BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
IUPUI Council on Retention and Graduation – October 13, 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement Understanding IUPUI Students: National Survey of Student.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, & Assessment
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Director, Institutional Research
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
NFO - Overview of WCU Students
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports

Conference Call Agenda Presenter: Ms. Susan D. Johnson, Project Associate NSSE Understanding the Institutional and Benchmark Reports Identifying strengths and weaknesses based on the NSSE data received Using raw data to run additional analyses Determining what data are actionable Understanding the Institutional and Benchmark Reports Identifying strengths and weaknesses based on the NSSE data received Using raw data to run additional analyses Determining what data are actionable

National Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Engagement Active & CollaborativeLearning Enriching Educational Experiences SupportiveCampusEnvironment Student – Faculty Interactions Level of Academic Challenge

Active & Collaborative Learning: Scale measures the degree to which students report active involvement in classes and collaboration in and outside of class environments. Participated in a community-based project as part of a regular course Worked with other students on projects during class Tutored or taught other students Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Participated in a community-based project as part of a regular course Worked with other students on projects during class Tutored or taught other students Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Sample Questions

Student-Faculty Interaction: Scale measures the frequency and type of faculty interactions students report. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor Worked with a faculty member on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student- life activities) Worked with a faculty member on a research project outside of course or program requirements Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor Worked with a faculty member on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student- life activities) Worked with a faculty member on a research project outside of course or program requirements Sample Questions

Student Satisfaction: Scale that ascertains students’ satisfaction with their institution. An evaluation of the student’s entire educational experience at this institution If starting over would the student attend the same institution An evaluation of the student’s entire educational experience at this institution If starting over would the student attend the same institution Sample Questions

Time Usage and Demands: Scale considers how students’ reported spending their time that may detract from their ability for academic and co-curricular engagement. Working for pay on campus Working for pay off campus Commuting to class Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) Working for pay on campus Working for pay off campus Commuting to class Relaxing and socializing (watching TV, partying, etc.) Providing care for dependents living with you (parents, children, spouse, etc.) Sample Questions

Piecing the Puzzle “Without persuasive evidence of the patterns of student engagement, administrators and faculty remain blind to important aspects of the undergraduate experience.” – Lee S. Shulman, President, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

BEAMS Project Meeting January 27, Hargrove How do you select peer institutions? Are these institutions you consistently compare yourself to in other assessment efforts? Is participation in volunteer work and community-based projects for seniors a focus for the campus? How can NJCU encourage seniors to continue to be involved in this type of work once they are out in their respective careers? Is there a culminating experience for seniors? Are exit interviews conducted with seniors on a campus-wide or departmental level? What is the level of faculty involvement with career services? How can NJCU increase the opportunities for students to work with faculty on research projects outside of coursework? (This may be beneficial in helping students that go on to graduate work) Are there services or programs that can free up time for students who commute and/or care for dependents? Who are the dependents students are caring for? Are there analyses you can run for particular cohorts of students that can further inform potential action plans? How do you select peer institutions? Are these institutions you consistently compare yourself to in other assessment efforts? Is participation in volunteer work and community-based projects for seniors a focus for the campus? How can NJCU encourage seniors to continue to be involved in this type of work once they are out in their respective careers? Is there a culminating experience for seniors? Are exit interviews conducted with seniors on a campus-wide or departmental level? What is the level of faculty involvement with career services? How can NJCU increase the opportunities for students to work with faculty on research projects outside of coursework? (This may be beneficial in helping students that go on to graduate work) Are there services or programs that can free up time for students who commute and/or care for dependents? Who are the dependents students are caring for? Are there analyses you can run for particular cohorts of students that can further inform potential action plans?