Graduate Portfolio to Document Impact on Student Learning CEC-TED 2004 Albuquerque, New Mexico Deborah S. Wallace, Ph.D. Susan B. Brown, Ph.D.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report

Advertisements

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.

Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers

TCH 216: Principles and Practices for Teaching and Learning in Secondary Schools.

Team Teaching Section 7: Monitoring Teacher. The Monitoring Teacher model One teacher assumes the responsibility for instructing the entire class. The.

February 2005Transition Services Preparation & Training Developing NCATE Assessment Rubrics: Modeling Best Practice For Our Students Pamela Luft Kent State.

Integrating Performance-Based Portfolios into Coursework Association of Teacher Educators Jacksonville, Florida February 17, 2003.

Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty

Overall Layout of Curriculum Development System in Organization of Educational Research and Programming.

ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.

Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?

What should be the basis of

performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC

Differentiated Supervision

In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.

 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.

The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.

Managing Data Collection: Where we were, where we are, and where we want to be! Gwen Brockman California State University, Dominguez Hills.

“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.

Validity/Reliability Matters Really? Beverly Mitchell, Kennesaw State University.

Road To Success Florida School Leader Assessment (FSLA)

Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.

Professional Teacher Education Unit (PTEU). 5 colleges 5 colleges Bagwell College of EducationBagwell College of Education College of the ArtsCollege.

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.

Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.

The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.

NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.

PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:

Standard V Competency 10 By: Ashley Rogers & Maricela Diaz.

After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.

Exhibit 3.11 Data Report to Unit Assessment Committee Spring 2008.

NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System

Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.

NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.

Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.

Using edTPA Data for Program Design and Curriculum Mapping Mary Ariail, Georgia State University Kristy Brown, Shorter University Judith Emerson, Georgia.

What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.

WELCOME TO WINTER QUARTER 2007 We are halfway there! iii. Sample Graduation Requirements & Integration Plan 2007a (Stanford.

Consistency of Assessment (Validation) Webinar – Part 1 Renae Guthridge WA Training Institute (WATI)

WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY College of Education and Human Services Integrating Technology Into Foundations and Methods Courses.

1 Educational Technology Electronic Teaching Portfolio Based on the ISTE/NCATE Foundation Standards for all educators. All candidates in teacher preparation.

Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.

Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.

Presentations of Action Research Planning for written summaries and sharing for Jan 2004.

Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.

By Sandra Taylor.  Introduction  Phase I  Phase II  Phase III  Phase IV  Conclusion.

Standards-Based Teacher Education Using Portfolios to Document Teacher Performance in a Continuous Assessment Model.

OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.

 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.

Teaching Strategies GOLD

Implementing edTPA An Overview.

Field Experiences and Clinical Practice

Valley City State University Conceptual Framework

Valley City State University Conceptual Framework

Assessing Experiential Learning Outcomes with Technology

Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003

Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair

Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair

Presentation transcript:

Graduate Portfolio to Document Impact on Student Learning CEC-TED 2004 Albuquerque, New Mexico Deborah S. Wallace, Ph.D. Susan B. Brown, Ph.D.

Learner Outcomes Review the evolution of our graduate portfolio and sample evaluation rubrics, candidate products and data documenting impact on K-12 student learning Sample structure of our proposed on-line portfolio Discussion of extensions of course outcomes into candidate teaching practice Discussion and feedback on portfolio model, products and rubrics

Graduate & Outcomes Proficiencies Candidate Performance Instrument (CPI) Impact on Student Learning Analysis (ISLA) Special Education Performance Outcomes Portfolio Narrative Rubric Master of Education in Special Education Presentation Evaluation RubricMaster of Education in Special Education Presentation Evaluation Rubric Kennesaw State University Professional Teacher Education Unit Assessment Plan

Candidate Performance Instrument KSU – PTEU Conceptual FrameworkPTEU Conceptual Framework Subject Matter Experts Facilitators of Teaching and Learning Collaborative Professionals

Measuring Impact on K-12 Student Learning Impact on Student Learning Assessment D etermine the effect of instruction on all your students’ learning (NCATE/PSC Standards 1, 3, 4) Guide decisions about future instruction and plans to improve upon every students’ performance (NCATE/PSC Standards 1, 3, 4 Communicate performance results to others (NCATE/PSC Standard 2)

Facilitators of Teaching & Learning Behavior Strategies Application Rubric Application Project Format Candidate Application Project Student Data Collection Sheet Communication Board Application Project Summary Data

Impact on Student Learning Cooperative Learning Project Cooperative Learning RubricCooperative Learning Rubric Lesson Plan Student Data Cooperative Learning Project Summary Data Direct Instruction Direct Instruction Summary Data

Internship Graduate Impact on Student Learning Graduate Impact on Student Learning Summary DataGraduate Impact on Student Learning Summary Data Special Education Performance OutcomesSpecial Education Performance Outcomes Observation Summary Data Summary Supervision Experience Form

Documenting Professional Growth Portfolio Narrative Rubric KSU – PTEU Conceptual Framework Subject Matter Experts Facilitators of Teaching and Learning Collaborative Professionals

Documenting Professional Growth Portfolio Narrative Rubric Working Portfolio Subject Matter Indicator 2 Indicator 4 Facilitators of Teaching & Learning Indicator 3 Indicator 7 Collaborative Professionals Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 4

Documenting Professional Growth Portfolio Narrative Rubric Portfolio Narrative Summary Data Master of Education in Special Education Presentation Evaluation Rubric Master of Education Portfolio Summary DataMaster of Education Portfolio Summary Data