PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation statusOverview New Framework  why  status  schedule Simulation subdetector  Forward spectrometer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DPG 2004 Köln C. Schwarz Particle Identification with the PANDA detector at GSI C.Schwarz, GSI.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
STORI’02Carsten Schwarz Physics with p at the Future GSI Facility Physics program Detector set-up p e - coolerdetector High Energy Storage Ring HESR High.
Concept of the PANDA Detector for pp&pA at GSI Physical motivation for hadron physics with pbars The antiproton facility Detector concept Selected simulation.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
Sci Fi Simulation Status Malcolm Ellis MICE Meeting Osaka, 2 nd August 2004.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Software Overview David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007 David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007.
Carsten Schwarz PANDA June 2004 CID Cherenkov Imaging Detectors ● RICH software at HERMES, Ralf Kaiser, Glasgow ● Present status of DIRC, C.S., GSI ● Spiralling.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
LOGO The η -mass measurement with the Crystal Ball at MAMI A. Nikolaev for the Crystal MAMI and A2 Collaborations Helmholtz Institut für Strahlen-
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
22 September 2005 Haw05 1  (1405) photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS H. Fujimura, Kyoto University Kyoto University, Japan K. Imai, M. Niiyama Research.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
J.RItman PANDA Collab. Meeting, May 2003 Status of the PANDA Simulations Event Generator UrQMD p A MVD Resolution Time of Flight Estimates of Data Rates.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
Calorimeters Design Issues and Simulation Needs C.Woody Physics Department Brookhaven National Lab EIC Simulation Workshop Oct 9, 2012.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
News on Rho PANDA Collaboration Meeting, Bochum K. Götzen, GSI 1.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Review and Perspective of Muon Studies Marco Destefanis Università degli Studi di Torino PANDA Collaboration Meeting GSI (Germany) September 5-9, 2011.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
PANDA Software Trigger K. Götzen Dec Challenge Required reduction factor: ~1/1000 (all triggers in total) A lot of physics channel triggers → even.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Prospect of SiPM application to TOF in PANDA
April12 DST calibration status
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Electromagnetic Physics Working Group discussion
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
Presentation transcript:

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation statusOverview New Framework  why  status  schedule Simulation subdetector  Forward spectrometer  EMC (TS) Status PID Benchmark channel  Status

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status New Framework not enough manpower for development switch to well proved framework  only few on the market decision: BaBar framework experiences in PANDA collaboration request to BaBar computing management  O.k but with Copyright

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status New Framework object-oriented environment: Compilation time for develpment shorter digitization, event-mixing, detector response reconstruction: vertexing, tracking, PID analysis: many fit routines available Advantages

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status New Framework Simulation Architecture

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status New Framework Status PANDA source code in new environment embedded (done) implementation in CVS (done) removal of database (30% done) implementation of detector geometry in Bogus  removal of BaBar geometry: dummy version (done)  implementation of PANDA geometry (to do) modification of reconstruction & analysis (to do)

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status New Framework Time schedule idea: study of benchmark channels for TR in new framework deadline event production: Second week of August implementation has to be finished until beginning of August

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Detector development: FS simulation and reconstruction of EMC (FS) is working idealized setup: appr PWO crystals implementation of more realistic setup has to be done  lead glass calorimeter? (talk in subgroup meeting: Piotr Hawranek)

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Detector development: FS new idea: Forward dipol (HERMES)  iron plate  shields the beam from the dipol field advantage:  no dipol behind FS disadvantage:  no acceptance between 0°-1° first calculations:  magnetic field: 1T  beam region: 100 mT HERMES: Side view of dipol with shielding

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Detector development: EMC (TS) gamma-efficiency vs. space between crystals default value: 2.0 mm space variation: 2.0mm-0.3mm 2000 events simulated: eff. increases dramaticaly by reducing the space target point geometry modification: point of intersection app. 2cm backward

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Reconstruction: PID PID problem with DIRC and RICH different efficiency for positive and negative particles reco with old tracker interface modified reconstruction: PID works properly (Carsten Schwarz, GSI)

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Benchmark channel (Jan Zhong, Bochum) problem: assignment of gammas to corresponding mesons possiblilities: requirement: No kinematic fit  spatial & energy resolution for each setup strategy: Probabilities for each hypothesis

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Benchmark channel (Jan Zhong, Bochum) calculation and via  best combination  least cuts  total energy, momentum  efficiency: more than 20% (talk in subgroup meeting)

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Benchmark channel (Alexander Golischewski, Bochum) (Agnes Lundborg, Uppsala) comparison: EMC setup with constant crystal length and extended cystal length improved efficiency and resolution with extended crystal length background studies still under investigation

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Benchmark channel (Francesca Ottone, Pavia) events analysed with cuts  energy <E(CM)<3.479 GeV  momentum P(CM)<0.5 GeV  position of vertex D0<0.5mm; -0.5mm<Z0<0.5mm  distance: primary to vertex < 2.5mm

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Benchmark channel (Andrei Sokolov, GSI/Giessen) selector for most important D°-decay modes mass difference method  improvement of resolution still problems:  Kaon & Pion identification  matching: charged particles with Cluster in EMC(TS) (talk in subgroup meeting)

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation status Benchmark channel (Marco Destefanis, Giessen) asymmetry in efficiency: lifetime  60mm instead 78.9mm  no energy loss in track reco  new framework: Kalman fitter (talk in subgroup meeting)

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation statusAgenda Simulation subgroup meeting June 2th 15:30-15:36: General 15:36-15:50: Status of new framework (Matthias Steinke) 15:50-16:04: Simulation of FS (Piotr Hawranek) 16:04-16:18: (Andrei Sokolov) 16:18-16:32: (Olaf Hartmann) 16:32-16:46: (Jan Zhong) 16:46-17:00: (Marco Destefanis)