Environment Canada’s Intervention on the Mary River Project Water Licence Application Nunavut Water Board Final Hearing Pond Inlet, NU Mark Dahl / Anne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Advertisements

Environment Canada Presentation to Nunavut Impact Review Board Regarding Baffinland Mary River Project NIRB Prehearing Conference Pond Inlet and Igloolik,
LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
Ministry of Environment Environmental Protection Division Presentation to CRD Sewage Forum, Sept. 26, 2005 Sewage is regulated in British Columbia by the.
CHEE 370 Waste Treatment Processes
Environment Environnement Canada Environment Canada’s Intervention Presentation Cumberland Resources Ltd.’s Meadowbank Gold Mine Final Public Hearing March.
Environment Canada’s Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Regarding AREVA Resources Canada Inc.’s Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project NIRB.
By Hung Nguyen Lime Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage at Leviathan Mine, California.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
HATCH ACRES MEADOWBANK GOLD PROJECT REVIEW OF CUMBERLAND’S FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) Submission to Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB)
Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Baker Lake, NU March 2-14,
Mary River Project Pre-Hearing Conference Presentation Igloolik, and Pond Inlet, Nunavut November 6-7 and 9-10, 2011.
Type ‘A’ Water Licence Application Department of Community and Government Services, Government of Nunavut Sewage Treatment and Water Supply Hamlet of Rankin.
Geochemistry and Water Quality Volume III: Seepage and Water Quality for Recliamed Tailings Containment Area – Lupin Operation Presentation to; The Nunavut.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Introduction: We will start with an overview of treatment processes 1) Why do we treat water and wastewater? The main objectives of the conventional wastewater.
Water Quality.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT of RIVER WATER QUALITY.
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
Freshwater Aquatic Organisms and Habitat ( ) Rick Palmer Senior Fisheries Biologist Sharleen Hamm Aquatic Ecologist.
Environment Canada’s Intervention on the Doris North Gold Project Water Licence Application Savanna Levenson/ Dave Fox / Anne Wilson Environmental Protection.
Jericho Aquatic Discharge Assessment Presented by: Bruce Ott, Senior Environmental Scientist, AMEC Earth & Environmental.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Brock Tabor Nancy Sonafrank Alaska Forum on the Environment 2013.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Type A Water License Renewal for the Nanisivik Mine Project Fisheries and Oceans.
THE DORIS NORTH WATER LICENSE APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut August 2007.
Presentation to Final Hearing Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation Mary River Project Type A Water Licence Application Nunavut Water Board Final Hearing Pond.
Integrated Constructed Wetlands Regulatory Aspects - the EPA’s role Aoife Loughnane Inspector, Environmental Licensing Programme Environmental Protection.
Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group Meeting Fisheries and Oceans Canada October 26 th to 28 th, 2010 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fish Habitat Management Program Intervention to the Nunavut Water Board on the Doris North Gold Project Cambridge Bay August.
COMPLIANCE 2008  Discharge Approvals  Inspections  Sampling Data  Annual Compliance letters.
Environment Canada’s Mandate and Role in the Mary River Project Review Water Board Community Meetings - Baffinland Pond Inlet, NU Mark Dahl / Anne Wilson.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
Toward the development of northern water standards presentation to the MVLWB December 5, 2007 Kathleen Racher Water Resources Division.
Pollution and Monitoring
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
July 2013 Environmental Update for SLEMA Board July 2013 Environmental Update for SLEMA Board Zhong Liu July 31, 2013.
Review of Interventions ____________ CanZinco Ltd.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
Miramar Hope Bay Ltd. Doris North Project Nunavut Water Board Licence Application Indian and Northern Affairs Presentation NWB Final Hearing Cambridge.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
Strategies to manage human activity in deserts 11.
Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing Rankin Inlet, Nunavut May 18-19, 2010 Water License #3BM-GRA----, Government of Nunavut, Dept. of Community and Government.
P.O. Box 18 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut X0B 0C0 Telephone: Fax: Kitikmeot Inuit Association Summary of Technical Issues.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
Review of Meadowbank Water License Application: Public Hearing
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Good afternoon __________ Chair, and members of the Board.
Baker Lake, Nunavut Anne Wilson, Environment Canada January 14, 2015
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
Alexander Petrovich Dalimayev,
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Meadowbank Water License Renewal
2.1 Monitoring Water Quality
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Freshwater Environment
Water Quality What is water quality?
WHALE TAIL PIT Expansion Project
WHALE TAIL PIT Expansion Project
Regional Environmental Health Specialist
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

Environment Canada’s Intervention on the Mary River Project Water Licence Application Nunavut Water Board Final Hearing Pond Inlet, NU Mark Dahl / Anne Wilson Environmental Protection Operations April 23 – 25, 2013

Page 2 Overview Mandate Water Quality Waste Management Closure and Reclamation Water Licence Term Conclusion

Page 3 EC’s Mandate Department of the Environment Act Fisheries Act -Pollution Prevention Provisions -Metal Mining Effluent Regulations; Canadian Environmental Protection Act Canada-Wide Standards for Mercury Emissions Canada-Wide Standards for Dioxins and Furans

Page 4 Water Quality

Page 5 Water Quality Discharge Limits - Sewage Baffinland’s Perspective : -Allow for operational variation and assimilative capacity -Type B licence criteria adequate for marine discharges -Criteria in Type A application are protective -Monitoring will detect impacts and allow management -Regulatory limits will be met at the end of pipe for Mary River -Dilution effect will ensure guidelines are met at Sheardown Lake

Page 6 Water Quality Discharge Limits - Sewage (cont.) EC’s Perspective: -Discharges must be non-deleterious -Avoid eutrophication of Sheardown Lake -Change in trophic status signals a large effect -Early detection of impacts is critical -Compliance with the Fisheries Act is mandatory

Page 7 Water Quality Discharge Limits - Sewage (cont.) EC’s Recommendations: a.Consider EC’s conclusions above when setting wastewater quality criteria b.Require source control of phosphorus c.Monitoring of appropriate environmental indicators to detect and prevent adverse changes to Sheardown Lake

Page 8 Water Quality Discharge Limits - Oily Water Wastewater Facility Baffinland’s Perspective: -Sporadic and infrequent discharge -Effluent will be treated and then combined with treated sewage EC’s Recommendation: -Oily water effluent should meet concentrations proposed in Table F-2 of the draft water licence prior to blending

Page 9 Water Quality Nutrients Baffinland’s Perspective: -Lakes are nutrient poor -Lakes are sensitive to nutrient inputs -Effluent will be treated -Monitoring used to detect impacts -Adaptive management applied to correct issues EC’s Perspective: -Phosphorus will increase in Sheardown Lake and Mary River -Eutrophication may result -May cause decline in winter oxygen concentration

Page 10 Water Quality Nutrients EC recommends that the water licence include: a.water quality objectives that are protective of the receiving environment for nutrients, with identified thresholds for action b.biological productivity monitoring during the open water season c.regular under-ice monitoring of dissolved oxygen concentrations in Sheardown Lake d.contingency plans to address any trend toward decreasing dissolved oxygen concentrations

Page 11 Baffinland’s Perspective: -Will meet the requirements of the Fisheries Act -Table F-1 criteria will be met EC’s Perspective -Effective monitoring will be required at Milne and Steensby Inlets EC recommends the Water Board a.Require monitoring at Milne Inlet b.Recommend monitoring at Steensby Inlet Water Quality Discharge Limits - Marine

Page 12 Baffinland’s Perspective: -Metal Mining Effluent Regulations (MMER) apply -Will monitor to ensure meet MMER criteria (Table F-6) Water Quality Discharge Limits - Mine Contact Water

Page 13 EC’s Perspective -Effects evaluation based on contaminant concentrations that were much lower than MMER -Discharging at MMER may result in exceedence of water quality objectives in Camp lake Tributary and Mary River -Need to be protective of Northern ecosystem -Early warning thresholds and actions should be identified Water Quality Discharge Limits - Mine Contact Water (cont.)

Page 14 Water Quality Discharge Limits - Mine Contact Water (cont.) ParameterMonthly AverageMaximum Grab pHBetween 6.0 – 9.0 Ammonia (as N)4.0 mg/L8.0 mg/L NitrateTo be determined Arsenic mg/L Copper mg/L Lead mg/L Nickel mg/L Zinc mg/L TSS15 mg/L30 mg/L Oil and Grease / TEH* No visible sheen / 5 mg/L *Total Extractable Hydrocarbons EC’s Recommendations: a.Discharge limits for mine contact water from East Pond, West Pond, pit and ore stockpiles as follows:

Page 15 Water Quality Discharge Limits - Mine Contact Water (cont.) EC’s Recommendations: b.Water quality objectives for pH, ammonia, nitrate, sulphate, chloride and total metals be maintained in the reaches of Camp Lake Tributary below the falls (i.e. where the stream is inhabited by fishes) and in Mary River; c.Water quality objectives be set for ammonia, nitrate, sulphate and major ions.

Page 16 Water Quality Closure - Open Pit Baffinland’s Perspective: -Pit water quality predictions will be updated as information becomes available -Closure Plan - mitigations, monitoring and treatment -Treatment options available -Do not anticipate treatment will be required years to fill -Discharge will meet MMER -Ongoing monitoring and management

Page 17 Water Quality Closure - Open Pit (cont.) EC’s Perspective: - time required to fill makes future water quality uncertain -Accelerated filling options should be examined -Objectives should be developed based on Table (FEIS Volume 7)

Page 18 Water Quality Closure - Open Pit (cont.) EC recommends that the Water Board: a.Require exploration of alternative pit filling options, weighing environmental costs and benefits b.Require a monitoring plan that includes a full list of parameters and proposed frequency/duration c.Include a requirement for objectives for pit water quality at closure which would be protective of aquatic life

Page 19 Water Licence Term Baffinland’s Perspective: -a 25 year term is appropriate EC’s Perspective: -Typical licence is 10 years or less -Renewal allows re-examination of conditions and verification of environmental assessment predictions. EC recommends that the term of the water licence be in the range of 10 to 12 years

Page 20 THANK YOU