Evaluating the impact of health research: Revisiting the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Impact Assessment Framework Nicola Lauzon, Marc Turcotte.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Advertisements

Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
PUTTING A VALUE ON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS: ADAPTING THE RESEARCH PAYBACK FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES JACK E. SCOTT, MARGARET BLASINSKY.
The Community Engagement Studio: Strengthening Research Capacity through Community Engagement Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI Executive Director, Meharry.
Informing the Strategy – Strengths and Gaps Delyth Morgan Strategic Research Coordinator Cardiff University, School of Medicine.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Developing a Research Agenda for Public Health Services in Canada Marjorie MacDonald, Trevor Hancock, Gilles Paradis, Anita Kothari.
Towards Better Exploitation and Economic Impact: Developing the EPSRC Partnership with the University Vince Osgood Associate Director, Economic Impact.
Measuring for Success NCHER Legislative Conference Sophie Walker September 26, 2013.
Developing and Submitting a Research Proposal in Psychosocial Oncology: Tips on Getting it Funded Mary Jane Esplen, PhD NCIC CCS Research Scientist & Associate.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Knowledge Translation. CIHR’s mandate CIHR is Canada's major federal funding agency for health research. Its objective is to excel, according to internationally.
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
Stakeholders Analysis as an Innovative Methodology for Building Health Research Capacity in Saskatchewan Though the main objective of the study was to.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Knowledge Translation: A View from a National Policy Perspective KU-02 Conference Oxford, England July 2, 2002.
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
Several Evaluations Theories and Methods Reference: Foundation of Program Evaluation by Sadish, Cook, and Leviton (1991)
The CIHR Perspective on Impact Measurement
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
Evaluation: A Necessity for the Profession, an Essential Support for Practitioners Linking Intervention with Outcome Bryan Hiebert University of Victoria.
Dr Abdul Ghaffar Executive Director Influencing policy-making Results of a multi-country study (London, 13 December, 2011)
1 KNOWLEDGE TO ACTION: ACTION TO RESEARCH Katharina Kovacs Burns, MSc, MHSA, PhD Conference on Moving Palliative & End-of-Life Care Forward Edmonton, Alberta.
State Higher Education Assessment Policies: State Higher Education Assessment Policies: Findings from Case Studies Thomas E. Perorazio John J.K. Cole The.
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the CTRC: Designing Quantitative and Qualitative Measures to Assess in Real Time the Value of the Center Mike Conlon, University.
Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.
Evidence and Organizational Decision Making: Never the Twain Shall Meet? Thomas Rundall, PhD Academy Health, Annual Research Meeting June 27, 2006.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors UNFCCC Workshop Bonn 9 June 2003.
Discussion From Republic of Science to Audit Society, Irwin Feller S. Charlot ASIRPA, Paris, France; June 13, 2012.
Crossing Methodological Borders to Develop and Implement an Approach for Determining the Value of Energy Efficiency R&D Programs Presented at the American.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
Measuring Innovation Impacts Ghislaine Tremblay Networks of Centres of Excellence December 7, 2011.
The Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research Berlin, 26/27 September 2005 Evaluation for a changing research base Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE,
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
Evaluation of Denmark’s Climate Change Funding to Developing Countries Overview of the Findings DIIS Seminar Copenhagen 30 September 2015.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Indicators Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata 16 December 2011.
STEPHANIE SHIPP SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTITUTE AMERICAN EVALUATION ASSOCIATION NOVEMBER 12,2009 Science of Science Policy: Making.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
Strengthening the Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Africa Consultation on IPBES May 2010 Nairobi, Kenya Peter Gilruth,
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Evaluating the Commercialization of Health Research – Methodological Challenges Marc Turcotte, Nicola Lauzon & Laura McAuley Strategic Policy and External.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Canada: Challenges and Models for Biotechnological Innovation. Tania M. Bubela, BSc, PhD, LLB School of Business, University of Alberta and the Centre.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
Integrating Qualitative Research Into Health Technology Assessment in Canada The CADTH Experience Laura Weeks, PhD Scientific Advisor Kristen.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Evaluating the Performance of PBOs Helaina Gaspard Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy (IFSD) June 6-10, 2016 World Bank GN-PBO Annual Meeting Washington,
Impact and the REF Consortium of Institutes of Advanced Study 19 October 2009 David Sweeney Director (Research, Innovation and Skills)
Evaluation What is evaluation?
BC SUPPORT Unit: Overview and update
for CIT Program Operation Resource Development Institute
Translational Research Methodology
How do we know that two heads are better
Ross O. Love Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
The Capture of Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health in
An Integrated Governance Approach towards Inclusive Development
Unlocking the Future & Distinct SA Research Opportunities
What is your impact pathway?
THE ENVIRONMENT THAT INFLUENCES NURSING CARE
Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS) /2020 Sean Dewitt, Program Manager, Health, Alberta Innovates Marc Leduc,
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating the impact of health research: Revisiting the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Impact Assessment Framework Nicola Lauzon, Marc Turcotte & Laura McAuley Impact Assessments Unit Canadian Institutes of Health Research Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Presentation Overview CIHR impact assessment framework history Study purpose & methods Findings Uses of CIHR framework Focus group feedback from framework users Application of Lessons learned Changes to the framework categories Development of a simplified conceptual model Next steps Questions 2

CIHR Impact Assessment Framework 2006 Category Description Advancing Knowledge discoveries, breakthroughs, and contributions to the scientific literature Building Capacity development and enhancement of research skills in individuals and teams Informing Decision-Making impacts in the areas of science, public, clinical, and managerial decision-making, practice and policy Health & Health Systems Impacts advances in prevention, diagnosis, treatment and palliation, functioning of the health system Economic Impacts commercialization of research discoveries and human capital gains 3

Study Purpose & Methods Purpose To document lessons learned and inform framework improvement Methods Document review of impact reports & protocols How has it been used, results of use, lessons learned Focus groups Feedback and input from users and potential users of framework Six groups; total 35 participants 4

Results: Document Review Uses of CIHR framework Topic-based assessment Focus on specific disease condition Investigate impacts across multiple categories Institute-based assessment Focus on research mandate areas of CIHR Institutes Investigate impacts across multiple categories Category-based assessment Focus exclusively on one impact category 5

Topic-based impact assessments Topic Cardiovascular disease Obesity SARS Main Lessons learned Validation of CIHR impact categories Impacts continue after 20+ years Attribution difficult Topic dictates types of impacts seen 6

Institute-based impact assessments CIHR International Review (2010 – 2011) Impacts of broad mandate areas of all 13 CIHR Institutes between 2000 – 2010 Lessons learned Limited availability of indicators in latter impact categories Need to revisit the categorization and utility of certain indicators Potential to improve bibliometric methodology 7

Results: Focus Groups Main theme of discussions: Attribution versus contribution Direct attribution desired Struggle to find value of latter categories and associated indicators Lessons Learned Need to clarify to stakeholders: Our conceptualization of the research impact process How CIHR fits into the research impact process How the CIHR framework fits into the research impact process 8

Simplified conceptual model of research impact 9 Research EnterpriseResearch Users Society Knowledge Decision-Making Health Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding Impacts on… Capacity Health System Economy

Research EnterpriseResearch Users Society Knowledge Decision-Making Health Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding Impacts on… Capacity Health System Economy Not-so-simplified version 10

Research Enterprise Research Users Society Knowledge Decision-Making Health Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding Impacts on… Capacity Health System Economy Not-so-simplified version 11 Government priorities Public priorities Funder priorities Government budget Partnerships & leveraged funds Peer review Researcher priorities Research Institution priorities Infrastructure Research team composition Publication bias Peer review Researcher characteristics Time lag to publication Continued relevance User characteristics Government priorities User acceptance Accessibility System capacity Economic outlook Personal characteristics Demand Political climate System capacity

Simplified conceptual model of research impact 12 Research EnterpriseResearch Users Society Knowledge Decision-Making Health Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding Impacts on… Capacity Health System Economy

Simplified conceptual model of research impact 13 Research EnterpriseResearch Users Society Knowledge Decision-Making Health Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding Impacts on… Capacity Health System Economy

Simplified conceptual model of research impact 14 Research EnterpriseResearch Users Society Knowledge Decision-Making Health Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding Impacts on… Capacity Health System Economy

Simplified conceptual model of research impact 15 Impacts on… Knowledge Capacity Decision- Making Health Health System Economy Research EnterpriseResearch Users Society Knowledge Translation Research Findings EffectUse Funding

16 CIHR Impact Assessment Framework Category Lower order indicators Higher order indicators Knowledge # Publications from grants in specific research area # Canadian publications in specific research area Capacity # CIHR-supported PhD trainee awards # Canadian PhD grads in health Decision- Making Citation in research Citation in health policy Health Outcome measures of condition X for clinical trial patients Prevalence of condition X in Canada Health Systems Health efficiencies from specific grants Wait times Economy License or royalty agreement counts # jobs created from spin-off companies

Next steps & Conclusions Continue testing model, framework categories and indicators Feedback & validation from stakeholders Alignment of model and framework with literature 17

Questions??? 18