Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introducing Multi-Level Government in the EUs Better Regulation Agenda Werner Stengg European Commission; DG Internal Market and Services; Impact Assessment,
Advertisements

Smart regulation communication HLG AB, 7 December 2010
1 SG C Smart Regulation: Regulatory Fitness High Level Group on Administrative Burden 17 October 2013 Elizabeth Golberg, Secretariat-General, European.
EU SME policy The “Small Business Act” for Europe and its Review
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
1 SG C Commission Communication on EU Regulatory Fitness COM (2012) 746 Working Group on Better Regulation Meeting of 4 th March, 2013 Michael Gremminger.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Geneva, 18 th March 2008 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S BETTER REGULATION STRATEGY Presentation by Cavan O’Connor.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission E.U. conference of Administrative Burden Reduction Malta, 1 February 2008 Burden Reduction in Support of.
1 1 st EIONET Workshop on Industrial Pollution 04 March 2015 Andreas Grangler DG Environment Unit C.4 (new!) – Industrial emissions E-PRTR Refit evaluation.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
Smart Regulation Responding to the needs of SMEs Commission Communication COM(2013) final of
BETTER REGULATION IN CYPRUS Andreas Charalambous Director of Economic Studies and EU Affairs Ministry of Finance 2 nd April 2012.
European Union SME policies Ulla Hudina EU Finance Day for SMEs, Athens, 20th January 2009.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Administrative Burden Reduction and Impact Assessment Presentation by Cavan O’Connor Close European Commission.
© EIPA – Craig Robertson - slide 1 Administrative Reform: The Lisbon Strategy: and Good Governance Craig Robertson Senior Lecturer, EIPA Conference organised.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
A Small Business Act for Europe Podgorica, 26 May 2008 Edward TERSMETTE.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Administrative Simplification: An overarching policy to maintain.
1 SG C Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) September 2014.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Better Regulation A key priority for the European Commission "Public participation – together towards good legislation" Brdo pri Kranju, 13 th May 2015.
European Commission, Technical Assistance Information Exchange Unit (TAIEX), DG Enlargement in co-operation with The Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
The role of Geographic Information within the evolving European Union Chris Corbin EUROGI ISSS-LORIS March 2004.
SMART REGULATION A cleaner, fairer and more competitive EU Summary by Elpida Heracleous 29 March 2010.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
The EU’s Better Regulation Package Implementation of Impact Assessment Manuel Santiago European Commission DG Enterprise & Industry.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr. Philipp Birkenmaier Secretariat of Nationaler Normenkontrollrat Nicosia, 2 April 2012.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
Better Regulation for Better Results Presentation to the Social partners 15 July 2015.
Ensuring Participation in Legislative Processes: European Principles and Practical Considerations Katerina Hadzi-Miceva European Center for Not-for-Profit.
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting Stakeholder Workshop 19/20 Nov 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
Social Europe New start for social dialogue 13 October 2015.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Policy-making Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance,
High Level Group on Administrative Burdens Thomas Bustrup 17thoct. 13 Administrative burdens and SMEs State of play and recommendations from a Danish perspective.
Presentation to the EUPAN Riga, March 2015 ISA 2 A Programme for Interoperability Solutions for European public Administrations, businesses and citizens.
HORIZON 2020 W ORK PROGRAMME DG Research and Innovation.
Planned activities for 2016 on better implementation and better regulation in the field of environment policy Make It Work Conference 10/11 Dec 2015 DG.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
Impact Assessment and Evaluation: Interaction between EU and MS level Andrew Farmer, Institute for European Environmental Policy Make it Work Conference.
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting MIG-P meeting 4 Dec 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
1 SG C Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) Meeting of Business Statistics Directors Group Presentation by Jonathon Stoodley, Secretariat-General,
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission International Conference on SCM.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
OVERVIEW OF THE EU SME POLICY Multicountry seminar on SME development policies Budapest, 30 November, 2005 Maarit Nyman European Commission DG Enterprise.
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr
Looking ahead to Horizon 2020 Multidisciplinarity in the context of Horizon 2020 Christina Miller Director UK Research Office
A.I.S.E. Cleaning and Hygiene Forum
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
The European Anti-Corruption Report
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review
REFIT Platform 20/02/2019 Diversity Europe Group.
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010

From Better to Smart Regulation Better Regulation has served its purposes – it had a significant impact on Commission's policy-making. Commission is stepping up a gear: moving from Better to Smart Regulation. President Barroso, through his “Political Guidelines for the next Commission” (sept. 2009), takes direct responsibility for smart regulation.

Three Key messages of Smart Regulation 1. It s about the whole policy cycle: from designing a legislation, to implementation, enforcement, evaluation and revision. 2. It remains a shared responsibility of the EU institutes and the member states: SR is an integral part of our collective efforts in all policy areas. 3. It strengthens the voice of stakeholders and end- users: wide-opening of Commissions policy-making to involve all stakeholders (longer consultation period, review of consultation process etc.).

The Whole Policy Cycle Emphasis on evaluating the functioning and effectiveness of existing regulation. Merging simplification and reduction of administrative burden: this overcomes the problem of obligations with high “irritation” burden but low AB. Ex-post evaluation: Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of EU legislation improves the quality of policy-making and identifies new opportunities to simplify and reduce AB.

The Whole Policy Cycle 2 Fitness checks: evaluation of all legislation in an area to obtain the full picture. assess if the regulatory framework for a policy area is fit for purpose and, if not, what should be changed. Identification of excessive burdens, inconsistencies, obsolete or ineffective measures to help identify the cumulative impact of legislation.

The Whole Policy Cycle 3 For the improvement of the quality of existing legislation, the Commission intends to: Review the evaluation guidelines to ensure that legislations deliver the indented benefits Improve transparency through websites and consultation Carry out 4 fitness checks (environment, employment, transport, industrial policy) Progress in the AB reduction program by 2012 Improve consultation with stakeholders Examine best practices from member states

The Whole Policy Cycle 4 Strengthening the Impact Assessment System: Evaluation by the European Court of Auditors – suggestions for improvement IA Board –provides independent quality control, doing a good job. IAs have become an integral part of policy-making of the Commission Council and Parliament should carry out their own IAs

Implementation of EU legislation EU legislation must be implemented properly if it is to achieve its goals: member states responsible for proper implementation - measures 'preventive action‘ (paying greater attention to implementation and enforcement in IAs when designing new legislation etc.). Legislation should be clear and accessible: Commission encourages member states to consolidate national legislation which transposes EU legislation and to make it electronically available, including via the EUR-Lex portal.

Shared Responsibility The European Parliament and Council: Adopt pending AB and simplification proposals more rapidly Deliver commitments made in the Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better-Law-Making Carry out IAs on substantive amendments to Commission proposals Carry their own IAs irrespective of the Commission and consider them as part of the policy-making process

Shared Responsibility 2 Member States: Smart Regulation must also be carried out by member states especially in areas such as company law, social security etc. (most national law). Promotion of national IAs - could complement those done by the Commission and help in the discussion. Exchange best national practices on smart regulation

Strengthening the voice of Stakeholders Public consultation period from 8 to 12 weeks (implemented in 2012 – so far 90% complies with 8 weeks). Review of the consultation process: Improve the quality of documents and availability Better use of tools: “Your Europe”, internet portals, sme panels etc. Use of member states channels

Conclusions Smart Regulation can help to achieve the ambitious objectives for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth set out by the Europe 2020 Strategy. Smart regulation is a shared responsibility and its success will depend on all institutions, member states and stakeholders involved in the formulation and implementation of EU policies. The Commission will report on progress in implementing the smart regulation agenda in the second half of 2012 (Cyprus Presidency!!).

Smart Regulation: a cleaner, fairer and more competitive EU (Denmark, UK, Netherland) How can end-users get involved in the policy-making process

Examples across Europe Belgium Kafka introduced an online contact point where citizens comment on existing regulations and submit proposals for improvement. These proposals formed the basis of a reform programme for the Federal Government

Examples across Europe Denmark Burden Hunters Project applies user- centric innovation techniques to allow users to identify the red tape that causes them more irritation. Civil servants visiting businesses to see challenges they face. Businesses set the agenda for regulatory action and help develop solutions to cut AB.

Examples across Europe UK Consulting on IAs: Views IAs as a continuous process, from the early stages of identifying a policy challenge through to development of policy options, public consultation and final decision making and implementation.

Examples across Europe France Simplifying Together: Developed a framework that focuses on “life-events” to understand better the burdens faced by businesses. Includes key point in life of a business (starting up, moving, hiring etc) Using this framework and through consultation with the users of regulation they developed a programme to reduce the number of processes, the cost and the time to navigate these events.

Thank you for your attention