Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department National Coalition of STD Directors Phoenix,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating Family Planning Services into an STD Clinic Setting Judith Shlay, MD, MSPH Denver Public Health Denver, CO.
Advertisements

Expanding and Improving STD Services during Resource Limited Times Heather James STD Field Services Supervisor Maricopa County STD Program.
WI State Report RVIPP, Indianapolis, IN June 9-10, 2010.
Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) in NM Bruce G. Trigg, MD Medical Director, STD Program Regions 1 and 3 New Mexico Department of Health.
How to Measure the Effectiveness of the IPP (and all the CT Screening being done)? **Reduce Infertility** Ultimate Goal Reduce PID Reduce Chlamydia Prevalence.
Innovative Approaches to Screen School Populations for Sexually Transmitted Infections Paritosh Kaul, MD Douglas B Richardson Gerrit Bruintjes Cornelis.
Expanding STD Prevention Opportunities Mark Thrun, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Director, HIV/STD Prevention.
Asking Patients About Sexual Health and Behavior for Improved Quality in Prevention and Care
Field Based Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Nilmarie Guzmán,MD & Michael Sands,MD University of Florida/Jacksonville and the Duval County Health Department.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Expedited Partner Therapy Toolkit: a response to EPT implementation barriers George E. Ware & the Region.
The Relationship Between Repeat Infections and Behavioral Risk Factors and Clinician Counseling: Findings from a Philadelphia STD Clinic M. Eberhart 1,
Maricopa County STD Update. Reportable STDs in Arizona (all within 5 working days) STD reporting forms available at:
Once Is Not Enough: Re-screening Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic Patients in Six Months to Detect New STDs Once Is Not Enough: Re-screening Sexually.
DC American Academy of Pediatrics Adolescent Health Working Group Expedited Partner Therapy Fact Sheet Updated February 20, 2014 DC American Academy of.
HIV INTERVENTION FOR PROVIDERS (HIP) Principal Investigators:  Carol Dawson Rose, RN, Ph.D. and Grant Colfax, MD. Co-Investigators:  Cynthia Gomez, Ph.D.,
American Indian and Alaska Native Programs, University of Colorado Denver Costs Associated with Diabetes Treatment and the Healthy Heart Demonstration.
Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. Chapter 26 The Patient Record Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
RVIPP Regional Meeting June 23-26, 2009 Indiana State Report
PREVENTING HIV AND OTHER STDs
Screening males for chlamydial infection in detention settings Charlotte K. Kent, MPH.
Expedited Partner Therapy in Wisconsin STD Control Section Wisconsin Division of Public Health June 2010.
Screening and Treatment for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia as an HIV Prevention Strategy: Rationale and Implementation Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University.
Midwest AIDS Training & Education Center Health Care Education & Training, Inc. HIV/AIDS Case-Finding In Family Planning Clinics.
Evaluation of Gonorrhea Screening in Family Planning Settings: California 2000 CK Kent, M Brammeier, G Bolan, N Casas, M Funabiku, P Blackburn Region IX.
Concurrent STD Morbidity in Sexual Contacts to Persons with STD’s: Implications for Patient-Delivered Partner Therapy (PDPT) Joanne Stekler, Laura Bachmann,
Analysis of Chlamydia Re-testing Rates Massachusetts Family Planning Update.
Essentia EMR Jenifer Brilla CRNP Wilkes University.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Re-Screening of CT Positive Clients in Region X IPP, Goldenkranz S., 1 Fine D. 1 1 Center for Health Training 2010 CDC STD Prevention Meeting,
Trends in Clinic Visits and Diagnosed C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae Infections Following the Introduction of a Co-Pay in an STD Clinic C. Rietmeijer.
Two Men with Extensive Genital Ulcer Disease Recent Cases at the Denver Metro Health Clinic.
STDs among Men who Have Sex with Men (MSM), San Francisco 2007—2010 STD Prevention and Control Services San Francisco Department of Public Health.
The Impact of Introducing “Express Visits” for Asymptomatic Persons Seeking STD Services in a Busy Urban STD Clinic System, Borrelli J 1, Paneth-Pollak.
Increasing the Efficiency of STI Clinics by Tailoring Services Based on a Risk Triage System Julie A. Subiadur, BSN, CCRC BC Brandy Mitchell, RN Dean McEwen.
Providing Comprehensive Reproductive Health Services for Men Visiting Clinics for Sexually Transmitted Infections Kees Rietmeijer, MD, PhD, MSPH Colorado.
SSuN: MSM prevalence monitoring and HIV Testing in STD Clinics Kristen Mahle & Lori Newman SSuN Call #3 Oct 30, 2008.
BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF CHLAMYDIA REINFECTION IN REGION VIII FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS FOR Hamby, Y, JSI Research & Training Institute Donovan,
Predicting Pregnancy Risk among Women Attending an STD Clinic Judith Shlay MD, MSPH Denver Public Health September 21, 2008 CityMatCH Conference.
BlueCross BlueShield of Western New York BlueShield of Northeastern New York ICD-10: Coding to the Highest Specificity November 17, 2015.
HIV Testing in Medical Settings Mark Thrun, MD Denver Public Health
Lichen Planus Case Studies from the Denver Metro Health Clinic.
Streamlined HIV Screening in a Municipal STI Clinic Kees Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department 2006 National STD Prevention Conference Jacksonville,
Gonorrhea Morbidity and Prevention Efforts in Los Angeles County Binh Goldstein, PhD, Epidemiologist Sarah Guerry, MD, Medical Director Sexually Transmitted.
Efficacy of a “One-Shot” Computerized, Individualized Intervention to Increase Condom Use and Decrease STDs among Clinic Patients with Main Partners Diane.
Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department.
STD/HIV Prevention Seattle & King County Robert Marks
A Woman With a Painful Labial Swelling
Effect of Clinical Program Integration on Eliminating Disparities in Access to Care P. Tambe, M. Allen, R. Lewis-Hardy, T. Dupree-Bright, E. Benning, S.
Sarah Thompson, PharmD, CDOE Director of Clinical Services, Coastal Medical.
Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Milwaukee County Juvenile Detention Center Wendi Ehrman MD Milwaukee Adolescent Health Program Medical College of.
Demographic and Behavioral Differences between Latino and non-Latino Patients Attending Baltimore City STD Clinics, Renee M. Gindi 1, Kathleen.
Meg Rosenberg, M.D., Montefiore School Health Program
Comments to the FDA on Conditions of Safe Use To Expand Which Drug Products Can Be Considered Nonprescription Marissa Schlaifer, RPh Director of Pharmacy.
The 5-Minute STD Case Study Primary Syphilis? Or?
Gonorrhea in Minnesota
Gonorrhea in Texas Jim Lee Senior Public Health Advisor
This is an archived document.
Martin Goldberg1, Daniel R. Newman2, TA Peterman2,
Comments to the FDA on Conditions of Safe Use To Expand Which Drug Products Can Be Considered Nonprescription Marissa Schlaifer, RPh Director of Pharmacy.
National STD Prevention Conference
Prevalence of Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Before and After Implementation of Routine Rectal Screening Ellen T. Rudy Sexually Transmitted Disease Program.
Division of STD/HIV/AIDS Chicago Department of Public Health
National STD Prevention Conference
The Relationship between Recent Alcohol Use and Sexual Behaviors/STDs: Gender Differences among STD Clinic Patients Heidi E. Hutton PhD, Mary E. McCaul.
Costing & Time & Motion Study of STD Partner Services in Washington State Epidemic Characteristics Drive Costs Rachel A. Silverman, PhD, ScM, David A.
M Javanbakht, S Guerry, LV Smith, P Kerndt
Promoting Sexual Health in NYS
Finding Sex Partners On-Line: What’s the Risk for STI
M. Jacques Nsuami, MD, MPH Stephanie N. Taylor, MD
Presentation transcript:

Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department National Coalition of STD Directors Phoenix, AZ October 22, 2008

EPT Legal Status in Colorado No legal impediments to provide EPT EPT specifically endorsed by: – Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners Policy 40-10, issued 5/10/2001 – “It is the position of the Colorado Board of Medical Examiners that the public risk of untreated sexually transmitted infection is greater than the risk of complications from prescribing in this less than ideal setting” – Colorado State Board of Pharmacy Policy 40-4, issued 7/19/2007 – “It is the position of the Colorado Pharmacy Board that the public risk of untreated sexually transmitted infection is greater than the risk of complications from dispensing in this less than ideal setting”

EPT in Colorado

EPT in Colorado

EPT in the STD Clinical Setting Questions How to implement EPT in a busy STD clinic? What are the EPT acceptance rates among patients eligible for EPT? What are the reasons eligible patients decline EPT?

Denver Metro Health Clinic 2007 Stats: – 19,706 clinic visits – 1,874 Ct cases (9.5% of all visits) – Men: 9/9% – Women: 8.9% – 700 GC cases (3.5% of all visits) – Men: 4.3% – Women: 2.4%

History of EPT at DMHC 11/2006 – 3/2007 – Demonstration Project 3/2007 – 8/2007 – Review by pharmacy board 9/2007 – Current – Standard of care

Partner Pack Chlamydia

Implementation of EPT at DMHC Provider training Changes to the electronic medical record – Treatment information includes EPT – Partner services questions include EPT and reasons why declined Chart review and provider feedback

EPT at DMHC Between 1/1/2008 and 8/31/2008 – 614 heterosexual patients with documented GC or CT eligible for EPT – 112 (18.2%) received EPT Median # partner packs: 1 Range: 1-3 – No demographic or risk differences between those who did or did not accept EPT

EPT Acceptance DMHC %

%

EPT Provider Rate % Accepting EPT Number of Eligible Patients by Provider (N= 28)

Number of EPT Partner Packs

Reasons for Declining EPT %

Conclusions Acceptance for EPT at the Denver Metro Health Clinic is about 20% Main reasons to decline EPT: – Partners already treated or currently in clinic – Patients want their partners to be seen by medical provider Provider success rate varies from 0 – 38% – Ongoing training necessary