MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
Do Now: Decide if the following activities are allowable with TIIA funds Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 Activity Revising.
District Determined Measures
Paul Toner, MTA, President Heather Peske, ESE, Associate Commissioner for Ed Quality Teachers Union Reform Network Conference November 1, 2013 Massachusetts.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 1 Welcome!  Please complete the four “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Model Curriculum Units: An Opportunity for Initiative Alignment ESE Fall Curriculum Summit Karen P. White, Sarah Churchill Silberman October 27 and 28,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs What is a DDM? Think of a DDM as an assessment tool similar to MCAS. It is a measure of student learning, growth,
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Unpacking the Educator Evaluation System Non-Professional Status Teachers entering the Evaluation System.
District Determined Measures
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
A Collaborative Approach to Planning for DDM’s Kristan Rodriguez, Ph.D Chelmsford Public Schools.
20 Years Later M.A.S.S. Executive Institute Mitchell D. Chester, Commissioner July 18, 2014.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Title IIA: Connecting Professional Development with Educator Evaluation June 1, 2015 Craig Waterman.
ORIGINAL SMART GOAL FORM Smart Goal Setting Form Name: School: Shared: Primary Evaluator (Name/Title): A minimum of one student learning goal and one professional.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Friday, January 10, :00-3:30 p.m.
The New MA Educator Evaluation Framework: District-Determined Measures and Student and Staff Feedback ASE June Statewide Conference June 10, 2013 Ron Noble.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Dr. Deborah A. Brady Ribas Associates, Inc.. First Hour  Overview of District Determined Measures  The Timeline  Quality Assessments  Tools from DESe.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
North Reading Public Schools Educator Evaluation and District Determined Measures: Laying the Foundation Patrick Daly, Ed.D North Reading Public Schools.
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
DDMs for School Counselors RTTT Final Summit April 7, 2014 Craig Waterman & Kate Ducharme.
Waiting Room  Today’s webinar will begin shortly. REMINDERS: Dial and enter the passcode # to hear the audio portion of the presentation.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
District-Determined Measures Planning and Organizing for Success Educator Evaluation Spring Convening: May 29, 2013.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
Special Educator Evaluation Matt Holloway Educator Effectiveness Specialist.
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Next Steps Prepared by the MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice January 2012.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Getting Started: Educator Evaluation in Non-RTTT Districts.
2013 MASS Executive Institute. More Than a Decade of Progress: Grade 10 MCAS % proficient or higher 2.
PARCC AND MCAS FAQ FOR ADMINISTRATORS AND EDUCATORS Will Massachusetts use PARCC or MCAS in spring 2016? To evaluate PARCC’s quality, rigor,
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Anne DeMallie, MMSP Coordinator December 8, :30.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 11  What role will student feedback play in your district next year?
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
District-Determined Measures November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Waiting Room Today’s webinar will begin shortly. REMINDERS:
Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations
Presentation transcript:

MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education The Educator Evaluation Framework Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory High Moderate Low Summative Performance Rating Student Impact Rating  Everyone earns two ratings 2

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 3 Two Ratings Summative Rating UnsatisfactoryImprovement Plan Needs Improvement Directed Growth Plan Exemplary Self-Directed Growth Plan Proficient 1-yr Self-Directed Growth Plan 2-yr Self-Directed Growth Plan LowModerateHigh Rating of Impact on Student Learning

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 4 Student Impact Rating  Evaluators must assign a rating based on trends (at least 2 years) and patterns (at least 2 measures)  Options:  Statewide growth measure(s) must be used, where available  District-determined Measure(s) of student learning comparable across grade or subject district-wide.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 5 Student Impact Rating – 2 examples YearMeasureStudent Results Year 1MCAS SGP, grade 8 English language artsLow growth Year 1Writing assessmentModerate growth Year 2MCAS SGP, grade 8 English language artsModerate growth Year 2Portfolio assessmentModerate growth YearMeasureStudent Results Year 1MCAS SGP, grade 8 English language artsHigh growth Year 1Writing assessmentModerate growth Year 2MCAS SGP, grade 8 English language artsHigh growth Year 2Writing assessmentModerate growth Year 2Portfolio assessmentModerate growth

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 6 Definition “Measures of student learning, growth, and achievement related to the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks, Massachusetts Vocational Technical Education Frameworks, or other relevant frameworks, that are comparable across grade or subject level district-wide. These measures may include, but shall not be limited to: portfolios, approved commercial assessments and district-developed pre and post unit and course assessments, and capstone projects.” 603 CMR  Student Measures  Aligned to Frameworks  Comparable Across District  Expansive Definition of Acceptable Measures

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 7 SY DDM Milestones DateAction September 2013 Example DDMs released: All districts and RTTT charter schools submit list of DDMs to pilot during the year. Template available here: Sept – June 2014 All districts and RTTT charter schools pilot DDMs June 2014 All districts and RTTT charter schools submit final plans, including any extension requests, for implementing DDMs during the school year*. *ESE will release the June 2014 submission template and DDM implementation extension request form in December

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 8 DDM Implementation Timeline  August 15 th – Commissioner’s Memorandum  Extension requests will be coupled with June 2014 submissions  One-year extension of DDM implementation for particular grade(s)/subject(s) or course(s) for which the district has not yet identified DDMs.  Blanket extensions will not be granted.  Use judiciously - not all districts will need an extension  Not a pause button.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 9 DDM Key Questions  Is the measure aligned to content?  Does it assess what the educators intend to teach and what’s most important for students to learn?  Is the measure informative?  Do the results tell educators whether students are making the desired progress, falling short, or excelling?  Do the results provide valuable information to schools and districts about their educators?

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 10 Refining your Pilot DDMs  Districts will employ a variety of approaches to identify pilot DDMs (e.g., build, borrow, buy).  Key considerations: 1.How well does the assessment measure growth? 2.Is there a common administration protocol? 3.Is there a common scoring process? 4.How do results correspond to low, moderate, of high growth? 5.Is the assessment comparable to other DDMs?  Use the DDM Key Questions and these considerations to strengthen your assessments during the pilot year.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 11 Resources Available Now:  Technical Guide B  DDMs and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series  Technical Assistance and Networking Sessions  Core Course Objectives and Example DDMs Coming Soon  Model Contract Language  DDM Pilot Plan Cohorts  Using Current Assessments Guidance (Curriculum Summit)

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 12 Example Assessments  150 assessments that provide over 800 options for different grades/subjects and courses.  More complete open source assessments coming!  We need your help! Please submit:  Assessment directions, materials, items and prompts  Scoring resources (rubrics, answer keys)  Other information (steps for administration, lesson plans, examples of how results are used)  To submit your examples, complete the survey and upload your materials at  WestEd's DDM submission help line at (415) (10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. EST.) 12

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 13 Example Assessments  Key features of each option are described in a one-page summary.  Each one-pager includes a link for additional information.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 14 Ongoing Work with WestEd 1.Continued collection and evaluation of locally- developed assessments. 2.Evaluation of all collected assessments for additional grade/subject and course coverage, specifically to expand the collection of Example DDMs in the minimum pilot areas. 3.Analyze new information submitted by assessment developers and make appropriate revisions to one- page summaries. 4.Execute a scope of work that will yield Example DDMs in the CVTE program areas

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 15 Using Current Assessments  Presentation  Guidance Document: Using Current Assessments in DDMs  Curriculum Summit November 6 th and 7 th  Content  Three steps for bringing together multiple assessments from across the year to measure growth  Two concrete examples of this process using the Curriculum Embedded Performance Assessments (CEPAs) from the Model Curriculum Units (MCUs)

Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 16 DDMs: 4 Key Messages 1.DDMs are part of a multidimensional framework.  Decisions about an educator’s impact or effectiveness will never be based of the results of a single DDM. 2.Focus is on students, not just educators  DDMs must yield information that will be useful to educators in improving student outcomes. 3.This is about building capacity.  DDMs provide districts a good reason to consider ways to refine and improve existing assessment practices. 4.Teachers have the necessary skills to lead the process of identifying DDMs – You can do this!  Many districts will have success leveraging teacher- developed assessments to develop DDMs.