CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STUDY OF PM CORRECTION FACTORS IN THE UK Dr Janet Dixon Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK.
Advertisements

Although this monitor is owned and operated by the State of Missouri, significant research was conducted with this technology for fence-line monitoring.
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project 1 The Validation Process I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project AASHTO SSOM -
BAM-1022 Continuous Beta Gauge
Finding That Elusive Pot of Gold or Networking Your Shelter Rebecca Peltzer & Jennifer Bradley, Polk County – Air Quality Steve Drevik, Agilaire.
Presentation to the Air Quality Forum – August 9, 2005 Clark County PM 10 Saturation Study Robert A. Baxter, CCM T & B Systems, Inc.
Regression Analysis. Unscheduled Maintenance Issue: l 36 flight squadrons l Each experiences unscheduled maintenance actions (UMAs) l UMAs costs $1000.
Working together for clean air Approved Regional Method (ARM) Demonstration Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Mike Gilroy, Erik Saganic Puget Sound Clean Air.
ADVANCES IN MONITORING METHODS FOR AIRBORNE PARTICLES Philip K. Hopke Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY USA.
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Working Together for Clean Air PM 2.5 Continuous Methods Lynnwood, Washington Site.
1 Guest Speaker: Bill Frietsche US EPA.  April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control.
Introduction to Thermo Electron Instruments Robert Kinsella Sky Patton Thermo Electron.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
Clean Air Markets Program Data
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
Clark County PM 10 Saturation Study Robert A. Baxter, CCM T&B Systems Clark County Air Quality Forum – 03/14/06.
Air Quality Surveillance Branch Air Monitoring Operations l Manual and Non-criteria Samplers » Reggie Smith » Special Purpose Monitoring & Data Support.
Introduction to BGI Instruments
Met One BAM-1020 Operation Key Points
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
Continuous Particulate Training Workshop
Introduction to Standard Reports. Standard Reports 2 How to get information out of AQS Standard Reports Site / Monitor Metadata Detail Data Reports “
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
CAMD PROGRAM UPDATE NACAA/EPA Ambient Air Monitoring Steering Committee Clean Air Markets Division, OAP June
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Continuous Particulate Monitoring Using Light Scatter Photometers.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
900-LC P. van Poppel – Field Support Specialist October 2009.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
Quality Control/ Quality Assurance Annabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
Quality Control – Part II Tim Hanley EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
1 Dec. 11, 1997 LEADS Quality Control Systems Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
Essential Statistics Chapter 51 Least Squares Regression Line u Regression line equation: y = a + bx ^ –x is the value of the explanatory variable –“y-hat”
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.
Measurement Quality Objectives = Data Validation Requirements Excerpted from EPA QA Handbook Volume II (aka “Redbook”)
2025 Partisol Sequential Sampler Deborah Bowe Thermo Electron Corporation.
1 Forecasting/ Causal Model MGS Forecasting Quantitative Causal Model Trend Time series Stationary Trend Trend + Seasonality Qualitative Expert.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Multiple Regression Analysis Regression analysis with two or more independent variables. Leads to an improvement.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Module 11 Module I: Terminology— Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP Catherine Brown U.S. EPA.
PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION
California Ambient Dioxin Air Monitoring Program (CADAMP) Kathy Gill Air Resources Board Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Environmental Protection.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
Implementation of Exceptional and Natural Events Policies and Rules in Arizona Ira Domsky, Deputy Director February 25, 2009.
Ozone and Lead Monitoring Issues Under Revised NAAQS Monitoring Steering Committee June 21-22, 2007 Washington, DC Phil Lorang, OAQPS.
In-Situ Filter Testing
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Continuous PM2.5 Monitoring
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Correcting TEOM Measurements using the KCL Volatile Correction Model
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board

Continuous PM2.5 Monitor Network ARB Ambient Air Monitoring Sites –13 Sites with BAM-1020 Monitors (17 units) –3 Special Purpose Sites (6 units) –61 total samplers 4 Collocated BAM-1020 Sites 9 Sites with FRM and BAM

Standard CARB BAM Configuration PM 10 Sampling Inlet (BX-802) Sharp Cut Cyclone (BX-807) Smart Heater Met Translator Option (BX-964) Firmware v2.58 Gast Rotary Pump (BX-121) Volumetric Flow Control

Data Analysis SLOPE: Indicator of the bias of the BAM compared to the FRM INTERCEPT: Offset between the BAM and FRM r 2: Correlation coefficient of the linear regression between the two instruments

BAM-1020 Accuracy

BAM-1020 Precision

Network Summary Overall BAM Network Performance –All BAM/FRM data regressed as one data set –Slope of –Intercept of 3.07 –r 2 of 0.940

BAM Maintenance Bi-Weekly Leak and Flow Checks are absolutely necessary to ensure proper operation Failed leak and flow checks are associated with poor FRM correlation in ARB’s experience Adhere to AQSB SOP 400 (BAM Standard Operating Procedures)

CARB Zero Test Sample Zero air using BX-302 HEPA Filter 76 consecutive hours (First 4 hours removed) Background set to Min/Max Zero test range of 14 ug/m 3 No value exceeding 20 ug/m 3 Any errors during test, re-run test Field zero test annually (24 hour test)

BAM Datalogger Review Review of the internal datalogger is important Reveals offsets between the BAM and the external data acquisition system Review of Q tot (total volume sampled) hourly values helps detect flow problems Detailed error codes are stored in the internal datalogger data

Conclusions The BAM-1020 Monitor is well-suited for PM-AQI, Prescribed Fire and Ag-Burn Forecasting, diurnal profiling, quantifying short term events, and characterizing atmospheric dynamics Is it good enough for regulatory determinations?

Next Steps Evaluate data using U.S. EPA’s Criteria Designation of Equivalence Methods for Continuous Surveillance of PM 2.5 Determine how good is good? –Slope: /- 5% –Intercept: 3 ug –Correlation: r 2 =.940 (r =.97)

Summary Contact Information –Voice: (916) – CARB BAM Website –