Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 11, 2009.
Advertisements

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 28, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 23, 2007.
Public Hearing June 4, Case: CDR Project: Winegard Road South PD LUP - Substantial Change Applicant: Hugh M. Lokey, P.E., Hugh M. Lokey.
Public Hearing April 30, Case:LUPA Project:Universal Boulevard PD LUPA (a.k.a. “U.S.I. South Campus PD”) Applicant:Jay R. Jackson District:6.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 14, 2010.
BCC CALLED PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #VA , APRIL 3, 2014 APPLICANT: TODD PRESSMAN, AGENT FOR WATERFORD LAKES OFFICE PARK BCC CALLED PUBLIC HEARING.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 1, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 21, 2007.
Case: CDR Project: Central Church of the Nazarene Planned Development (PD) / Land Use Plan (LUP) Applicant: Jeff W. Banker, Highland Engineering.
West Orange Relief High School Board of County Commissioners May 5, 2015 BZA #SE , APRIL 28, 2015 (Board-Called Public Hearing / Appeal) APPLICANT:
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 25, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 15, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING July 13, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 15, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 3, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 6, 2011.
Public Hearings August 4, Case: CDR Project: Universal Boulevard PD / LUP Applicant: Jay Jackson, Kimley-Horn & Associates District: 6.
Public Hearings August 6, Case: LUP Project: Ivey Groves PD/LUP Applicant: Thomas Daly, Daly Design Group, Inc. District: 1 Proposed Use:R-CE.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 5, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 5, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 3, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING April 7, 2009.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING July 21, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 26, 2008.
Regular Cycle Amendment Small Scale Amendment And Concurrent Rezoning Requests Adoption Public Hearings January 27, 2015.
Public Hearings September 15, Case: PSP Project: North of Albert’s PD / Westside PSP Applicant: Jennifer J. Stickler, Kimley - Horn and.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Public Hearing February 26, Case:CDR Project:Beck/Overstreet Planned Development / Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant:Kevin.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING November 23, 2010.
Case: LUP Project: Jama PD / LUP Applicant: Momtaz Barq, Terra-Max Engineering, Inc. District: 1 Acreage:8.94 gross acres Request:To rezone the.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 29, 2010.
FEBRUARY 21, 2012 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE , Nov. 03, 2011 APPELLANT/APPLICANT: CHANTEL PRESTON.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING March 15, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING April 5, 2011.
Public Hearings June 30, Case: CDR Project: Village F Master PD / LUP Applicant: Eric Warren, Poulos & Bennett District: 1 Acreage:1,
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 3, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 13, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 17, 2010.
Public Hearing November 27, Case:CDR Project:Hunter’s Creek Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant:David.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 22, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING March 4, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING November 17, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 15, 2011.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING April 22, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 16, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 22, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 2, 2007.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING March 9, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING November 9, 2010.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING April 28, 2009.
Public Hearings December 15, Case: CDR Project: Gooding’s Plaza PD/LUP Applicant: Jennifer Stickler Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. District:
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 6, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING March 24, 2009.
HOLLYWOOD PLAZA PARKING GARAGE BZA #VA APPLICANT: JOSHUA WALLACK APPELLANT: SCOTT A. GLASS HOLLYWOOD PLAZA PARKING GARAGE BZA #VA
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 9, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 27, 2009.
Public Hearing February 26, Case: CDR Project: Orangewood Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) Substantial Change Applicant: Kristy.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 27, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009

Board of County Commissioners Project :Orlando International Hotel PD/LUP Substantial Change Applicant: Paul Batt District #:6 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Orlando International Hotel Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) 1) to grant a waiver from Section (a)(2) to allow for two building signs at 800 square feet each and 42 feet in height in lieu of 200 square feet each and 10 feet in height, and 2) Approve the Master Sign Plan dated “Received July 27, 2009.” Project :Orlando International Hotel PD/LUP Substantial Change Applicant: Paul Batt District #:6 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved Orlando International Hotel Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) 1) to grant a waiver from Section (a)(2) to allow for two building signs at 800 square feet each and 42 feet in height in lieu of 200 square feet each and 10 feet in height, and 2) Approve the Master Sign Plan dated “Received July 27, 2009.”

Board of County Commissioners Zoning Map

Board of County Commissioners Future Land Use Map Future Land Use Map

Board of County Commissioners Orlando International Hotel Land Use Plan Orlando International Hotel Land Use Plan

Board of County Commissioners Action Requested  To continue the public hearing for this application until November 17, 2009.

Board of County Commissioners Action Requested  Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the approved Orlando International Hotel PD/LUP dated “Received July 27, 2009,” subject to the six (6) conditions in the staff report.

Board of County Commissioners 1. Development shall conform to the Orlando International Hotel PD Land Use Plan dated “Received July 27, 2009,” and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinance and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Received July 27, 2009," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. DRC Recommendations

Board of County Commissioners 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a “promise” or “representation” shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners 3. All previous applicable Conditions of Approval dated July 18, 2006 shall apply: a. Outside storage and display shall be prohibited. b. This project shall comply with the Convention Plaza District performance standards. c. This project shall enter into the Convention Center Hotel Agreement. d. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. 4.A waiver from Chapter (a)(2) to allow for two building signs at 800 square feet each and 42 feet in height in lieu of 200 square feet each and ten (10) feet in height. 5.A waiver from Chapter 31.5 to allow an additional 10,700 square feet of graphics wall signage (murals) in lieu of 200 square feet is denied. 6.Signage shall comply with Chapter 31-5 (T-C Standards) and any approved waivers. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009

Board of County Commissioners Project :The Quadrangle PD/LUP Substantial Change Applicant: Paul Chipok District #:5 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved The Quadrangle Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to approve the conversion of Tract 24 from all commercial uses to a mixed-use development that may include commercial, student housing, senior housing, and/or multi-family uses. Project :The Quadrangle PD/LUP Substantial Change Applicant: Paul Chipok District #:5 Request: To consider a substantial change to the approved The Quadrangle Planned Development/ Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) to approve the conversion of Tract 24 from all commercial uses to a mixed-use development that may include commercial, student housing, senior housing, and/or multi-family uses.

Board of County Commissioners Zoning Map

Board of County Commissioners Future Land Use Map Future Land Use Map

Board of County Commissioners The Quadrangle Land Use Plan The Quadrangle Land Use Plan

Board of County Commissioners Action Requested  Find the request consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and approve the Substantial Change to the approved The Quadrangle PD/LUP dated “Received June 24, 2009,” subject to the ten (10) conditions in the staff report.

Board of County Commissioners 1. Development shall conform to The Quadrangle PD Land Use Plan dated “Received June 24, 2009,” and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinance and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Received June 24, 2009," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. DRC Recommendations

Board of County Commissioners 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a “promise” or “representation” shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. All previous Conditions of Approval dated February 3, 2009 shall apply: (a) As specifically applicable to Tracts 16 & 18, all acreages regarding conservation areas and buffers are considered approximate until finalized by Conservation Area Determination and Conservation Area Impact Permits. Approval of this plan does not permit any proposed conservation impacts. (b) As specifically applicable to Tract 5: Tract 5 shall only be used for office uses. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners 4. All previous applicable conditions of approval dated January 4, 2005 shall apply: (a) As applicable to the entire PD: (1) This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a “promise” or “representation” shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners (2) Prior to construction plan approval, certification with supporting calculations shall be submitted, which states that this project is consistent with approved master utility and stormwater plans for this Planned Development. (3) Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter (4) Outdoor storage and display shall be prohibited. (5) This project shall comply with Lighting Ordinance (6) This project shall comply with the Commercial Design Standards Ordinance. (7) The developer shall obtain wastewater and water service from Orange County subject to County rate resolutions and ordinances. (8) This project shall comply with the drainage requirements of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners (b) As specifically applicable to Tract 11: (1) A Developer’s Agreement for right-of-way shall be required with the approval of the rezoning. (2) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property shall be re- platted. (3) There shall be no direct access to Rouse Road. (4) Commercial restaurants shall not have outdoor speakers or music. 5. The following Student Housing waivers are granted and are consistent with previous Board approvals for student housing: (a) A waiver is granted from Section to allow parking spaces for student housing at a ratio of 1.0 spaces per unit in lieu of 1.25 spaces per bedroom. (b) A waiver is granted from Section (d) to eliminate the requirement of a six-foot masonry wall along University Boulevard. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners (c) A waiver is granted from Section (d) to eliminate the requirement of a six-foot masonry wall along Alafaya Trail. (d) A waiver is granted from Section (h) to allow a maximum building height of 10 stories/120 feet in lieu of 3 stories/40 feet. (e) A waiver is granted from Section to eliminate the requirement of providing recreational facilities at the rate of 2.5 acres per 1,000 population. (f) A waiver is granted from Section (c) to allow 2,063 bedrooms in lieu of the maximum 750 permitted. (g) A waiver is granted from Section (g) to allow for one unit to equal bedrooms instead of 2 bedrooms. This is based upon an ITE rate provided by Orange County. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners 6. Because the location of Tract 24 merits an intense development style due to the proximity of the UCF campus, the following waivers are granted from the suburban standards of the Land Development Code: (a) A waiver is granted from Section to allow parcels within Tract 24 to have a 0 foot building setback in lieu of 10 foot building setback between internal parcels. (b) A waiver is granted from Section to allow a 25 foot setback from the right-of-way line of University Blvd in lieu of 60 foot from the centerline for parking structures. (c) A waiver is granted from Section (d) to allow a maximum building height of 10 stories/120 feet in lieu of 3 stories/40 feet for student housing and multi-family (senior housing). (d) A waiver is granted from (j) to eliminate the spatial separation of buildings. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners 7. The following multi-family waivers are granted: (a) A waiver is granted from Section to allow a minimum unit size of 250 square feet in lieu of 500 square feet to allow for dorm-style units. (b) A waiver is requested from Section (h) to eliminate the requirement of providing recreation areas at the rate of 2.5 acres per 1,000 residents. One acre shall be provided for the multi-family development. 8. A waiver is granted from Section to allow commercial parking at a ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet in lieu of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. 9. Senior Housing will be segregated from student housing in a separate structure and the buildings will not touch. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners 10. No permanent school-aged children that will impact the Orange County Public School system shall be generated as a result of student housing and/or senior housing on Tract 24. Any proposal to add permanent school- aged children on Tract 24 will be deemed a substantial change and shall require BCC approval, and will be subject to school concurrency. DRC Recommendations Cont’d.

Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING