  carries a gml:id  feature-type fixes content model  strongly typed  feature content model must be derived from gml:AbstractFeatureType  standard properties  substitution group chains  property == element  element name == property name  lowerCamelCase  value is simple content or complex content  by rep – value inline  by ref – target of a xlink:href  gml:AssociationType provides pattern  no derivation requirement

27/10/ UML GML tricks  Class hierarchy == element substitution group chain  XML Schema type derivation relationships must support this  UML multiple inheritance  use XML Schema model-groups  multiple substitution-group affiliation coming in XML Schema v 1.1?  XML Schema  use > for Objects/Features  use OCL for properties  XML Schema derivation-by-restriction  OCL  If restriction and extension is required  do restriction first -> *BaseType  then do extension -> *Type

27/10/

27/10/ Feature types in the geosciences  Bed, pluton, rock-body  Contact, fault  Fold  Not a discrete object, but may have a name  Basin  Objects with fuzzy boundaries  Specimen  Geochemistry measurement  Geophysical measurement, geophysical survey/image  Drill-hole/borehole/well  With logs  Mineral deposit  Economically significant  Mine, pit, stope, driveway …

27/10/ Fault  Complex set of properties  Geometry – surface in 3-D space, trace on map  Age  Displacement field – decreases to zero at tip of embedded fault  Surface roughness  Damage zone, alteration halo

27/10/ Section view Drillhole/Borehole/Well Map view Observations  Survey  Continuous logs  Intervals  Horizons  Point observations Position is 1-D  arc-length from collar  Collar Location (Point Property) All these are “logs”  Shape (Linestring Property)  Samples