Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-Agri Project Kick-off Meeting, Mol, 24-25, 2011 Remote Sensing of Crop Acreage and Crop Mapping in the E-Agri Project Chen Zhongxin Institute of Agricultural.
Advertisements

Using Area Frame for Agricultural Censuses and Surveys: The Philippines Experience by: Rosalinda M. Garcia, Bureau of Agricultural Statistics Minerva Eloisa.
Nonparametric and Probabilistic Classification of Agricultural Crops Using Multitemporal Images Smögen Workshop, August 2006 Jun Yu & Bo Ranneby.
USGS / Famine Early Warning Systems Network 10 October 2005 G. Galu GHA/USGS-FEWS NET KENYA: Pilot - Crop Production Estimation.
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
On Remotely Sensed Responses Monitoring Science and Technology Symposium September 21, 2004 Raymond L. Czaplewski, Ph.D. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain.
Arkansas 2015 Planting Progress April 13, Arkansas Highlights Arkansas’ corn planting advanced significantly in the week ending April 12. Planting.
North American Croplands Richard Massey & Dr. Teki Sankey.
USE OF GIS IN CENSUS MANAGEMENT AND MAPPING: THE KENYAN EXPERIENCE Presented by Joseph Nyangaya Ndubi Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
CBERS: the Brazilian Experience Gilberto Camara Director for Earth Observation INPE Workshop – 3 Years of CBERS, Beijing, October 2002.
These early results were obtained using one year’s set of FIA field data, DISTANCE: EUCLIDEAN WEIGHTING FUNCTION: NO WEIGHTS. NUMBER OF PLOTS: 696 NUMBER.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
A Statistically Valid Method for Using FIA Plots to Guide Spectral Class Rejection in Producing Stratification Maps Mike Hoppus & Andrew Lister USDA-Forest.
Mobile Bay Water Quality Assessment Using NASA Spaceborne Data Products Jenny Q. Du Mississippi State University.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
Improvements Of Sample Design For Rural Statistical Surveys In China Michael Steiner National Agricultural Statistics Service United States Department.
Transforming a sample design for taking into account new statistical needs, new information or new technological instruments for data collection Elisabetta.
PREPARATION, ORGANISATION AND CONDUCTING OF THE POST- ENUMERATION SURVEY IN THE STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, May 2008.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
National Resources Inventory Jeff Goebel Resource Inventory Division USDA-NRCS, Beltsville, MD.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Agriculture Information System for ICT Developed by Prof. Dharmendra Singh & Team Sponsored by: RailTel-IITR.
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service USDA/NASS: Programs and Census of Agriculture Washington State Conservation.
Operational Agriculture Monitoring System Using Remote Sensing Pei Zhiyuan Center for Remote Sensing Applacation, Ministry of Agriculture, China.
CropScape Demo Innovations to Minimize Crop Loss in a Changing Climate Rick Mueller National Agricultural Statistics Service February 24, 2012.
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Acreage Estimation ITEM CROPLAND DATA LAYERS - In Season Post Season Total CDL's2148 ESTIMATES PRODUCED State.
Using Multiple Methods to Reduce Errors in Survey Estimation: The Case of US Farm Numbers Jaki McCarthy, Denise Abreu, Mark Apodaca, and Leslee Lohrenz.
Data Users Needs & Capacity Building International Programs National Agricultural Statistics Service United States Department of Agriculture November 2009.
Tracking impacts of 2012 droughts on crop condition through daily satellite observations Currently droughts are affecting production in multiple main agricultural.
How USDA Forecasts Production and Supply/Demand. Overview  USDA publishes crop supply and demand estimates for the U.S. each month.  Because of the.
1 The American Community Survey An Update Pamela Klein American Community Survey Office Washington Metropolitan Council on Governments Cooperative Forecasting.
Compression and Analysis of Very Large Imagery Data Sets Using Spatial Statistics James A. Shine George Mason University and US Army Topographic Engineering.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GFSAD30 Field Work Planning: Progress in Australia Pardha, Prasad, and Jun GFSAD30 monthly meeting,
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.
June 2009 Wye City Group 1 Use of remote sensing in combination with statistical survey methods in the production of agricultural, land use and other statistics.
Identifying Sources of Error: the 2007 Classification Error Survey for the US Census of Agriculture Jaki McCarthy and Denise Abreu USDA’s National Agricultural.
Area estimation in the MARS project. A summary history J. Gallego,– MARS AGRI4CAST.
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Rapid Prototyping of NASA Next Generation Sensors for the SERVIR System.
EGSC WaterSMART-irrigation water use research John W. Jones USGS Eastern Geographic Science Center March 08, 2012 Input for the ACF WaterSMART Stakeholders.
Reference Data Standard Protocols Kamini Yadav Dr. Russ Congalton.
Cropland using Google Earth Engine
Kussul Nataliia, Shelestov Andrii, Skakun Sergii Space Research Institute of NAS of Ukraine and SSA of Ukraine Kyiv National University of Environmental.
MODIS-based Cropland Classification in North America Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University.
UTILIZATION OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA in U.S. and EU George Hanuschak, U.S.,USDA Jacques DeLince, EU, MARS For MEXSAI Conference November, 2004.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Reference data & Accuracy Assessment Dr. Russ Congalton Kamini Yadav.
Suphalak Prasertsang Pornpan Kaewsringam Krongsuk Chayakul Tanaporn Kongprasert Pannee Pattanapradit NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICE, THAILAND MAY 2010.
1 Crop area estimation in Geoland 2 Ispra, 15/12/2011 H. Kerdiles, J. Gallego, O. Léo, MARS Unit, JRC Ispra Q. Dong, I. Piccard, R. Van Hoolst, VITO, BE.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
Using County Assessor's Records To Improve Data Collection Efforts For The June Area Survey Denise A. Abreu, Wendy Barboza, Matt Deaton and Linda J. Young.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Mapping Variations in Crop Growth Using Satellite Data
Satellite Data Tools For Wyoming Agriculture
Assessment of Current Field Plots and LiDAR ‘Virtual’ Plots as Guides to Classification Procedures for Multitemporal Analysis of Historic and Current Landsat.
General Concepts on Sampling Frames
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
The GISCO task force “Remote Sensing for Statistics”
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Concepts and Definitions Used in Area Sampling Frame
Calculating land use change in west linn from
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Presentation transcript:

Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics Service Fairfax, VA, USA Acknowledgements: Commissioner Lester Spell, Jr., D.V.M., MDAC, Dr. Joseph H. McGilberry, Director, Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service, James Brown, Mississippi Department of Transportation, and the USDA Field Enumerators in Mississippi were critical to the success of this project. Thomas L. Gregory National Agricultural Statistics Service Jackson, MS, USA Fred L. Shore, Ph.D. Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce Jackson, MS, USA

The Cropland Data Layer in Mississippi Based on USDA/NASS programs started in the 1970s and the LARSYS software from Purdue University. Mississippi project started in 1999 using the Peditor and RSP software programs of NASS A cooperative project of NASS, Mississippi State University, and the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce

Data Collection for the MS 2004 Cropland Data Layer June Agricultural Survey Area Frame sample selection of 356 segments by strata, generally 1 square mile per segment. June Agricultural Survey field observations. Landsat 5 satellite imagery scenes with little or no clouds.

Clouds, March 3, 2004

The MS Delta, April 4, 2004

June Agricultural Survey Segment Selection

Mississippi Data Collection

Segment Locator Map and Field Locations

Scene Selection for MS 2004 (Possible Delta ADs Shown in Red) Analysis District Primary Scene Secondary Scene

Multi-Temporal Crop Signatures Computer processing using Peditor and RSP. Use of two Landsat 5 scenes of different dates with 7 bands each. Use of the ground truth data. Clustering the crop signatures and training the classifier. Comparison of statistics of 3 possible analysis districts to select the best classification for the MS Delta.

Multi-Temporal Classification Statistics to Select the Analysis District for the MS Delta, 2004 Analysis District Dates Percent Correct (%) Commission Error (%) Overall CottonSoybeansRiceCottonSoybeansRice 4/4/2004 and 5/6/2004 9/27/2004 and 4/4/2004 5/6/2004 and 9/27/ AD01 AD06 AD08

Image Processing for MS CDL, 2004 for MS CDL, 2004

AD08 AD06 Legend Multi-Temporal Field Classification Comparison

The Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Release Date, July 2005

Bolivar County CountyCropland Data Layer, 2004 Release Date, July 2005

Mississippi State-Wide Cropland Data Layer Acreage Estimation Results, 2004

MS Major Crop CDL vs. Official NASS Acreage Estimates,

Multi-Temporal Classification Results Mississippi Cropland Data Layer 2004 Multi-Temporal Strategies Three multi-temporal strategies were tested for the MS Delta region. The date combination selected for the multi-temporal administrative district gave superior definition for the classified map and better classification statistics overall.

Multi-Temporal Classification Results Mississippi Cropland Data Layer 2004 Acreage Estimates The 2004 CDL acreage estimates for the major crops were consistent with previous years with 2 crops essentially in agreement with the NASS Official Estimates. Very early (wheat and corn) and late (sweet potatoes) crops showed less agreement, indicating the importance of the satellite scene dates.