Higher-Level Clients to Leverage MUSTANG Metrics Dr. Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center Managing Data from Seismic Networks September 9-17 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. GSN ANSS Traditional Waveform Review  The “morning run” Daily summarizes problems with availability, timing,
Advertisements

Power Spectral Density (PSD) Probability Density Functions (PDF)
Lecture 6 Basic Statistics Dr. A.K.M. Shafiqul Islam School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis
GSN Quality Assurance System Concepts of Operations GSN-QC Coordination Meeting IRIS DMC - 11/16/2011.
Histograms & Comparing Graphs
Science for Planet Earth April 2010 A Decade of Earthquake Monitoring with an Educational Seismograph Larry.
Extending the North Atlantic Hurricane Record Using Seismic Noise Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Northwestern University American Geophysical.
RHESSI Visibilities Gordon Hurford, Ed Schmahl, Richard Schwartz 1 April 2005.
Improved Quality Control for Seismic Networks ---MUSTANG.
Chapter One Characteristics of Instrumentation بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Calculating and Interpreting the Correlation Coefficient ~adapted from walch education.
Control charts : Also known as Shewhart charts or process-behaviour charts, in statistical process control are tools used to determine whether or not.
1 What is the Richter Scale? How large is a large earthquake? How is earthquake size measured? Earthquake Magnitude Module LRW-1 Prepared for SSAC by Laura.
Calibration & Curve Fitting
August 13-19, 2010Data Management Workshop Foz do Iguassu- Brazil Seismic Quality Assurance Rick Benson IRIS DMC Rick Benson IRIS DMC.
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson Carleton University.
Seismicity around Lhasa Tsoja Wangmo 1), Norsang Gelsor 1) and Jens Havskov 2) 1) Jiangsu Road No 36 Lhasa, Tibet, PRC 2) University of Bergen, Department.
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Workshop on Earthquakes: Ground- based and Space Observations 1 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria 2 Institute of Physics,
Power Spectral Density (PSD) Probability Density Functions (PDF) A Seismic Data QC and Network Design Tool Developers: Dan McNamara, Ray ANSS.
Bob Woodward, Bob Busby, Katrin Hafner, and David Simpson
Data Collection & Processing Hand Grip Strength P textbook.
Array Response Functions with ArrayGUI
Seismic Anisotropy Beneath the Southeastern United States: Influences of Mantle Flow and Tectonic Events Wanying Wang* (Advisor: Dr. Stephen Gao) Department.
Seismic Networks Operated by Central Weather Bureau in Taiwan Ta-Yi Chen Central Weather Bureau.
8-13 January 2012, Bangkok, Thailand Institute of Seismology, National Academy of Sciences, Kyrgyz Republic.
A New QUACK Controlet: Sesimic Noise Probability Density Functions Developers: Dan McNamara, Ray Buland, Harold Bolton, Jerry USGS Richard Boaz.
Skewness & Kurtosis: Reference
IRIS Broad-Band Instrumentation Workshop; Lake Tahoe, Mar 24-26, 2004 Gabi Laske Cecil H. and Ida M. Green Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics.
Data Preprocessing Dr. Bernard Chen Ph.D. University of Central Arkansas Fall 2010.
Project IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers) Project IDA Measuring Seismic Noise IRIS Metadata Workshop January 12, 2012 Peter Davis Project.
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
Objectives 2.1Scatterplots  Scatterplots  Explanatory and response variables  Interpreting scatterplots  Outliers Adapted from authors’ slides © 2012.
FREQUANCY DISTRIBUTION 8, 24, 18, 5, 6, 12, 4, 3, 3, 2, 3, 23, 9, 18, 16, 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, 13, 15, 9, 11, 11, 7, 10, 6, 5, 16, 20, 4, 3, 3, 3, 10, 3, 2,
Introduction to PQLX Dr. Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center Dr. Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center.
Automated Data Quality Assurance: QUACK and MUSTANG Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center.
50 years of global seismology: USGS Albuquerque Seismological Lab.
Statistical Analysis Topic – Math skills requirements.
IRIS Summer Intern Training Course Wednesday, May 31, 2006 Anne Sheehan Lecture 3: Teleseismic Receiver functions Teleseisms Earth response, convolution.
Chapter 3-Examining Relationships Scatterplots and Correlation Least-squares Regression.
MUSTANG Quality Assurance Gillian Sharer TA Team Meeting November 9-10, 2015 With contributions from Rob Casey, Bruce Weertman, Laura Hutchinson, and Mary.
GSN QC at the IRIS DMC Mary Templeton GSN Coordination Meeting Seattle, WA November 16, 2011.
P wave amplitudes in 3D Earth Guust Nolet, Caryl Michaelson, Ileana Tibuleac, Ivan Koulakov, Princeton University.
Building Station Metadata with PDCC
Station Metadata The NRL (Nominal Response Library) Dr. Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center Managing Data from Seismic Networks September
USNSN/ANSS Real Time Data Flow at the NEIC. Topics NEIC Real-time Data System Networks Contributed to NEIC in Real-time Internal Flow of Real-time Data.
1 Rosalia Daví 1 Václav Vavryčuk 2 Elli-Maria Charalampidou 2 Grzegorz Kwiatek 1 Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha 2 GFZ German Research.
Seismology Dylan Mikesell April 5, 2011 Boise State University.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Thurs Nov 12, 12:45 Nov 8-17, 2009Data Management Workshop Cairo, Egypt.
Station Metadata: What do I Need?
Susan L. Beck George Zandt Kevin M. Ward Jonathan R. Delph.
Network Interactions with MUSTANG: MUSTANG Clients and Network Reports
ISPAQ: IRIS System for Portable Assessment of Quality
Chiangmai Seismic Station,Thailand (CHTO)
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
Station Metadata: What do I Need?
USArray Quality Assurance
AC-9/AC-S data analysis from CDOM Lab
Seismic Instrumentation
1-D Mississippi embayment sediment velocity structure and anisotropy: constraint from ambient noise analysis on a dense array Chunyu,Liu1; Charles A. Langston1.
Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Requirements, needs, wants:
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
MUSTANG Training Session for North American Regional Networks
Applying linear and median regression
Rony Azouz, Charles M. Gray  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Higher-Level Clients to Leverage MUSTANG Metrics Dr. Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center Managing Data from Seismic Networks September Hanoi, Vietnam Dr. Mary Templeton IRIS Data Management Center Managing Data from Seismic Networks September Hanoi, Vietnam

Why Have Multiple Clients? Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Finding problems Analyst review Tracking problems Reporting problems Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Finding problems Analyst review Tracking problems Reporting problems

Customizing Quality Assurance Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Scripting your own clients wget curl R Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Scripting your own clients wget curl R

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Finding Problems: Automated Text Reports (internal use) A script retrieves MUSTANG metrics Metrics are grouped by problem type Focuses on problem stations for further review Finding Problems: Automated Text Reports (internal use) A script retrieves MUSTANG metrics Metrics are grouped by problem type Focuses on problem stations for further review

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Analyst review Metrics: dead_channel_exp 20 Review plot using MUSTANG noise-pdf service Analyst review Metrics: dead_channel_exp 20 Review plot using MUSTANG noise-pdf service Nepal Earthquake microseisms *IU.WCI.00.BHZ isn’t completely dead – it still records some energy

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Analyst review Review plot using MUSTANG noise-mode-timeseries service Analyst review Review plot using MUSTANG noise-mode-timeseries service Problem started on August

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Analyst review Review sample_mean plot using MUSTANG databrowser Analyst review Review sample_mean plot using MUSTANG databrowser

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Analyst review Example: Channel Orientation Analysis The orientation_check metric finds observed channel orientations for shallow M>= 7 events by Calculating the Hilbert transform of the Z component (H{Z}) for Rayleigh waves Cross-correlating H{Z} with trial radial components calculated at varying azimuths until the correlation coefficient is maximized The observed channel orientation is difference between the calculated event back azimuth and observed radial azimuth Analyst review Example: Channel Orientation Analysis The orientation_check metric finds observed channel orientations for shallow M>= 7 events by Calculating the Hilbert transform of the Z component (H{Z}) for Rayleigh waves Cross-correlating H{Z} with trial radial components calculated at varying azimuths until the correlation coefficient is maximized The observed channel orientation is difference between the calculated event back azimuth and observed radial azimuth Stachnik, J.C., Sheehan, A.F., Zietlow, D.W., Yang, Z, Collins, J. and Ferris, A, 2012, Determination of New Zealand Ocean Bottom Seismometer Orientation via Rayleigh- Wave Polarization, Seismological Research Letters, v. 83, no. 4, p

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Analyst review orientation_check measurements from 2013 and 2014 for CU.ANWB having correlation coefficients > 0.4 Analyst review orientation_check measurements from 2013 and 2014 for CU.ANWB having correlation coefficients > 0.4 Median observed Y azimuth differed from the metadata by degrees This value was omitted from the median because it fell outside two standard deviations A discrepancy with the CU.TGUH.00 metadata orientation was found using this metric. Its metadata has since been corrected.

Why Have Multiple Clients? You can browse small networks by channel: But for large networks, a retrieving a list is faster You can browse small networks by channel: But for large networks, a retrieving a list is faster percent_availability box plot

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC Tracking Problems Tracking Problems

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC HTML report Tracking Problems Tracking Problems

Quality Assurance Practice at IRIS DMC … Reporting Problems Reporting Problems Virtual network report summarized by network Links to analyst assessment of issue

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Use Metrics Thresholds Find problems by retrieving channels that meet a meaningful metrics condition Missing data have percent_availability=0 Channels with masses against the stops have very large absolute_value(sample_mean) Channels that do report GPS locks where clock_locked=0 have lost their GPS time reference Use Metrics Thresholds Find problems by retrieving channels that meet a meaningful metrics condition Missing data have percent_availability=0 Channels with masses against the stops have very large absolute_value(sample_mean) Channels that do report GPS locks where clock_locked=0 have lost their GPS time reference

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Finding Metrics Thresholds Retrieve measurements for your network wget ' query?metric=sample_mean &net=IU &cha=BH[12ENZ] &format=csv &timewindow= T00:00:00, T00:00:00' Finding Metrics Thresholds Retrieve measurements for your network wget ' query?metric=sample_mean &net=IU &cha=BH[12ENZ] &format=csv &timewindow= T00:00:00, T00:00:00'

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Finding Metrics Thresholds Find the range of metrics values for problem channels Finding Metrics Thresholds Find the range of metrics values for problem channels Threshold for pegged masses: abs(sample_mean) < 1e+7

A Note About Amplitude Metrics Metrics reported in counts may have different thresholds for different instrumentation sample_max sample_mean sample_median sample_min sample_rms Metrics reported in counts may have different thresholds for different instrumentation sample_max sample_mean sample_median sample_min sample_rms

A Note About Amplitude Metrics PSD-based metrics have their instrument responses removed – one threshold works for similar (e.g. broadband) instrumentation dead_channel_exp pct_below_nlnm pct_above_nhnm transfer_function PSD-based metrics have their instrument responses removed – one threshold works for similar (e.g. broadband) instrumentation dead_channel_exp pct_below_nlnm pct_above_nhnm transfer_function

A Note About Amplitude Metrics PDF – a “heat-density” plot of many Power Spectral Density curves: Healthy PSDs Calibration Dead channel New High Noise Model NHNM New Low Noise Model NLNM

Metrics Threshold Example Problem HHE poles: HHN poles: Sign error

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Combine metrics Dead channels have almost linear PSDs (dead_channel_exp < 0.3) and lie mainly below the NLNM (pct_below_nlnm > 20) Combine metrics Dead channels have almost linear PSDs (dead_channel_exp < 0.3) and lie mainly below the NLNM (pct_below_nlnm > 20)

Combined Metrics Example Problem dead_channel_exp 20

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Metrics Arithmetic Metrics averages num_gaps / # measurements num_spikes / # measurements Metrics differences pct_below_nlnm daily difference Metrics Arithmetic Metrics averages num_gaps / # measurements num_spikes / # measurements Metrics differences pct_below_nlnm daily difference

Metrics Arithmetic Example Problem A nonzero gap average for all channels with no high num_gap days may indicate an ongoing telemetry problem.

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Some favorite metrics tests for GSN data noData: percent_availability = 0 gapsGt12: num_gaps > 12 avgGaps: average gaps/measurement >= 2 noTime: clock_locked = 0 dead: dead_channel_exp 20 pegged: abs(sample_rms) > 10e+7 lowAmp: dead_channel_exp >= 0.3 && pct_below_nlnm > 20 noise: dead_channel_exp 20 hiAmp: sample_rms > avgSpikes: average spikes/measurement >= 100 dcOffsets: dc_offset > 50 badRESP: pct_above_nhnm > 90 || pct_below_nlnm > 90 Some favorite metrics tests for GSN data noData: percent_availability = 0 gapsGt12: num_gaps > 12 avgGaps: average gaps/measurement >= 2 noTime: clock_locked = 0 dead: dead_channel_exp 20 pegged: abs(sample_rms) > 10e+7 lowAmp: dead_channel_exp >= 0.3 && pct_below_nlnm > 20 noise: dead_channel_exp 20 hiAmp: sample_rms > avgSpikes: average spikes/measurement >= 100 dcOffsets: dc_offset > 50 badRESP: pct_above_nhnm > 90 || pct_below_nlnm > 90

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Scripting your own client can take advantage of these strategies:

Strategies for leveraging MUSTANG metrics Incorporate graphics

IRIS DMC QA Website Currently has links to Existing MUSTANG clients MUSTANG resources and tutorials Interpreting Power Spectral Density graphs We hope to add tutorials on MUSTANG’s R-based metrics packages and other ways to script your own clients in the future Currently has links to Existing MUSTANG clients MUSTANG resources and tutorials Interpreting Power Spectral Density graphs We hope to add tutorials on MUSTANG’s R-based metrics packages and other ways to script your own clients in the future

Thank you