Effectiveness of the 'WHO Safe Communities' model to prevent injury in whole populations: a Cochrane Systematic Review Anneliese Spinks, Rod McClure, Cathy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Advertisements

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Protocol Development.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Designs to Estimate Impacts of MSP Projects with Confidence. Ellen Bobronnikov March 29, 2010.
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY DESIGNS IN EVALUATING MEDICINES USE INTERVENTIONS 1 Lloyd Matowe 2 Craig Ramsay 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University 2 HSRU,
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
Reading the Dental Literature
Oregon EPC DRUG EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW PROJECT Methods for Comparative Evidence Reviews September 2005 Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center for the Drug.
Are topical NSAIDs a safe and effective treatment for Corneal Abrasions? Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Health System Andrew.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2014.
Campbell Collaboration Colloquium 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programmes Dr Sarah Miller Centre.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Purpose The National Physical Activity Guidelines Dimensions of Physical Activity Methods used to Measure Physical Activity Appropriate instruments for.
Meta Analysis MAE Course Meta-analysis The statistical combination and analysis of data from separate and independent studies to determine if there.
Funded through the ESRC’s Researcher Development Initiative
Water and sanitation interventions for better child health: Evidence from a synthetic review Hugh Waddington Birte Snilstveit Howard White Lorna Fewtrell.
Program Evaluation. Program evaluation Methodological techniques of the social sciences social policy public welfare administration.
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Systematic Reviews.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
EBC course 10 April 2003 Critical Appraisal of the Clinical Literature: The Big Picture Cynthia R. Long, PhD Associate Professor Palmer Center for Chiropractic.
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Estimation of the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes from primary care and secondary care source data: comparison of record linkage with capture- recapture.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
WHO GUIDANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EVIDENCE-BASED VACCINE RELATED RECOMMENDATIONS August 2011.
Water interventions generally described positive health impacts, but there was insufficient data on some types of interventions to draw strong conclusions.
Community wide interventions for physical activity Clinical
Choosing Evidence-Based Approaches (Programs, Policies, Practices) A Comprehensive Framework.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Lithuanian Education Quality Management: System of School Internal and External Audits Ričardas Ališauskas Head of Education Development Division of the.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Systematic Review Krit Pongpirul, MD, MPH. Johns Hopkins University.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Family-based Prevention of Offending: A Meta-Analysis David P. Farrington & Brandon C. Welsh 2003 Jenna Ayers Radford University.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
` ASystematic review of the effectiveness of nurse coordinated transitioning of care on readmission rates for patients with heart failure Jason T. Slyer.
THE SOCIAL MARKETING EVIDENCE BASE: A WEB-BASED RESOURCE ON SOCIAL MARKETING EFFECTIVENESS IN GLOBAL HEALTH Shilpa Modi, Rebecca Firestone, Graham Smith,
Results: Objective 2 Nicholas C. Heck 1, Lucas A. Mirabito 1, Kelly LeMaire 1, Nicholas A. Livingston 2, and Annesa Flentje 3 Abstract Objective: The present.
Unit 4 – Risk Reduction Program Planning. Unit 4 - Seminar Topics  Collaborating with stakeholders in addressing risk reduction  Identifying and prioritizing.
SECONDARY PREVENTION IN HEART DISEASE CATHY QUICK AUBURN UNIVERSITY/AUBURN MONTGOMERY EBP III.
Dr. Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi An-Najah National University Employ evidence-based practice: key elements.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
The Effect of Continuous Combination Oral Contraceptive use on Subsequent Fertility The Effect of Continuous Combination Oral Contraceptive use on Subsequent.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 From: Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic.
Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
Systematic review of Present clinical reality
Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis and managment
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Unit 6 Research Project in HSC Unit 6 Research Project in Health and Social Care Aim This unit aims to develop learners’ skills of independent enquiry.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
HCS 542 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
HCS 542 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
MECIR: the bits that reviewers keep getting wrong!
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Presentation transcript:

Effectiveness of the 'WHO Safe Communities' model to prevent injury in whole populations: a Cochrane Systematic Review Anneliese Spinks, Rod McClure, Cathy Turner, Jim Nixon

Rationale – Why a WHO Safe Communities Systematic Review? WHO Safe Communities formally initiated in 1989 At least 80 communities world-wide have been designated, with many more under preparation

Rationale – cont. Given the global interest and effort being afforded the Safe Community concept, it is of public health interest to determine to what degree the model is successful, i.e. Are injury rates reduced in the communities to which it is applied?

Web-accessed database of peer-reviewed systematic reviews Entails a rigorous methodology that provides a framework for high quality assessment of interventions

Objectives To conduct a Cochrane Systematic review to determine the effectiveness of the 'Safe Communities' model to prevent injury in whole populations, or targeted sub-groups of populations.

Searching for Evidence – Inclusion Criteria 1.Designated WHO Safe Community 2.Appropriate control community 3.Objective injury outcomes 4.Original data

Studies Located 61 studies written about Safe Communities 41 reported intervention outcomes 16 met the inclusion criteria 8 Individual Safe Communities

Included communities - Scandinavia Falkoping Falun Lidkoping Motala Harstad

Included communities - Australasia La Trobe Shire of Bulla Waitakere

Summary of Results Mainly “positive” 11 studies (4 communities) report significant decrease in injuries compared to control communities 2 studies report ‘no change’ while injury rates in control areas rose 1 study reports no overall change but decrease in pediatric sub-group 2 studies report no significant effect

Community / /96 Community 2 Limitations to Validity Arbitrary base-line / follow-up periods (particularly for those of short duration in small communities)

Limitations to Validity cont. Reliance on administrative databases to ascertain injury rates Not always taking pre-existing trends into account Publication bias Only small number of communities evaluated to date

Conclusions Cochrane methodology provides a framework to evaluate the Safe Communities Model There is evidence that Safe Communities model does reduce injuries in whole populations Not many communities have been formally evaluated Limitations in evaluation methodology

Review available at: