1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
58 th Traffic Safety Conference Romell Cooks Regional Administrator Central Region May 10,
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
Maryland Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Education Program Maryland Highway Safety Office City of Rockville Toole Design Group, LLC Rockville, MD April 11,
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.
Type Name Here Technical Program Services Eduardo C. Serafin, PE, AICP.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Meeting the AASHTO Safety Goal Daniel L. Carter, PE UNC Highway Safety Research Center AASHTO Safety Mgmt Subcommittee Meeting September 2, 2009.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
1 Hawaii Strategic Highway Safety Plan: FACILITY DESIGN Dan Galanis Injury Prevention and Control Program Hawaii Department of Health 1250 Punchbowl St.,
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
Annual Safety Meeting February 21, 2007 Ron Marshall, SD LTAP Local Rural Road Safety in SD - What does the data tell us?
The Safety Solution is Local and Personal !!! Business of Saving Lives The Safety Problem Is Global.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
Safer Journeys: New Zealand’s Road Safety Strategy to 2020 Chris Foley NEW ZEALAND.
Teens and Trucks and Defeating Distracted Driving July 2011.
1 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION November 5, 2010.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
October 24, 2015 The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance Vermont Highway Safety Alliance AARP Driver Safety Annual Meeting October 29, 2014 Presented by: Kevin.
Statewide Analysis Strategies Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Lane Departures By: Deborah S. McAvoy, M.S., P.E., PTOE Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Director Malcolm Dougherty California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) October 28, 2015 Caltrans’ Highway Safety Improvement Program.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
Southeastern Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths Dodge County Board Presentation October 12, 2010.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
Do Now Questions 1. When parking downhill on a street with a curb, the vehicles wheels should be? 2. The most common type of parking on city streets and.
INDOT Office of Traffic Safety Manager, Mike Holowaty
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Older Road Users Emphasis Area Team
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
SCDOT Highway Safety Program
Understanding Younger Drivers
What’s UP with County Roads?
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Driver Education Committee June 25, 2018
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
Presentation transcript:

1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012

Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). * Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Counties 6/21/2012 6/18/ Year Crashes Metro ATP 210,586 2,876 5 Year Crashes Metro ATP 210,586 2,876 State System 83,531 – 40% 877 – 31% State System 83,531 – 40% 877 – 31% CSAH/CR 65,672 – 31% 1,187 – 41% CSAH/CR 65,672 – 31% 1,187 – 41% Rural 2,692 – 4% 141 – 12% Rural 2,692 – 4% 141 – 12% Urban 62,926 – 96% 1,042 – 88% Urban 62,926 – 96% 1,042 – 88% All Way Stop 1,332 – 4% 19 – 4% All Way Stop 1,332 – 4% 19 – 4% Run off Road 689 – 62% 50 – 63% Run off Road 689 – 62% 50 – 63% On Curve 320 – 46% 30 – 60% On Curve 320 – 46% 30 – 60% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 3,033 (42%), 76 (55%) Rear End – 1,689 (24%), 11 (8%) Head On – 206 (3%), 11 (8%) Left Turn – 735 (10%), 9 (7%) Right Angle – 3,033 (42%), 76 (55%) Rear End – 1,689 (24%), 11 (8%) Head On – 206 (3%), 11 (8%) Left Turn – 735 (10%), 9 (7%) Thru-Stop 7,149 – 19% 138 – 28% Thru-Stop 7,149 – 19% 138 – 28% Right Angle – 6,332 (28%), 126 (52%) Rear End – 8,472 (37%), 42 (17%) Left Turn – 3,122 (14%), 21 (9%) Head On – 810 (4%), 17 (7%) Right Angle – 6,332 (28%), 126 (52%) Rear End – 8,472 (37%), 42 (17%) Left Turn – 3,122 (14%), 21 (9%) Head On – 810 (4%), 17 (7%) Signalized 22,807 – 62% 243 – 49% Signalized 22,807 – 62% 243 – 49% Inters-Related 874 – 40% 51 – 38% Inters-Related 874 – 40% 51 – 38% City, Twnshp, Other 61,383 – 29% 812 – 28% City, Twnshp, Other 61,383 – 29% 812 – 28% Inters-Related 37,058 – 61% 492 – 60% Inters-Related 37,058 – 61% 492 – 60% Not Inters-Related 15,084 – 25% 255 – 31% Not Inters-Related 15,084 – 25% 255 – 31% Run Off Road – 2,184 (15%), 76 (30%) Rear End – 5,407 (36%), 53 (21%) Head On – 1,054 (7%), 51 (20%) Right Angle – 1,521 (10%), 19 (7%) Run Off Road – 2,184 (15%), 76 (30%) Rear End – 5,407 (36%), 53 (21%) Head On – 1,054 (7%), 51 (20%) Right Angle – 1,521 (10%), 19 (7%) Animal 495 – 18% 6 – 4% Animal 495 – 18% 6 – 4% Not Inters-Related 1,118 – 51% 79 – 59% Not Inters-Related 1,118 – 51% 79 – 59% Head On, SS Opp 90 – 8% 14 – 18% Head On, SS Opp 90 – 8% 14 – 18% On Curve 32 – 36% 4 – 29% On Curve 32 – 36% 4 – 29% Unknown/Other 8,256 – 14% 76 – 9% Unknown/Other 8,256 – 14% 76 – 9% Unknown/Other 204 – 9% 5 – 4% Unknown/Other 204 – 9% 5 – 4% Other/Unknown 5,764 – 16% 92 – 19% Other/Unknown 5,764 – 16% 92 – 19% Right Angle – 177 (35%), 13 (43%) Head On/SS Opp – 50 (10%), 5 (17%) Run Off Road – 53 (10%), 4 (13%) Right Angle – 177 (35%), 13 (43%) Head On/SS Opp – 50 (10%), 5 (17%) Run Off Road – 53 (10%), 4 (13%) Thru-Stop 510 – 58% 30 – 59% Thru-Stop 510 – 58% 30 – 59% Run Off Road – 81 (34%), 5 (28%) Right Angle – 25 (10%), 3 (17%) Head On/SS Opp – 15 (6%), 2 (11%) Run Off Road – 81 (34%), 5 (28%) Right Angle – 25 (10%), 3 (17%) Head On/SS Opp – 15 (6%), 2 (11%) Other/Unknown 241 – 28% 18 – 35% Other/Unknown 241 – 28% 18 – 35% Not Animal 2,196 – 82% 135 – 96% Not Animal 2,196 – 82% 135 – 96% All Way Stop 38 – 4% 2 – 4% All Way Stop 38 – 4% 2 – 4% Signalized 85 – 10% 1 – 2% Signalized 85 – 10% 1 – 2% Ped/Bike 2,508 – 4% 219 – 21% Ped/Bike 2,508 – 4% 219 – 21% Non Ped/Bike 60,402 – 96% 823 – 79% Non Ped/Bike 60,402 – 96% 823 – 79% Ped 1,078 – 43% 139 – 63% Ped 1,078 – 43% 139 – 63% Bike 1,430 – 57% 80 – 37% Bike 1,430 – 57% 80 – 37% Int 781 – 72% 92 – 66% Int 781 – 72% 92 – 66% Signal 560 – 72% 53 – 58% Signal 560 – 72% 53 – 58% Int 1,124 – 79% 55 – 69% Int 1,124 – 79% 55 – 69% Signal 702 – 62% 32 – 58% Signal 702 – 62% 32 – 58%

Dakota/Washington County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes Dakota/Washington 35, Year Crashes Dakota/Washington 35, State System 14,674 – 41% 202 – 35% State System 14,674 – 41% 202 – 35% CSAH/CR 10,976 – 31% 234 – 41% CSAH/CR 10,976 – 31% 234 – 41% Rural 1,152 – 10% 43 – 18% Rural 1,152 – 10% 43 – 18% Urban 9,824 – 90% 191 – 82% Urban 9,824 – 90% 191 – 82% All Way Stop 397 – 6% 4 – 4% All Way Stop 397 – 6% 4 – 4% Run off Road 308 – 64% 12 – 57% Run off Road 308 – 64% 12 – 57% On Curve 115 – 37% 5 – 42% On Curve 115 – 37% 5 – 42% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 599 (39%), 20 (48%) “Other” – 117 (8%), 7 (17%) Rear End – 204 (13%), 3 (7%) Left Turn – 161 (10%), 3 (7%) Right Angle – 599 (39%), 20 (48%) “Other” – 117 (8%), 7 (17%) Rear End – 204 (13%), 3 (7%) Left Turn – 161 (10%), 3 (7%) Thru-Stop 1,547 – 24% 42 – 39% Thru-Stop 1,547 – 24% 42 – 39% Right Angle – 781 (21%), 23 (53%) Rear End – 1,822 (48%), 9 (21%) Left Turn – 392 (10%), 4 (9%) Head On – 109 (3%), 4 (9%) Right Angle – 781 (21%), 23 (53%) Rear End – 1,822 (48%), 9 (21%) Left Turn – 392 (10%), 4 (9%) Head On – 109 (3%), 4 (9%) Signalized 3,764 – 57% 43 – 40% Signalized 3,764 – 57% 43 – 40% Inters-Related 322 – 37% 18 – 45% Inters-Related 322 – 37% 18 – 45% City, Twnshp, Other 9,597 – 27% 138 – 24% City, Twnshp, Other 9,597 – 27% 138 – 24% Inters-Related 6,582 – 69% 108 – 65% Inters-Related 6,582 – 69% 108 – 65% Not Inters-Related 2,269 – 24% 50 – 30% Not Inters-Related 2,269 – 24% 50 – 30% Run Off Road – 419 (18%), 20 (40%) Rear End – 809 (36%), 11 (22%) Head On – 169 (7%), 10 (20%) Run Off Road – 419 (18%), 20 (40%) Rear End – 809 (36%), 11 (22%) Head On – 169 (7%), 10 (20%) Animal 282 – 24% 3 – 7% Animal 282 – 24% 3 – 7% Not Inters-Related 485 – 56% 21 – 53% Not Inters-Related 485 – 56% 21 – 53% Head On, SS Opp 42 – 9% 8 – 38% Head On, SS Opp 42 – 9% 8 – 38% On Curve 11 – 26% 1 – 13% On Curve 11 – 26% 1 – 13% Unknown/Other 739 – 8% 8 – 5% Unknown/Other 739 – 8% 8 – 5% Unknown/Other 63 – 7% 1 – 3% Unknown/Other 63 – 7% 1 – 3% Other/Unknown 873 – 13% 19 – 18% Other/Unknown 873 – 13% 19 – 18% Right Angle – 68 (%), 5 (%) Run Off Road – 17 (%), 2 (%) Right Angle – 68 (%), 5 (%) Run Off Road – 17 (%), 2 (%) Thru-Stop 199 – 62% 9 – 50% Thru-Stop 199 – 62% 9 – 50% Run Off Road – 32 (35%), 2 (22%) Rear End – 18 (20%), 1 (11%) Right Angle – 11 (12%), 1 (11%) Run Off Road – 32 (35%), 2 (22%) Rear End – 18 (20%), 1 (11%) Right Angle – 11 (12%), 1 (11%) Other/Unknown 91 – 28% 9 – 50% Other/Unknown 91 – 28% 9 – 50% Not Animal 870 – 76% 40 – 93% Not Animal 870 – 76% 40 – 93% All Way Stop 10 – 3% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 10 – 3% 0 – 0% Signalized 22 – 7% 0 – 0% Signalized 22 – 7% 0 – 0% Ped/Bike 232 – 82% 25 – 13% Ped/Bike 232 – 82% 25 – 13% Non Ped/Bike 9,590 – 98% 166 – 87% Non Ped/Bike 9,590 – 98% 166 – 87% Ped 55 – 24% 10 – 40% Ped 55 – 24% 10 – 40% Bike 177 – 76% 15 – 60% Bike 177 – 76% 15 – 60% Int 40 – 73% 9 – 90% Int 40 – 73% 9 – 90% Signal 24 – 60% 4 – 44% Signal 24 – 60% 4 – 44% Int 154 – 87% 7 – 47% Int 154 – 87% 7 – 47% Signal 90 – 58% 2 – 29% Signal 90 – 58% 2 – 29%

4 Washington Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes Washington 12, Year Crashes Washington 12, State System 5,767 – 46% 82 – 43% State System 5,767 – 46% 82 – 43% CSAH/CR 3,236 – 26% 58 – 30% CSAH/CR 3,236 – 26% 58 – 30% Rural 358 – 11% 13 – 22% Rural 358 – 11% 13 – 22% Urban 2,878 – 89% 45 – 78% Urban 2,878 – 89% 45 – 78% All Way Stop 149 – 8% 2 – 10% All Way Stop 149 – 8% 2 – 10% Run off Road 69 – 54% 3 – 60% Run off Road 69 – 54% 3 – 60% On Curve 35 – 51% 3 – 100% On Curve 35 – 51% 3 – 100% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 182 (43%), 4 (57%) Rear End – 78 (18%), 2 (28%) Head On – 15 (4%), 1 (14%) Right Angle – 182 (43%), 4 (57%) Rear End – 78 (18%), 2 (28%) Head On – 15 (4%), 1 (14%) Thru-Stop 427 – 24% 7 – 33% Thru-Stop 427 – 24% 7 – 33% Rear End – 425 (45%), 2 (33%) Head On – 21 (2%), 2 (33%) SS Opp – 18 (2%), 1 (17%) Right Angle – 190 (20%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 425 (45%), 2 (33%) Head On – 21 (2%), 2 (33%) SS Opp – 18 (2%), 1 (17%) Right Angle – 190 (20%), 0 (0%) Signalized 938 – 52% 6 – 29% Signalized 938 – 52% 6 – 29% Inters-Related 125 – 44% 8 – 62% Inters-Related 125 – 44% 8 – 62% City, Twnshp, Other 3,500 – 28% 52 – 27% City, Twnshp, Other 3,500 – 28% 52 – 27% Inters-Related 1,815 – 64% 21 – 53% Inters-Related 1,815 – 64% 21 – 53% Not Inters-Related 741 – 26% 14 – 35% Not Inters-Related 741 – 26% 14 – 35% Run Off Road – 169 (23%), 7 (50%) Head On – 75 (10%), 3 (21%) Rear End – 212 (29%), 2 (14%) Run Off Road – 169 (23%), 7 (50%) Head On – 75 (10%), 3 (21%) Rear End – 212 (29%), 2 (14%) Animal 76 – 21% 0 – 0% Animal 76 – 21% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 127 – 45% 5 – 38% Not Inters-Related 127 – 45% 5 – 38% Head On, SS Opp 13 – 10% 2 – 40% Head On, SS Opp 13 – 10% 2 – 40% On Curve 3 – 23% 1 – 50% On Curve 3 – 23% 1 – 50% Unknown/Other 267 – 9% 5 – 12% Unknown/Other 267 – 9% 5 – 12% Unknown/Other 30 – 11% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 30 – 11% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 300 – 17% 6 – 29% Other/Unknown 300 – 17% 6 – 29% Right Angle – 20 (30%), 2 (67%) Run Off Road – 5 (7%), 1 (33%) Rear End – 11 (16%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 20 (30%), 2 (67%) Run Off Road – 5 (7%), 1 (33%) Rear End – 11 (16%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 67 – 54% 3 – 38% Thru-Stop 67 – 54% 3 – 38% Other/Unknown 39 – 31% 5 – 63% Other/Unknown 39 – 31% 5 – 63% Not Animal 282 – 79% 13 – 100% Not Animal 282 – 79% 13 – 100% All Way Stop 9 – 7% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 9 – 7% 0 – 0% Signalized 10 – 8% 0 – 0% Signalized 10 – 8% 0 – 0% Ped/Bike 55 – 2% 5 – 11% Ped/Bike 55 – 2% 5 – 11% Non Ped/Bike 2,823 – 98% 40 – 89% Non Ped/Bike 2,823 – 98% 40 – 89% Ped 16 – 29% 1 – 20% Ped 16 – 29% 1 – 20% Bike 39 – 71% 4 – 80% Bike 39 – 71% 4 – 80% Int 10 – 63% 0 – 0% Int 10 – 63% 0 – 0% Signal 4 – 40% 0 – 0% Signal 4 – 40% 0 – 0% Int 31 – 79% 1 – 25% Int 31 – 79% 1 – 25% Signal 19 – 61% 0 – 0% Signal 19 – 61% 0 – 0% 6/21/2012

Washington County Crash Data Overview Urban Crashes 78% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in urban areas. Non-Ped/Bike Related Crashes 89% of CSAH/CR urban severe crashes are non-ped/bike crashes o 53% of these crashes were intersection related  29% occurring at a signalized intersection  33% occurring at a thru-STOP intersection o 35% of these crashes were non-intersection related (majority are road departure) Rural Crashes 22% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. 62% of CSAH/CR severe rural crashes are intersection related 6/21/20125

Washington County Emphasis Areas Emphasis Area Statewide Percentage ATP Metro*Washington County Interstate, US & TH CSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Interstate, US & TH CSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes8, Drivers Young drivers (under 21)24%21%(198)26%(357)26%(248)27%(24)26%(19)31%(17) Unlicensed drivers8%9%(86)7%(100)9%(86)7%(6)4%(3)9%(5) Older drivers (over 64)14%12%(113)12%(162)10%(101)11%(10)15%(11)9%(5) Aggressive driving and speeding-related20%21%(204)15%(206)21%(203)19%(17)18%(13)22%(12) Drug and alcohol-related26%27%(255)18%(249)21%(205)24%(21)19%(14)30%(16) Inattentive, distracted, asleep drivers20% (195)21%(290)15%(147)19%(17)21%(15)17%(9) Safety awareness Unbelted vehicle occupants25%22%(207)14%(199)13%(125)21%(19)22%(16)20%(11) Special Users Pedestrians crashes8%9%(85)11%(153)19%(181)7%(6)1%(1)15%(8) Bicycle crashes4%2%(23)6%(86)10%(100)0%(0)4%(3)7%(4) Vehicles Motorcycles crashes16%14%(130)16%(223)17%(163)18%(16)25%(18)28%(15) Heavy vehicle crashes10%11%(105)7%(97)7%(65)16%(14)4%(3)4%(2) Safety enhancements Highways Train-vehicle collisions0% (0)0%(1)0%(4)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Road departure crashes28%21%(200)13%(182)13%(129)18%(16)24%(17)39%(21) Consequences of leaving road Intersection crashes42%45%(425)58%(793)51%(491)38%(34)51%(37)41%(22) Head-On and Sideswipe (opposite) crashes15%14%(131)17%(228)14%(138)20%(18)21%(15)9%(5) Work zone crashes2%4%(37)2%(22)1%(13)6%(5)0%(0)2%(1) EMSEnhancing Emergency Capabilities Management Information and decision support systems More effective processes * Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Counties DPS Crash Data Records, 2006 to 2010 Top 5 Emphasis Areas by Jurisdiction Note: Numbers are not additive, as one crash may involve a young driver at an intersection. The numbers represent severe crashes (Fatal and A-type Injury crashes) 6/21/2012

Safety Workshop Objective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific locations.) Date/Time: August 9 Location: Dakota Lodge Facility West St. Paul, MN Agenda 8:30 – Coffee and Registration 9:00 – Introductions 9:10 – County Safety Reviews 9:30 – Law Enforcement 9:50 – Local Safety Advocate 10:00 – Background Information/Desired Outcomes 10:30 – Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies 12PM – 1PM - Lunch 2:15 – Report Back/Final Presentation 2:45 – 3PM - Wrap-up 7 6/21/2012

8 Washington County’s Sample Invite 6/21/2012

9 Safety Workshop – County Assignments April/May Confirm groups and select group leaders Select dates June Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip) Send invites (example has been provided) July Dakota & Washington Counties: RSVP Head Count to Suzanne Hanrahan by July 27th Group Coordinator (Suzanne): Confirm final headcount by July 30th Group Coordinator (Suzanne): Carla Stueve (SRF) at Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop