AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
Advertisements

Regional Haze Modeling: Recent Modeling Results for VISTAS and WRAP October 27, 2003, CMAS Annual Meeting, RTP, NC University of California, Riverside.
UC Riverside Attribution of Haze Meeting, June 22, 2005, Seattle, WA UNC/CEPENVIRON Corp. Spatial Processing and Display of WRAP Emissions Data, and Source.
Biocomplexity Project: N-deposition Model Evaluation UCR, CE-CERT, Air Quality Modeling Group Model Performance Evaluation for San Bernardino Mountains.
Preliminary Results CMAQ and CMAQ-AIM with SAPRC99 Gail Tonnesen, Chao-Jung Chien, Bo Wang, UC Riverside Max Zhang, Tony Wexler, UC Davis Ralph Morris,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Technical Scope of Work: Tom Moore, WESTAR/WRAP on behalf of University.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
WRAP Regional Haze Analysis & Technical Support System IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2006.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Modeling Source Apportionment Gail Tonnesen,
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
ENVIRON International Corporation University of California at Riverside Review of WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC) Deliverables Related to the Technical.
Use of Hybrid Plume/Grid Modeling and the St. Louis Super Site Data to Model PM 2.5 Concentrations in the St. Louis Area Ralph Morris, Bonyoung Koo, Jeremiah,
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2015 Scope of Work University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
TAF Meeting, Boise, ID, May 2007 Regional Modeling Center Project Update May 22, 2007 Gail Tonnesen, University of California, Riverside Ralph Morris,
CMAQ Evaluation Preliminary 2002 version C WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Annual CMAQ Performance Evaluation using Preliminary 2002 version C Emissions.
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
UC Riverside FEJF Meeting, Las Vegas, NV Dec 8, 2004 UNC/CEPENVIRON Corp. WRAP/RMC Fire Sensitivity Modeling Project Mohammad Omary, Gail Tonnesen WRAP.
WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Tagged Species Source Apportionment (TSSA)
TSS Project Update and Demo of Selected Tools WRAP IWG Meeting Santa Fe, NM December 7, 2006.
Regional Modeling Center Workplan Fire/Carbon/Dust Workshop May 24, 2006.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON International Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center Overview of WRAP Regional Haze Modeling Activities.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Modeling Forum-AoH Meeting, San Diego, CA Nov 26, 2006 Overview of Other RPO Modeling Work Ralph Morris ENVIRON International.
Model & Chemistry Intercomparison CMAQ with CB4, CB4-2002, SAPRC99 Ralph Morris, Steven Lau, Bongyoung Koo ENVIRON International Corporation Gail Tonnesen,
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Use of Advanced Probing Tools in One-Atmosphere Air Quality Models for Model Evaluation, Culpability Assessment and Control Strategy Design Presented at.
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Model Performance Evaluation with the.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Phase II -- Task Source Apportionment Modeling Study Design University.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Modeling Forum Status Report WRAP Planning Team Meeting February 22-23, 2006 John Vimont, Mary Uhl, & Kevin Briggs, Forum Co-Chairs.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver 7/22/04 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Emission, Meteorology Inputs and CMAQ Performance.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Results from January/July CMAQ Source Apportionment Modeling Gail Tonnesen,
Overview of ARS Presentations and Review of EI Data Sets AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 CAMx Model Performance Evaluation University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Results & Status ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside Dust Emission Joint.
Evaluation of CAMx: Issues Related to Sectional Models Ralph Morris, Bonyoung Koo, Steve Lau and Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International Corporation Novato,
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Regional Modeling Center (RMC) Preliminary Fire Modeling Results.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
TAF Meeting, Las Vegas, NC, 2/6/2007 Regional Modeling Center Proposed 2007 Work plan February 6, 2007 Gail Tonnesen, University of California, Riverside.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 December WRAP Modeling Forum Conf Call Call Information: December 20, 1pm.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Project Update Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID.
WRAP Technical Work Overview
Alternative title slide
VISTAS Grid Resolution Sensitivity
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Attribution of Haze Workgroup Organizational Meeting
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results
CRGAQS: CAMx PSAT Results
Presentation transcript:

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung Chien, Yingqun Wang University of California, Riverside Zac Adelman University of North Carolina Ralph Morris, Gerry Mansell et al. ENVIRON Corporation Int., Novato, CA

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Topics Model versions, datasets, domains, CPU benchmarks. Description of PSAT set up. Schedule for Modeling Results. Sample Results for monthly averages. Comparison of CAMx/PSAT and CMAQ/TSSA. Results on webpage at:

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 CMAQ & CAMx Visibility Modeling National RPO 36-km grid Model performance evaluation (MPE) compares model results to ambient monitoring data ( IMPROVE, NADP, CASTNet, STN, AQS ), on the web for 2002 Base B. PSAT source apportionment is being completed for 2 cases: –Plan 2002 C –Base 2018 B

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Air Quality Model Versions Using CAMx with PSAT version 4.3 Not using CMAQ/TSSA for WRAP, but we are testing CMAQ/TSSA on WRAP domain with EPA funding: –CMAQ/TSSA results are being compare to PSAT for QA. –previous CMAQ/TSSA was with CMAQ version 4.2 and 4.3, had problems with mass conservation errors. –current results are CMAQ 4.5 which includes new options for vertical advections with improved mass conservation.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PM Source Apportionment PM Source Apportionment Technology ( PSAT ) Plan C and 2018 Base C emissions. State Level Geographic Regions: –WRAP states, offshore, Canada, MX, CENRAP and Eastern US Track two families of PM Source Apportionment: –SO4; NO3 and NH3/NH4. For Secondary Organic Aerosols (SOA) use standard model output for anthropogenic and biogenic SOA –No geographic source apportionment for SOA or Primary PM.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP PSAT 18 Source Regions

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Geographic Source Region Codes

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT Emissions Source Group Codes

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Emissions Source Group Codes in QA step Note that the emissions groups above combine some PSAT source groups to allow comparison to CMAQ/TSSA for QA. Examples of emissions source-area groups: PT_CO = point sources from Colorado MV_EA = mobile sources from eastern US ( MWRPO, VISTAS, MAIN-VU ) BCON = transport from boundaries ( GEOS-CHEM )

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling White paper describes issues associated with the CAMx PSAT modeling:

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Analysis Products for PSAT Current results are daily and monthly averages for QA. When annual run is complete we will process SO4 and NO3 at each Class I area for W20% Days. Convert to Extinction (B ext ) and determine State’s contribution to Worst 20% days for 2002 Plan C and 2018 B.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Big Bend GuadalupeWichita Mtn Example CENRAP Results for 4 Class I areas

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Example CENRAP detailed results for a Class I area

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT July average Spatial Results

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 TSSA

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Summary of Ranked sources for Canyon Lands PSATTSSA Boundaries Point UT Point NM Point Mexico Point CO Point NV Point CENRAP Area Offshore Point AZ Point eastern US Point Wyoming Point offshore Point CA Point NM Point UT Boundaries Point CO Point NV Point offshore Point AZ Fires/Area/Etc UT Point Wyoming Point Mexico Mobile Utah Point Eastern US Point CENRAP

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 PSAT

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 TSSA

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 OC Source Apportionment Do not include SA treatment of secondary organic aerosols: –CMAQ already includes 3 OC species primary organic aerosols biogenic secondary organic aerosols –We have analysis of these species for the various existing model runs might provide info on OC apportionment.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Errors/Uncertainties Additional errors have been discovered in the emissions inventories: –2018 B non-WRAP EGU emissions were underestimated. –PM2.5 emissions in the WRAP road dust inventory. –We are evaluating the effects of these errors.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Effects of non-WRAP EGU error July

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Effects of non-WRAP EGU error August

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Effects of non-WRAP EGU error September

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Summary: Effects of non-WRAP EGU error Effects on WRAP states are relatively small. Effect is a small over-estimate of progress in 2018 for eastern tier WRAP states. Recommend we continue using 2018 B for PSAT results.

AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Summary Plan 2002 C PSAT complete mid August. Base 2018 B should be complete late August. Will prepare receptor bar plots for the average 20% best and 20% worst days (based on IMPROVE data). Results posted on webpage at: