1 Training Strategies and Resources for States Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form Saundra Harrington (VA) Part C Mary Peters (WI) Section 619 Chelsea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Advertisements

Module 2 Learning More about the Summary of Functional Performance Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
State Prekindergarten Standards, Children with and without Disabilities: We’re ALL on the Same Page 2005 OSEP Early Childhood Conference December 2005.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Early Childhood Outcomes: Implications for Personnel Preparation and Professional Development Session Leader: Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
Experiences Developing and Conducting Training on the ECO Child Outcomes Summary Form Ted Maloney, MT Pam Reising-Rechner, IL.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 15: Discussion Facilitator Exit Information.
ECO 2012 Illinois’ Professional Development Strategies for Training Child Outcomes Ted Burke Illinois Early Intervention Training Program 7550 W. 183rd.
A Guide to the Implementation Process Stages, Steps and Activities July 29, pm EDT ECTA Implementation Process Team.
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Regulatory Services Section Child Care Center Handbook Child Care Center Handbook NC Division of Child Development.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
1 Birth to 3 Child Outcomes Maryland’s Approach to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories August 28, 2007 Deborah Metzger
The State of New Hampshire’s Family Involvement with the Child Outcomes Process.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
A Professional Development Model for Teachers in Child- Care Centers CEC National Conference April 2, 2009 Seattle, WA Madelyn James UIC PhD student in.
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Aligning Child Outcome Measurement to Early Learning Standards NECTAC Outcomes Meeting Monday, August 27, 2007.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
ECO 2008 Illinois’ Professional Development Strategies for Training Child Outcomes Baltimore, MD Ted Burke, Director Illinois Early Intervention Training.
Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Chandra Jones Vanessa Winborne MICC Parent Michigan Part C Coordinator.
Essential knowledge and skills for effective participation in the Child Outcome Summary Process Be able to describe and differentiate the three child outcomes.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
ECO 2007 Online Training Strategies August 26, 2007 Baltimore, MD Ted Burke, Director Illinois Early Intervention Training Program 7550 W. 183rd Street.
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Using COS Data to Inform Program Improvement at All Levels Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and nurture.
What Did North Carolina Learn From Child Outcomes Pilots ? Sherry Franklin, NC Part C Quality Improvement Unit Manager Steve Snipes, NC Part C Program.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Vanessa WinborneJulie Lagos Michigan Part C CoordinatorParent,
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
1 Resources for Increasing Child Development Knowledge Virginia August 27, 2008 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia.
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Norfolk Integrating Outcomes into the IFSP Narrative Sandi Harrington July 31, 2010.
ECO FAMILY EXPERIENCES AND OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT SYSTEM SIOBHAN COLGAN, ECO AT FPG CHELSEA GUILLEN, ILLINOIS MELISSA RASPA, ECO AT RTI ALICE RIGEWAY, CONNECTICUT.
1 Assuring the Quality of Data from the Child Outcomes Summary Form.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Authentic Assessment in Early Intervention
ECO Family Experiences and Outcomes measurement system
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Using the Decision Tree for Summary Ratings Discussions
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Presented by: Marcella Franczkowski, Assistant State Superintendent
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Presentation transcript:

1 Training Strategies and Resources for States Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form Saundra Harrington (VA) Part C Mary Peters (WI) Section 619 Chelsea Guillen (IL) Part C Mary Anketell and Deb Daulton (PA) Birth-5

2 Each state will describe: Content and format of their COSF training How they have ‘rolled-out’ training statewide Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned

3 Content and format of COSF training in Virginia Presentation from State Part C TA Consultant and 2 peer trainers (1 peer trainer consistent at all 8 trainings) Used 3 case studies to walk through the process Spent time on typical development expectations

4 COSF training “roll-out” in Virginia Held regional trainings across the state Set the expectation that ALL service providers would attend one of the trainings and if not able, that someone attending the training would ensure they received all the information (trained 400 service providers)

5 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Virginia Understanding of typical child development across providers was discouraging Provided guiding questions and adapted the decision tree with family friendly language to assist with the conversation

6 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Virginia (continued) Some localities have adapted the evaluation narrative to move away from the domains and report our results in the functional areas. This has been most helpful

7 Content and format of COSF training in Wisconsin Training Modules include: OSEP Child Outcomes: background and understanding the three child outcome areas Ongoing Child Assessment Completing the Child Outcome Summary Form Reporting Child Outcomes Team Process

8 COSF training “roll-out” in Wisconsin 2005 Stakeholder meetings and initial training Statewide training for small sample LEAs and counties 2007Modules and train-the-trainer for Child Outcome facilitators in each region

9 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Wisconsin Birth to 6 Child Outcome system [] Separate lead agencies [] Part C = census [] 619 = sample strategy Building a statewide training/technical assistance network Building with Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards training/best practice for on-going assessment GSEG activities to develop a shared data system

10 Content and format of COSF training in Illinois Focus on why and how as well as state-specific requirements Age-expected development, understanding immediate foundational skills, and how to include families in the discussion Solicited input from service coordinators about challenges in completing COSF ratings

11 Content and format of COSF training in Illinois (continued) Face-to-face training, online training, peer training, case studies Videos - child-specific and hopefully soon, mock IFSP meeting

12 COSF training “roll-out” in Illinois Started with service coordinators using statewide face to face training in March and April 2006 Online training for providers was available beginning April 2006

13 COSF training “roll-out” in Illinois (continued) In May of 2007, we followed up with a train the trainers model that was to include both providers and service coordinators Information has also been included in the online service coordinator training and the systems overview training for all new service coordinators and providers

14 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Illinois Provider training is still optional -- so many have not completed it Need to increase knowledge of age expected development Need to develop resources for families More work remains on how to incorporate ratings into Illinois' IFSP process Need to provide more sophisticated online training for both SCs and providers

15 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Illinois (continued) Concerns with covering all domains adequately when only a single provider is involved How to meaningfully rate very young children and speech-only kids Getting all parties involved with the process in a recommended practice kind of way, i.e. incorporating it fully in the IFSP process and including all team members in the discussion

16 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Illinois (continued) Biggest challenge is getting everyone to enter data and ensuring consistency Still working on getting strategies/resources to SCs and providers Lesson learned -- best trainings include parallels of actual IFSP teams- much better discussions and understanding

17 Content and format of COSF training in Pennsylvania Matching 5 developmental domains to 3 child outcomes Typical child development Assessment tool training Web resources for child development information

18 COSF training “roll-out” in Pennsylvania State staff identify what programs are involved such as EI, Child Care, Head Start Participants identified through program supervisors Complete training sessions Refresher sessions

19 COSF training “roll-out” in Pennsylvania (continued) Use of state TA consultants Web based registration Roll out week Videoconferences Materials on web

20 Issues, challenges, strategies, and lessons learned in Pennsylvania Numbers of staff to train Do we know how many? Turn over Developing the perfect database Maintaining the level of training support Roll out with early childhood partners Explaining progress on the COSF