Responding to Special Education Disproportionality Understanding your Data Presenters: Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott, DPI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Significant Disproportionality and CEIS Special Education Directors Meeting September 2010 Dr. Lanai Jennings Coordinator, Office of Special Programs.
Advertisements

Disproportionality in Special Education
Race-Ethnicity Proportionality Proportionality in the Special Education Population, by Race-Ethnicity, in Alaskan Public Schools Juenau, AK October 27.
Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting Oct , 2008.
HOW TO EXAMINE AND USE FAMILY SURVEY DATA TO PLAN FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT Levels of Representativeness: SIOBHAN COLGAN, ECO AT FPG BATYA ELBAUM, DAC -
Significant Disproportionality: Information and Expectations Oregon Department of Education Dianna Carrizales & Sara Berscheit.
Presentation by Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Statewide Briefing,
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
DISPROPORTIONALITY DATA GUIDE Using Discipline Data within SWPBIS to Identify and Address Disproportionality Session B9 Kelsey R. Morris, EdD—University.
State Directors Conference Boise, ID, March 4, 2013 Cesar D’Agord Regional Resource Center Program WRRC – Western Region.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
Addressing Disproportionality through Technical Assistance: A Case Study of New York Project 405 Team Metropolitan Center for Urban Education New York.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Fixing a Broken Model How to Use Significance Testing to Assess for Disproportional Representation.
DAC Back-to-School Training Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Disproportionality: A Look at Quantitative Methods, Data,
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Oregon’s K-12 ELL/SPED students: Data & outcomes.
Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two.
Data Analysis & Disproportionality Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Diversity in Special Education. What is Diversity Diversity is about difference – students in special education vary in many ways, and those in regular.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI National Picture –Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education October,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Disproportionality and CREATE CHRISHIRELLA WARTHEN CHRISHIRELLA WARTHEN School Administration Consultant School Administration Consultant Disproportionality/Culturally.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Demographic Trends in Massachusetts Charter Schools Preliminary Analysis October 2015.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
D isproportionality O verrepresentation and Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Sources of Disproportionality in Special Education: Tracking Minority Representation through the Referral-to-Eligibility Process Ashley Gibb M. Karega.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Demographic & Attrition Trends in Massachusetts Charter Schools Preliminary Analysis December 2015.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
Accountability Training Review Agenda for Today: Review of calculation changes and what’s new In depth review of Closing Gaps calculations Graduation Rates.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
WELCOME What is on your table? Agenda for both days
What Data Can Tell Us – and What It Can’t
Chancellor’s Office Data Resources for Student Success October 7, 2015
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
What is “Annual Determination?”
Discipline Identification and Reporting
Disproportionality.
DISPROPORTIONALITY REGULATIONS
CClick here to get started
2012 Accountability Determinations
Agenda Part I Significant Disproportionality Part II Equity in IDEA Final Rule Overview Part III Standard Methodology Part IV Data Reporting Part V Questions.
Chronic Absenteeism Equity Profile
Fall 2011 Melissa Aro Data Management and Reporting
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Significant Disproportionality
Significant Disproportionality
Presentation transcript:

Responding to Special Education Disproportionality Understanding your Data Presenters: Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott, DPI

Presentation Topics  Indicators 9 & 10  Criteria  Risk  Risk Ratio  Weighted Risk Ratio

Indicator 9: Disproportionate Representation in Special Education & Related Services  Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification

Indicator 10 : Disproportionate Representation in Specific Disability Areas  Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification  Six Specific Categories

Criteria  A total enrollment of 100 students for any given racial group;  There must be 10 students with disabilities in the particular racial group in question; and  The specific criteria must be met for three consecutive years

Additional Criteria  Risk levels for a racial group that are 1% or higher than the state risk for White students  Weighted risk ratio that is at least 2.0 times compared to risk for all others in the district  Other criteria may be applied depending on unique circumstances

Sources of Data  ISES 3 rd Friday September Count  October 1 Child Count

What Is Risk?  Risk is a particular racial group’s likelihood of being identified for special education or for a given disability category  Risk answers the question, “What percentage of a particular racial group is receiving special education or has been identified as having a particular disability?”

What Is Risk?  Calculation: Number of students from racial/ethnic group in disability category Number of enrolled students from racial/ethnic group Multiply by 100 to express as a percentage

Risk  For Example: Black students with CD = 4 = 4% Black students enrolled = 100 The risk of an enrolled Black student being labeled as having CD = 4%.

Exercises for Calculating Risk  Use your own data  Calculate for “all disabilities” within your district Example: Statewide all disabilities: # Hispanic students with disabilities for ,127 Total Hispanic public enrollment = 59,450 *100 = 11.99

Exercises for Calculating Risk (continued)  Calculate the risk for all special education categories and for the specific disability category in which you were identified  Explore racial gaps – graph your results  Comparison to White risk

What Is Risk Ratio?  Risk Ratio---Compares the risk for one racial/ethnic group to the risk for all other groups  If there were no differences between racial/ethnic groups, the risk ratio would be 1.0 (everybody would have equal risk)

What Is Risk Ratio?  Calculation: Risk for racial/ethnic group for disability category Risk for comparison group for disability category

Risk Ratio  For example: Black students with CD = 4 = Risk = 4% Black students enrolled = 100 White students with CD = 2 = Risk = 2% White students enrolled = 100 Risk Ratio = 4% 2% = 2.0 Black students are twice as likely as White students to be identified

Exercises for Calculating Risk Ratio  Calculate risk ratio for disability category your district was identified for  Criteria for district identification – examine risk ratios of one racial group as compared to all others  Still may want to look at individual risk levels

Weighted Risk Ratio  Risk ratios are not comparable across districts  Weighted risk ratio adjusts for district variability Allows for comparisons across districts  Use weighted risk ratio for identification (per federal guidelines)

Resources  Westat TA Guide: Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education %20Technical%20Assistance%20Guide.pdf %20Technical%20Assistance%20Guide.pdf  Wisconsin State Performance Plan – Indicators 9 & 10