Central Arkansas Veterans Home (CAVH) Business Plan Decision Brief 23 Sep 15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Area 4: Participant Services, Financial
Advertisements

The Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Recommended Budget, Fiscal Year
Medicaid and Meaningful Use – The “Other” EHR Incentive Program: What Hospital Leaders Should Know About the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Wisconsin Hospital.
1 Regulation of Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities Legislative Audit Bureau February 2003.
1 Wisconsin Veterans Homes Legislative Audit Bureau March 2011.
Redirection of 1991 Realignment Los Angeles County.
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
New York State Workforce Investment Board Healthcare Workforce Development Subcommittee Planning Grant Overview.
FLORIDA MATERNAL, INFANT & EARLY CHILDHOOD HOME VISITING INITIATIVE florida association of healthy start coalitions, inc.
South Carolina Hospital Association HITECH Stimulus Calculator These worksheets have been forwarded to South Carolina hospital CFOs. They provide hospital-
Classification: Unclassified DECISION BRIEF. Classification: Unclassified Parts of the Decision Brief Purpose Problem Statement Recommendation Prior Coordination.
Determination of Construction Contract Duration for Public Projects in Saudi Arabia By: Ahmed Saleh Al-Sultan, June 1989 Presented by Sameh Elish January.
Roy Cales, NSI (850) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Technology.
[Local] Workforce Investment Board New Member Orientation.
New Staff Orientation 1 CMS Role of the State Agency Role of the Surveyor Stephanie Senior, RN Branch Manager, Survey Region 2. New York.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Real Estate Principles and Practices Chapter 15 Property Management © 2014 OnCourse Learning.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 37 Long-Term Care.
VISIONING SESSION May 29, NWD Planning Grant  One year planning grant, started October 1, 2014; draft plan by September 30, 2015; final plan by.
PROBLEM SOLVING. PURPOSE Why are you giving the Decision Brief?
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
AWPHD Legislative Summary House Bill 1196: Increasing the dollar limit for small works roster projects House Bill 1847: Increases bid limits for public.
Office of Small Business Utilization U.S. General Services Administration GSA Mentor-Protégé Program Anthony “Tony” Eiland Program Manager.
Budget Update January 15, Budget Calendar TEN YEAR ANALYSIS General Fund.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION FUND 2011 Updates February 1, 2011.
Arkansas Association of Area Agencies on Aging Presentation to Legislative Health Reform Task Force AUGUST 19-20,
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
February 2015 Ohio State Budget and Federal Long Term Care Update Kenneth Daily, LNHA
The Staff Study Individual Requirement Introduction and Overview.
Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act Acquisition of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping.
PERT Overview Federal Perspective Annual PERT Workshop February 7-9, 2012 Nevada Site Office Evelyn Landini, Contracting Officer Brookhaven Site Office.
NC Water Resources Congress Annual Meeting Raleigh, NC October 30, 2014 State Water Infrastructure Update: The State of NC and Water, Wastewater and Stormwater.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) Health Information Technology: State EHR Adoption Loan Program The adoption of health information.
Talbot County Project Sunburst Talbot County Department of Parks & Recreation Private/Public Partnership July 12,
Agency for Persons with Disabilities Overview House Healthy Families Subcommittee January 16, 2013 Barbara Palmer Director Rick Scott Governor.
4733 Bethesda Ave, Suite 600 Bethesda, MD (P) Developing Criteria for Project Programming.
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) 2004 Renewal Competition.
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Medicaid In The Schools (MITS) National Picture of School-Based Medicaid Programs January 2008.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
Local Governance & Sectors Subcommittee Regions recommendation.
Kelly Andrisano, JD, PACAH Executive Director November 5, 2015.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
Coordinating Nonpublic School Services Jack Clark Allentown City School District Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator, DFP.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Chapter 257 of the Acts of 2008 Congregate Housing Services Coordination Provider.
MHSA Revised Fiscal Policies California Department of Mental Health Carol Hood January 17, 2008.
ARIZONA HEALTHCARE FORUM JULY 21-22, 2011 PHOENIX, AZ RURAL HEALTH CLINICS 101.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
Review of Fiscal Law December 18, 2002 DRAFT. Change Management Center 22 DRAFT Overview  Purpose & Objective  Challenges  Assertions  Partnership.
Diverse Business Program Presented By: Dwan Lee – PennDOT Bureau of Equal Opportunity Anthony Stever – PennDOT Bureau of Public Transportation Kenyon Holley.
Youth & Family Services Modifications to Foster Care Services at Great Oaks Village May 24,2011.
1 Hearing to Discuss the Potential Interplay and Effect of the Money Available to States’ Low- Income Weatherization Programs under the American Recovery.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES Construction Services October 28, 2013.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Solicitation VA69D-16-R-0583 Rehab Renovation Pre-Proposal Conference June 22, :00am CDT NCO 12 Great Lakes Acquisition Center.
Decision Brief By: C/CPT. Purpose To inform my Army JROTC SAI of my post graduation plans.
Authorization to Enter Into Contract with Four Consultants for General Plan Implementation Services City Council February 6, 2017.
Introduction to Title I
Introduction to Title I
HOME Underwriting and Subsidy Layering Training
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
Header Title 2/23/2019.
Eagle Leadership Development Program
Debbie Henderson, Program Administrator
Presentation transcript:

Central Arkansas Veterans Home (CAVH) Business Plan Decision Brief 23 Sep 15

Purpose To gain your decision on the business plan for the new Central Arkansas Veterans Home (CAVH).

Problem Statement To determine the best business plan that will provide sustainable high-quality care for our Veterans at the Central Arkansas Veterans Home no later than 2 nd QTR, FY 2017.

Recommendation COA1 – Hybrid with state administration and direct care.

Key: COA1 = Hybrid with state administration and direct care. COA2 = Hybrid with state administration. COA3 = Contract. *Assumption: Results with a COA1 may support COA2 as well. Prior Coordination (1 of 3)

Organization/SME Results Veterans CommissionCOA3* OLTCCOA1 American Legion RepCOA1* Arkansas Advocates for Nursing Home ResidentsCOA1 LouisianaCOA1 MissouriCOA1 MississippiCOA1 OklahomaCOA1 TennesseeCOA1 TexasCOA3* AlabamaCOA3 AlaskaCOA1 Prior Coordination (2 of 3)

Organization/SME Results CaliforniaCOA1 ColoradoCOA1 DelawareCOA1 Florida COA1 GeorgiaCOA3 IdahoCOA1 IowaCOA1 KansasCOA1 KentuckyCOA1* North DakotaCOA1* OregonCOA3* UtahCOA3 National Association of State Veterans HomesInfo Only Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Info Only Prior Coordination (3 of 3)

Outline Background Facts & Assumptions Discussion -Courses of Action -Screening Criteria -Surviving COAs -Evaluation Criteria -Analysis of COAs -Comparison of COA Conclusion Restated Recommendation Decision

Background A.C.A § : -ADVA authorized by statute to establish and maintain Veterans homes. -The home shall be operated under the supervision of the department. Former Little Rock home closed amid controversy in , small-house style “Green House” design selected. January 2014, a new site was selected in North Little Rock. July 2014, ADVA contracted with a design professional. February 2015, ADVA contracted with a general contractor. Construction began June CAVH will be operationally ready in 2 nd QTR, FY The Green House/Eden approach shall embody the following values: -Meaningful life for Veterans and their dependents -Empowered staff -Real home environment

Key Facts & Assumptions (F) Small-house design is more inefficient than a traditional facility. (F) “Universal” worker is key to gaining efficiencies. (F) Three of 152 state veterans homes are small-house design. (F) One percent of all nursing facilities are small-house design. (A) Industry has little depth operating small-house model. (F) ADVA submitted an RFI to 18 vendors; three responded. (A) Vendors are hesitant to bid on small-house model. (A) Quality vendors will bid on any COA. (F) CAVH capacity is 96 residents (8 cottages X 12 residents each). (A) Certification in order to receive federal reimbursement at least 6 months. (F) ADVA will require start-up funds for first X-X months of operations. (A) Long-term CAVH will operate like AVHF, self-sustaining. (A) Quality care can be achieved through either public, private or hybrid operated home.

Courses of Action COA1 (Hybrid with state administration and direct care) COA2 (Hybrid with state administration) COA3 (“Turn-Key” Contract) COA4 (100% State Operated)

Screening Criteria Must meet minimum OLTC & VA standards of care. Must adhere to state procurement laws. Must be able to execute plan within established timeline. Must be fiscally responsible and sustainable.

Surviving Courses of Action COA1 (Hybrid with state administration and direct care) COA2 (Hybrid with state administration) COA3 (“Turn-Key” Contract) COA4 (100% State Operated)

Evaluation Criteria (1 of 5) Short Title: Care Definition: According to the Green House Model, care is achieved through long-term relationships between Veterans and “Universal workers” (CNA staff). Unit of Measure: Turnover rate (%). Benchmark: 27.3% Formula: Lower is better. Weight 5

Evaluation Criteria (2 of 5) Short Title: Reinvestment Definition: Maximum amount of potential retained earnings. Unit of Measure: Dollars Benchmark: $459, Formula: More is better. Weight 4

Evaluation Criteria (3 of 5) Short Title: Public-Private Partnerships Definition: Maximize Veteran services by leveraging public-private partnerships. Unit of Measure: Percentage Benchmark: 54% Formula: More is better. Weight 3

Evaluation Criteria (4 of 5) Short Title: Responsiveness Definition: The ability of ADVA to correct deficiencies and make value-added adjustments. Unit of Measure: Time Benchmark: days Formula: Less time is better. Weight 3

Evaluation Criteria (5 of 5) Short Title: Execution Definition: Ability to mitigate delays in order to execute business plan in established timeframe. Unit of Measure: Yes/No Benchmark: Yes Formula: Yes is better. Weight 1

Analysis of COA 1 “Hybrid with state administration and direct care” Advantages Care: 16% turnover Reinvestment: $919, Responsiveness: days Execution: 2 nd place Disadvantages Public-Private Partnerships: 12% private sector

Analysis of COA 2 “Hybrid with state administration” Advantages Public-Private Partnerships: 59% private sector Responsiveness: days Execution: 1 st place Disadvantages Care: 24% turnover Reinvestment: $459,500.00

Analysis of COA 3 “Turn-Key Contract” Advantages Public-Private Partnerships: 74% private sector Disadvantages Care: 52% turnover Responsiveness: days Reinvestment: $0.00 Execution: 3 rd place

Comparison of COAs Care (%)COA1 (16%) < COA2 (24%) < COA3 (52%) WT: 5 Reinvestment ($)COA1 ($919,000.00) > (COA2 ($459,500.00) > COA3 ($0.00) WT: 4 Public-Private Partnerships (%)COA3 (74%) > COA2 (59%) > COA1 (12%) WT: 3 Responsiveness (Days)COA1 (35.70 days) < COA2 (35.75 days) < COA3 (35.79 days) WT: 3 Execution (Yes)COA2 (1 st place) > COA1 (2 nd place) > COA3 (3 rd place) WT: 1

Conclusion COA 1 is the best because: Advantage: Care - Lowest turnover rate. Advantage: Reinvestment - Highest potential for reinvestment of funds into Veteran long-term care. Advantage: Responsiveness – Shortest time to correct deficiencies. Advantage: Execution - Institutional experience in execution of COA. However, Disadvantage: Public-Private Partnerships - Lower % of operations achieved through public-private partnerships.

Recommendation COA1 – Hybrid with state administration and direct care.

Guidance