Dynamics of Traffic Flows in Combined Day-to-day and With- in Day Context Chandra Balijepalli ITS, Leeds 15-16 September 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Macroscopic ODE Models of Traffic Flow Zhengyi Zhou 04/01/2010.
Advertisements

A Logit-based Transit Assignment Using Gradient Projection with the Priority of Boarding on a Transit Schedule Network Hyunsoo Noh and Mark Hickman 2011.
How Bad is Selfish Routing? By Tim Roughgarden Eva Tardos Presented by Alex Kogan.
Use of Kalman filters in time and frequency analysis John Davis 1st May 2011.
Using Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models to Represent Day-to-day Variability Dirck Van Vliet 20 th International EMME Users’ Conference Montreal October.
DYNAMIC POWER ALLOCATION AND ROUTING FOR TIME-VARYING WIRELESS NETWORKS Michael J. Neely, Eytan Modiano and Charles E.Rohrs Presented by Ruogu Li Department.
1 Transportation Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequence Meeghat Habibian Modeling approach.
1 EL736 Communications Networks II: Design and Algorithms Class8: Networks with Shortest-Path Routing Yong Liu 10/31/2007.
A Path-size Weibit Stochastic User Equilibrium Model
A Bayesian approach to traffic estimation in stochastic user equilibrium networks Chong WEI Beijing Jiaotong University Yasuo ASAKURA Tokyo Institute of.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
On Modeling Feedback Congestion Control Mechanism of TCP using Fluid Flow Approximation and Queuing Theory  Hisamatu Hiroyuki Department of Infomatics.
Resampling techniques Why resampling? Jacknife Cross-validation Bootstrap Examples of application of bootstrap.
Stochastic Differentiation Lecture 3 Leonidas Sakalauskas Institute of Mathematics and Informatics Vilnius, Lithuania EURO Working Group on Continuous.
Dynamic Origin-Destination Demand Flow Estimation under Congested Traffic Conditions Xuesong Zhou (Univ. of Utah) Chung-Cheng Lu (National Taipei University.
2003 Fall Queuing Theory Midterm Exam(Time limit:2 hours)
1 TCOM 501: Networking Theory & Fundamentals Lecture 7 February 25, 2003 Prof. Yannis A. Korilis.
11 Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Information Provision under Stochastic Demand and Capacity Conditions: A Multi-day Traffic Equilibrium Approach Mingxin.
Planning operation start times for the manufacture of capital products with uncertain processing times and resource constraints D.P. Song, Dr. C.Hicks.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
1 A State Feedback Control Approach to Stabilizing Queues for ECN- Enabled TCP Connections Yuan Gao and Jennifer Hou IEEE INFOCOM 2003, San Francisco,
On Self Adaptive Routing in Dynamic Environments -- A probabilistic routing scheme Haiyong Xie, Lili Qiu, Yang Richard Yang and Yin Yale, MR and.
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
MATE: MPLS Adaptive Traffic Engineering Anwar Elwalid, et. al. IEEE INFOCOM 2001.
A Calibration Procedure for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu, Utah State University Jun-Seok Oh, Western.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Workshop on “Irrigation Channels and Related Problems” Variation of permeability parameters in Barcelona networks Workshop on “Irrigation Channels and.
Flow Models and Optimal Routing. How can we evaluate the performance of a routing algorithm –quantify how well they do –use arrival rates at nodes and.
Robust Regression for Minimum-Delay Load-Balancing F. Larroca and J.-L. Rougier 21st International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 21) Paris, France, September.
Minimum-Delay Load-Balancing Through Non-Parametric Regression F. Larroca and J.-L. Rougier IFIP/TC6 Networking 2009 Aachen, Germany, May 2009.
Particle Filtering in Network Tomography
Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars CONGESTION PRICING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION Karine Deschinkel Laboratoire PRiSM – Université de Versailles.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
David Watling, Richard Connors, Agachai Sumalee ITS, University of Leeds Acknowledgement: DfT “New Horizons” Dynamic Traffic Assignment Workshop, Queen’s.
CONTINUOUS PRICE AND FLOW DYNAMICS OF TRADABLE MOBILITY CREDITS Hongbo YE and Hai YANG The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 21/12/2012.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
On Activity-Based Network Design Problems JEE EUN (JAMIE) KANG, JOSEPH Y. J. CHOW, AND WILL W. RECKER 20 TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRANSPORTATION AND.
CS 478 – Tools for Machine Learning and Data Mining Backpropagation.
Mixture Models, Monte Carlo, Bayesian Updating and Dynamic Models Mike West Computing Science and Statistics, Vol. 24, pp , 1993.
CS 782 – Machine Learning Lecture 4 Linear Models for Classification  Probabilistic generative models  Probabilistic discriminative models.
SUPA Advanced Data Analysis Course, Jan 6th – 7th 2009 Advanced Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences Dr Martin Hendry Dept of Physics and Astronomy.
Network Design and Analysis-----Wang Wenjie Queuing Theory III: 1 © Graduate University, Chinese academy of Sciences. Network Design and Performance Analysis.
16 Sep 04Transport Workshop at Queen's1 A numerical comparison of three heuristic methods for path reassignment for dynamic user equilibrium Ying-en Ge.
Opportunistic Traffic Scheduling Over Multiple Network Path Coskun Cetinkaya and Edward Knightly.
Benjamin Heydecker JD (Puff) Addison Centre for Transport Studies UCL Dynamic Modelling of Road Transport Networks.
Modeling Drivers’ Route Choice Behavior, and Traffic Estimation and Prediction Byungkyu Brian Park, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Studies University.
Enlarging the Options in the Strategy-based Transit Assignment TRB Applications Conference Reno 2011 Isabelle Constantin and Michael Florian INRO.
1 An Arc-Path Model for OSPF Weight Setting Problem Dr.Jeffery Kennington Anusha Madhavan.
Capacity-constrained Traffic Assignment in Network with Residual Queues and Implementation in EMME/2 Tel.: , 16th.
1 Slides by Yong Liu 1, Deep Medhi 2, and Michał Pióro 3 1 Polytechnic University, New York, USA 2 University of Missouri-Kansas City, USA 3 Warsaw University.
TRB Planning Applications Conference May 2009, Houston,TX A Caveat on O-D Matrix Estimation/Adjustment: Deviations from a seed matrix and Simultaneous.
September 28, 2000 Improved Simultaneous Data Reconciliation, Bias Detection and Identification Using Mixed Integer Optimization Methods Presented by:
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 9: Least.
Statistical Methods. 2 Concepts and Notations Sample unit – the basic landscape unit at which we wish to establish the presence/absence of the species.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
D. AriflerCMPE 548 Fall CMPE 548 Routing and Congestion Control.
Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology
Fall 2004 Backpropagation CS478 - Machine Learning.
Travel Time Perception and Learning in Traffic Networks
URBAN TRANSPORTATION NERWORKS
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Hidden Markov Models Part 2: Algorithms
Transportation Engineering Route Choice January 28, 2011
Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequenced
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Multivariate Methods Berlin Chen
A mesoscopic approach to model path choice in emergency condition
Ying-en Ge and Malachy Carey 16 September 2004
Presentation transcript:

Dynamics of Traffic Flows in Combined Day-to-day and With- in Day Context Chandra Balijepalli ITS, Leeds September 2004

Objectives of this Presentation To introduce the combined day-to-day and with- in day context of dynamic traffic assignment To introduce the extended method of approximation To discuss the issues in computing the parameters e.g., jacobians of travel time functions To discuss some numerical results

The Context Day-to-day dynamics: drivers’ learning and adjusting With-in day dynamics: delays along the route based on prevailing traffic conditions Not dealing with departure time choice

Logit based route choice model coupled with MSA Dynamic loading of the flows on the routes using a whole-link model Time varying demand Initial cost vector Route flows Route Costs Average route flows, costs, outflow profile, travel time flow profile, etc Route Choice Model Dynamic Link Loading Model

Literature Review Cantarella, G.E. and Cascetta, E. (1995) Dynamic Processes and Equilibrium in Transportation Networks: Towards a Unifying Theory, Transportation Science 29(4), Davis, G.A. and Nihan, N.L. (1993) Large Population Approximations of a General Stochastic Traffic Assignment Model, Operations Research 41(1), Friesz, T.L., Bernstein, D., Smith, T.E., Tobin, R.L. and Wie,B.W. (1993) A Variational Inequality Formulation of the Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Problem, Operations Research 41(1), Hazelton, M. and Watling, D. (2004) Computation of Equilibrium Distributions of Markov Traffic Assignment Models, Transportation Science 38(3),

The Extended Method of Approximation Assume the drivers are indistinguishable and rational in minimising their perceived travel cost Perceived Travel Cost Measured Travel Cost Error in Perceived Travel Cost

Measured travel costs are updated using m = memory length λ = memory weighting

The number of drivers taking each possible route on day n during time period T, conditional on the weighted average of costs, is obtained as independently for T = 1,2,… independently for T = 1,2,… q T = demand during time period t p T (.) = route choice probability vector

Conditional Moments Then the expectation and variance of the conditional distribution for each time period would be

Unconditional Moments Based on standard results, the unconditional first moment is given as Davis and Nihan (1993) proved that the equilibrium distribution is approximately normal with its mean equal to the solution of SUE in each time period, as the demand grows larger

Unconditional Moments Diagonalised OD Demand Flow Jacobian of Choice Probability Vector Jacobian of Travel Time Vector

Computing the Jacobians Computing the derivatives of choice probability vector in case of logit function i.e. matrix ‘D’ is relatively straight forward But computing the matrix ‘B’ (jacobian matrix of cost vector) is not!

Computing the Matrix B Assume linear dynamic travel time function, where, = travel time for vehicles entering at t = travel time for vehicles entering at t a = free flow travel time b = congestion related time x(t) = number of vehicles on the link at t Major time periods, T Minor time steps, t

Mean travel time in major period T is Φ(t) = entry time for vehicles exiting at t

Numerical Jacobians Perturbation of inflow in any time period and studying its impact on the travel times of all the time periods Operate the main program to obtain SUE flows Operate a single link model to obtain the jacobians numerically

Numerical Example Three link parallel route network servicing a single OD pair with linear dynamic cost functions Time Period 1 Time Period 2 Time Period 3 Time Period Origin Destination Number of drivers in each periodRouteab Network Parameters

Results Jacobians by numerical method for Route 1 Jacobians by analytical/ finite difference approximation method

Results θ = 0.01 θ = 0.4 MeanVarianceMeanVariance Simulation Naïve Approximation Estimates of Mean and Variance for Route 1 Time Period 1

Plan for Further Work Analytical expressions for the jacobians Non-linear dynamic cost functions Network with multiple ODs

Any questions, comments, suggestions welcome!