POLICY SCAN - RATING THE INDICATORS – PART TWO Ventura County Public Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engaging Your Community in Practical Program Evaluation Stephanie Welch, MS-MPH, RD, LDN Knox County Health Department Phone (865)
Advertisements

SteeringCoordinating Data / Research Logistics Community Engagement Community Health Planning Committee Structure Austin / Travis County CHA CHIP.
A look inside…. What is the Texas Cancer Plan? A statewide blueprint for cancer prevention and control A consensus-based, strategic document for public-
Thurston County Public Health & Social Services Department Public Health and Social Services Department Assessment Team Meeting.
So What’s to Eat in Your Neighborhood? By- Rhonda Sanders March 4, 2010 Growing Health Communities.
Review of the Literature on Engagement.
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
Results Introduction Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Wisconsin and the United States. Given the risk of smoking initiation during.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Creating a Blueprint for NCCF Affiliate Success. Why is this work necessary? To achieve greater impact in our local communities and together achieve greater.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Lessons Learned from Mass Media Campaigns to Reduce Exposure to Secondhand Smoke: Work in Progress Karen Gutierrez Elizabeth Schar Rebecca Murphy Dave.
Evaluating Tobacco Law Enforcement Roundtables Partial Results (events still ongoing) Partial Results from two Regional Roundtables High stakeholder participation.
Outreach Evaluation Series: Community Assessment Susan Barnes and Alan Carr National Network of Libraries of Medicine Outreach Evaluation Resource Center.
Programming Techniques and Skills for Advisory Leaders Ralph Prince and Roger Rennekamp, Ph.D. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
SAH Year 2: CHANGE Reassessment Shannon Griffin-Blake, Ph.D. Team Lead, Program Services and Evaluation CDC’s Healthy Communities Program National Center.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Local Wellness Policy Its Purpose and Its Power Local Wellness Policy Training Workshop Division of School & Community Nutrition and Coordinated School.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
6. Penilaian Kurikulum The Meaning of Evaluation 1.Evaluation is a process or group of processes by which evaluators gather data in order to make decisions.
Healthy Kids, Healthy America: Preventing Childhood Obesity in Louisiana Schools and Communities Pam Romero Louisiana Council on Obesity Prevention & Management.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Track A: Basic Science This track highlighted all aspects of HIV structure, replication, and the host immune responses and led to a greater understanding.
Overview of the Guide to Assessing Needs and Resources and Selecting Science-Based Programs One ME Coalition Orientation January 27, 2003 Hornby Zeller.
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Process Evaluation Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011 Billings, MT.
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2013 The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2013 National, State, and Local Data National.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Approach and Key Components. The Goal of Cities for Life: To help community groups and primary care providers create an environment that facilitates and.
CHILD HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM Using Data for Advocacy and Policy Change UCLA Center for Health Policy Research California Health Interview Survey.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
IAOD Evaluation Seminar “Demystifying Evaluation in WIPO- Best Practices from Initial Evaluations” Geneva November, Evaluation Section Internal.
Evaluating a Research Report
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
IN Shape Indiana Indiana State Department of Health Community Nutrition Obesity Prevention Division Community Resource Guides Project.
Community Assessment For CX 1 Round 2. Community Assessment Measures what is going on in tobacco control in your community Measures what is going on in.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2011 The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2011 National, State, and Local Data National.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
POLICY SCAN RATINGS July 12, B EFORE YOU BEGIN R ATING … Organize the policies collected by city and indicator Summarize data by each attribute.
Environmental Scan CTG Partners Training July 31, 2012.
Sampling/ Qualitative Research The Curious Skeptics Still at Work.
Sociological Research Methods. The Research Process Sociologists answer questions about society through empirical research (observation and experiments)
Fair and Appropriate Grading
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Facts and Figuring it Out How to Complete the Healthy School Report Card.
Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State.
Information Management and Market Research. Marketing Research Links…. Consumer, Customer, and Public Marketer through information Marketing Research:
Lessons 3-6: Campaigning for Energy Efficiency. Supporters of the Big Energy Efficiency Project.
Research methods 16 th January Research methods Important to have a clear focus for your research. Hypothesis Question Grounded data.
Defining and measuring disparities, inequities, and inequalities in the Healthy People initiative Richard Klein MPH, David Huang, Ph.D. National Center.
Community Resources Assessment Training 2- Community Resources Assessment Training 2-1 Community Resources Assessment Training 2-1.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Trigg County Public Forum Nutrition and Physical Activity January 23, 2014.
Dubai Statistics Center practices in Human Resources Management - What is DSC? - Planning - Performing - Measuring and Evaluating - Supporting Factors.
 Community Health Status Assessment MAPP Phase 3 California Gaining Ground Coalition Small County Learning Community August 13, 2015 Tamara Maciel Bannan,
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
Evaluation Nicola Bowtell. Some myths about evaluation 2Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer always involves extensive questionnaires means.
ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, Health & HIV/AIDS (26/11 – 07/12/2012, Turin) Introduction to National Occupational.
Group Health Center for Community Health and Evaluation
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2011
Presentation transcript:

POLICY SCAN - RATING THE INDICATORS – PART TWO Ventura County Public Health

Questions or thoughts before we dive in…..  Progress on data collection efforts?  New data sources to share?  Successes or challenges

RECAP:CTG Strategic Directions  Tobacco  Obesity: Healthy Eating Active Living  Clinical Preventive Services  Social and Emotional Wellness  Healthy and Safe Physical Environments

4 Data Sources (Quick Recap)  Gathering relevant data helps to determine the level of community support for a particular indicator  There are two types of data recommended for collection  Quantitative and Qualitative

New Data Sources  Health Indicators Warehouse  National Center for Education Statistics  USDA Food Environment Atlas

6 Quantitative Data (Quick Recap) Quantitative data are usually numbers, percentages, or statistics. Gathered from:  State and regional reports  Web sites ( such as AskCHIS [California Health Interview Survey], C-Stats [County and Statewide Archive of Tobacco Statistics], etc.)  Local evaluation reports

7 Qualitative Data (Quick Recap) Qualitative Data: descriptive data objectively collected and gathered locally  Interviews  Focus groups  Coalition/advisory committee member discussions  Observations  Documents (such as policy records, newspaper clippings, or correspondence )

Materials Provided:  Copy of today’s presentation  Attribute Definitions  Indicator Rating Guide  Indicator Rating Worksheet Instructions  Indicator Rating Sheet  Indicator Rating Sheet for Data Entry  Group Activity Materials

What are Attributes? 9 Attributes are characteristics of indicators that were pre-selected by the CDC and VCPH (i.e., public awareness, public support, etc.)  You will rate 16 attributes for each indicator  An attribute rating guide (rubric) will assist you in determining each rating  Attributes are a guide to help determine if a particular indicator is a priority in the community you are rating.

Attributes:  Evidence Based  Potential Reach  Public Awareness  Public Support  Media Attention  Education/Awareness Campaign  Media Campaign  Voluntary Policy  Local Legislated Policy  State policy  Preemption  Health Equity/Disparities  Active Enforcement  Compliance  Intensity/Comprehensiveness/ Exemptions/Fidelity  Sustainability  Other

Steps to Rating Attributes 11  Convene those who should participate in the rating process  Share with the group relevant data pertaining to each attribute  Using the Indicator-Attribute Rating Guide, discuss the conclusions that can be drawn about each attribute  Reach a group consensus on the rating for each attribute (the rating scale ranges from zero to four)  Record the rating and make any edits necessary to the summary of findings  Continue process for all remaining attributes

How to come up with an “OVERALL Rating”  As a group, arrive at an overall impression of this indicator. Looking at the ratings of the attributes, does it appear to be a compelling need in the target community?  Reach a group consensus on a rating for this indicator.

Overall Indicator Rating Tips 13  Most often a subjective process  Is NOT a mathematical average of the attributes ratings  Some attributes may deserve greater weight than others  Is a judgment call based on the collective wisdom of the group  Group must discuss their feelings about the attributes and come to a consensus  The overall rating will help you determine if there is a compelling need in the target community  Comment, comment, comment – support your rating and explain how the group arrived at the rating

Group Activity – Rating an Indicator  Elect a spokesperson and a scribe  Using the data gathered and your knowledge on Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Multi-Unit Housing (Apartments) discuss and rate each attribute.  Come to a consensus to give this indicator an “OVERALL” RATING”  Share your findings with the group