Workshop 4 Monitoring by Statistical Indicators Goal setting & formulation of operational objectives as a key challenge of monitoring systems Case 1: The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMON QUALITY ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK (CQAF) IN VET.
Advertisements

Introduction to VET Quality Assurance in the UK Mark Novels 6 th December 2011 Quality Assurance in Technical and Vocational Education and Skills Study.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
The EVA Barometer Signe Ploug Hansen Special Adviser at the unit for methodology and IQA The Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
ENQA – QAA meeting 8-9 December 2005 Birmingham, UK 8 December, – Introductions to workshop themes.
ENQA GA. Bucharest, October 2011
4th Module: Information Systems Development and Implementation:
The CeQuInt Assessment Frameworks Axel Aerden & Maria E. Weber.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Dimensions of Data Quality M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
Thematic Introduction, Aims of the Conference & Conference Run Jürgen Horschinegg Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture.
The use and convergence of quality assurance frameworks for international and supranational organisations compiling statistics The European Conference.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Quality in Education and Training
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Séamus Puirséil, Vice – President, ENQA.
All images © Mat Wright Ensuring quality – what can be learnt from the UK and the rest of Europe? Santiago June 2014 Geoff Fieldsend.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Students as equal partners? Where do we stand? And how to reach beyond the surface regarding participation? Andrea Blaettler, Academic Affairs Committee.
Quality in Education and Training Cases of Good Practice in VET and HE Main results of the study Lorenz Lassnigg.
Welcome to the Preparatory Lunch for workshop chairs & rapporteurs, the chair of the plenary panel discussion & the EC representatives to discuss.
1 Quality Assurance in VET M. Kirsch & Y. Beernaert Quality Assurance and Accreditation in VET Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Bulgaria – September /October.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
ESG Part 2: European standards for the external quality assurance of higher education Conference on self-evaluation July, Belgrade Lewis Purser.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Romanian VET following ECVET recommendation National Centre for TVET Development Romania.
1 European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training INTERNATIONAL EXPERT SEMINAR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION IN LIFE LONG LEARNING BERLIN,
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
1 REVIMP From review to improvement Dr. Adrie Visscher Faculty of Behavioural Sciences The Netherlands.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET - PIU Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO RO2006/
Workshop 7 QIBB – QualitätsInitiative BerufsBildung. The Austrian Approach to Quality in VET Practical experience with the implementation of the new Austrian.
Workshop 5 Peer Review in VET & HE Peer review as an instrument for quality assurance & quality development – new developments & lessons learned Case 1:
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Setting the context: Full costing and the financial sustainability of universities Country Workshop: POLAND EUIMA – Full Costing Project University of.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
Consistency of Assessment (Validation) Webinar – Part 1 Renae Guthridge WA Training Institute (WATI)
Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Workshop 1 (Self-)Evaluation, Reporting, Feedback Generating & using evaluation results for quality improvement in the Netherlands HE system & in the Spanish.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
1 Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February Brussels.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Workshop 2 Structural Conditions for Change / Improvement Institutional arrangements for quality assurance meeting labour market needs & planning improvement.
Workshop 3 Quality Assurance in a System(atic) Perspective Good practice from the Irish VET sector & the Austrian HE sector Case 1: The Austrian FH Council.
Towards a European Qualifications Framework Relevance beyond Europe? Moscow 18 April 2006 Jens Bjornavold European centre for development of vocational.
Alice Pedretti, Project Manager Effective management of complaints for companies Lessons learned from the Management of Complaints Assessment Tool Amsterdam,
Good administration by public bodies means: Produced by Steffan Sanchez.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
The EQAVET Framework – supporting quality and relevance of VET
Module 9 Designing and using EFGR-responsive evaluation indicators
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Needs assessment and evaluation : service improvement and women
Тowards regionally-based standards of qualifications
Designing Assessment Things to be considered:
WHY DO WE NEED Capacity development 4.0?
What should a decision-maker know?
Kirsi Hiltunen 16 December 2015 Baku, Azerbaijan
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
Assessment Methods.
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

Workshop 4 Monitoring by Statistical Indicators Goal setting & formulation of operational objectives as a key challenge of monitoring systems Case 1: The use of indicators for quality development in Denmark Case 2: The use of management information for statistical monitoring in Swedish HE

Workshop 4 please delete non-discussed principles below Common Principles for Quality Assurance in E&T discussed: Focus was on indicators, their use in QD/QA, and data production The following points were touched to some extent, at least indirectly: QA to ensure accountability & improvement of E&T QA as an integral part of the internal management of E&T institutions QA systems:+ clear & measurable objectives & standards + consistent evaluation methods (self-assessm. & external review) + feedback mechanisms & procedures for improvement + widely accessible evaluation results QA as a co-operative process across levels, involving all relevant stakeholders, within countries & across Europe

Workshop 4 Main Lessons Learned/Workshop Results 1. We should put indicators in the right perspective: tools not truth; starting point not end; reasonable application; fairness related to available resources; take into account unintended effects (e.g., selectiing best pupils, give better marks) 2.To integrate indicators in decision making we need clear and operational goals and objectives (criteria, standards), and we should use a combination of “hard” (objective data with consequences) and “soft” approaches (hearing the stakeholders view and perspective). Open problem is to account for the contextual conditions. 3. Concerning data, we need publicly available individual data (instead of aggregate data) in order to calculate useful indicators, and particularly in order to make in-depth causal analyses for improving insight, and to understand contextual factors. Important issues are combination of statistics and process-produced data, quality control of the data, and (reasonable) data protection.

Workshop 4 optional Peer-learning visits for VET & HE: topichosting countrymain objective Data production as a combination of processproduced data and statistics, considering technical data reliability and data protection (maybe Sweden) To set up a comprehensive data base for the use in QD/QA Many other topics/objectives without concrete proposal: - choice of indicators, same indicators for VET and HE (maybe related to project by ENQA-VET), how do different kinds of users respond to indicators? -research oriented: how institutions behave if budget allocation is related to indicators (hard, soft ways of doing this) - how does assessment of non-formal and informal qualifications work in terms of outcomes? - how to measure competences and to include them in statistical systems?