1 2007 English Language Arts (ELA). 2 2006 & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

Advertisements

FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.

NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.

1 RESULTS. 2 60% % % 1986 (first year NYC tracked four-year graduation rate) CITY GRADUATION RATES.

Presentation by Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Statewide Briefing,

School Report Cards For 2003–2004

1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.

1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.

Mikaila Mariel Lemonik Arthur Data on Race and Education.

1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.

Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.

Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.

1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.

Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August

ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT

Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.

1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.

Update on Data Reporting September Repository System Goal To consolidate the Department’s collection of individual student data in the repository.

1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.

2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.

1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.

Florida Department of Education Jeanine Blomberg, Commissioner External Factors Review: GRADE 3 FCAT READING 2005, 2006, 2007 Jay Pfeiffer, Deputy Commissioner.

Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework: Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Rebecca H. Cort VESID October 2007 Statewide Meeting.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.

Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.

Mobile County Public Schools is the Largest System in Alabama.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.

1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.

Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.

Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

Graduation Rate: A Process; A Product New Hanover County Schools September 2012.

PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE MATH Students in Performance Levels GRADE % +5.6% +0.2% +14.7% + 1.4% (All.

1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.

2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.

A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Data for the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts February 2006.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.

2017 FSA Grade 3 English Language Arts

76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income

Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.

2017 State Assessment Highlights

National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016

Dalton Middle School Data Review

Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential

Presentation transcript:

English Language Arts (ELA)

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning Standards increased in Students in grades 3-5 were more likely to meet the Standards than older students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 3 = 185, ,457 Grade 4 = 190, ,499 Grade 5 = 201, ,133 Grade 6 = 204, ,463 Grade 7 = 210, ,839 Grade 8 = 212, ,971 Grades 3-8= 1,205,1201,228,362 Number Tested

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public At every grade level, except grade 3, the percentage of tested students who at least partially met the Standards increased somewhat. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 2 and above

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public With the exception of grade 3, in every grade a smaller percentage of students scored at Level 1 in 2007 than Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 1

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Mean Scores for All Public Schools At each grade level, a score of 650 signifies meeting the Standards. At all grade levels, the average student met the Standards. In grades 6-8, the mean scale score increased by 3-5 points in

& 2007 English Language Arts The effect of increased participation of LEP students is illustrated by removing LEP students from the analyses for 2006 and 2007

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Performance of Students Who Are Not LEP In each grade, considering only students who were not LEP, the percentage meeting the ELA Learning Standards increased in Percentage of Non-LEP Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested Grade 3 = 182, ,364 Grade 4 = 187, ,299 Grade 5 = 195,162190,653 Grade 6 = 199,697194,529 Grade 7 = 205,019202,540 Grade 8 = 207,177203,895 Grades 3-8 = 1,176,7471,156,280

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Performance of Students Who Are Not LEP In every grade a smaller percentage of students who were not LEP scored at Level 1 in 2007 than Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Mean Scores of Students Who Are Not LEP At all grade levels, the average student met the Standards. In grades 5-8, the mean scale score increased by 3-7 points in

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Performance of Students Who Are Not LEP - NYC Only In each grade, except third, considering only students who were not LEP, the percentage meeting the ELA Learning Standards increased in A smaller percentage of students in grades 6-8 than in earlier grades met the Standards. Percentage of Non-LEP Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested Grade 3 = 59,62958,413 Grade 4 = 62,205 59,060 Grade 5 = 64,804 62,650 Grade 6 = 65,754 62,016 Grade 7 = 66,021 65,354 Grade 8 = 66,796 65,315 Grades 3-8= 385,182372,808

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Performance of Students Who Are Not LEP - NYC Only In every grade a smaller percentage of students who were not LEP scored at Level 1 in 2007 than Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Mean Scores for Students Who Are Not LEP – NYC Only At each grade level, a score of 650 signifies meeting the Standards. At all grade levels, the average student met the Standards. In grades 5-8, the mean scale score increased by 5-8 points in

& 2007 English Language Arts Performance of Limited English Proficient Students

English Language Arts (ELA) Performance of LEP Students LEP students In grades 3-5 were more likely than those in grades 7 and 8 to score at Level 2 or above. Percentage of LEP Students Scoring at Levels 2, 3 and 4 Grade 3 = 17,093 Grade 4 = 14,200 Grade 5 = 11,480 Grade 6 = 9,934 Grade 7 = 9,299 Grade 8 = 10,076 Grades 3-8 = 72,082 Number of LEP Students Tested

& 2007 English Language Arts Results by Gender

English Language Arts (ELA) Performance by Gender The disparity in graduation rate is foreshadowed by the larger percentage of females than males who meet the Standards at every grade level. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

English Language Arts (ELA) Performance by Gender Males were more likely than females to score at Level 1. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1

& 2007 English Language Arts Results by Need/Resource Capacity Category

19 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 3 and & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA ) Performance in Grades by Need/Resource Capacity Category The variations among need/resource categories were substantial. Students in Rural Districts, where fewer than one percent of tested students were LEP, showed the largest percentage increase. The smallest performance increase was in New York City, where about 77 percent of tested LEP students were enrolled.

20 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 2 and Above 2006 & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Performance in Grades by Need/Resource Capacity Category The differences among categories in students partially meeting the Standards were much smaller.

21 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Performance in Grades by Need/Resource Capacity Category The percentage of students scoring at Level 1 decreased at every grade level. Students in Large City Districts were 9 times as likely as those in Low Need Districts to score at Level 1.

& 2007 English Language Arts Results by Racial/Ethnic Group

& 2007 English Language Arts All Grades 3-8 by Racial/Ethnic Group The performance differences among racial/ethnic groups were substantial. The percentage of students meeting the Standards increased in all racial/ethnic groups except Hispanics. The Hispanic group includes the largest percentage of LEP students (22%); the Asian group the second largest percentage (11%). Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

& 2007 English Language Arts All Grades 3-8 by Racial/Ethnic Group Blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans were more than twice as likely as Whites and Asians to score at Level 1. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1

& 2007 English Language Arts Results for the Big 5 Cities

26 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and & 2007 English Language Arts Performance in All Grades 3-8 by Big 5 Cities There were substantial differences among the Big 5 in performance. While Buffalo achieved the largest increase in performance, they had the smallest percentage of students meeting the standards.

27 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level & 2007 English Language Arts Performance in All Grades 3-8 by Big 5 Cities In each Big 5 district fewer students scored at Level 1 in 2007 than in With the exception of New York City, at least one in ten students scored at Level 1.

& 2007 English Language Arts Results by Students with Disabilities

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Students with Disabilities The percentage of students with disabilities meeting the ELA Learning Standards increased in Students in grades 3-5 were more likely to meet the standards than older students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 3 = 23,811 26,692 Grade 4 = 26,474 28,281 Grade 5 = 28,987 29,985 Grade 6 = 28,883 29,055 Grade 7 = 29,237 29,842 Grade 8 = 29,119 29,514 Grades 3-8= 166, ,369 Number Tested

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Students with Disabilities In every grade, a smaller percentage of students with disabilities scored at Level 1 in 2007 than Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 1

& 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Mean Scores for Students with Disabilities At every grade except 3, the mean scale score increased.

32 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 3 and & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Students with Disabilities Performance in Grades by Need/Resource Capacity Category The variations among need/resource categories were substantial. Students with disabilities in Low Need Districts were substantially more likely than those in other categories to meet the Standards. In every category, except the Large City Districts, a larger percentage of students with disabilities met the Standards in 2007 than in 2006.

33 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Students with Disabilities Performance in Grades by Need/Resource Capacity Category The percentage of students with disabilities scoring at Level 1 decreased in every category. Students in Large City Districts were 4 times as likely as those in Low Need Districts to score at Level 1.

34 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and & 2007 English Language Arts Students with Disabilities Performance in All Grades 3-8 by Big 5 Cities Among the Big 5, New York City had the largest percentage of students with disabilities meeting the Standards. In every district except Rochester a larger percentage of students met the Standards in 2007 than in 2006.

35 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level & 2007 English Language Arts Students with Disabilities Performance in All Grades 3-8 by Big 5 Cities In each Big 5 district except Rochester fewer students scored at Level 1 in 2007 than in 2006.