FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pamela Norris Project Manager Kraft Kennedy & Lesser, Inc.
Advertisements

ETFMS - SYSTEM OVERVIEW
Draft Concept of Operations (CONOPS) for CS#1- FAS Centralised service on Flight Plan and Airport Slot Consistency (FAS) Matthis Birenheide Project Manager.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Transition & Roll-Over Period Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements,
Data-link Elements and Role of Stakeholders – Reflections of an ANSP
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
Part 4. ATC clearances and instructions
Doc.: IEEE /024 Submission January 2001 Jim Carlo, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Patents and IEEE 802 Stds IEEE 802 Chair’s Viewpoint Jim Carlo General.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office Outcome of the ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June – 1 July 2010.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Accounting Information Systems, 9/e, Romney/Steinbart 18-1 Accounting Information Systems 9 th Edition Marshall.
AIDC safety benefits & limitations AIDC Implementation Seminar 28 th – 31 st October 2014 Adam Watkin Airservices Australia.
Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Internal models Gareth Truran Head of Department, London Markets.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Gulf of Mexico 50 NM Lateral Separation – RNAV Routes Project Project Overview ATO Oceanic & Offshore.
Objective FCM03 ESSIP Plan 2014 Octavian CIOARA DPS/PEPR
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June.
FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Testing Report.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-25/PIA-2 Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through.
PDI TRAINING SESSION: Risk Management Registration for International Travel You will need a CSU EID.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
Why Flight Plan and ATFCM adherence?
© FREQUENTIS 2010 Datum: Rev.1 Autor: ODOSeite: 1 FPL 2012 Kym Shenton Senior Technical Engineer/Safety Engineer Frequentis California, Inc.
ICAO Flight Plan 2012 Workshop ARE YOU READY? Durban 24 August 2012.
Common Issues, Work Arounds, Fun Facts to Know and Tell September 2007.
Welcome to the SARS Tax Workshop The purpose of this presentation is merely to provide information in an easily understandable format and is intended to.
ICAO Changes to the Present Flight Plan Form Amendment 1 to the PANS-ATM Fifteenth Edition (PANS-ATM, Doc 4444) Tom Brady ICAO HQ.
MRAM. June 12th,  Last time: Discussed purpose for GIM1 Listed Proposal types to which we apply Review Criteria Covered Criteria in detail  Today:
PRJ505 Communications Management. Communication Management Processes: –Planning –Information Distribution –Performance Reporting –Stakeholder Management.
IEEE-SA Public Review IEEE/PES PE/SPDC Committee San Diego, CA May 2015.
Vendors Conference Prestwick 2011 Customer Picture Implementation of Changes to ICAO FPL 2012 Christoph Kunze Lufthansa Systems 7th December 2011.
Successful Invoicing Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis.
GGUS at PEB – –- page 1 LCG Klaus-Peter Mickel, GridKa Karlsruhe LCG-PEB-Meeting ( ) The Global Grid User Support Model (Report of GDB.
ICC © Ifield Computer Consultancy Limited 2013 Ifield Computer Consultancy Limited Presentation to Directorate General of Civil Aviation of Kuwait And.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board August 22, 2008.
© 2011 LAIC Aktiengesellschaft © Ifield Computer Consultancy Limited 2013 ATRAK-AISS Aeronautical Information System Services.
Doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Submission Nov 2005 Jon Edney, NokiaSlide 1 The Lock-out Problem - an Analysis Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
LG DATABASE AND REPORTING SYSTEM (LGDRS) 8-9 September 2015
1 WG-MISD Release of Radioactive Material (RRM) Work Stream Colin Hord, UK CAA Nigel Gait UK Met Office.
EUR Flight Planning Guidance
CERTIFICATE IV IN BUSINESS JULY 2015 BSBWRT401A - Write Complex Documents.
CPS Update Teri Hunt. ISIR Datamart  ISIR Datamart will be implemented on Jan. 2, 2004  Will store ISIR data for retrieval and distribution.
© EUROCONTROL 2016 – Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC) Integration of Airport and the Network Benefits Hans Koolen NMOC Network Operations Services.
WG2A meeting 7-8 October 2004 Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Agenda item 9b Discussion on final Intercalibation register.
Collecting Copyright Transfers and Disclosures via Editorial Manager™ -- Editorial Office Guide 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Submission June 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 and System Design Document Notice: This document has been prepared.
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
FPL 2012 Kym Shenton Senior Technical Engineer/Safety Engineer
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Performance Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)
CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop
FILING OF VFR FLIGHT PLANS
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
After the FCC Form 471 E-rate Program Applicant Training
FAA Implementation of Amendment 1
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTATION FOR CONSTITUENT BODIES MEETINGS
FPL 2012 FPL Vendor Conference Mona Annaddaf Scotland, 7-8/12/2011
ICAO 2012 Network Operations Update
AIDC safety benefits & limitations
Training & Documentation
RAD in DFS – information for external stakeholders
SAS & RAD Jens Albek Operative Route Analyst
ICAO 2012 FPL Anthony Coult 8 Dec 2011.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
TG1 and System Design Document
Acknowledgment for CBP transmission
Ready to transition/ Clear to transition
Presentation transcript:

FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Deployment Content Deployment Policy Transition Contingency States IFPS AOs Preparation Formal Feedback (State Letter) – EUR Implementation Plan AIC Publication NEC Feedback for IFPS Documentation IFPS User Manual Doc CNS Filing ‘Guidance Material’ Training

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October EUR Region Deployment Policy Objective: All FPLs in New format from 15/11 AOs and CFSPs should submit FPLs in New format from 00:01 UTC on 12 Nov 2012 onwards AROs, IFPS, ATC systems should accept New from 12/11 FPLs should NOT be submitted in Old format after 00:01 UTC on 15 Nov 2012  IFPS will not accept FPLs with DOF on 15 Nov during the period Nov 2012  RPLs for Winter ’12-’13 should be submitted in New format

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October © EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management Unit Transition – IFPS ANSPs 00:00 15/11/2012 Reception of Old by ANSPs Reception of New by ANSPs IFPS Translation from New to Old Possible transition for an IFPS State without a period of mixed reception of Old and New ENV Parameter per Addressee (ICAO_2012_READY_DATE) Default = 00:00UTC on 16/11/ hrs + 24 hrs *Applicable only for IFR/GAT FPLs !

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October © EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management Unit ANSP Database Content ≈ FPL Dist. Parameter and Size of Airspace IFPS ‘FPL2012_READY’ Parameter Old format only New format only

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October © EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management Unit Reception by IFPS/ACCs of Old format on 15/11 FPL received by ARO in Old format Initial EOBT Flying time to Europe = 12hrs 24 hrs FPL distributed by ARO & received by IFPS / ANSPs in Old format ! ACCs don’t want to receive FPLs +/- 18hrs in advance therefore FPLs frequently distributed by ARO several hours after reception: Long-haul flight departing outside Europe:

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October © EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management Unit Reception by ACCs of Old format from IFPS after 16 Nov (1) Received by IFPS in Old format EOBT 24 hrs Flying time to Europe = 12hrs FPL Dist Parameter e.g. – 4hrs FPL reception by ANSP in Old format Long-haul flight departing outside Europe: DLA

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Re-Addressing by IFPS FF EUCHZMFP EUCBZMFP EGLLZPZX AD ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 (FPL-ABC123-I/S......) Aircraft Operator IFPS AD Line Addressing Normal Addressing

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Re-Addressing & 2012 Transition ‘Unknown’ (= address doesn’t exist in IFPS database) AD Line addressees Receive Old format prior to 15 Nov Receive New format after 15 Nov ‘Known’ AD Line addressees Receive Old/New in accordance with ENV parameters for the unit concerned

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October AO - FPL Submission Scenarios 1.Entirely within IFPZ a) May be submitted to IFPS in New format now b) May be submitted in Old format until 23:59 on14/11 c) Should be submitted in New format from 12/11 d) Shall be submitted in New format from 15/11 2. Departing to outside IFPZ Same as for 1. and may inc. AD line addresses in each of the cases a) to d) 3. Departing from outside IFPZ Should be submitted to ARO at ADEP in accordance with State requirements

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October IFPS Default Addressing Scenarios AD UKKKZQZQ UREEZQZX UARRZQZX (FPL-AZA123-I/S -A334/H-B2GRSYW/S1 -LIRF1800 -N0460F380……. -VIDP0750 VIDD -PBN/B2 DOF/ Normal - Old format Copy - Old format ‘AD’ - Old format Normal - New format Copy - New format ‘AD’ - New format

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October IFPS Default Addressing Scenarios cont. AD UKDDZQZX UREEZQZX UARRZQZX (FPL-AZA123-I/S -A334/H-B2GRSYW/S -LIRF1800 -N0460F380……. -VIDP0750 VIDD -PBN/B2 DOF/ Normal - Old format Copy - Old format ‘AD’ - Old format Normal - New format Copy - New format ‘AD’ - New format

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October IFPS Default Addressing Scenarios cont. AD UKDDZQZX UREEZQZX UARRZQZX (FPL-AZA123-I/S -A334/H-B2GRSYW/S -LIRF1800 -N0460F380……. -VIDP0750 VIDD -PBN/B2 DOF/ Normal - Old format Copy - Old format ‘AD’ - Old format Normal - New format Copy - New format ‘AD’ - New format

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Mixed Mode - Considerations (FPL-AZA123-I/S -A334/H-B2RSYW/S1 -LIRF1800 -N0460F380……. -VIDP0750 VIDD -PBN/B2 DOF/ Old format New format Aircraft Operator Departure ACC 1 ACC 2 ACC 3 Destination (DEP-AZA123-LIRF1830-VIDP- DOF/121115) ? ? ? (ARR-AZA123-LIRF-VIDP0110) ‘New’ ‘Old’

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Problem Example An example from 24 th September: 1.TAM submit (using SITA service) a FPL in New format including the IFPS addresses 2.IFPS automatically rejects due to a syntax error (NAV/ contains too many characters) and sends a REJ to TAM 3.TAM don’t understand the error and are unable to correct it because it doesn’t reflect the message they sent! Analysis made with Madrid Comms centre, SITA, TAM and Brasilian authorities reveals: Brasil Comms centre translated into Old format believing IFPS requires it.

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Roll-Over Period - Analysis Technical Conclusions IFPS and/or an ATC unit may expect to receive some, legitimately submitted, Old format messages on 15 Nov IFPS and/or an ATC unit may expect to receive both Old and New format messages for the same flight The communications network can influence the result therefore end-to-end (OPT) testing essential A State having installed a translator at the level of the Comms Centre must be sure it will switch correctly on 15/11 Procedural Conclusion AOs should submit in New format from 12/11. Certainly if any part of a flight could possibly occur on the 15 th, then all messages should be submitted in New format IFPOs need to be aware that not all errors are due to originator mistakes

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Contingency – IFPS State An IFPS State which experiences a problem with the switch to New format can request to revert to Old format Via request to IFPS Supervisor Messages processed by IFPS prior to the change back to Old and awaiting transmission will still be received in New format (short FPL Distribution Parameter = short transition period)

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Contingency – Non-IFPS State A non-IFPS State which experiences a problem with the switch to New format can have FPLs received via IFPS re-addressing function (AD line addressing) sent in Old format Via request to IFPS Supervisor Only a partial solution – not relevant to FPLs that don’t penetrate the IFPS zone (IFPZ) or VFR or OAT

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Contingency – Flight Plan Providers No mitigation against the need to submit in New format from 15/11 Provided at least a portion of flight (IFR) is within the IFPS Zone then: An AFTN communication problem can be mitigated by: Submitting directly to IFPS via SITA network using IFPS SITA addresses (BRUEP7X + PAREP7X) Submitting directly to IFPS via B2B (for existing B2B users, cannot be implemented at short notice) An ATC unit outside IFPZ having announced it’s unable to accept New format can be addressed via AD line

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October Deployment Content Deployment Policy Transition Contingency States IFPS AOs Preparation Formal Feedback (State Letter) – EUR Implementation Plan AIC Publication NEC Feedback for IFPS Documentation IFPS User Manual Doc CNS Filing ‘Guidance Material’ Training