Beam Physics Work 2011-2016 D.S. 3.11.2011. List of Workpackages Area packages Main beam electron source (Steffen Doebert) Main beam positron source (Steffen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASTeC Linear Collider Activities Susan Smith. ASTeC Aims To contribute to LC accelerator R&D, positioning the UK to take a lead in delivery of significant.
Advertisements

CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Positron Source Update Jim Clarke Deepa Angal-Kalinin James Jones Norbert Collomb At Daresbury Laboratory and Cockroft Institute 21/07/2009.
Lau Gatignon / CERN for MDI team. MDI is very different between ILC and CLIC:  Organization wise (ILC in experiments, CLIC on machine side)  QD0 technology.
Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004.
CLIC Parameters and Design Work D.S
Machine-Detector Interface MDI Panel Report MDI Panel is one of several World-Wide Study (WWS) panels (R&D, Detector costing, MDI, 2 IRs) Interim panel.
Stimulating a discussion on cavity performance metrics.
CLIC Staged Design October 2012 D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 Technical System Review John Noonan, ANL Yusuke Suetsugu,KEK Paolo Michelato, INFN Milano.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Controls & LLRF ILC Controls Telecon August 17, 2006 John Carwardine RDR Report Writing.
A. Yamamoto, N. Walker, and M. Ross, ILC-GDE Project Managers S. Stapnes, CERN LC Studies Leader LCWS12 - Opening Accelerator Plenary, , 18:00.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
Workshop Goals Marc Ross LC May, 2013 Accelerator Plenary.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
Current CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1. Main Beam Generation Complex Drive Beam Generation Complex Layout at 3 TeV D. Schulte2.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group D. Schulte
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
Philip Burrows SiD meeting, Chicago 15/11/081 Progress on the LoI Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Hiro Aihara, Mark Oreglia.
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
E. GschwendtnerMDI, 18 Feb Post-Collision Line and Dumps Working Group The PCLD Working Group shall co-ordinate the design and experimental work.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
1 Physics Input for the CLIC Re-baselining D. Schulte for the CLIC collaboration.
Considerations for the CDR and Strategy Update The current CDR planning focuses on 3 TeV and a downscaled not optimised 500 GeV machine, aiming for completion.
CLIC Energy Stages Meeting D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Beam Dynamics WG Summary N.Solyak, K.Kubo, A.Latina LCWS 2014 – Oct 6-10, 2014 – Belgrade, Serbia.
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 18 May 2009 CES 9 June News from ILC Japan CFS review 1-3 June 2010 :
CFS / Global – 04 Aug, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –ADI meeting 23.07: Parameter tables with low energy / low power operation –BA Workshop Planning CFS participation.
CLIC Machine-Detector Interface Working Group (MDI) Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CLIC-ACE of 3 September 2008.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
Global Design Effort CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work Materials for discussion Daniel Schulte, Rogelio Tomas and Emmanuel Tsesmelis for CLIC team Andrei Seryi for.
Rebaselining Progress D. Schulte for the CLIC rebaselining team Davide Aguglia, Roberto Corsini, Steffen Doebert, Konrad Elsener, Alexej Grudiev, Erk Jensen,
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Questions from the CLIC accelerator team (D. Schulte, LCD “monthly” 25 Feb. 2013) -> a first attempt to answers 1 25 March 2013.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Introduction D. Schulte for K. Kubo and P. Tenenbaum.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.
1 The next steps – focusing points Define the scope, strategy and cost of the project implementation. Main input: The evolution of the physics findings.
Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.
10/08/04gek/ITRP/korea1 ITRPGEK Pre Meeting 6 thoughtsAug Both technologies can be made to work and either would lead to a linear collider with.
CLIC Luminosity Experimental Programme Daniel Schulte for the CLIC Team.
Beam Physics News D. S. for the beam physics team June 1 rst, 2011.
February 4, 2007 Global Design Effort 1. February 4, 07 Global Design Effort IR&MDI: 2 Tuesday’s discussion EDR organization Work Package distribution.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
CLIC Re-baselining CSC, October Possible CLIC stages studied 2.
J.P.DelahayeTILC08: 06/ 03/ 081 CLIC-ILC Collaboration? Following visit of CERN (Nov 07)
Mandate Priorities Other tasks Membership Forthcoming reports to CTC
CLIC work program and milestones
CLIC module working group
Draft SuperB Organization Chart for TDR Phase
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
CLIC Klystron-based Design
M.Jonker CTC MPO-WG status
CLIC Study Aim Conceptual design report in 2010
Future Collider Projects at CERN
MACHINE DETECTOR INTERFACE WORKING GROUP STATUS
Beam Delivery System Schedule at ILC2010
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
Presentation transcript:

Beam Physics Work D.S

List of Workpackages Area packages Main beam electron source (Steffen Doebert) Main beam positron source (Steffen Doebert, interim) Damping rings (Yannis Papaphilippou) RTML: ring to main linac transport (Andrea Latina) Two-beam acceleration (D.S. interim) BDS: beam delivery system (Rogelio Tomas) MDI: machine detector interface (Lau Gatignon) Drive beam complex (Bernard Jeanneret) Integrating packages Integrated design (D.S.) Simulations and integrated studies (Andrea Latina) Feedback design (D.S., interim) Machine protection and operation (Michael Jonker) Background (D.S., interim) Polarisation (?)

Some Comments We will have to address a number of issues to move from a conceptual to a more technical design e.g. further improve BDS alignment Will have to define a staged approach for CLIC This may have to be repeated depending on LHC findings Will have to define basic parameters for each stage Preliminary choices might be reasonably straightforward But better understanding of optimisation and limitations is needed e.g. an update of the cost model We will have to make a design for each energy stage and find a path between them Detailed for the first stage Less detailed for the others Will need to iterate on a number of areas and systems for cost optimisation and risk minimisation

Generic Tasks for each Area