Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
A Guide to Implementation
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Centinela Valley UHSD BTSA Induction Overview September 16, 2013.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
UESCO/IFLA Workshop on Development of Information Literacy through School Libraries in Southeast Asia September 2005.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Timberlane Regional School District
Implementation of the Common Core Learning Standards BOE Meeting Presentation May 22, 2012.
TUSD’s New Online Assessment Tool
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
OTES AND TESTING AND BEARS… OH MY!!! WHAT IS HAPPENI NG?
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Student Learning Objectives. An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
EDUCAUSE 2001 Mid-Atlantic Conference
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
TKES and SLO assessments
Using data for instructional decision-making
Presentation transcript:

Lancaster County School District

Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout the state. In years past, we have often relied on State or Federal assessment tools for information about our teaching and learning products; student success rates. SLOs offer an opportunity to create and accumulate data for every class, every teacher, and every subject; as opposed to data gathered primarily from State tests like PASS and EOCs.

With the utilization of SLOs, all teachers will establish student learning objectives or goals, based on relevant information about their students “this year” and reflective of subject matter and class or grade level demographic information. SLOs open the door to establish assessments and gather data to align goals, objectives and standards.

SLOs will promote collaboration with colleagues, administrators, schools and districts. SLOs also establish a pathway for all teachers to further their professional growth as they discuss learning objectives with colleagues and administrators during scheduled conferences.

SLOs will impact every student in every school and generate hard data for progressive efforts to improve our efficacy and efficiency.

Specific:  The objective is focused by content standards; by learners’ needs. Measurable:  An appropriate instrument/measure is selected to assess the objective. Attainable:  The objective is within the teacher’s control to effect change and is an appropriate focus for the students’ academic year. Results Oriented/Relevant:  The objective is feasible for the teacher and the skill or content to be measured is appropriate. Time-bound:  The objective is contained within a single school year or instructional period.

 MAP is a computer adaptive test that is administered to the whole class at once.  The Literacy By Design test is based on the reading series. The test is a paper/pencil test with multiple choice questions.  The benchmarks assessment is a reading assessment administered individually.  All three assessments are administered at the beginning of the year as a pre-test and end of year as post-test.

 Teacher enhanced capacity for data driven instruction  Clear connection between curriculum, assessment, and student data  Teacher input and ownership in his/her evaluation

 Each SLO must be approved by the principal or assistant principal by September 30, 2015 for first semester courses and by February 15, 2016 for second semester courses.  The principal (or designee) will conduct a  Preliminary conference  Mid-course conference  Summative conference with each teacher to discuss students’ progress towards the goals in the SLO and provide support as needed.

TaskDeadline Administrators attend regional SLO training presented by SDE By October 2014 Professional Development day - Teachers attend a SLO overview by SDE and principals October 13, 2014 Teachers begin developing SLOs and select/create aligned assessments December 30, 2014 Gather information about district-wide formative and summative assessments by subject/course January 30, 2015 Develop a yearly calendar/timeline for the SLO cycle. February 28, 2015 Determine additional professional development needs for implementation March 30, 2015 Align SLO goals with district goalsApril 15, 2015