1 Indiana 3D Hydro Group The Effects of Envelope Irradiation on Gravitational Instabilities in Embedded Protoplanetary Disks Kai Cai Astronomy Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From protostellar cores to disk galaxies - Zurich - 09/2007 S.Walch, A.Burkert, T.Naab Munich University Observatory S.Walch, A.Burkert, T.Naab Munich.
Advertisements

Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style.
FU Ori and Outburst Mechanisms Zhaohuan Zhu Hubble Fellow, Princeton University Collaborators: Lee Hartmann (Umich), Charles Gammie (UIUC), Nuria Calvet.
Processes in Protoplanetary Disks Phil Armitage Colorado.
Star Formation and the Interstellar Medium
Processes in Protoplanetary Disks Phil Armitage Colorado.
James Wadsley, Sijing Shen (McMaster), Lucio Mayer, Joachim Stadel (Zurich),Graeme Luftkin (Maryland), Tom Quinn (Washington) UWO Disk Workshop 2006 Simulating.
“The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence II: The interaction of the planet with the disc” Papaloizou & Nelson 2003, MNRAS 339.
Non-ideal MHD and the Formation of Disks Shantanu Basu Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Wolf Dapp ( Juelich Supercomputing Centre, Germany ),
From Massive Cores to Massive Stars Mark Krumholz Princeton University Collaborators: Richard Klein, Christopher McKee (UC Berkeley) Kaitlin Kratter, Christopher.
Low-mass H-burning stars, brown dwarfs, & planets 13 M J 80 M J Planets Mayor & Queloz 1995 Brown dwarfs Rebolo et al Stars 1 M J = 0.01 M 
Excesos IR F   Discos “flared ”
The Influence of Planets on Disk Observations (and the influence of disks on planet observations) Geoff Bryden (JPL) Doug Lin (UCSC) Hal Yorke (JPL)
PHOTOELECTRIC CHARGING of DUST GRAINS in PROTOSTELLAR DISKS Prof. Ana I. Gómez de Castro Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Dr. Andreas Pedersen Helsinky.
Model SEDs of Massive YSOs Barbara Whitney, Tom Robitaille, Remy Indebetouw, Kenny Wood, and Jon Bjorkman.
« Debris » discs A crash course in numerical methods Philippe Thébault Paris Observatory/Stockholm Observatory.
ASTR377: A six week marathon through the firmament by Orsola De Marco Office: E7A 316 Phone: Week 6, May 24-27, 2009.
Star and Planet Formation Sommer term 2007 Henrik Beuther & Sebastian Wolf 16.4 Introduction (H.B. & S.W.) 23.4 Physical processes, heating and cooling.
Monte Carlo Radiation Transfer in Protoplanetary Disks: Disk-Planet Interactions Kenneth Wood St Andrews.
The Formation of Uranus and Neptune (and intermediate-mass planets) R. Helled Tel-Aviv University 1 Dec
J. Cuadra – Accretion of Stellar Winds in the Galactic Centre – IAU General Assembly – Prague – p. 1 Accretion of Stellar Winds in the Galactic Centre.
Goal: To understand how stars form. Objectives: 1)To learn about the properties for the initial gas cloud for 1 star. 2)To understand the collapse and.
Chapter 19 Star Formation (Birth) Chapter 20 Stellar Evolution (Life) Chapter 21 Stellar Explosions (Death) Few issues in astronomy are more basic than.
Processes in Protoplanetary Disks Phil Armitage Colorado.
Lucio Mayer (Zurich), Thomas Quinn (University of Washington), James Wadsley (McMaster University), Joachim Stadel (Zurich) GIANT PLANET FORMATION VIA.
Dust Envelopes around Oxygen-rich AGB stars Kyung-Won Suh Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science Chungbuk National University, Korea
Molecular Hydrogen Emission from Protoplanetary Disks Hideko Nomura (Kobe Univ.), Tom Millar (UMIST) Modeling the structure, chemistry and appearance of.
Modeling Disks of sgB[e] Stars Jon E. Bjorkman Ritter Observatory.
Deciphering Ancient Terrsa 20 Apr 2010 Low-metallicity star formation and Pop III-II transition Kazu Omukai (Kyoto U.) Collaborators: Naoki.
THERMAL EVOLUION OF NEUTRON STARS: Theory and observations D.G. Yakovlev Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia Catania, October 2012,
COOLING OF NEUTRON STARS D.G. Yakovlev Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, St.-Petersburg, Russia Ladek Zdroj, February 2008, 1. Formulation of the Cooling.
Kaitlin Kratter Harvard CfA / U Toronto Chris Matzner (U Toronto), Mark Krumholz (UCSC), Richard Klein (LLNL/Berkeley) Townsville, Sep 17th, 2010 Binary.
Disk Instability Models: What Works and What Does Not Work Disk Instability Models: What Works and What Does Not Work The Formation of Planetary Systems.
Time-Dependent Phenomena in Protoplanetary Disks
HBT 28-Jun-2005 Henry Throop Department of Space Studies Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Boulder, Colorado John Bally University of Colorado DPS Pasadena,
Long term evolution of circumstellar discs: DM Tau and GM Aur Ricardo Hueso (*) & Tristan Guillot Laboratoire Cassini, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur,
Infall rates from observations Joseph Mottram 1. Why is infall relevant? Infall must happen for star formation to proceed The rate of infall on envelope.
Double diffusive mixing (thermohaline convection) 1. Semiconvection ( ⇋ diffusive convection) 2. saltfingering ( ⇋ thermohaline mixing) coincidences make.
Lecture 15 main sequence evolution. Recall: Initial cloud collapse A collapsing molecular cloud starts off simply:  In free-fall, assuming the pressure.
Kenneth Wood St Andrews
HBT 28-Jun-2005 Henry Throop Department of Space Studies Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) Boulder, Colorado John Bally University of Colorado Portugal,
Outflows from YSOs and Angular Momentum Transfer National Astronomical Observatory (NAOJ) Kohji Tomisaka.
The University of Western Ontario Shantanu Basu and Eduard Vorobyov Cores to Disks to Protostars: The Effect of the Core Envelope on Accretion and Disk.
Fragmentation and Evolution of the First Core
March 27, 2008 Milan Raicevic ICC, Durham University Studying the role of inhomogeneous reionization in galaxy formation with GALFORM and SimpleX Collaborators:
Evolved Protoplanetary Disks: The Multiwavelength Picture Aurora Sicilia-Aguilar Th. Henning, J. Bouwman, A. Juhász, V. Roccatagliata, C. Dullemond, L.
Processes in Protoplanetary Disks Phil Armitage Colorado.
Biosimilar (Insulin) – Competitive Landscape and Market & Pipeline Analysis, 2016 DelveInsight’s, “Biosimilar (Insulin) – Competitive Landscape and Market. Request for sample of this research report:
A resolution of the magnetic braking catastrophe during the second collapse cc2yso UWO, May 17, 2010 – Wolf Dapp Wolf B. Dapp & Shantanu Basu.
Terrestrial Planet Formation in Binary Star Systems ROSES Workshop 2005 February Jack J. Lissauer, NASA Ames Elisa V. Quintana, NASA Ames & Univ. Michigan.
Arman Khalatyan AIP 2006 GROUP meeting at AIP. Outline What is AGN? –Scales The model –Multiphase ISM in SPH SFR –BH model Self regulated accretion ?!
ERIC HERBST DEPARTMENTS OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY Chemistry in Protoplanetary Disks.
Star Formation Triggered By First Supernovae Fumitaka Nakamura (Niigata Univ.)
Orbital Evolution of Dust Grains and Rocks During FU Orionis Outbursts
The History of the Baryon Budget Yann Rasera Supervisor: Romain Teyssier and Jean-Pierre Chièze Horizon Project Cosmological simulations Analytical model.
Ravit Helled Institute for Computational Science
Young planetary systems
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
FORMATION OF LOW-MASS COMPANIONS BY DISC FRAGMENTATION
“The hot bubbles around nascent planets :
Molecules: Probes of the Interstellar Medium
and the Stellar Upper Mass Limit
Planetesimal formation in self-gravitating accretion discs
Eduard Vorobyov and Shantanu Basu
Identifying the Key Factors in the Planet Formation Process
The Life Cycle of Stars Starry, Starry Night.
Can Giant Planet Form by Direct Gravitational Instability?
Population synthesis of exoplanets
Mayer et al Viability of Giant Planet Formation by Direct Gravitational Instability Roman Rafikov (CITA)
Click to add master title
Presentation transcript:

1 Indiana 3D Hydro Group The Effects of Envelope Irradiation on Gravitational Instabilities in Embedded Protoplanetary Disks Kai Cai Astronomy Department Indiana University May 18, 2006 (Now at: McMaster University) Richard H. Durisen Annie C. Mejía (Univ. of Washington) Megan K. Pickett (Purdue Univ. Calumet) Aaron C. Boley Scott Michael

2 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 2 Gravitational Instabilities in Embedded Disks Gravitational Instabilities (GIs) in Disks Toomre’s stability parameter for Q = c s  /  G  < 1  ring instability for Q <  spiral instability Several class 0/I disks have low Q’s e.g. HL Tau, L1551 IRS5 Why? Disks are earlier times Disks are earlier times This Study: Effects of Envelope Irradiation

3 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 3 3D Hydro Code Numerical Characteristics: 2 nd order in space and time Eulerian Fixed cylindrical grid (r, ,z) (256,128,32) to (512,512,64) ~ millions of cells ! Runs in parallel on SMP machines r = 512 z = 64  = 128

4 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 4 Radiative Cooling: Mejía (2004) & Cai (2006) – Radiative cooling in the atmosphere (  R <2/3) – Flux-limited diffusion in the disk interior (  R  2/3) – Envelope irradiation: blackbody flux with T env – D’Alessio et al. (2001) mean opacities (dust grains): a max can vary (n(a) ~ a -3.5, a min =  m) z (AU) Atmosphere (  < 2/3) Interior (  ≥ 2/3) r (AU) Envelope Irradiation

5 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 5 Initial Axisymmetric Model Initial model for radiative cooling simulations Initial model for radiative cooling simulations R = 40 AU M d = 0.07 M  M  = 0.5 M   (r)  r -1/2 Q min =1.5 R = 40 AU M d = 0.07 M  M  = 0.5 M   (r)  r -1/2 Q min =1.5

6 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 6 The Disk Evolution: four phases Irr 15K

7 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 7 The Effects of Envelope Irradiation Irr 15K Irr 25K No Irr. 14 ORPs 3500 yr Irr 50K Simulations compared during the asymptotic phase  A  = 1.51 Global t cool = 2.7 ORPs  A  = 1.01 Global t cool = 5 ORPs  A  = 1.16 Global t cool = 3.2 ORPs  A   0.40 Global t cool ~ 9 ORPs Cai et al. (2007, in prep.)

8 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 8 Total Nonaxisymmetry A sum of the amplitudes of all m’s, then averaged temporally   A  (  ORPs) No-Irr: 1.51 Irr 15K: 1.16 Irr 25K: 1.01 Irr 50K: continues to damp Boss (2002) reported a similar effect when he raised outer disk T.

9 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 9 Envelope Irradiation: Q(r) At 14.9 ORPs (= 3725 yrs)

10 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 10 Total Energies … ∇·F∇·F   ∫(∇· F)dVdt ∫  dVdt cooling heating

11 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 11 The Luminosity of the Envelope Irradiation L env =  T env 4  2  R d 2 = total energy input rate of the envelope irradiation on the disk Stellar luminosity L  =  T  4  4  R  2 (T  = 4000 K, R  = 2 R  ) In all cases, net disk luminosity L disk ~ 5×10 30 erg/s 1.3× /350K 7.2× × K 8.6× × K L env (erg/s) L env / L  T env

12 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 12 Vertical Structure  Irradiation tends to make the disk isothermal vertically No-Irr 25K  T

13 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 13 Mass Transport, Modes & Torques Gravitational torques (A. Boley) Average mass transport over the last 3 ORPs

14 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 14 L1551 IRS 5 system Osorio et al. (2003) Lim & Takakuwa (2005) A triple?

15 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 15 L1551 IRS 5 : model fit Osorio et al. (2003)

16 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 16 A new initial model M  = 0.3 M , M d = 0.2 M , R = 15 AU,  (r)  r -1, Q min <1 - close to L1551 IRS 5 northern disk Setup: T env = 120K, a max =200  m L env ~ L ⋆ of T Tau star (T= 4000K, R= 2R ๏ ) 2 AU

17 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 17 Simulating a L1551 IRS 5 Disk Disk expands  R final ~ 30 AU: unrealistic Very high midplane  & long radiative cooling time

18 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 18 Q(r) and the Correction Factor Corrected Q min = (1 + k mu h)Q 0 ~

19 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 19 Analytic Analyses Rafikov (2005)    min   inf [f(  )] 1/5, T mid  T min  T inf [f(  )] 2/5, etc M  disk (at 20 AU) :  inf  201 g cm -2, T inf  39 K, but [f(  )] 1/5 might be large (~1.5) For L1551 IRS 5 disk (at 10 AU):  inf  1220 g cm -2 and T inf  65.6 K, but [f(  )] 1/5 ~ 5.3  Despite simplifications, Rafikov (2005)’s analytic arguments may be valid out to ~ 20 AU for our disk. Matzner & Levin (2005): o nly discussed SLING as global GIs

20 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 20 Conclusions Envelope irradiation tends to suppress GIs – it cannot be ignored ! No dense clumps produced, so direct giant formation by GIs unlikely. GIs  fragmentation! Mild irradiation preferentially suppresses high-order modes Future Stellar irradiation – T irr (r) ~ r -1/2 Consider the gravitational effect of a binary companion – e.g., Mayer et al. (2005), Boss (2006) -> Roche potential Mass infall onto the disk - e.g., Mayer et al. (2004), Banerjee et al. (2004), Vorobyov & Basu (2005) ……

21 Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Indiana University - Purdue University Calumet 3D Hydro Group Click to edit Master subtitle style Click to edit Master title style 21 Thank you!