Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TJC, Institutional Effectiveness And You. Definition Institutional Effectiveness is an ongoing, comprehensive, and institutionally integrated system,
Advertisements

2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Susan Burrow August 17, The Purpose of the QEP Improve student learning in developmental math through active learning and supplemental instruction.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
Office of Institutional Research CCSSE & Active and Collaborative Learning.
Engagement in Learning Marian A. Ford EDHE Class Agenda Engagement Theory Experimental Learning Theory Cognitive Apprenticeships/Internships Study.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
ENGAGING STUDENTS, CHALLENGING THE ODDS 2006 SFCC Findings
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
Why Are HIP Practices so Important to Students?... Where and how are we accomplishing these at CWU? HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES: Create an environment that helps.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Results for Faculty
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
Director, Institutional Research
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The Heart of Student Success
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) provides community colleges across the United States with information about effective educational practices to inform decision making and target institutional improvements. Specifically, CCSSE is intended to provide information to further efforts in student learning and persistence. The Community College Student Report (CCSR) is the CCSSE survey instrument that collects student responses about their engagement in an effort to measure institutional quality. Student engagement is defined by CCSSE as “the amount of time and energy students invest in meaningful educational practices. “ Annual Participation: In the 2010 administration of CCSSE at Rock Valley College, 426 students participated in the CCSR. As a medium-sized college by CCSSEE definition, the target for participation is 800. As such, Rock Valley College sampled 53% of its target for participation CCSSE Participation at RVC Target Participation800 Actual Participation426 % of Target53% Understanding the Scores: Using Benchmark scores, comparisons can be made among subgroups and to other groups of colleges participating in the survey, including the following: <> Illinois - community colleges in the state participating in the survey <> 2010 CCSSE Cohort - all the community colleges in the nation participating in the 2010 administration of the survey <> 2010 Top Performing Colleges - the ten colleges in the nation with the highest scores for each of the identified benchmark; actual colleges may change with each benchmark Benchmark 1: Active and Collaborative Learning “Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems.” Summary: <> Rock Valley College scored a 49.0 on this benchmark. <> RVC students rated this benchmark slightly higher than their peers in Illinois community colleges. <> RVC students rated this benchmark lower than their peers in national comparison groups. NOTE: Information for this report comes from CCSSE Standard Reports. Additional data, including disaggregated data (i.e., gender, race/ethnicity, age, developmental, first generation and full-time/part-time status), is available. More complete reporting of CCSSE results will be posted on the Assessment website.

Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Benchmark 2: Student Effort Benchmark 3: Academic Challenge Summary: <> Rock Valley College scored a 51.0 on this benchmark. <> RVC students rated this benchmark higher than their peers in Illinois community colleges, as well as peers in the 2010 CCSSE Cohort. <> RVC students rated this benchmark lower than their peers in 2010 Top Performing Colleges. “Students’ own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals.” “Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. These survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance.” Summary: <> Rock Valley College scored a 52.4 on this benchmark. <> RVC students rated this benchmark higher than their peers in Illinois community colleges, as well as peers in the 2010 CCSSE Cohort. <> RVC students rated this benchmark lower than their peers in 2010 Top Performing Colleges.

Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Benchmark 4: Student-Faculty Interaction Benchmark 5: Support for Learners Summary: <> Rock Valley College scored a 48.3 on this benchmark. <> RVC students rated this benchmark slightly higher than their peers in Illinois community colleges. <> RVC students rated this benchmark lower than their peers in national comparison groups. Summary: <> Rock Valley College scored a 47.8 on this benchmark. <> RVC students rated this benchmark lower than their peers in Illinois community colleges and in national comparison groups. “In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning.” “Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that provide important support services, cultivate positive relationships among groups on campus, and demonstrate commitment to their success.”