Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 High Intensity Challenges of the FAIR Project Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, GSI, Darmstadt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAIR Synchrotrons SIS100/300
Advertisements

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck et al.,
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
ISIS Accelerator Division
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
March 14-15, 2007ECloud Feedback, IUCF1 Electron-Cloud Effects in Fermilab Booster K.Y. Ng Fermilab Electron-Cloud Feedback Workshop IUCF, Indiana March.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
The new FAIR accelerator complex at GSI: Project, Challenges, First steps Ralph C. Bär ICALEPCS, 16. October 2007.
Peter Spiller, Heavy Ion Fusion Symposium Princeton June 7-11, 2004 Accelerator Plans at GSI for Plasma Physics Applications.
Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.
Helmholtz Centre for Ion Research G. Moritz, Cryogenic Expert meeting, GSI, September 19/ (courtesy of D. Krämer for the FAIR Design Team) Current.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
P. Spiller, SIS18upgrade, Peter Spiller GSI, Darmstadt Kick off Meeting - EU Construction DIRAC Phase SIS18 upgrade.
I. Strasik et al. ● Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in FAIR Synchrotron SIS 100 ● CERN Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in.
Cooler Injector Synchrotron (CIS) at IUCF V.S. Morozov MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30-31, 2015.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Peter Spiller, CBM collaboration meeting GSI-Darmstadt 11. February 2004 Status of the future accelerator project.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High Current Beam Physics Group Simulation of space charge and impedance effects Funded through the EU-design study ‘DIRACsecondary.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High-Current Beam Physics Accelerator Facility for Energetic Ion Beams of High Intensity and Quality Inter’l Accelerator Project.
Beam loss and longitudinal emittance growth in SIS M. Kirk I. Hofmann, O. Boine-Frankenheim, P. Spiller, P. Hülsmann, G. Franchetti, H. Damerau, H. Günter.
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Peter Spiller, GSI, ICFA workshop, Optimization of SIS100 Lattice and Dedicated Collimation System P. Spiller, GSI ICFA 2004 Bensheim
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim FAIR accelerator theory group HESR 4: beam dynamics and collective effects Tasks: o Task 1: Detailed beam accumulation studies.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HE-LHC, Oct , 2010, Malta Simulation of IBS (and cooling) Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany 1.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
The High Intensity Frontier Franco Cervelli INFN-Pisa 7 Nov, 2005.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Elias Métral, LHC collimation working group meeting, 17/07/061/26 E. Métral for the RLC team LATEST ESTIMATES OF COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE EFFECTS u Reminder:
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
CR: status and activities at BINP I.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk O.Dolinskyy, GSI,Darmstadt , MAC, GSI, Darmstadt.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH GSI visitation W. Barth W. Barth, WAO 2014, Mainz/Germany.
Two-beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
EC plans in connection with eRHIC Wolfram Fischer ILCDR08 – Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 10 July 2008.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Interpretation of beam signals for high intensities
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
FAIR high intensity beam dynamics
FAIR synchrotrons and optics challenges
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
Invited talk TOAC001 ( min, 21 slides)
Collective effects in CEPC
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 High Intensity Challenges of the FAIR Project Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, GSI, Darmstadt

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Nov. 7, 2007: FAIR project start event Partners signing communiqué: Austria, Germany, Spain, Finland, France, Poland, Romania, Russia, Sweden, Great Britain German Minister Ms. Schavan on November 7, 2007

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB international participants 500 international scientists attended the symposium on the Physics of FAIR FAIR start event

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 FAIR rings and parameter baseline layout 100 m UNILAC SIS-18 SIS-100/300 HESR Super FRS NESR CR RESR FLAIR Radioactive Ion Production Target Anti-Proton Production Target Existing facility UNILAC/SIS-18: provides ion-beam source and injector for FAIR Existing facility UNILAC/SIS-18: provides ion-beam source and injector for FAIR New future facility: provides ion and anti-matter beams of highest intensities and up to high energies New future facility: provides ion and anti-matter beams of highest intensities and up to high energies Accelerator Components & Key Characteristics Ring/Device Beam Energy Intensity SIS100 (100Tm) protons 30 GeV 4x U GeV/u 5x10 11 (intensity factor 100 over present, short single bunch) SIS300 (300Tm) 238 U GeV/u 2x10 10 CR/RESR/NESR ion and antiproton storage rings HESR antiprotons 14 GeV ~10 11 Super-FRS rare isotope beams 1 GeV/u <10 9 p-linac L=216 m L=1080 mThis presentation: SIS-18 and SIS-100

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Required FAIR beam intensities Heavy ions SIS-18 today * After upgrade (to SIS 100) SIS 100 Reference ionU 28+ / U 73+ U 73+ U 28+ Maximum energy0.2 / 1 GeV/u1 GeV/u0.2 GeV/u2.7 GeV/u Maximum intensity 5x10 9 / 3x10 9 2x x x10 11 Repetition rate0.3 Hz1 Hz2.7 Hz 0.7 Hz Bunch length> 100 ns50 ns -60 ns FAIR specific beam dynamics challenges: o Intensities at the ‘space charge limit’ o High beam quality (weak or lost Landau damping) o Long accumulation time (1 s) in SIS-100 o Reducing beam loss induced pressure increase 5x10 11 U 28+ SIS 18 SIS 100 cycle * UNILAC studies: L. Gröning’s talk, Tuesday

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-18 intensities status and upgrade parameters (long. space charge effect on the UNILAC micro-bunches) Injection energy: 11.4 MeV/u (acceptance) Challenge: Working point optimization and resonance compensation for low beam loss (< 10 %). G. Franchetti’s talk on Tuesday SIS-18 L=216 m Incoherent space charge tune shift: ≈ 5x10 9 U 28+ ≈ 3x10 9 U 73+

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 U 28+ lifetime in SIS-18 low beam intensities R. Olson et al., J. Phys. B (2004) Born approximation: CTMC simulations: G. Weber, Heidelberg, 2006 Energy [MeV/u] lifetime [s] 2001 G. Weber 2004 CTMC Born Loss of one or more electrons: (Lifetime) -1 :

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-18 upgrade Control of the dynamic vacuum pressure Beam loss mechanisms: U 28+ -> U 29+ (stripping) U 73+ -> U 72+ (capture) Dynamic pressure: Desorption coefficient: NEG coated vacuum chambers Challenges: - increase pumping speed - localize beam loss - minimize desorption Combined pumping/collimation ports behind every dipole group. U 28+ lifetime in SIS-18 (C. Omet) N(t) 1.8E10 8E9 60 % loss 270 ms P.Spiller

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-18 upgrade new dual rf system B f =0.35 ! φ s =45 0 Bucket filling factor U 28+ : 2/3 V 0 [kV]f [MHz]harmonic MA Ferrite Magnetic Alloy (MA) filled rf cavity For SIS-18 operation with 2.7 Hz the existing rf voltages are not sufficient. P. Hülsmann et al. Additional compact rf cavity system: + increase rf bucket area + flattened bunch profiles Challenges: - Space charge induced voltage reduction: ≈40 % - Bunch stability with space charge - Control of bunch deformation due to beam loading (low Q)

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-100 bunch compression #cavitiesVoltage [kV] Frequency [MHz]Concept Acceleration (h=10)Ferrite Compression (h=2)MA (low duty cycle) SIS 100 L=1080 m Single bunch formation 8 bunches ‘bunch merging’ pre-compression rotation extraction 0.2->1.5 GeV/u ∆Q sc ≈ -0.6 ! RF cavity systems in SIS 100: 2-4x x10 11 Particles/bunchbunch length 25 ns29 GeV/u p 60 ns1.5 GeV/u U 28+ Final bunch parameters: rf compressor section (≈40 m) bunch compressor loaded with 20 MA cores

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 space charge reduces the effect of beam loading SIS-100 bunch pre-compression barrier rf buckets with beam-loading and space charge # cavitiesR s /cavity [kΩ] Q s f res acceleration f 0 barrier MHz compression MHz Longitudinal space charge impedance: Stationary bunch profile from the Haissinski equation (no rf): with Bunch area increases by 20 % during pre-compression. Longitudinal dilution budget in SIS-100: Factor 2. Vlasov simulation including cavity beam loading and space charge.

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS 100 dipole magnets full size model from Babcock Noell GmbH 1st Full Size Dipole is ready for testing! Dipole magnet with elliptical beam pipe 2D/3D field calculations Superconducting magnet with 4 T/s and B max = 1.9 T P. Spiller, SIS-100, Tuesday afternoon

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-100 field quality and beam loss at injection energy 0.2 GeV/u SIS-100 transverse apertures at injection (0.2 GeV/u) dynamic aperture magnet aperture lattice aperture beam High intensity challenges for SIS-100: Long time scales up to 10 6 turns (1 s) Space charge tune shift of ΔQ sc =-0.25 ‘Thick’ medium energy beams (2/3 filling factor) Optimized working point for < 5 % loss. G. Franchetti (2008) Simulation scan of the SIS-100 dynamic aperture tune space charge tune spread G. Franchetti, SIS-100 technical design report (2008) Long-term (up to 1 s) 3D particle tracking studies with ‘frozen’ space charge indicate a space charge limit at 3x10 11 U 28+ (design 5x10 11 ).

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-18 transverse impedance spectrum (200 MeV/u) wall (smooth) f0f0 e-cloud kicker (x) kicker (y) Specific SIS-18/100 impedance issues: - Low frequencies and beam energies - Thin (0.3 mm ) stainless steel pipe (optional corrugated) - Ferrite or magnetic alloy loaded ring components - Distributed collimation system Doliwa, Weiland (2006) Ferrite loaded kicker modules ‘Space charge impedance’: Transverse impedances in SIS-18/100 e-clouds ?: - electrons from residual gas ionization and beam loss. - e-accumulation: survival rate in bunch gaps ? - transv. ‘impedance’: Ohmi, Zimmermann, PRL (2000) - long. impedance: Al-khateeb et al. NJP (2008) dc: Loss of Landau damping

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Resistive (thin) beam pipe in SIS-100 Transverse impedance and shielding Al-khateeb, Hasse, Boine-F., Daqa, Hofmann, Phys. Rev. ST-AB (2007) SIS 100 transverse resistive wall impedance (200 MeV/u)Transmission coefficient ! In SIS-100 the thin (0.3 mm) beam pipe is the dominant transverse impedance contribution ! Transmission: Structures behind the pipe might contribute ! SIS-18: Measured growth rate of the resistive wall instability agrees with impedance formula.

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Transverse Impedance Budget with Space Charge Specific issues for SIS-100: - Long time scales (up to 1 s) - Image current and space charge effects - Long bunches and ‘dc-like’ barrier rf beams Potential cures: - octupoles and nonlinear space charge (Kornilov et al. PRST-AB 2008) - feedback systems coasting beam stability boundaries (from dispersion relation) Challenges: - Octupoles and dynamic aperture - 3D space charge and image current effects Head-tail instability in SIS-100 (talk by V. Kornilov this Monday afternoon): -Sacherer’s formula predicts head-tail modes with 70 ms growth rate in SIS-100 ! -3D simulation studies including: resistive wall impedance, image currents, space charge, nonlinear rf. -’Mode coupling regime’: (ν s : synchrotron tune) Chromatic damping

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Transverse Schottky signals with space charge Understanding signals from stable beams with space charge Boine-Frankenheim, Kornilov, Paret, PRST-AB (2008) The measured Schottky band (upper sideband) with space charge is deformed, but not shifted. coasting beam (measurement in SIS-18) coherent betatron frequencies: Modified Schottky band: bunched beam (simulation) Q0Q0 Q 0 +ν s Central line is not shifted, but synchrotron satellites are. Amplitudes seem to follow the dc results P(z). Transverse Schottky signals from real or from computer beams provide important information on the mode structure and Landau damping with space charge.

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Decoherence with image currents and space charge 3D simulation studies with space charge and impedances Beam pipe bunch Initial offset z I(z) dc Bunch profile 0L=2 πR Injected bunch in SIS-100 with a transverse offset. Coherent and incoherent tune spread along the bunch: coherent tune shift: Interplay of space charge and image currents: -mode coupling (due to image currents) -persistent bunch modes -halo formation !

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 Summary A next design iteration of the FAIR synchrotron facilities has been finalized. (see latest Technical Reports.) For high intensity operation a number of optimization challenges have still to overcome. Of outmost importance is to further increase the beam intensity and quality in the UNILAC/SIS-18 injector. SIS-18/SIS-100 high intensity challenges: - Working point and resonance compensation for low beam loss. - Control of the dynamic vacuum pressure for heavy ions. - Complex RF manipulation at high beam intensities. - Control of coherent beam instabilities. FAIR related talks: V. Kornilov, Coherent instabilities in SIS-100, Monday afternoon G. Franchetti, Space charge resonances in SIS-18, Tuesday afternoon P. Spiller, SIS-100, Tuesday afternoon L. Gröning,Emittance grwoth stdy in the UNILAC, Tuesday morning

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 in 2016 Thank you ! Austria China Finland France Germany Greece India Italy Poland Slovenia Spain Sweden Romania Russia UKObservers:

Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, HB2008 SIS-18 working point and resonance compensation N 7+ Challenge: Multi-turn injection (MTI) and working point optimization for low beam loss (< 10 %). G. Franchetti’s talk on Tuesday