Maurice Hendrix (Semi-)automatic authoring of AH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

1 Ontolog OOR Use Case Review Todd Schneider 1 April 2010 (v 1.2)
Information Retrieval Liam Quin, Barefoot Computing, Toronto.
IRRA DSpace April 2006 Claire Knowles University of Edinburgh.
Multilinguality & Semantic Search Eelco Mossel (University of Hamburg) Review Meeting, January 2008, Zürich.
Meta Data Larry, Stirling md on data access – data types, domain meta-data discovery Scott, Ohio State – caBIG md driven architecture semantic md Alexander.
Maurice Hendrix, A3H AH2008, 29/07/2008 A meta level for LAG Adaptation Language.
Maurice Hendrix (Semi-)automatic authoring of AH.
1212 Department of Computer Science Adaptive Hypermedia and The Semantic Web Socrates course UPB Romania Course 4 Dr. Alexandra Cristea
Adaptive Hypermedia and The Semantic Web Dr. Alexandra Cristea
Adaptive Hypermedia and The Semantic Web Socrates course UPB Romania, Course 5 Dr. Alexandra Cristea
PROLEARN International Summer School 27May – 2June 2007 Authoring and Engineering Adaptive eLearning Systems Dr. Alexandra Cristea
Maurice Hendrix, Alexandra Cristea* London Knowledge Lab 25/11/2008 *Based on work in collaboration with Paul De Bra,
Maurice Hendrix, Alexandra I. Cristea EC-TEL 2009 {maurice, Adaptation languages for learning: the CAM meta-model.
Fawaz Ghali, Alexandra Cristea, Craig Stewart and Maurice Hendrix Collaborative Adaptation Authoring and Social Annotation in MOT (a.k.a MOT 2.0)
Adaptive Hypermedia Content Authoring using MOT3.0 Jonathan G. K. Foss Dr. Alexandra I. Cristea.
LAOS: Layered WWW AHS Authoring Model and their corresponding Algebraic Operators Alexandra I. Cristea USI intensive course Adaptive Systems April-May.
LAOS: Layered WWW AHS Authoring Model and their corresponding Algebraic Operators Dr. Alexandra Cristea
Distributing the Indexing and Retrieval of Information Winston Bourne IRNLP.
Maurice Hendrix CS411 seminar, 22/10/2009 Adaptation languages for learning: the CAM meta-model.
XML: Extensible Markup Language
XML DOCUMENTS AND DATABASES
Tutorial 1: Developing a Basic Web site
Embedding Knowledge in HTML Some content from a presentations by Ivan Herman of the W3c.
OntoBlog: Informal Knowledge Management by Semantic Blogging Aman Shakya 1, Vilas Wuwongse 2, Hideaki Takeda 1, Ikki Ohmukai 1 1 National Institute of.
A New Learning Tools. Topic Maps is a standard for the representation and interchange of knowledge, with an emphasis on the findability of information.
A Web of Concepts Dalvi, et al. Presented by Andrew Zitzelberger.
OWL-AA: Enriching OWL with Instance Recognition Semantics for Automated Semantic Annotation 2006 Spring Research Conference Yihong Ding.
1 Draft of a Matchmaking Service Chuang liu. 2 Matchmaking Service Matchmaking Service is a service to help service providers to advertising their service.
IS 360 Web Promotion. Slide 2 Overview How to attract visitors.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Maurice Hendrix and Alexandra Cristea (Semi-)automatic authoring of AH.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Adding metadata to web pages Please note: this is a temporary test document for use in internal testing only.
Learning Object Metadata Mining Masoud Makrehchi Supervisor: Prof. Mohamed Kamel.
INF 384 C, Spring 2009 Ontologies Knowledge representation to support computer reasoning.
Welcome to AC301, Intermediate Accounting II Professor Michael J. Bootsma Unit 1 Seminar – Excel Template Guide.
Ontology-Driven Automatic Entity Disambiguation in Unstructured Text Jed Hassell.
Meta Tagging / Metadata Lindsay Berard Assisted by: Li Li.
Andrew S. Budarevsky Adaptive Application Data Management Overview.
2007. Software Engineering Laboratory, School of Computer Science S E Web-Harvest Web-Harvest: Open Source Web Data Extraction tool 이재정 Software Engineering.
Semantic Visualization What do we mean when we talk about visualization? - Understanding data - Showing the relationships between elements of data Overviews.
An Automatic Software Quality Measurement System.
WEB 2.0 PATTERNS Carolina Marin. Content  Introduction  The Participation-Collaboration Pattern  The Collaborative Tagging Pattern.
Text Analytics in Action: Using Text Analytics as a Toolset TBC 4:15 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Marjorie Hlava Semantic enrichment / Semantic Fingerprinting.
Iana Atanassova Research: – Information retrieval in scientific publications exploiting semantic annotations and linguistic knowledge bases – Ranking algorithms.
© 2006 University of Kansas An LSID resolver for specimens and a digression into issues raised by the use of GUIDs Steve Perry
Semantic web Bootstrapping & Annotation Hassan Sayyadi Semantic web research laboratory Computer department Sharif university of.
An Ontological Approach to Financial Analysis and Monitoring.
1 DAFFODIL Effective Support for Using Digital Libraries Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Understanding the World of SEO
Christopher Hirt Daniel Wells
Evaluating Adaptive Authoring of AH
The BARTOC story: from blog to basic to full terminology registry
Embedding Knowledge in HTML
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
RichAnnotator: Annotating rich (XML-like) documents
Database Systems Instructor Name: Lecture-3.
Database Architecture
LAOS: Layered WWW AHS Authoring Model and their corresponding Algebraic Operators Alexandra I. Cristea UPB intensive course “Adaptive Hypermedia” January.
A meta level for LAG Adaptation Language re-use in education
Evaluate the integral using integration by parts with the indicated choices of u and dv. {image} 1. {image} none of these
LAOS: Layered WWW AHS Authoring Model and their corresponding Algebraic Operators Alexandra I. Cristea UNESCO workshop “Personalization in Education” Feb’04.
Embedding Knowledge in HTML
Only first semantic applications
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Information Retrieval and Web Design
Information Retrieval and Web Design
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Maurice Hendrix (Semi-)automatic authoring of AH

Outline Why automatic authoring System overview Semantic Desktop Adding resources (ranking) Future integration

Why automatic authoring Make authoring task easier Manual annotation is bottleneck By integrating authoring environment into semantic desktop

System overview

Concept maps and lessons are hierarchies: MOT hierarchy structure

Semantic Desktop Desktop where everything is stored with extra metadata We uses RDF as storage format Example RDF (also has an XML representation) :

Adding Resources MOT goal/domain maps are hierarchies with tree structure, siblings are concepts at the same level The Semantic Desktop can be searched for resources. They are ranked by 2 formulae Possible use of other sources like Ariadne

Ranking Concept oriented Article Oriented where: rank(a,c) is the rank of article a with respect to the current domain concept c; k(c) is the set of keywords belonging to the current domain concept c; k(a) is the set of keywords belonging to the current article a; |S| = the cardinality of the set S, for a given set S.

Selection of ranking method - snapshot

Equal ranks

Allow duplicates among siblings We call concepts in MOT at the same depth in the hierarchy Siblings The author has to make a choice. Adding to all siblings can mean students get the link multiple times Choosing one of the siblings can mean students dont always get the link when relevant.

Selection of duplicates/none snapshot

Add meta-data as separate concepts The retrieved resources might have attributes themselves If resources have further attributes, these can be added as domain attributes in MOT The resource can also be made into a domain concept with its own separate domain attributes

Add metadata as attributes

Add metadata as Separate concepts

Separate concepts/ attributes snapshot

Compute resource keywords as set The number of times a keyword occurs might indicate the relevance of the keyword. The ranking formulae can be computed on sets of keywords or multisets.

Set/ multiset snapshot

Before MOT hierarchy snapshot

After MOT hierarchy snapshot

Future integration noticed steep learning curve and confusion Integrating Enricher into MOT could help Currently creating WebEnricher

Questions?