The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ein Netzwerkpartner des FEEI The state of implementation of the Electronic Communications package in Austria Achim Kaspar Association of Alternative.
Advertisements

DUBLIN November 15, The aim A single telecoms market for 500 million consumers.
DG Information Society PSC 1 The 1999 Communications Review Peter Scott DG Information Society Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
1 Review of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications Stephen Banable European Commission DG Information Society and Media ITU Conference.
The regulation of competition under the Austrian Telecommunications Act 2003 („TKG 2003“) by Stephan Polster 6 th AIJA Winter Seminar January.
Marek Piiroja  In principle at the moment in Estonia the fibre access (including prices) is not regulated and by the SMP decision on 2009.
Implementing EU 2009 regulatory framework National experiences in the Enlargement countries Budva, Montenegro – 1-2 October 2012.
Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.
©Ofcom Review of the Framework Some issues under discussion by regulators Jim Niblett International Policy Director 22 December 2005.
CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES (HAKOM) TELECOM SINGLE MARKET – CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS DOMAGOJ MARIČIĆ, CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY.
1 A New Regulatory Paradigm for European Electronic Communications Alexandre de Streel ITS-Regional Conference, Sept
The Australian telecommunications access regime Presentation to ACMA International Training program 2006 Michael Eady Communications Group Compliance and.
1 Reform of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications What it means for Access to Emergency Services Reform of the EU regulatory framework.
Development of BB markets Access markets (M4 & M5) and remedies applied Linda Paršova 10 TH BALTIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES REGULATORS’
The European Railway Agency in development
Broadband Development in the Republic of Moldova July 2015, Spain, Barcelona BEREC-EMERG-REGULATEL-EaPeReg Joint Summit CRISTINA LUCHITA Chief of.
© RRT1 Regulatory Developments of Electronic Communications during 2009 in Lithuania.
Theory and Practice Under The New Regulatory Framework: Some Case Studies Peter Alexiadis Partner Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP/Brussels FROM TELECOMMUNICATIONS.
PRESENTER : Kosta Trpkovski Slo-Mac Business forum, Ohrid, September, 07-10th 2006 MACEDONIA Electronic communications market liberalization in the Republic.
Asta Sihvonen-Punkka Director General of EMA Vice-Chair of ERGEG Baltic Electricity Mini-Forum 24 th of April, 2009 Riga The 3 rd Package – implied changes.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Market reviews in Oftel Elaine Axby 31 October 2002.
0 Blending competition and regulation New Dehli, December 5, 2006 Benoit Loutrel, Director, Regulation of fixed and mobile markets Department AUTORITE.
Market Analysis under the New EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications CLA European Conference 2005 Stockholm, October 27-28, 2005 Hogan &
DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES (HAKOM) DO WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY REGULATION? Marina Brkljačić, CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR.
The New EU Directives Oftel Forum 25/04/02 Heather Clayton.
FAQs about the new regulatory framework Lucy Rhodes
European Commission 1 TSM Regulation: Spectrum Briefing on Telecoms Single Market Package Anthony Whelan Head of Unit – Spectrum Electronic Communications.
New EU-Framework for electronic communication Implications for Broadcasting Hans Peter Lehofer, KommAustria 16th EPRA-Meeting Ljubljana.
IRG/ERG Gabrielle Gauthey Member of the Board of ART.
Spectrum authorisation under new EU package Roger Stewart Radiocommunications Agency Head of licensing policy unit.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
This project is funded by the European Union EU regulatory framework for electronic communications - Access Directive Richard Harris Independent EU telecommunications.
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
Erkki Liikanen - Date The Challenges for the Mobile Sector The European Commission’s perspective Pearse O’Donohue European Commission DG INFSO.
SMP and dominance Pál Belényesi Verona 29 November November 2006.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
The New Legislative Framework
Harmonisation in progress: the telecom regulation example Andrzej Chrzanowski Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation URTiP, Poland November 2004.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 4: Regulation in the EU Copyright © 2007.
Michael Schmoeltzer Member of ERGEG Gas Working Group GIE Annual Conference, 6/7 May 2009, Groningen ACER & ENTSOG and their interaction.
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
Evaluation of restrictions: art. 15 and art TAIEX Seminar on the EU Service Directive, 3 May 2007 Carlos Almaraz.
MARKET ANALYSIS IN SERBIA Workshop on EU telecommunications regulation, Belgrade, June Aleksandar Utjesinovic Market Analysis and Cost Accounting.
Bundle Regulation: The CMT’s approach to margin squeeze in bundled offers Workshop on EU telecommunications regulation Iván Santos Esteras Comisión del.
SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF LATVIA THE STRUCTURE OF RECOMMENDATION ON REGULATED ACCESS TO NGA AND THE ROLE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION AS THE FIRST STEP.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
Developments and the regulatory environment in the electronic communications market Rivo Mets.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
Mec887Warwick Business School1 IDATE L’Europe en marche…….. Montpellier, 21 November 2002 “From Deregulation to Consolidation- the case of Europe” Martin.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.
1 Outline Of Regulation In The Telecommunication Sector.
Liberalisation and regulation in the telecommunication sector: Theory and empirical evidence Week 3 The European Regulatory Framework for the Telecommunication.
key regulatory issues in the Republic of Moldova 3rd Meeting of the Benchmarking Expert Working Group (BEWG) February 2017 Ladies.
New competition tool in the European regulation:
Eastern European Partner countries
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Regulation of NGA networks – the EU experience
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
The new European regulatory framework for electronic communications and perspectives 27th january.
The competition enforcement in regulated sectors
Ex ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality
FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Case IT/2005/0260.
The UK Trade Remedies Regime: Review of Existing EU Trade Orders
Presentation transcript:

The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006

Starting point Commission’s Recommendation of February 2003 on the relevant markets in Telecom Commission’s Recommendation of February 2003 on the relevant markets in Telecom In accordance with the Framework Directive In accordance with the Framework Directive These markets are susceptible to ex ante regulation These markets are susceptible to ex ante regulation

How? 18 markets introduced in the Recommendation 18 markets introduced in the Recommendation The analysis must be carried out on the basis of antitrust criteria as indicated in the Guidelines (on SMP assessment, 2002) The analysis must be carried out on the basis of antitrust criteria as indicated in the Guidelines (on SMP assessment, 2002) The analysis must be assessed in a forward-looking basis The analysis must be assessed in a forward-looking basis The analysis must take into account the economical and technical development of the market The analysis must take into account the economical and technical development of the market

Legal background Article 7 of Framework Directive (Consultation Mechanism) Article 7 of Framework Directive (Consultation Mechanism) National Regulatory Authority (NRA) and the Commission together National Regulatory Authority (NRA) and the Commission together On the basis of: On the basis of: Commission’s Recommendation on relevant markets Commission’s Recommendation on relevant markets Guidelines on market analysis Guidelines on market analysis

Principles of the market analysis Consultation procedure both at national and community level Consultation procedure both at national and community level Commission has the final word (Comments letter - No comments letter – Veto) Commission has the final word (Comments letter - No comments letter – Veto) The NRAs have to carry out the analysis on the basis of national circumstances The NRAs have to carry out the analysis on the basis of national circumstances

NRAs „logic of working steps” Define markets according to the principles of Competition Law Define markets according to the principles of Competition Law If found not competitive – SMP designation If found not competitive – SMP designation After the identification of SMP(s) – impose obligations After the identification of SMP(s) – impose obligations Check-up – post-removal of obligations Check-up – post-removal of obligations

What markets?

Retail markets Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential customers. Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential customers. Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for non-residential customers. Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for non-residential customers. Publicly available local and/or national telephone services provided at a fixed location for residential customers. Publicly available local and/or national telephone services provided at a fixed location for residential customers. Publicly available international telephone services provided at a fixed location for residential customers. Publicly available international telephone services provided at a fixed location for residential customers. Publicly available local and/or national telephone services provided at a fixed location for non- residential customers. Publicly available local and/or national telephone services provided at a fixed location for non- residential customers. Publicly available international telephone services provided at a fixed location for non-residential customers. Publicly available international telephone services provided at a fixed location for non-residential customers. The minimum set of leased lines The minimum set of leased lines

Wholesale markets 8. Call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location. 8. Call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location. 9. Call termination on individual public telephone networks at fixed location 9. Call termination on individual public telephone networks at fixed location 10. Transit services in the fixed public telephone network. 10. Transit services in the fixed public telephone network. 11. Wholesale unbundled access to metallic loops and sub-loops 11. Wholesale unbundled access to metallic loops and sub-loops 12. Wholesale broadband access. 12. Wholesale broadband access. 13. Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines. 13. Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines. 14. Wholesale trunk segments of leased lines. 14. Wholesale trunk segments of leased lines. 15. Access and call origination on public mobile telephone networks 15. Access and call origination on public mobile telephone networks 16. Voice call termination on individual mobile networks. 16. Voice call termination on individual mobile networks. 17. National market for international roaming on public mobile networks 17. National market for international roaming on public mobile networks 18. Broadcasting transmission services, to deliver broadcast content to end users 18. Broadcasting transmission services, to deliver broadcast content to end users

Procedure of market analysis I. 1. Market analysis must start with asking operators to provide information. Request for information must be proportionate, motivated, and business secrets must be respected (confidential information); 2. After having carried out the market analysis, NRA shall carry out a national consultation with all operators, which have 30 days to submit comments in the draft measure proposed by the NRA. 3. After this consultation, the draft measure must be submitted to the National Competition Authority, which has 45 days to comment.

Procedure of market analysis II. 4. National consultations over → NRA must submit the draft measure to the Commission and to the other NRAs which have minimum 30 days to comment 5. If Commission finds out that the decision would create a barrier to the single European market or Commission has serious doubts as to the compatibility of the draft measure with Community law, the adoption of the measure must be delayed by a maximum of an additional two months 6. Veto right for the Commission: market definition & SMP identification (Obligations: only comment)

Procedure of market analysis III. 7. In exceptional circumstances, NRAs may act urgently in order to safeguard competition and protect the interest of users. But only: proportionate and provisional measures without consulting either interested parties. The Commission will verify the compatibility of those measures with Community law and in particular will assess their proportionality in relation to the policy objectives of Article 8 of the Framework Directive. 8. If the NRA wishes to make the provisional measures permanent, or extends the time for which it is applicable, the NRA must go through the normal consultation procedure set out above.) 9. Once an NRA's decision has become final, NRAs should notify the Commission of the names of the undertakings that have been designated as having SMP and the obligations imposed on them

Examples of obligations Wholesale markets (Access Directive) Wholesale markets (Access Directive) Transparency Transparency Accounting separation Accounting separation Essential facilities Essential facilities Retail markets (Universal Service Directive) Retail markets (Universal Service Directive) Carrier selection and pre-selection Carrier selection and pre-selection

Statistics (March 2006) Approx. 340 notifications received so far Approx. 340 notifications received so far From 20 Member States From 20 Member States 112 comments letters 112 comments letters 71 no comments letters 71 no comments letters 4 veto decisions 4 veto decisions

Thank you for your attention