David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Experiences with Information Technology and their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement Thomas F. Nelson Laird and George D. Kuh.
Advertisements

TJC, Institutional Effectiveness And You. Definition Institutional Effectiveness is an ongoing, comprehensive, and institutionally integrated system,
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
October 17,  Review of CCSSE  Descriptions of HCC Students  Discussion of Benchmark Results  Item Results  Critical Thinking analysis.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
Moreno Valley College Who Are We? Community, Students, Teachers Prepared by David Torres, Dean, Institutional Research, (951)
Facilitators of School Improvement February 2013 Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore Macomb ISD.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Monitoring Report 2015 – 01 Global Ends Statement.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
California State University, San Bernardino  Founded in 1965, CSUSB provides outstanding post-secondary educational opportunities and a pathway to upward.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Direction of Kansas Education Brad Neuenswander Interim Commissioner, KSDE Fall, 2014.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Results for Faculty
Alamo Colleges District
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
Presentation transcript:

David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District

SSS Methodology Done in conjunction with CCSSE in Spring 2011 Each survey had 5 parts Demographics Importance Campus Climate Services General Satisfaction Sample size =284 (2010 sample size = 652).

Demographics 79% completed most of their units at MVC, followed by RCC (16%) and NC (5%) Sample2011 MVC Males53%48% Females45%51% Declined to state 2%1%

Demographics SampleSpring 2011 MVC White32.6%26.7% African American9.7%13.8% Hispanic40.5%45.1% Asian / Pacific Islander8.6%6.7% Other8.6%7.7%

Demographics SampleSpring 2011 MVC Under 180.4%3.5% %29.6% %25.8% %21.4% 36 and Over3.2%19.7%

Demographics (continued) 57% lived in households of less than $50,000/year 73% live with parents 1 out of every 10 is a single parent 88%+ live with 3 or more people

Demographics (continued) 75% first generation 63% want an AA/AS or transfer 64% attend in the morning 48% enroll in 12+ units Work: 57% <20 hours, 26%=21-34, 10% fulltime

Student Learning Outcomes

Reasons for not attending

Importance

Campus Climate

Services

General Satisfaction

General Satisfaction (cont.)

CCSSE provides standardized benchmarks of student engagement Administered Spring 2011 Surveyed 480+ MV students CCSSE Background

Active and Collaborative Learning Student Effort Academic Challenge Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Benchmarks

Students learn more when they are … …actively involved in their education and apply what they are learning in different settings collaborate with others to solve problems or master challenging content that prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems. Measured by 7 survey items Benchmark 1- Active and Collaborative Learning.

These 8 survey items measure: How students’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning Likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals Benchmark 2-Student Effort

These 10 survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students the rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance Benchmark 3- Academic Challenge

The more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Measured by 6 survey items. Benchmark 4- Student-Faculty Interaction

Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that provide important support services cultivate positive relationships among groups on campus demonstrate commitment to their success 7 items measure this construct Benchmark 5- Support for Learners

Moreno Valley – CCSSE Benchmarks

Determine which benchmarks need improvement Understand the survey items that informed the benchmarks Develop targeted treatments that are hypothesized to positively affect these items Suggestions for moving forward…

CCSSE and Accreditation

end of slide show