HW215: Models of Health & Wellness Unit 7: Health and Wellness Models Geo-political Influences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilizing the Electronic Medical Record to Reduce Inappropriate Medication Use Alan White, PhD – Abt Associates Valerie Weber, MD – Geisinger Health System.
Advertisements

Update on Recent Health Reform Activities in Minnesota.
1 Understanding How the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Works USPSTF 101.
CANCER SCREENING 2011 DELAWARE CANCER EDUCATION ALLIANCE STEPHEN S. GRUBBS, M.D. HELEN F. GRAHAM CANCER CENTER DELAWARE CANCER CONSORTIUM OCTOBER 5, 2011.
†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
BREAST CANCER SCREENING Anoop Agrawal, M.D.. NEW USPSTF BREAST SCREENING GUIDELINES Published by US Preventative Screening Task Force in November 2009.
Review of Recommendations to the Secretary of Health and Human Service April 16, 2013.
Controversies in Breast Cancer Allan Arkush, DO, FACOS.
1 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: The Challenge of Transparency Dr. Albert Siu New York Academy of Medicine.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Colorectal cancer: How do we approach health disparities? Marta L. Davila, MD, FASGE University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Clinical Practice Screening for Colorectal Cancer David A. Lieberman, M.D. N Engl J Med Volume 361(12): September 17, 2009.
Geriatric Health Maintenance: Cancer Screening Linda DeCherrie, MD Geriatric Fellow Mount Sinai Hospital.
299. Breast Cancer Screening Paul Jones, PGY2 Resident Rounds 25 July 2012.
An Overview of the Alberta Screening & Prevention Initiative.
© Open University Press, 2004 Overview Prevention and screening Psychological predictors of screening The ethics and usefulness of screening? Psychological.
How to Overcome Barriers and Develop Collaborative Guidelines Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP Chair, Guidelines International Network Director, Clinical.
Practice Guidelines The Good, The Not-So-Good The Ugly 1.
Interdisciplinary Care and Treatment Involves Us TOO James Kiefert, EdD Chairman, Board of Directors Us TOO International Prostate Cancer Education and.
A Summary Of Key Findings From A National Survey Of Voters. #07160.
AIMGP Seminar Series January 2004 Joo-Meng Soh Edited by Gloria Rambaldini CANCER SCREENING PART II.
Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH Andi Marmor, MD, MSEd October 21, 2010.
Health Care Reform Through the Cancer Lens State and Private Sector Reforms for Hispanic Healthcare Edward E. Partridge, MD National Board President American.
Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Weighing the Risks and Benefits Kathy J. Helzlsouer, M.D., M.H.S. Prevention and Research Center, Women’s.
Chartered Value Exchanges (CVEs) September 2008 CVEs may wish to tailor this slide deck for use with stakeholders in your community.
Health Care Reform Affordable Care Act Robert Morris MS, MPH Vice President Health Initiatives American Cancer Society.
Health & Welfare Council of Long Island May 12, 2010.
Performance Measurement Orientation To schedule a presentation of “Performance Measurement Orientation” for your organization staff and/or collaborators,
Cancer Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Nursing Diagnosis Research for Students Chapter Five.
PERIODIC MEDICAL EXAMINATION BY DR. ANGELA ESOIMEME MBBS, MPH, FWACGP.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Chapter 32 Poverty.
CISNET and BCSC: Working Together To Model The Population Impact Breast Cancer Screening A Celebration of the Work of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
HW215 MODELS OF HEALTH AND WELLNESS Unit 3: Shifting Paradigms :Health & Wellness.
Module 2: Quality and Quality Measures The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes.
Lower Hudson Valley Perinatal Network Serving Dutchess, Putnam, Rockland & Westchester Counties Presented at the Quarterly Education & Networking Conference.
Put Prevention Into Practice. Understand the PPIP Program What is Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP)? What is Put Prevention Into Practice (PPIP)? Why.
HW 215: Models for Health and Wellness Unit 2: Multicultural Perspective to Understanding Health.
Managed Care. In the broadest terms, Kongstvedt (1997) describes managed care as a system of healthcare delivery that tries to manage the cost of healthcare,
HW215 MODELS OF HEALTH AND WELLNESS Unit 7: Health and Wellness Model Design: Geopolitical Factors.
VA National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Using USPSTF Recommendations in VHA Clinical Practice Linda Kinsinger, MD, MPH Chief Consultant.
Joni Reynolds, RN-CNS, MSN Director of Public Health Programs Winnable Battles: Cancer in Colorado.
Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture b This material (Comp1_Unit9b) was developed.
During this presentation the learner will be able to: 1. Understand current breast cancer screening guidelines for mammography. 2. Compare and contrast.
Improving Value in Health Care: Challenges and Potential Strategies Arnold M Epstein October 24, 2008 Congressional Health Care Reform Education Project.
GUIDE TO EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS. ASDs now affect one in every 110 children Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Lifelong effect on functioning,
Mark Clanton, M.D. M.P.H. Deputy Director Cancer Care Delivery Systems Moving Discovery Through to Delivery: A Critical Opportunity for Leadership and.
USPSTF CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN A PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT CURRICULUM Timothy Quigley, MPH, PA-C Associate Professor Wichita State University.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Screening of genital cancers Evidence Based Presented by Dr\ Heba Nour.
Mammography. Basic Facts About Mammograms Simply put, a mammogram is just an x-ray taken of the breast tissues in the body. Mammograms require that a.
Welcome to Seminar HW215 Models of Health and Wellness Created by Jeanne Zyrkowski Adapted by Earon Davis Unit 7 Health and Wellness Model Design Geo-political.
The US Preventive Services Task Force: Potential Impact on Medicare Coverage Ned Calonge, MD, MPH Chair, USPSTF.
Importance of HIV Education of HIV Screening and Risk Among Adults 65 Years Old and Older In A Senior Center JESSICA WARD RN,BSN,FNP COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY.
From EBM to SDM: Michel Labrecque MD PhD Michel Cauchon MD Department of Family and Emergency Medicine Université Laval Teaching how to apply evidence.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 From: Medications for Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Unit 3 – Public Health Statistics Chapter 7 – Statistics: Making Sense of Uncertainty.
Breast Cancer Screening 1. 2 Methods 3 Mammography.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
How Do We Individualize Guidelines in an Era of Personalized Medicine? Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS VA Palo Alto Health Care System Stanford University, Stanford.
Cancer Screening Guidelines
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
Mammograms and Breast Exams: When to start /stop mammograms
Conflicts of interest Major role in development of GRADE
From: Medications for Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(10):
Stamatia Destounis, MD, FACR, FSBI, FAIUM
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S.
Presentation transcript:

HW215: Models of Health & Wellness Unit 7: Health and Wellness Models Geo-political Influences

Agenda for the Unit 7 Seminar Unit 7 Learning Objectives Discussion of the Importance of the Efficacy of Screening Unit 7 Discussion Questions

Unit 7 Learning Objectives Recognize the effects of geography on health outcomes. Recognize the power politics holds on distribution of health resources which in turn affects health outcomes. Describe geo-political design components. Evaluate the impact of eHealth and the use of advanced technology related to geography on health and wellness models. Identify design components for incorporation into a geo-political model of health and wellness.

A Closer Look at Breast Cancer Screening.... Why? Recognize the power politics holds on distribution of health resources which in turn affects health outcomes (Unit 7 Learning Outcome) Evaluate Health and Wellness Information (US Preventive Services Task Force & American Cancer Society)

What is the Issue? 2002 Recommendations: - A “B” Recommendation for screening mammography for women 40 years or older Recommendations: - A “C” Recommendation for screening mammography for women 40 years or older. B=Recommended Routinely C=Not Recommended Routinely Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – About USPTF (n.d). Retrieved electronically on 4/7/10 from

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force “The mission of the USPSTF is to evaluate the benefits of individual services based on age, gender, and risk factors for disease; make recommendations about which preventive services should be incorporated routinely into primary medical care and for which populations; and identify a research agenda for clinical preventive care.” “Public Law Section 915 mandates that AHRQ convene the USPSTF to conduct scientific evidence reviews of a broad array of clinical preventive services, develop recommendations for the health care community, and provide ongoing administrative, research, technical, and dissemination support.” Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – About USPTF (n.d). Retrieved electronically on 4/7/10 from

Why the Change? “The precise age at which the benefits from screening mammography justify the potential harms is a subjective judgment and should take into account patient preferences.” Benefits vs. Risks Beneficence, Non-Malfeasance Reduced chance of dying vs. false positives, unnecessary biopsies U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 151(10):

Ann Intern Med 2009;151: ©2009 by American College of Physicians

American Cancer Society “With its new recommendations, the USPSTF is essentially telling women that mammography at age 40 to 49 saves lives; just not enough of them. The task force says screening women in their 40s would reduce their risk of death from breast cancer by 15 percent, just as it does for women in their 50s. But because women in their 40s are at lower risk of the disease than women 50 and above, the USPSTF says the actual number of lives saved is not enough to recommend widespread screening. The most recent data show us that approximately 17 percent of breast cancer deaths occurred in women who were diagnosed in their 40s, and 22 percent occurred in women diagnosed in their 50s. Breast cancer is a serious health problem facing adult women, and mammography is part of our solution beginning at age 40 for average risk women.” American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society Responds to Changes to USPSTF Mammography Guidelines (11/16/2009). Retrieved electronically on 4/7/10 from _Changes_to_USPSTF_Mammography_Guidelines.asp _Changes_to_USPSTF_Mammography_Guidelines.asp

Efficacy of a Screen? Validity – Is the test accurate? Reliability – Will the test produce the same result when repeated?

Validity of a Screen Sensitivity – false negatives - the extent to which those with the disease will be told they don’t have the disease. Specificity – false positives – the extent to which those without the disease will be told they do have the disease.

Unit 7 Seminar: Question #1 What are the benefits and negative consequences of using Web-based information for health and wellness education, medical diagnoses and treatment on the design of health and wellness models?

Evaluating Health Web Sites Accuracy Authority Bias/Objectivity Currency/Timeliness Coverage National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Evaluating Health Web Sites (n.d.). Retrieved electronically on 4/6/2010 from

Unit 7 Seminar: Question #2 What key advancements in health care technology occurred during the last few decades? How have these improvements affected health care?

Unit 7 Seminar: Question #2 a. Access to care b. Patient/family self-care c. Care management d. The future role of community hospitals and health centers e. The future role of physicians f. The future role of nurses g. Issues relating to minority health Ellis, D. (2003). The Impact of Technological Advances on Community Health and the Role of Foundations in Fostering Beneficial Use. Retrieved on 4/6/2010 from

Unit 7 Seminar: Question #3 What geographic and political considerations accompany the use of Web-based information for health and wellness, education, medical diagnoses and treatment?

Questions?

References American Cancer Society. American cancer society responds to changes to USPSTF mammography guidelines (11/16/2009). Retrieved electronically on 4/7/10 from nds_to_Changes_to_USPSTF_Mammography_Guidelines.asp nds_to_Changes_to_USPSTF_Mammography_Guidelines.asp Ellis, D. (2003). The Impact of Technological Advances on Community Health and the Role of Foundations in Fostering Beneficial Use. Retrieved on 4/6/2010 from National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Evaluating health web sites (n.d.). Retrieved electronically on 4/6/2010 from U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 151(10): Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – about USPTF (n.d). Retrieved electronically on 4/7/10 from