10 Sept 2006SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model The Role of Ambient Noise Tomography in Developing the California 3-D Seismic Velocity Model:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPP 1257 Modelling of the Dynamic Earth from an Integrative Analysis of Potential Fields, Seismic Tomography and other Geophysical Data M. Kaban, A. Baranov.
Advertisements

Group Velocity Dispersion Curves from Wigner-Ville Distributions Simon Lloyd 1, Goetz Bokelmann 1, Victor Sucic 2 1 University of Vienna 2 University of.
Upper mantle of the Bohemian Massif (Central Europe) studied by surface waves from Kurile Islands M8.1 and M8.3 earthquakes Petr Kolinsky Jiri Malek Institute.
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
Earth's Interior:Earth's Interior: A. Layers of the Earth: 1. Crust -Thin, outermost layer of the earth. 2. Mantle -Layer of the earth between the crust.
Global Distribution of Crustal Material Inferred by Seismology Nozomu Takeuchi (ERI, Univ of Tokyo) (1)Importance of Directional Measurements from geophysicists’
Thermal structure of old continental lithosphere from the inversion of surface-wave dispersion with thermodynamic a-priori constraints N. Shapiro, M. Ritzwoller,
Earthscope Seminar: the summary Teresa Mae Lassak April 30 th, 2007.
Horizontal resolution Current network (5yrs, M≥5.5) Rayleigh wave 50s distance from the pole (deg)
Heintz et al lateral resolution : km km T > 40s, long paths T > 15s, shorter paths Surface-wave tomography studies: Vs at 100.
GG 450 April 15, 2008 Refraction Applications. While refraction is used for engineering studies such as depth to basement and depth to the water table,
Computer Aided Tomography Tomos: cut (Gr.) Extensively used to find 3D structure from surface measurements (X-ray, sound, seismic waves)
Application of empirical Green’s functions for the construction and validation of the GBCVM Morgan P. Moschetti and Michael H. Ritzwoller Center for Imaging.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Capricorn Transect : Lithospheric Background B.L.N. Kennett Research School of Earth.
What coronal parameters determine solar wind speed? M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru, K. Fujiki, H. Itoh and T. Murakami Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
Heat Flow and the Seismogenic Zone in Southern California Colin F. Williams USGS, Menlo Park, CA U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Review of the Seismology component of the training course
Surface wave tomography : 1. dispersion or phase based approaches (part A) Huajian Yao USTC April 19, 2013.
Crust and upper mantle structure of Tien Shan Orogen and its surroundings by ambient noise tomography and earthquake tomography Yong Zheng a, Yingjie Yang.
Melting Regions of the Mantle Terry Plank: LDEO with C-T. Lee (Rice) D. Forsyth (Brown) E. Hauri (Carnegie ) K.Fischer (Brown) G. Abers (LDEO) D.Wiens.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland presentation Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media:
An array analysis of seismic surface waves
Detecting temporal velocity changes using various methods Haijiang Zhang University of Science and Technology of China.
An Extension of Stochastic Green ’ s Function Method to Long-Period Strong Ground-motion Simulation Y. Hisada and J. Bielak.
Surface waves Earthquakes generate both body waves (P, S) and surface waves Surface waves are generated along any free surface in the medium In the Earth,
Integrated and Comparative Geophysical Studies of Crustal Structure of Pull-apart Basins: The Salton Trough and Death Valley, California Regions.
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
An Optimization Method on Joint Inversion of Different Types of Seismic Data M. Argaez¹, R. Romero 3, A. Sosa¹, L. Thompson² L. Velazquez¹, A. Velasco².
CISN Ability to Detect Induced Earthquakes Egill Hauksson & Thomas Goebel, Caltech 10 October 2014.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Update Presented by: Michael Mierzwa, P.E. Lead Flood Management Planner California.
Lithospheric Structure of the Gulf of California – Salton Trough Region, NARS-Baja Array Working Group: Robert Clayton, Caltech Don Forsyth, Brown Antonio.
Other Tectonic Rifts: the Woodlark-D'Entrecasteaux Rift, Papua New Guinea Geoffrey Abers, Boston University Thanks to: A. Ferris (BU), S. Baldwin (Syracuse),
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
T Nov 11, Sino-US Workshop, Boulder1 Mike Ritzwoller 1 Ying Yang 1 Morgan Moschetti 1 Fan-Chi Lin 1 Greg Bensen 1 Xiaodong Song 2 Sihua Zheng.
The Columbia Plateau: A Land of Many Floods Olivia Miller & Morgan Rosenberg.
Visualizing TERASHAKE Amit Chourasia Visualization Scientist Visualization Services San Diego Supercomputer center Geon Visualization Workshop March 1-2,
Relative Teleseismic Surface Wave Attenuation using Transportable Array Data Team QDP ON Austin Holland, Joshua Richardson, Weisen Shen, Paul Ogwari.
Dynamic Planet Module Review. Bending of a wave due to changes in its velocity 1.Convection 2.Reflection 3.Subduction 4.Refraction.
Seismological Analysis Methods Receiver FunctionsBody Wave Tomography Surface (Rayleigh) wave tomography Good for: Imaging discontinuities (Moho, sed/rock.
1/24/09 Updated 12/23/09 What about Hawaii? Don L. Anderson.
1 Wavefield Calibration Using Regional Network Data R. B. Herrmann Saint Louis University.
Barbara Romanowicz1, Aimin Cao2, M. Panning3, F
Status and recent updates of the Community Velocity Models (CVM and CVM-H) A. Plesch 1) Define basic structure of these models 2) Highlight their similarities.
Reference Earth model: heat-producing elements & geoneutrino flux *Yu Huang, Roberta Rudnick, and Bill McDonough Geology, U Maryland *Slava Chubakov, Fabio.
California Energy Commission California’s Transmission Planning Experience for Renewable Energy Joint Agency Workshop to Introduce the Renewable Energy.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Transport Science Questions.
Review Seminar: Unit 4 Project “Dangerous and Natural Energy” Freddie Arocho-Perez Kaplan University SC300: Big Ideas in Science.
5 a day – California Geology. 1. Why is the Central Valley of California such a good place for agriculture? 2. How did the gold in California get up on.
Velocity and Attenuation in the Eastern Bay Area and the Delta Donna Eberhart-Phillips UC Davis USGS Delta workshop 10 Sept 2015.
Data Integration Challenges Building 3-D models of earth structure via integration of geological and geophysical data - schemes, data models, and work.
Introduction to Seismology
On constraining dynamic parameters from finite-source rupture models of past earthquakes Mathieu Causse (ISTerre) Luis Dalguer (ETHZ) and Martin Mai (KAUST)
ABSTRACT –Basic Principles and applications
Full-3D Tomography of Crustal Structure in Central California
Dynamic Planet Module Review
Session 4: GOCE for Solid Earth
Lithosphere Delamination and Small-Scale Convection Beneath California Imaged with High Resolution Rayleigh Wave Tomography Donald W. Forsyth and Yingjie.
Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France
Seismic Waves and the Earth’s Interior Structure
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences
Basic info Kaijian Liu Rice University 5th year graduate student
Archean continental terranes commonly have deep keels, but the whole upper mantle of western North America shows very slow seismic velocities.
CIG and Marine Seismology*
The Fiery Earth Earth’s Interior.
Geophysics/Tectonics
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
Finding The SLO Moho GOAL: Estimate Crustal Thickness Beneath San Luis Obispo & Coastal California.
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Andy Nyblade, Penn State University
Presentation transcript:

10 Sept 2006SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model The Role of Ambient Noise Tomography in Developing the California 3-D Seismic Velocity Model: Brief Thoughts Ventura basin LA basin Central Valley Imperial Valley Shapiro, Stehly, Campillo, & Ritzwoller, High resolution surface wave tomography from ambient seismic noise, Science, 307, 615, March 11, Oct, 2004 Past: application to So. CA. group speed maps short periods ( s). Present: refinement of the method application to new regions extension to phase velo- cIties & Love waves larger scales, longer periods smaller scales, shorter periods inversion for 3D Vs. Near Future: joint interpretation with other data.

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model Applications to New Regions (W. US Using TA/ USArray) & Inversion for a Crustal Vs Model 16 sec, group velocity, 10/04-7/06 Map by Morgan Moschetti

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model 16 sec, group velocity, 10/04-7/06 group velocity San Joaquin Valley Applications to New Regions (W. US Using TA/ USArray) & Inversion for a Crustal Vs Model

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model 16 sec, group velocity, 10/04-7/06Preliminary crustal thickness Applications to New Regions (W. US Using TA/ USArray) & Inversion for a Crustal Vs Model Inversion by Morgan Moschetti

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model Extension to Phase Velocities at Longer Periods: High Resolution Mantle Constraints 25 sec Phase velocity Ambient noise Yang & Moschetti 25 sec Phase velocity Teleseismic 2-plane wave method Yang & Forsyth

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model Closing Comment on the Use of Ambient Noise Tomography The Role of Ambient Noise Tomography in Developing the California 3-D Seismic Velocity Model: Closing Comments Complements other kinds of information: homogeneously distributed provides a means to integrate models from different regions way to extrapolate the model into new areas Vs in the crust & uppermost mantle More useful than traditional surface wave data: significantly higher resolution shorter period, provide constraints on the crust. Easily introduced into inversions in which other data are interpreted jointly and with a priori constraints.

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model 35.5, 242 Tehachapi Mtns

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model 37, 242 White Mtns

SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model