B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site Calibration for 3D GPS Operations
Advertisements

Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
GNSS DERIVED HEIGHTS- PART 2 NOS/NGS - 59
REAL TIME POSITIONING “ IT DEPENDS” REAL TIME POSITIONING PDOP MULTIPATH SATELLITES BASE ACCURACY BASE SECURITY REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY PPM.
Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning 21 April 2008.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
A COMPLETE SURVEY CREW CGSIC 49th Meeting-Civil GPS Service Interface Committee CORS User Forum Hilton Garden Inn Savannah, Georgia September 2009.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Vertical Datums and Heights
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the Geodetic Surveys in Israel Gershon Steinberg Survey of Israel 1 Lincoln St. Tel-Aviv 65220, Israel Gilad.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
The RSGPS program and OPUS - RS Getting There Faster –
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
NGS AND REAL TIME POSITIONING
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
© 2009 Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. OPUS and VRS for QA Surveys of the PAMAP Program Eric M. Orndorff, MS, PLS Zach Lupold, BS Great Lakes Region Height.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Common Marks. Datasheet Basics The NGS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase,PROGRAM = datasheet,
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar March 20, pm ET Key Considerations and Concerns When Using OPUS Projects to Position.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
CORS. CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines.
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
Improved Hybrid Geoid Modeling and the FY 2000 Geoid Models Dr. Daniel R. Roman January 16, : :30 Conference Room 9836.
GPS Heights Primer Chris Pearson 1 1 National Geodetic Survey 2300 South Dirksen Pkwy Springfield IL.
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
Improved Covariance Modeling of Gravimetric, GPS, and Leveling Data in High-Resolution Hybrid Geoids Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Research Geodesist.
Class 27: 28 April 2008 Planning and Analysis of a Height Modernization Survey using TM 58/59 GISC April 2007.
NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT WHY HOW WHEN NAD83(NSRS)
GPS Derived Heights: A Height Modernization Primer December 1, 2006 Professional Land Surveyors of Colorado 2006 Fall Technical Program Renee Shields National.
Lecture 5 – Differential Correction
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey 1 Guidelines for Establishing GPS-Derived Ellipsoid and.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Towards Optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS OCTOBER 9, 2014 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
RTN Field Procedures and Best Practices New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors January 20, 2016 Dan Martin Northeast Regional Geodetic.
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
GPS Site Calibration Objectives  Explain the Co-ordinate systems used in GPS Surveying.  Explain what a calibration is.  Explain the 5 main process.
1700+ Active sites 200+ Contributors CORS Network continued growth RTN AND NGS “FOUNDATION CORS” WILL BE THE PRIMARY ACCESS TO THE NSRS.
H 88 = h 83 – N 03. THE TECHNOLOGY SWEET SPOT SBAS: 2 M H, 6 M V, 0.3 M SMOOTHED H, CHEAP COMMERCIAL DGPS: FEW DM, $$ USCG BEACON: METER+, CHEAP CORS/OPUS:
GPS Derived Heights: A Height Modernization Primer May 8 and May 10, 2007 National Geodetic Survey Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey National Oceanic.
Guidelines for Real Time GNSS Networks (RTN) Administration.
Improvements to the Geoid Models
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Presentation transcript:

B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE TO NEAREST CALIBRATION POINT)? B SAME OFFICE & FIELD CALIBRATION USED? FYI: GNSS CAN PROVIDE GOOD RELATIVE POSITIONS IN A PROJECT WHILE STILL NOT CHECKING TO KNOWNS IN AN ABSOLUTE SENSE TWO POINT CALIBRATION

RT DERIVED ORTHO HEIGHTS - LOCALIZE OR NOT? PASSIVE MARKS ARE A SNAP SHOT OF WHEN THEY WERE LEVELED OR DERIVED FROM GPS IF YOU BUILD FROM A MONUMENTED BM AND THE DESIGN WAS DONE REFERENCED TO IT, IT IS “THE TRUTH”, UNLESS IN GROSS ERROR. CONSTRAINING TO PASSIVE BMs IS A GOOD WAY TO NOT ONLY LOCK TO THE SURROUNDING PASSIVE MARKS, BUT ALSO TO EVALUATE HOW THE CONTROL FITS TOGETHER. HOW GOOD IS THE NGS HYBRID GEOID MODEL IN YOUR AREA? (SIDE NOTE: GEOID 09 IS THE CURRENT MODEL USED BY OPUS)

CALIBRATIONS/VERTICAL LOCALIZATIONS

HOW FAR CAN I GO BEFORE MY LEVELED DIFFERENCES ARE DIFFERENT FROM MY ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT DIFFERENCES?

LVL_DH Program Program LVL_DH converts the published orthometric height difference between two NAVD 88 bench marks into a leveled height difference by removing the orthometric correction from the published relative height. This process requires the exact gravity values at the two bench marks used in the NAVD 88 adjustment. These gravity values are maintained by NGS in its data base. ROD & INSTRUMENT CORRECTIONS ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT CORRECTION

EXAMPLE

LVL_DH OUT

GNSS DERIVED HEIGHTS Summary of expected orthometric height precisions/accuracies- 95% Confidence REMEMBER REDUNDANCY AND A CHECK ON KNOWN POINTS CORS = 0.05 m OPUS-S = 0.05 m OPUS-RS = 0.05 m NGS 58/59 = 0.02 m local, 0.05 m to NSRS SINGLE BASE REAL TIME = 0.02 m ≤ 10 Km, remember GIGO RTN = m,

ELLIPSOID, GEOID & ORTHO HEIGHTS H 88 = h 83 – N 03 NAD 83 (HARN) USE GEOID O3 NAD 83 (CORS 96) USE GEOID 09 ITRF USE SCIENTIFIC GEOID (USGG)

USING GNSS MANUFACTURER’S SOFTWARE- TGO

Available “On-Line” at the NGS Web Site: SEARCH: “NGS 58”

Network / Local Accuracy NSRS

HARN/Control Stations (75 km) Primary Base (40 km) Secondary Base (15 km) Local Network Stations (7 to 10 km) GPS ELLIPSOID HEIGHT HIERARCHY

DATA COLLECTION PARAMETERS VDOP < 6 for 90% or longer of 30 minute session –Shorter session lengths stay < 6 always –Schedule travel during periods of higher VDOP Session lengths for baselines ≤ 10 KM = 30 minutes & collect at 5 second data interval Session lengths for baselines 10 – 15 KM = 1 hour & collect at 15 second data interval Track satellites down to 10° elevation angle

REDUNDANCY If extra measurements are included then a least squares adjustment will provide a check on the accuracy of control point coordinates and can also be used to identify bad observations. More measurements should be included than the minimum - needed to determine the origin and possibly the orientation and scale of the survey Redundant measurements taken with different satellites and satellite geometry provide a mitigation for multipath effects. Each local station must have at least two acceptable baselines to its closest neighbor

Two Days/ Same Time > Difference = -0.2 cm “Truth” = Difference = 4.6 cm Two Days/ Different Times > Difference = 4.6 cm “Truth” = Difference = 2.3 cm

BASELINE PROCESSING “MULTI-STATION” PROCESSING MODE DOUBLE DIFFERENCING (ELIMINATES SAT/RECEIVER CLOCK, HARDWARE BIASES, REDUCES NOISE PARAMETERS) PRECISE EPHEMERIS (14 DAYS LATENCY) 15 ° CUT OFF FIX ALL INTEGERS FOR BASELINES LESS THAN 40 KM USE A TROPO MODEL RATHER THAN FIELD MET DATA UNLESS PROVEN BETTER USE RELATIVE TROPO SCALE PARAMETER FOR STATIONS OVER 15 KM AND FOR LARGE INTERSTATION RELIEF BASELINE RMS ≤ 1.5 CM REDUNDANT BASELINES DIFFER BY ≤ 2.0 CM IN ELLIPSOID HEIGHT

ADJUSTMENT OF PRIMARY NETWORK STATIONS FROM CONTROL Horizontal Adjustment (Latitude, Longitude, Ellipsoid Heights) Minimum Constrained [One fixed station] –Fix latitude, longitude and ellipsoid height at one station –Resolve all blunders and large residuals –Determine which Control and known Primary Base Station coordinates should be fixed Constrained [All suitable stations fixed] –Fix latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid heights at Control and known Primary Base Stations –Make sure the constraints did not distort the project NOTE - Geoid model NOT applied at this time

ADJUSTMENT OF LOCAL NETWORK STATIONS Horizontal Adjustment (Latitude, Longitude, Ellipsoid Heights) Minimum Constrained [One fixed station] –Fix latitude, longitude and ellipsoid height at one station –Resolve all blunders and large residuals –Evaluate coordinates at Control and Primary Base Station should not be greatly affected by Local Station baselines (similar to NAD 83 NSRS 2007 VS. CORS 96) Constrained [All suitable stations fixed] –Fix latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid heights at Control and Primary Base Stations –Make sure the constraints did not distort the project NOTE - Geoid model NOT applied at this time

Summary-Vector Processing Accomplished Elevation Mask - 15 degrees Ephemeris - Precise (typ. 14 days latency) Tropospheric Correction Model Iono Corrections - All baselines longer than 5 km. Fix Integers Baselines less than 5 km: L1 fixed solution Baselines greater than 5 km: Iono free (L3) solution Baselines must have RMS values ≤ 1.5 cm Baselines must have difference in “up” ellipsoid height ≤ 2.0 cm

Station pairs with large repeat base line differences also result in large residuals. NGS guidelines for estimating GPS-derived ellipsoid heights require user to re-observe these base lines.

Table Summary of Guidelines

(continued)

Guidelines for Establishing GPS-Derived Orthometric Heights (Standards: 2 cm and 5 cm) SEARCH: “NGS 59”

3 BASIC RULES: A Guide for Establishing GPS-Derived Orthometric Heights (Standards: 2 cm and 5 cm) USE NOS-NGS 58 – GPS DERIVED ELLIPSOID HEIGHTS USE PUBLISHED NAVD 88 CONTROL USE CURRENT HYBRID GEOID MODEL

29 ESTIMATING GPS-DERIVED ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS - FOUR BASIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS 1-Occupy stations with known NAVD 88 orthometric heights (Stations should be evenly distributed throughout project) 2-Project areas less than 20 km on a side, surround project with NAVD 88 bench marks, i.e., minimum number of stations is four; one in each corner of project 3-Project areas greater than 20 km on a side, keep distances between GPS-occupied NAVD 88 bench marks to less than 20 km 4-Projects located in mountainous regions, occupy bench marks at base and summit of mountains, even if distance is less than 20 km

3-D Vertical Adjustment (Orthometric Heights) Minimum Constrained [One fixed station] –Fix latitude, longitude, and orthometric height at one station –Resolve all blunders and large residuals –Compare orthometric heights from adjustment with published NAVD 88 –Determine which NAVD 88 bench marks should be fixed Constrained [All suitable orthometric heights fixed] –Fix latitude, longitude at one station –Fix orthometric heights at all suitable stations –Make sure the constraints did not distort the project COMBINED NETWORK VERTICAL ADJUSTMENT

Combined Network Horizontal Adjustment Perform combined adjustment –Control and Primary Base network along with local network –Latitude, longitude, and ellipsoid height Use GEOID model to obtain geoid heights Make sure combined adjustment did not distort the project

SUMMARY Mistakes (blunders) and systematic errors must be removed before the adjustment A least squares adjustment handles random errors and provides a single solution (Try to eliminate all systematic errors) The Minimally Constrained adjustment checks the internal consistency of the network The Constrained adjustment checks the existing control and references the network to the datum The vertical adjustment estimates GPS-derived Orthometric heights- Approaching 3 rd order leveling accuracies OPUS with redundant observations can produce 5 cm orthometric heights in areas of high accuracy hybrid geoid coverage

Elevation published to centimeters Orthometric height determined by GPS Identified as Height Mod survey station

BIG PICTURE ISSUES IN RT POSITIONING  PASSIVE / ACTIVE – WHAT IS ‘TRUTH’?  GEOID + ELLIPSOID / LOCALIZE – QUALITY OF GEOID MODELS LOCALLY. ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS ON CORS? GRID / GROUND – LOW DISTORTION PROJECTIONS- SHOULD NGS PLAY? ACCURACY / PRECISION- IMPORTANCE OF METADATA SINGLE SHOT / REDUNDANCY RTK / RTN NATIONAL DATUMS / LOCAL DATUMS / ADJUSTMENTS- DIFFERENT WAYS RTN GET THEIR COORDINATES-VARIOUS OPUS, OPUS-DB, CORS ADJUSTED, PASSIVE MARKS. VELOCITIES - NEW DATUMS, “4 -D” POSITIONS GNSS / GPS