Highway Costs Spring 2015. Highway Transportation Costs Type of CostExamples Highway investment costEngineering design, ROW, grading, drainage, pavement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions Presented by: Hank Bonstedt Executive Director Prestressed.
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Waheed Uddin, PhD., P.E. Professor and Director, CAIT Center for Advanced Infrastructure Technology Department of Civil Engineering The University of Mississippi.
Critical Length of Grade
Vehicle Flow.
Spring Valuation of Transportation Safety Value of Life Human Capital Direct Costs Output Losses Net Consumption Gross Output Willingness to Pay.
Spring Sampling Frame Sampling frame: the sampling frame is the list of the population (this is a general term) from which the sample is drawn.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
CE 4640: Transportation Design
Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - In Search of Better Investment Decisions - Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Executive.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
CE 4640: Transportation Design
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
Chapter 3. Highway Design for Performance
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer AAA Michigan Road Improvement Demonstration Program Economic Analyses Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Methods and Preliminary Results January 10, 2011 John Harvey Nick Santero Lev Khazanovich.
Benefit Cost Analysis For Intersection Driver Support Systems David Levinson & Xi Zou 2004.
Urban transport: The public vs private debate LO: Explain the management of transport in urban areas, including the public versus private debate
ALI SALMAN1 LECTURE - 11 ASST PROF. ENGR ALI SALMAN ceme.nust.edu.pk DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT COLLEGE OF E & ME, NUST DEPARTMENT.
May 10, 2011 Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network Dr. Alexander Paz,
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
Economic Evaluation of Pavement Alternatives CEE 320 Steve Muench 9/12/ The majority roads are public facilities built with tax money to serve the.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
 Cross section elements consist of the following:  1.Traffic lanes (carriage ways);  2.Shoulders;  3.Medians;  4.Curbs;  5.Side slopes.
Thomas R. Bane P.E. 605 Suwannee Street Mail-station 32 Tallahassee Florida (850) Roadside - Benefit – Cost.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
ROUNDABOUTS Improving Safety and Efficiency The Ohio Department of Transportation District Clark Ave. Ashland, OH Julie Cichello, P.E. District.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Roads Economic Decision Model (RED) January 2008 Rodrigo Archondo-Callao Senior Highway Engineer, ETWTR The World Bank.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Freeways and Multilane Highways CTC-340. HMWK Ch 13 Read Section 13.7 Ch 13 # 2, 3 Ch 14# 1, 4, 5, 6, 8.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Geometric Design (I). Learning Objectives To understand the considerations and quantifiable aspects of geometric design.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) By Josh Hinds.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance December 16, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger.
Benefit/Cost Ratios, Internal rate of Return, valuation, and depreciation.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
Project Feasibility Analysis
INTERCHANGE DESIGN Fall 2017
Introduction and Applications
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Highway Engineering CE 431
Presentation transcript:

Highway Costs Spring 2015

Highway Transportation Costs Type of CostExamples Highway investment costEngineering design, ROW, grading, drainage, pavement Highway maintenance costMowing, lighting, care of roadside parks Highway user cost a)Motor vehicle b)Travel time c)crashes a)Fuel, lubrication, tires b)Vehicle-hours unit value of time c)Crash rate versus unit crash costs Transit capital costsTerminals, shops, administrative offices Transit operating costsDriver’s wages, maintenance of buses Transit user costs a)Transit money costs b)Transit travel time costs a)Auto running costs to get to terminals, sum of fares b)Time waiting for bus, time riding buses

HIGHWAY USER COSTS SeverityCost (Y2009) Death$1,290,000 Non-Fatal Injuries$68,100 PDO$8,200 Direct Crash Costs (per person) TypeCost Person-hour$2.40* Persons-vehicle1.25 Total$3.00 Value of Time * $7.00 per single-unit trucks, $8.00 for combination trucks (include wage and benefits for drivers)

Comprehensive Crash Costs (per person) TypeCost (Y2012) Death$4,538,000 Injury A$230,000 Injury B$58,000 Injury C$28,000 No injury$2,500 tingtheCostsofUnintentionalInjuries.aspx Unintentional-Injuries-2014.pdf

USER BENEFITS Unit highway user cost: Where, HU = Highway user costs in dollars per 1,000 vehicles B = basic section costs (travel time, vehicle running costs as a function of highway geometric characteristics) A = Crash costs L = length of section T = Transition section costs due to change in speed between adjacent sections D = additional costs caused by delay at intersections

USER BENEFITS User Benefits (between two alternatives): Where, U 0 = user cost per unit of traffic without the improvement U 1 = user cost per unit of traffic with the improvement V 0 = traffic volume without the improvement V 1 = traffic volume with the improvement Induced and Diverted Traffic (may need to take average traffic volumes between alternatives):

Wright & Dixon (2004) Figure 4-1 Basic Section Costs (B)

Wright & Dixon (2004) Figure 4-2 Section Transition Costs (T)

Wright & Dixon (2004) Figure 4-3 Intersection Related Costs (D)

Wright & Dixon (2004) Figure 4-4 Intersection Related Costs – Idling (D)

Important Economic Equations Present Value of some future single payment: Present Value of a series of uniform annual end payment: Present Value Factor when user benefits change from year to year: r = average growth rate, = future annual value estimate/first year value, Y = number of years between estimates

Benefit-Cost Ratio Where, PV = Present value ΔU = user benefits, the reductions in highway costs ΔM = increase in annual maintenance, operating and administrative cost due to investment ΔR = increase in residual value due to the project at the end of the project life ΔI = increase in investment costs due to the project

EXAMPLE A highway agency is considering eliminating an S-Sharp curve on a multilane highway. The total construction cost for the improvement is estimated to be $2 million and will be incurred at the inception of the project. Annual maintenance costs are anticipated to be $2,000 less after the improvement because the elimination of the curve reduces pavement and guardrail damage. The characteristics of the proposed alternatives:

Key Assumptions Two curves have same geometry: can be analyzed together There is no speed differential for passing one curve to the other The design speed increases from 50 mph to 60 mph for the alternative design (#1) One-way hourly volume is equal to the ADT divided by 18 (the number of hours used for the analysis) The capacity is reduced in year 20 to reflect normal deterioration of the roadway

TRAFFIC DATA

CALCULATION OF USER COSTS

Basic Section Costs – Alternative 0 Year B = (27.8 x $3/hour) = $

CALCULATION OF USER BENEFITS Assuming a 25-year analysis period and a 4-percent discount rate, the present value of benefits is then PW g x first year of project: 18.7 x $172,827 = $3,231,865 For two-way traffic: 2 x $3.231,865 = $6,463,730 Note:

CALCULATION OF PROJECT-RELATED COSTS NET PRESENT VALUE OF PROJECT NPV = $6,463,730 – $1,718,198 NPV = $4,745,532 BENEFIT-COST RATIO B/C = $6,463,730 / $1,718,19 NPV = 3.62 > 1

UPDATING USER COSTS Wright & Dixon (2004) Table 4-9

UPDATING USER COSTS Wright & Dixon (2004) Table 4-10

UPDATING USER COSTS Wright & Dixon (2004) Example 4-6

Construction Unit Costs Some useful websites: /bidprice/s_0101.htm =VIEWPROD&ProdID=45