Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
State and District Perspectives: Putting Policy into Practice
Educator Effectiveness Teacher Quality Standards Expert Office Hours
Educator Effectiveness: Instruction and Assessment Linda Barker, Director of Teaching and Learning.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Colorado Department of Education, Dept. of Higher Education and Educator Effectiveness Fall 2013 Educator Effectiveness Principal Quality Standards Expert.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
CCEA Evaluation Committee Andrew Burns (West) Gerry Camilli (CTHS) Jeri-Sue Dean (PEA) Lisa Farley (EHS) Maria Heymans (SHHS) Robin Lopez (Ponderosa) Patricia.
Consistency of Assessment
Assessment Review and Design for Student Learning Outcomes.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Session Materials  Wiki
Educator Effectiveness: Connecting Coursework to Career Success / End of Year Self-Assessment May 15, 2014.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
What does Educator Effectiveness (aka SB 191) mean for us?
The Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness 2013 Teacher Librarians and S.B Where Do We Fit In? An information session for all.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
All certified staff need to write professional development learning goals. A minimum of three learning goals are required. Individual Professional Development.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
S.B Implementation: Professional Practice for Higher Education Leaders September 13, :30 pm – 1:45 pm.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
S.B. 191 Overview and Update Katy Anthes, PhD Executive Director of Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education For the ELC January 2012.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Colorado Department of Education Katy Anthes March 2014 Educator Effectiveness & Teacher Librarians.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Legislative Overview and Professional Practice
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Objectives Participants will be able to:
Colorado Department of Education
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment

Learning Targets I can understand the purpose of the TQS. I can analyze what the term “effective” means. I can decode what each TQS element means. GOAL: I can locate where I fall on the continuum for each TQS during my journey of growth.

 BOCES – Boards of Cooperating Educational Services  CGM – Colorado Growth Model  CMAS – Colorado Measures of Academic Success  DPF - District Performance Framework  PARCC – Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers  SLO – Student Learning Objectives  SPF - School Performance Framework  SSP – Specialized Service Professionals  UIP - Unified Improvement Plan  TCAP – Transitional Colorado Assessment Program  TQS – Teacher Quality Standards Acronyms 3

Purposes of TQS…  A system to evaluate the effectiveness of licensed personnel and continually improve the quality of education and student outcomes.

Effectiveness: Define It! 6

Definition of Teacher Effectiveness Effective teachers in the state of Colorado have the knowledge, skills, and commitments needed to provide excellent and equitable learning opportunities and growth for all students. They strive to support growth and development, close achievement gaps and to prepare diverse student populations for postsecondary and workforce success. Effective teachers facilitate mastery of content and skill development, and employ and adjust evidence-based strategies and approaches for students who are not achieving mastery and students who need acceleration. They also develop in students the skills, interests and abilities necessary to be lifelong learners, as well as for democratic and civic participation. Effective teachers communicate high expectations to students and their families and utilize diverse strategies to engage them in a mutually supportive teaching and learning environment. Because effective teachers understand that the work of ensuring meaningful learning opportunities for all students cannot happen in isolation, they engage in collaboration, continuous reflection, on-going learning and leadership within the profession.

AHHHHHvaluation!!!  Thinking about evaluation experiences in your past…  What did you want most from your evaluator?  What makes an evaluation meaningful? 8

Let’s Revisit: Purposes of TQS  Provide timely, meaningful, actionable, feedback for professional growth and continuous improvement.  Provide a basis for making decisions in the areas of hiring, compensation, promotion, assignment, professional development, earning and retaining non-probationary status, dismissal, and nonrenewal of contract.

 Providing credible and meaningful feedback with:  Actionable information: opportunities for improvement  Idea that this is a process and not an event  Involves all stakeholders in a collaborative process  Families, teachers, related service providers, administration, school board, etc.  Takes place within a larger, aligned and supportive system  All components of the system must focus on increasing the number of educators and students who are successful  Decisions are made based on what is best for kids Framework

STATE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS Framework for System to Evaluate Teachers Definition of Teacher Effectiveness I. Know Content 50% Professional Practice Standards 50% Student Growth Measures Weighting: How Much Does Each Standard Count Towards Overall Performance? Observations of Other Measures Teaching Aligned with CDE Guidelines State Other Assessments Other Measures Summative for Non-tested Aligned with Assessments Areas CDE Guidelines Match of test to teaching assignments Weighting: Scoring Framework: How Do Measures of Quality Standards Result in a Determination of Individual Performance? Performance Standards IneffectivePartially EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective Quality Standards II. Establish Environment III. Facilitate Learning IV. Reflect on Practice V. Demonstrate Leadership VI. Student Growth Appeals Process

Teacher Quality Standards  Unpacking the Elements:  Read the assigned standard and each element.  Describe a practice or two that brings this element to life in the classroom.  Predict  what students could be doing to reflect this practice (Standards 1-3) or  what artifacts that would support the practices (Standards 4-5).

State Model Rubric Basics  Standards based  Cumulative in content  Each level of the rubric represents an increase in the quality, intensity, consistency, breadth, depth, and complexity of practice  Outlines the practices to which you aspire

Teacher Quality Standard Performance Rating Levels Element of the Standard Professional Practice is Not Observable Professional Practice is Observable Components of the Rubric

Reading the Rubric

Rubric Structure and Rating Level Focus The focus of the Basic rating is the educator whose performance does not meet state quality standards. The educator rated as Basic is typically performing at a foundational level. Every educator is expected to perform Basic professional practices in their day-to-day work. The focus of Partially Proficient and Proficient levels is what educators do on a day-to-day basis to achieve state performance standards and assure that students are achieving at expected levels. The focus of Accomplished and Exemplary ratings shifts to the outcomes of the educator’s practices, including expectations for staff, students, parents and community members, as a result of practices exhibited under rating levels 2 and 3.

Look for the first unchecked professional practice. Move one column back to identify the rating for the element. Determining the Rating

Look for the first unchecked professional practice. Move one column back to identify the rating for the element. Determining the Element Rating

Look for the first unchecked professional practice. Move one column back to identify the rating for the element. Determining the Element Rating

Learning Targets I can understand the purpose of the TQS. I can analyze what the term “effective” means. I can decode what each TQS element means. GOAL: I can locate where I fall on the continuum for each TQS during my journey of growth.

3-2-1 Feedback  3 Things You Learned  2 Questions You Have  1 Goal You Set During Today’s Workshop