September 2007 - 1 - Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515) 281-8911

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
Advertisements

National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
AWMA Meeting October 15, 2013 Stack testing issues and questions Dennis Thielen.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Rider 8 Technical Workgroup Development. Introduction - Rider 8 Program for Ozone 74 th State Legislative Session authorized and budgeted to assist areas.
Dispersion Modeling Jim McGraw Program Development Supervisor.
PSD Workgroup David Klemp State of Montana. Problem Statements Redesignation –Untimely processing of PSD Redesignation requests and limited guidance for.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Iowa Title V Operating Permits Lori Hanson, Title V Operating Permit Section Supervisor.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Kimberton, PA | Columbus, GA | Strategic Air Planning: Where Do We Grow From Here? Colin McCall |
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
NAAQS UPDATE SIP Steering Committee January 13, 2011.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
A Proposal to Fund the Air Quality Bureau of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources Mick Durham.
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits Joel Leon, Bureau of Technical Services April 9, Presented by – ACE academy New Jersey Department.
Compliance Assistance and Ambient Air Monitoring Brian Hutchins Supervisor, Air Quality Bureau July 2014.
AWMA – Georgia Chapter Air Permitting Update April 16, 2013 Eric Cornwell Stationary Source Permitting Program.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
SIP Steering Committee Meeting March 29,  In October 2011, EPA issued draft SIP and modeling guidance related to the 1-hour SO2 standard issued.
Lori Hanson Title V Operating Permit Supervisor (515)
Air Quality Regulations – What’s New? (for Ethanol Plants) Shelley Schneider Air Quality Division Administrator.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
A&WMA Southern Section Annual Meeting Biloxi, MS September 12, 2012 Carla Brown, P.E. MS Dept. of Environmental Quality
Dispersion Modeling Challenges for Air Permitting Justin Fickas Christine Haman Jake Stewart.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Air Quality Standards and Nonattainment Updates Rule Development Workshop Chapter , F.A.C. October.
NSR and Title V Activities WESTAR Business Meeting May 2005.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Natural Events Policy Questions PM 2.5 Natural Events – States/Regions Need Written Statement Clarifying Position That It Is Allowed Under Current Law.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
Risk Assessment for Air Pollution Control Permits
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Citizen’s Advisory Council Meeting September 19, 2017
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Status of Exceptional Events
Presentation transcript:

September Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515)

September Topics Modeling Workgroup Haul Road Modeling PM 2.5

September Modeling Workgroup April 24 – 26, 2007 Facilitated by Iowa Department of Administrative Services Included DNR, local programs, EPA, industry, and consultants Balanced participation –Policy and Management –Permiters and Permitees –Experienced modelers

September Modeling Workgroup Purpose Simplify, clarify, and improve guidance and procedures for non-PSD modeling Scope: –Modeling Guidelines, including modeling applicability procedure –Modeling Checklist –Update both for AERMOD

September Workgroup Process Identified modeling issues and concerns Sub-groups addressed specific issues and revised applicable guidance Workgroup products reviewed by sub-groups and then workgroup as a whole Documents currently being reviewed by the AQB management and staff Expect implementation of revised guidance by mid- September

September Modeling Workgroup Products Updated Modeling Guidelines –Revised format of modeling applicability determination –Made applicability process more transparent Revised Modeling Checklist Updated construction permit form MD Facilities requiring facility-wide modeling list (90% list) –Clarified criteria for being added or removed from list –Revised 90% list

September Modeling Guidelines Updated for AERMOD and AIWG guidance Reflects our current practice Revised modeling applicability procedure – off ramps Existing units still modeled at actual emission rates Ambient air – on property easements

September Facilities Requiring Modeling List (90% List) Existing list had been used for years Clarifies which facilities will be included on the list –SIP facilities –Facilities modeled within 90% of the NAAQS Project at potential emissions Existing units at actual emissions Pollutant specific –List revised according to this criteria Clarifies how facilities can be removed from the list –SIP facilities only removed with SIP revision –Revised modeling associated with a permitting project

September Haul Roads When to include in haul roads in modeling analyses How to characterize haul roads in a modeling analysis

September Haul Roads – When to Include Required in PSD PM 10 NAAQS and annual increment Not required in PSD PM hour increment Not required in non-PSD projects unless there is a reason to believe there is a PM 10 NAAQS problem –Citizen complaints –Ambient monitoring

September Haul Roads – How to Characterize Volume source or area source –R H = height of the tire –σ Z = (1.5 X height of truck)/4.3 –σ Y = (2 X width of the road)/2.15 –Parameters can be varied with justification Haul road parameters used in SIP modeling can only be changed if the trucks are changed

September PM 10 and PM 2.5 DNR will resume evaluation of annual PM 10 NAAQS –PSD immediately –Non-PSD October 31, 2007 DNR had not required annual PM 10 NAAQS analyses since EPA revoked the annual PM 10 standard in October 2006 EPA’s interim PM 2.5 implementation policy instructs that PM 10 should be used as a surrogate until EPA announces final PM 2.5 implementation guidance EPA PM 2.5 implementation guidance expected later this year

September Questions?