T.Takahashi Hiroshima Photon Collider testbed and other possibilities at future ATF2 T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. Dec 21 2007 ATF2 meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vulcan Front End OPCPA System
Advertisements

New hardware and setups New short pulse regime Experimental results TW power Future plans on laser development ATF CO 2 LASER progress Vitaly Yakimenko.
Particle acceleration in plasma By Prof. C. S. Liu Department of Physics, University of Maryland in collaboration with V. K. Tripathi, S. H. Chen, Y. Kuramitsu,
High Intensity Laser Electron Scattering David D. Meyerhofer IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 11, November 1997.
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
Friday 28 th April Review of the aims and recommendations from the workshop L. Rinolfi.
/18 Yasuaki Ushio Hiroshima University The result of cavity compton experiment.
Compton Experiment at the ATF Update since TILC09 Positron Workshop Durham 28-October-2009 Junji Urakawa instead of T.Takahashi KEK for collaborators.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko, I. Pogorelsky BNL Collaboration meeting, Beijing, January 29-February1, 2006.
Status of g ray generation at KEK-ATF ► Introduction ► Status of the cavity R&D ► Out Look French Labs. : LAL (Orsay) in Collaboration with CELIA (Laser.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
Compton Linac for Polarized Positrons V. Yakimenko, I. Pogorelsky, M. Polyanskiy, M. Fedurin BNL CERN, October 15, 2009.
Status of g ray generation at KEK-ATF ► Introduction ► Status of the cavity R&D ► Out Look French Labs. : LAL (Orsay) in Collaboration with CELIA (Laser.
SAPPHiRE workshop, CERN 19 th Feb 2013 A SAPPHiRE Laser? Laura Corner Lasers for Accelerators group (L4A) John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science,
1 Waves, Light & Quanta Tim Freegarde Web Gallery of Art; National Gallery, London.
Photon Collider at CLIC Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk LCWS 2001, Granada, Spain, September 25-30,2011.
Experimental Effort for Alternative Schemes Experimental Effort for Alternative Schemes Hirotaka Shimizu Hiroshima University ILC2007 at DESY Hamburg.
R & D for particle accelerators in the CLF Peter A Norreys Central Laser Facility STFC Fellow Visiting Professor, Imperial College London.
UCLA Frequency-domain interferometry diagnostic system for the detection of relativistic plasma waves Catalin V. Filip, Electrical Engineering Department,
Status of R&D of Optical Cvities at KEK-ATF ►Introduction ►Status of the cavity R&D ►Out Look KEK, Hiroshima University LAL (Orsay) in Collaboration withCELIA.
Progress of Novel Vacuum Laser Acceleration Experiment at ATF Xiaoping Ding, Lei Shao ATF Users’ Meeting, Apr. 4-6, 2007 Collaborators: D. Cline (PI),
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Feedback R&D for Optical Cavity Ryuta TANAKA (Hiroshima univ.) 19 th Feb 2013 SAPPHiRE DAY.
Ultrafast particle and photon sources driven by intense laser ‐ plasma interaction Jyhpyng Wang Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima γγ state of the art and research plan, what system tests can be done at ATF2, ESA T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. March GDE BDS/ACFA.
Status of the optical cavity R&D at ATF IWLC2010 Geneva 20-October-2010 T.Takahashi Hiroshima University for collaborators.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Status and Plan of Compton  -ray Generation at KEK-ATF Japanese Labs. : KEK, ATF group, Hiroshima University Tsunehiko OMORI (KEK) for 13 February 2014.
Study of High Intensity Multi-Bunch  -ray Generation by Compton Scattering ATF TB 28/May/2006 presented by Tsunehiko OMORI (KEK) on behalf.
Compton Experiment at ATF Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for Collaborators (particularly Omori san for slides)
Summary of Gamma-Gamma session Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University Mar LCWS10/ILC10.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima Optical Cavity R&D for Photon Colliders T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. 26 May 2008 NanoBeam 2008.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima Optical Cavity R&D around KEK-ATF T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. Nov LCWS08 at Chicago.
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
Progress at BNL Vitaly Yakimenko. Polarized Positrons Source (PPS for ILC) Conventional Non- Polarized Positrons: In our proposal polarized  -ray beam.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima Photon Collider testbed at ATF2 ~a possible plan~ T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. May ATF2 meeting.
Status of the Compton Experiment at the ATF TILC09 18-April-2009 T.Takahashi Hiroshima University for collaborators.
Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk IWLC2010, CERN October 21, 2010 A FEL pumped solid state laser system for the photon collider at CLIC.
Compton Experiment at ATF DR 2009 Summary and Plan ATF2 Project Meeting 15-Dec-2009 T. Omori (KEK) for collaborators.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima /11/5 Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University 高橋 徹 広島大学.
Laser electron beam x 30 Multi-Compton chamber system γ-ray cm Conceptual design in 2005 Snowmass X 5 at present Big progress During R&D.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
Compton Gamma-ray Generation Experiment by Using an Optical Cavity in ATF POSIPOL 2007 Workshop at LAL Hirotaka Shimizu Hiroshima University.
Update of R&D Optical Cvities at KEK-ATF ►Introduction ►Status of the cavity R&D ►Recent activities ►Out Look KEK, Hiroshima University LAL (Orsay) in.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko 1, D. Cline 2, Ya. Fukui 2, V. Litvinenko 1, I. Pogorelsky 1, S. Roychowdhury 3 1 BNL, 2.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Interaction Region of gamma gamma colliders
SUPA, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde,
Polarized Electron Source for eRHIC (the ring-ring option)
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
Free Electron Lasers (FEL’s)
Summary for the Sources working group
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
Development of Optical Resonant Cavities for laser-Compton Scattering
Multi banch generation Experiment at ATF
Summary of Gamma-Gamma session
R&D of Freedback-Free Optical Resonant Cavity
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Transverse coherence and polarization measurement of 131 nm coherent femtosecond pulses from a seeded FEL J. Schwenke, E. Mansten, F. Lindau, N. Cutic,
DANE Compton ring for ultra high flux photons in the 100 KeV-10 MeV energy range D. Alesini (LNF, INFN Frascati)
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
EX18710 (大阪大学推薦課題) 課題代表者  矢野 将寛 (大阪大学大学院 工学研究科) 研究課題名
Presentation transcript:

T.Takahashi Hiroshima Photon Collider testbed and other possibilities at future ATF2 T.Takahashi Hiroshima Univ. Dec ATF2 meeting

future but before ILC Photon beam for the PLC option of the ILC –physics scenario is yet to be described wait for LHC & ILC e+e- run –accelerator and detector issues to be considered T.Takahashi Hiroshima Once ATF2 has accomplished its primary goal, it will be an ultra high-quality beam facility Optical cavity: the most unknown component Physics with electron beam and lasers –topics from the workshop on Laser-Electron Interaction toward the ILC (Dec 12-14, Hiroshima)

T.Takahashi Hiroshima Lasers for Photon Colliders have to meet requirement of; –5J/pulse, 1-3ps pulse duration ~2TW pleak power –337ns separation 3000bunches/train –5Hz ~70kW average power –O(10  m) focusing –timing ~1ps too costly to be built by single laser

an idea Klemiz, Monig 40m Laser: 40mJ/Pulse 714W average 115kW peak diode power

Nanobeams 2005 – Kyoto – October 17-21, 2005J. Gronberg - LLNL The MERCURY laser already has more average power than we need Goal: 100 J 10 Hz 10% Efficiency 2-10 ns < 5X Diffraction limit > 10 8 shots Output Diode arrays 8 diode arrays 6624 diodes total 730 kW peak power Front-end 300 mJ Gas-cooled amplifier heads Helium gas flow at 0.1 Mach Cavity Laser: 764 W average power 119 kW peak power Gronberg requirement for Cavity

what we need for PLC cavity pulse stacking enhancement ~ 100 keeping circularly polarized laser high power –O(10J)/pulse, ~2TW, ~70kW focusing laser spot ~ (10  m) large scale - circumference ~ 100m±(<nm) synchronized with electron bunch (<ps) high vacuum –not allowed to affect e beam ~ O(10 -7 P) T.Takahashi Hiroshima

ATF-Layout Lasers ATF2 beamline ATF-DR

T.Takahashi Hiroshima Ring cavity at ATF-DR -after we learn a lot from PosiPol cavities- 1m 50mr circumference 4.62m (15.4ns) ー >64.9MHz For 154ns spacing: 1/10 scale (15.4ns) Lasers 10W mode locked,,,154nJ/pulse ->15.4  J/pulse w/ 100 pulse stacking 2400  /xing very similar to PosiPol experiment A laser pulse hits once in 10 turns

T.Takahashi Hiroshima Step by step plan 1.Cavities for Compton based pol. e+ projects –Fabry-Perot type spherical mirrorFabry-Perot type spherical mirror –Fabry-Perot type off-axis parabolic mirrorFabry-Perot type off-axis parabolic mirror 2.Going to large scale –CW laser –independent mirror control 3.1-2m scale ( with ATF bunch) –pulse laser (low energy) –independent mirror control 4.Cavity w/ high power laser at ATF2-IP –not possible at ATF-DR as high power laser is destructive target 42cm 1~2m ATF-DR Lab ->ATF-DR if possible ATF2 ~2015?

Topics from Hiroshima workshop T.Takahashi Hiroshima

Explore early universe in the laboratory T.Takahashi Hiroshima 11 ILC Polarized electrons Laser wires,,,,, Photon Colliders Axion, neutrino Lasers Optical Cavity High power lasers gravitational wave detectors by reproducing interaction by creating environment intense field Unrhu, Swinger field self-focusing getting information of space-time structure

Reflection of EM wave at the relativistic mirror A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 891 (1905) v Incident pulse Reflected EM wave Bulanov

EM Pulse Intensification and Shortening in Flying Mirror Light Intensification Process seed laser pulse Wake Wave driver laser pulse reflected e.m. pulse Bulanov M. Kando, et.al 、 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, (2007)

3D Particle-In-Cell simulation (II) k E k E Driver pulse: a=1.7 size=3 x6 x6, Gaussian I peak =4  W/cm 2  (1  m/ ) 2 Reflecting pulse: a=0.05 size=6 x6 x6, Gaussian, s = 2 I peak =3.4  W/cm 2  (1  m/ ) 2 XZ,color: E y XY,contour: E z XY,color: E x at z=0 EzEz ExEx Bulanov

The wakefield excitated in cm − 3 plasma by the EM wave with a 0 = 15 has the Lorentz factor a 0 1/2 (ω pe /ω )  125. The laser pulse intensification of the order of 465 may be realized. For the counter-propagating 1  m, 2× W /cm 2 laser pulse with the reflected beam diameter is 40µm, the final intensity is 5× W /cm 2. The driver pulse intensity should be sufficiently high and its beam diameter should be enough to give such a wide mirror, i.e. to be 4× W /cm 2 with the diameter 40 µm. The driver and source must carry 6 kJ and 30 J, respectively. Reflected intensity can approach the Schwinger limit. In this range of the electromagnetic field intensity it becomes possible to investigate such the fundamental problems of nowadays physics using already available laser, as e.g. the electron-positron pair creation in vacuum and the photon-photon scattering WITH the ELI and HiPER LASERS PARAMETERS. Laser Energy Required to Achieve the Schwinger Field Bulanov

16 Radiation via event horizon - access to zero-point energy - F P Rindler 1 x t Rindler 2 Minkowski spacetime Trajectory of observer with a constant proper acceleration  (Rindler observer) Rindler 1 and 2 are causally disconnected (introduction of an event horizon) Unruh temp. ⇔ Hawking temp. Minkowski spacetime looks as if thermal bath to a Rindler observer via the Bogoliubov trans. Optical laser as a source of acceleration Electron as an Rindler particle homma

2007/12/14International Workshop lEI A test at Sumitomo Heavy Industries (now at AIST) Electron beam 35.4MeV/c 1nC Maximum E compton 14.9keV 800nm ~10 17 W/cm 2 Ti:sapphire laser Bent electrons are dumped Detectors K.Homma Int.J.Mod.Phys.B21: ,2007 Slit for X-rays Narrow slit Detectors at 5m downstream Simulated linear Compton spectrum homma

2007/12/1418 Arrival time distribution measured by PMT sensitive to 200~700 nm range with Q.E. > 10% A) e-beam on / laser on (laser leak + signal) B) e-beam off / laser on (laser leak) C) e-beam on / laser off (Brems.) D) e-beam off / laser off (noise etc.) A) – B) A sharp peak is located at 1ns narrow bin with ~2 sigma deviation from zero, which is different from Brems. position. [ns] There seems to be an enhancement of visible rays. homma

T.Takahashi Hiroshima Summary ATF2 can be –place for he PLC test bed demonstration of high intense photon beam ATF2 beam + intense field –possibly place to perform another aspect of particle physics Intense field very high but low repetetion PW lasers, flying mirrors not very high (~TW or more) but high repetiton optical cavity + pulse lasers <- ILC technology

World-Wide-We b of Laser Compton

T.Takahashi Hiroshima Ring cavity+High power at ATF2-IP 1m 50mr 64.9MHz ×50mJ=3.245kW Cavity can be the same as ATF- DR but the laser is not Average power = 50mJ×20×repetition = as low as 1W (or less) we want 50mJ/pulse for the laser (5J/pulse in cavity) Continuous pumping (64.9MHz)of the cavity is not wise: just for 20 bunches (for a train) Peak laser pumping power = need mini-Mercury amplifier?