What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
The Chesapeake Bay TMDL: Coming to an Impaired Water Near You? Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Jack E. Frye Virginia Director Chesapeake Bay Commission December 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
Stormwater Management/ MS4 Permitting International Municipal Lawyers Association 2014 Annual Conference Baltimore, Maryland Gene Tanaka
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
David Johnson, Director, Department of Conservation and Recreation Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator, Department of Environmental Quality October.
Ann Swanson Executive Director Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Status Report: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Clean Up Plan Presented to P otomac Roundtable by Jack E. Frye April 9, 2010.
The Virginia Bar Association October 22, 2009 Richmond, Virginia Reginald Parrish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Update on.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
Impact of Recent Environmental Regulations on Land Use Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Chesapeake Bay Initiatives in The State of the Bay has been in decline over the past 30 years. The major problem is non-point pollution, which cannot.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
MACo Winter Conference
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Chesapeake Bay Program
Watershed Implementation Plan
Water Quality Credit Trading
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Approach to Setting Local Planning Goals
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking, swimming, fishing Aquatic life use support –Identify pollutant sources (non-point and point sources) –Identify load reductions for sediment, nitrogen and phosphorous Federally mandated “Pollution Diet” Implementation is key

How did we get to this point? Presidential Executive Order to cleanup the Bay EPA will set goals and oversee Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) progress EPA mandates passed on to states States are passing down implementation to local government Local government will set local goals and strategies

What does this mean? TMDL sets pollution limits…WIP sets strategies to meet those limits Bay TMDL and WIP will require nutrient and sediment reductions from stormwater Enhanced Stormwater regulations by the VA House and Senate will ensure these goals will be met Powhatan County is in the process of adopting a Stormwater Ordinance which will help us achieve the TMDL goals

Watershed Implementation Plans (WIP) Specify what kind of actions will be taken Best Management Practices (BMP) Wastewater treatment upgrades Stormwater retrofits and upgrades Caps on new nutrient loads Nutrient Trading

February 1, 2012 – Counties submit local strategies and goals to state Final Phase II WIP submitted to EPA-3/30/12 2 year progress reports from localities to state to EPA starting % BMP implementation checkup Insufficient progress may lead to early intervention by EPA 2025 BMP implementation goals met Important Dates

What are the consequences? Also known as “backstops”: Chesapeake Bay Act area expansion Loss of land-use taxation rates Loss of cost-share assistance for BMP (agricultural best management practices) installation Loss of federal funding to state and county programs EPA will take over local conservation programs related to the TMDL