Presentation Template Social Network Analysis using Socilyzer

Ask how people work together and share ideas, analyze the collaboration, and identify action points Methodology for Organizational Network Analysis Having planned the analysis and its scope as well as designed the questionnaire, the process of deriving insights from data on collaboration is straightforward. Surveys Send out surveys for people to identify who they talk to and work with within the predefined set of people. Data processing Apply graph techniques to summarize and characterize collaboration. Analysis Analyze network on network, group and individual level using metrics and visualization. Action points Identify improvement opportunities and fulfil the study’s objectives.

What collaboration looks like as a graph and examples of characteristics Graph Example with Characteristics Highlighted ISOLATED PERSON MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP BRIDGEBUILDER CLUSTER INFLUENCER ONE-SIDED RELATIONSHIP

One-sided idea sharing: group 1-4 share ideas with group 5-6, not the other way around Idea Sharing - Groups Depicting ”Daily” to ”Weekly” answers to ”How often do you share ideas with this person?” Percentage of utilized connections out of possible connections within and between departments. IDEAS SHARED BY WITH

All except two people are approached to discuss new business opportunities Idea Sharing – Engaged Individuals Top Three Person 1 Person 13 N/A

On average each employee go to two others to discuss new ideas Idea Sharing – Engaging Individuals Top Three Person 1 Person 6 Person 5

9 out of 14 people are positioned to be brokering ideas in the network Idea Sharing – Most Mediating Individuals Top Three Person 6 Person 8 Person 9

Almost all in the network have a large reach that connects them to all others. Three have particularly good connections. Idea Sharing – Most Central Individuals Top Three Person 6 Person 5 Person 8

Three people show up as key players for idea sharing at our company Idea Sharing – Top Five Individuals Bridgemakers and bottlenecks Identified by highest betweenness scores* 1.Person 6 – 53 2.Person 8 – 48 3.Person 5 – 43 4.Person 9 – 42 5.Person 1 – 32 Influencers and individuals “in the know” Identified by highest closeness scores** 1.Person 6 – Person 5 – Person 8 – Person 7 – Person 12 – 0.33 * Betweenness measures how often a person mediates contact between others, i.e., appears in the shortest path for all other individual pairs. ** Closeness measures how far away an individual is from all others in the network.

”High” to ”Very high” answers to ”To which degree would our company benefit from you discussing business ideas with the following people?” List of people that have both identified each other with the answers “High” or “Very high” 20 pairs have identified each other as someone our company would benefit from if they work together Desired Collaboration – List of Pairs Person 12 – Person 2 Person 2 – Person 8 Person 8 – Person 10 Person 8 – Person 12 Person 10 – Person 4 …