A. Doyuran, L. DiMauro, W. Graves, R. Heese, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, H. Loos, J.B. Murphy, G. Rakowsky, J. Rose, T. Shaftan, B. Sheehy, Y. Shen, J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schemes for generation of attosecond pulses in X-ray FELs E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov The potential for the development of XFEL beyond.
Advertisements

Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
Coherent Radiation from High-Current Electron Beams of a Linear Accelerator and Its Applications S. Okuda ISIR, Osaka Univ Research Institute.
Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov (SASE & MCP) C. Behrens, W. Decking, H. Delsim, T. Limberg, R. Kammering (rf & LOLA) N. Guerassimova and R. Treusch (PGM.
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
A. Zholents, July 28, 2004 Timing Controls Using Enhanced SASE Technique *) A. Zholents or *) towards absolute synchronization between “visible” pump and.
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a
Electro-Optic Beam Diagnostic at BNL DUV-FEL
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
August, 2003 W.S. Graves 1 Electron beam diagnostic methods William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presented at 2003 ICFA S2E Workshop DESY-Zeuthen August,
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
FEL simulation code FAST Free-Electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility Generic name FAST stands for a set of codes for ``full physics'' analysis of FEL.
07/27/2004XFEL 2004 Measurement of Incoherent Radiation Fluctuations and Bunch Profile Recovery Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
Jörn Bödewadt | Seeding at FLASH | | Page 1 Click to edit Master subtitle style Jörn Bödewadt Recent Results of Seeding at FLASH Supported by.
+ SwissFEL Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Bolko Beutner, Sven Reiche
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
Free Electron Lasers (I)
S. Spampinati, J.Wu, T.Raubenhaimer Future light source March, 2012 Simulations for the HXRSS experiment with the 40 pC beam.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
SFLASH  SASE interference setup & optics rough estimation 1d estimation 3d estimation summary.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
J. Wu In collaboration with Y. Jiao, W.M. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche (PSI), Y. Cai, A.W. Chao, Y. Ding, X. Huang,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Longitudinal Space Charge Micro- bunching in SDL (DUV-FEL) T. Shaftan, L. Carr, H. Loos, B. Sheehy,
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
External Seeding Approaches for Next Generation Free Electron Lasers
W.S. Graves 2002 Berlin CSR workshop 1 Microbunching and CSR experiments at BNL’s Source Development Lab William S. Graves ICFA CSR Workshop Berlin, Jan.,
NON-WIGGLER-AVERAGED START-TO-END SIMULATIONS OF HIGH-GAIN FREE- ELECTRON LASERS H.P. Freund Science Applications International Corp. McLean, Virginia.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Jörn Bödewadt Recent Results of Seeding at FLASH Supported by BMBF under contract 05K13GU4 and 05K13PE3 DFG GrK 1355 Joachim Herz Stiftung Helmholtz Accelererator.
UCLA Claudio Pellegrini UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy X-ray Free-electron Lasers Ultra-fast Dynamic Imaging of Matter II Ischia, Italy, 4/30-5/3/
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
FEL Spectral Measurements at LCLS J. Welch FEL2011, Shanghai China, Aug. 25 THOB5.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
SIMULATION FOR TW LCLS-II Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11:  9 – m, 10.
Free Electron Laser Studies
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Minjie Yan Ch. Gerth, E. Hass Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Two color FEL experiment
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Free Electron Lasers (FEL’s)
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
THE LEUTL* -> ALFF# Project
Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
SASE FEL PULSE DURATION ANALYSIS FROM SPECTRAL CORRELATION FUNCTION
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Longitudinal-to-transverse mapping and emittance transfer
Longitudinal-to-transverse mapping and emittance transfer
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19.
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Presentation transcript:

A. Doyuran, L. DiMauro, W. Graves, R. Heese, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, H. Loos, J.B. Murphy, G. Rakowsky, J. Rose, T. Shaftan, B. Sheehy, Y. Shen, J. Skaritka, X.J. Wang, Z. Wu, L.H. Yu National Synchrotron Light Source Brookhaven National Laboratory SATURATION of THE NSLS DUV-FEL AT BNL

HGHG FEL RADIATOR DISPERSIVE SECTION MODULATOR SEED LASER 800 nm, ~ 30 MW HGHG OUTPUT * 266 nm, ~ 100 uJ, 1 ps (FWHM) * 88 nm, ~ 1 uJ ELECTRON BEAM d=3.89 cm, L=10 m, B=0.31 T d=8 cm L=80 cm B=0.22 T

Deep UV Free Electron Laser at the Source Development Laboratory Modulator Wiggler : L = 0.8 m w = 8 cm K = 1.67 Dispersion Magnet: L = 30 cm  = 3 for 30 MW seed laser Radiator (NISUS) Wiggler: L = 10 m, w = 3.89 cm B = 0.31 T, K = 1.126

Undulator & Electron Beam Parameters Energy177 MeV Charge300 pC Normalized emittance4 mm * mrad Compressed bunch length, RMS ps Energy spread, RMS0.05 % Period3.89 cm Number of periods (length)256 (10 m) Peak field0.31 T Betatron wavelength25 m Electron beam size, RMS (4 mm mrad)250 um Undulator NISUS parameters Measured electron beam parameters

HGHG FEL hardware 9 YAG Triplet 3 QA QB QA 1918 Modulator 17 DS 1516 th/tv12th/tv11 NISUS Spectrometer

Measurements of Electron Beam Properties Longitudinal beam parameters Time (ps)  rms = 400 fs Transverse beam parameters Q = 300 pC measured by zero-phasing method Measured by pop-in monitors along the NISUS Matching and alignment is done by automated MATLAB routines

Beam based alignment of NISUS wiggler Initial (green) and corrected (blue)Beam trajectories (green) relative beam trajectories along the wigglerto the alignment laser (blue)

NISUS Wiggler Diagnostics Alignment laser

HGHG Gain Measurements For 30 MW seed power  = 3 HGHG saturates at 5 th m in NISUS yielding ~100  J energy For 1.8 MW seed power  = 8.7 HGHG saturates at the end of NISUS Energy vs. distance along the wiggler

SASE HGHG Shot to shot intensity fluctuations for SASE and HGHG

HGHG and SASE measured spectra under same electron beam conditions HGHG spectral brightness is 2x10 5 times larger than SASE spectral brightness 0.23 nm FWHM x SASE spectrum is calculated with GENESIS by H. Loos after 20 m of the NISUS structure to have a fair comparison with HGHG SASE spectral brightness would still be lower than HGHG by an order of magnitude x Spectrum of HGHG and SASE at 266 nm

0.35nm Estimation of SASE Pulse Length from Spectrum Electron beam is ~1 ps FWHM S. Krinsky and R.L. Gluckstern, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A483, 57 (2002

HGHG Pulse Length Measurements Two-photon absorption pump probe autocorrelation trace Pulse length is 0.63 ps Seed laser 1.8 MW Saturation at the end of wiggler

First User Experiment in DUV-FEL Ion Pair Imaging Spectroscopy F-F- CH 3 + Molecular Beam Source Imaging MCP Detector CCD Camera Skimmer VUV IPIS Technique: Excitation of a molecule in the VUV/XUV accesses ion-pair states that dissociate. If one of the products is structureless (such as F - ), then the kinetic energy release directly reflects the internal energy in the other product and the dynamics of the process. CH 3 F* CH 3 F 88 nm HGHG CH 3 + -F - K.E.R. CH 3 + +F - Image Super excited dynamics states

First User Experiment in DUV-FEL

Summary & Conclusions n Gain of DUV-FEL at 266 nm has been studied for various seed laser powers. HGHG FEL saturates at the middle of the 10 m long NISUS wiggler n Spectrum of HGHG is measured to be narrow compare to SASE spectrum (2.3 Å) n Output energy is measured to be stable (7% RMS) which is mainly limited by the accelerator performance n Pulse length is measured to be ps which proves that HGHG output is temporally nearly Fourier transform limited n The 3 rd harmonic (88nm) of the HGHG is used in a chemistry experiment