Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov. 2006 Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Advertisements

(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Processing: zero-offset gathers
Attenuating the ice flexural wave on arctic seismic data David C. Henley.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson
Seismic reflection Seismic reflection profiling basically same principle as echo sounding But lower frequency used for greater subbottom penetration Trade.
Seismic Reflection Processing/Velocity Analysis of SAGE 2007 Data Andrew Steen Team Members; Stan, Tim, Josh, Andrew.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
AASPI Seismic Processing Lab Manual and Wiki using Schlumberger’s Vista Software Package Bryce Hutchinson*, Thang Ha, and Kurt J. Marfurt, University of.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Stacking  Statics  Residual statics in combination with the velocity analysis  Muting  Approximated zero offset section.
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
AGU 2015 Fall Meeting Session ID: 8656 Session Title: New development in open source and academic seismic software Conveniors: Majdański, Polkowski.
Spiking Deconvolution In order to compress seismic signal in time and whiten the spectrum. Advantages: shows embedded signal in noise Disadvantages: heightens.
Introduction to Deconvolution
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
SAMPLE IMAGE December 10th 2007 Software Product Management Massy 1 TIKIM “Kirchhoff pre-stack time migration” Overview (Jean-Claude LANCELOT) Meeting.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Reflection seismograms
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Processing Seismic Reflection Data of La Bajada Fault Ryan Lester.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson
1 Geophysical Methods Data Acquisition, Analysis, Processing, Modelling, Interpretation.
Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E.
Existing Subsurface Model
Reflection velocity analysis
(C) 2002 University of Wisconsin, CS 559
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
New ProMAX modules for reflectivity calibration and noise attenuation
Active Source Seismology
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Convolution and Deconvolution
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
Homomorphic Speech Processing
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Chapter 3 Sampling.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer Title: Workshop Overview

Workshop Targets Give an overview on the seismic reflection acquisition Give an overview on the seismic reflection acquisition Give an overview on the seismic reflection processing Give an overview on the seismic reflection processing Show the mathematical background behind the processing steps Show the mathematical background behind the processing steps Show some synthetic and field examples Show some synthetic and field examples

Seismic Reflection Acquisition Principles of data acquisitions Principles of data acquisitions Equipment used for data acquisitions Equipment used for data acquisitions Problems facing geophysicists in the field Problems facing geophysicists in the field Examples of field trips Examples of field trips

Reflection Data Processing Principles of signal processing Principles of signal processing Mathematical basics of signal data processing Mathematical basics of signal data processing Time and frequency domain filters Time and frequency domain filters Designing a processing flow sequence Designing a processing flow sequence

Items of signal processing 1D and 2D Fourier Transform 1D and 2D Fourier Transform Aliasing Aliasing Processing Sequence Processing Sequence Demultiplexing Demultiplexing Seismic Filters Seismic Filters Trace Edit Trace Edit Static Correction Static Correction Coherent Noises Coherent Noises Convolution, Deconvolution, Cross- and Auto-correlation Stacking NMO Velocity Analysis Migration Modeling

Factors Controlling the Quality of the Seismic Reflection Data Acquisition Parameters Acquisition Parameters Number of Folds Number of Folds Type of Source Type of Source Surface and Subsurface Conditions Surface and Subsurface Conditions Environmental and Demographic Conditions Environmental and Demographic Conditions Used Equipment Used Equipment Weather Conditions Weather Conditions Care taking Through Acquisition Care taking Through Acquisition

Effect of number of folds A single fold section

Effect of number of folds A 12-folds section

Effect of Surface and Subsurface Conditions Poor signals between A and B is due to a karstic limestone on the surface.

Effect of Surface and Subsurface Conditions Same section after using a charges placed in a hole below the karstic limestone

Effect of Demographic Conditions A village is situated between points A and B, so the vibroseis source worked at low power

In conclusion, acquisition of seismic reflection data are never done in ideal cases or ideal environment. We always have problems.

Why do we need data processing? 1.To solve acquisition problems 2.To enhance the appearance of the data 3.To give a true view of the subsurface

Effect of Deconvolution Before Deconvolution After Deconvolution

Effect of NMO Before NMOAfter NMO After NMO & Stacking Note: The multiples are under-corrected Note: The multiples are attenuated after stacking

Effect of Migration

Effect of Interpreter A seismic line interpreted by six different contractors

End of this lecture Thank You for you attention All examples on this lecture is based on Oz Yilmaz, 2001, “Seismic Data Analysis, processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data”, Published by SEG