Casper Signal Processing Workshop 2009 SKA Signal Processing (Preliminary) Wallace Turner Domain Specialist for Signal Processing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beamformer implementations (Mike Jones, Kris Zarb Adami, David Sinclair, Chris Shenton) Starting with top level considerations for now, ie Not, which FPGA.
Advertisements

SKADSMTAvA A. van Ardenne SKADS Coördinator ASTRON, P.O. Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo The Netherlands SKADS; The.
Paul Alexander DS3 & DS3-T3 SKADS Review 2006 DS3 The Network and its Output Data Paul Alexander.
Schediwy: Advantages and Disadvantages of Sparse Aperture Arrays Fermilab: October 2009.
Kristian Zarb Adami Pathfinders for the SKA: Nlog(N) vs. N 2 Imaging Instruments:
SKA South Africa Overview Thomas Kusel MeerKAT System Engineering Manager April 2011.
PELICAN Imaging Framework Imaging on short timescales leads to very large correlator output data rates. In order to cope with these rates and produce updated.
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy 1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) From LOFAR design to SKA1 System.
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
Sascha D-PAD Sparse Aperture Array.
Prototype SKA Technologies at Molonglo: 3. Beamformer and Correlator J.D. Bunton Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, CSIRO. Australia. Correlator.
SPDO report Richard Schilizzi and Peter Dewdney US SKA Consortium Meeting Madison, 17 November 2008.
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays. AAVS1 256 antenna elements distributed over –4 stations –64 elements each.
Performance of station array configurations Sparse vs. Dense, Regular vs Random Jaap D. Bregman AAVP Workshop,Cambridge,
Dec 2010 AAVP Cambridge workshop AAVP AAVS1/2-low demonstrators Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate.
National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center © Germán Cortés M 2008 SKA TDP Antenna Optics By Germán Cortés M. Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853, USA National.
Name1 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKA(DS) System Design Aspects: building a system Laurens Bakker.
Central Development Laboratory (Adapted from John Webber’s Viewgraphs, April 2002 Presented tonight by Skip Thacker) IEEE Tour April 2003.
Georgina Harris1 2-PAD 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October Polarisations All Digital Dr Georgina Harris / Prof Tony Brown SKADS System Design.
Backend electronics for radioastronomy G. Comoretto.
1 © 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Ultra High-speed Telecommunication Requirements for the SKA Peter Elford Business Development.
ASKAP Signal Processing Overview DIFX Users and Developers Meeting
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
FPGA-based Dedispersion for Fast Transient Search John Dickey 23 Nov 2005 Orange, NSW.
SKA Introduction Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate Andrew Faulkner, Andre Gunst, Peter Hall.
Road to MeerKAT KAT-7 DBE Alan Langman. meerKAT Overview Objectives of meerKAT Location Location Location MeerKAT Engineering Specification Prototypes.
Transition from SKADS to PrepSKA Richard Schilizzi Lisbon, 3 October 2008.
Rosie Bolton1 SKADS Costing work 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 SKADS Costing work: Spreadsheets to scalable designs Rosie Bolton Dominic.
Paul Alexander & Jaap BregmanProcessing challenge SKADS Wide-field workshop SKA Data Flow and Processing – a key SKA design driver Paul Alexander and Jaap.
XNTD/SKAMP/LFD Correlator 4th RadioNet Engineering Forum Workshop Next Generation Correlators for Radio Astronomy and Geodesy June 2006, Groningen,
Rosie Bolton SKADS Workshop April 10th 2008 SKADS Costing work: beyond the benchmark scenario Rosie Bolton Paul Alexander, Andy Faulkner and SKADS Costing.
SKA System Design Kobus Cloete 9 December 2010 AAVP Workshop "Exploring the Universe with the world's largest radio telescope"
Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility SKADS FP6 Meeting – Chateau de Limelette – 4-6 November,
Andrew Faulkner 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS Benchmark Scenario Andrew Faulkner.
Australian Astronomy MNRF Development of Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMIC) ATCA Broadband Backend (CABB)
MeerKAT DBE Past Present Future Alan Langman 28 September 2009.
ASKAP Capabilities John Reynolds on behalf of the SEIC and ASKAP team.
Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics MWA Project: Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics Centre of Excellence for All-sky.
Ariadne’s Thread Kristian Zarb Adami. Simulator Aims ۞ Provide the system architect a tool to visualise trade-offs in designs ۞ Provide the scientist.
The Correlators ( Spectrometers ) Mopra Induction - May 2005.
ASKAP: Setting the scene Max Voronkov ASKAP Computing 23 rd August 2010.
AAVS processing: Uniboard implementation. UNIBOARD Jive led FP7 project UniBoard, high integration density >> processing / m3
Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) David R DeBoer ATNF Assistant Director ASKAP Theme Leader 06 November 2007.
ASKAP Update David DeBoer ASKAP Project Director 26 May 2010.
Summary of the Paris SKA Meeting 4-8 September 2006 R. T. Schilizzi.
A real-time software backend for the GMRT : towards hybrid backends CASPER meeting Capetown 30th September 2009 Collaborators : Jayanta Roy (NCRA) Yashwant.
Roshene McCool1 Phase Transfer & WANs 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 Local Oscillator distribution over fibre Roshene McCool SPDO – Signal.
Omnisys There are a few different activities at Omnisys that may be of your interests. –New correlation spectrometer IC’s. –New FFT spectrometers –Future.
Paul AlexanderSKA Computational Challenges Square Kilometre Array Computational Challenges Paul Alexander.
Philippe Picard 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 Station Processing Philippe Picard Observatoire de Paris Meudon, 11th October 2007.
A System View on SKA Bandwidth Usage G.W. (Dion) Kant AAVP Dwingeloo, 14 December 2011.
Rosie Bolton 2 nd SKADS Workshop October 2007 SKADS System Design and Costing: Update and next steps Rosie Bolton University of Cambridge.
Square Kilometre Array eInfrastructure: Requirements, Planning, Future Directions Duncan Hall SPDO Software and Computing EGEE 2009.
SKA System Overview (and some challenges) P. Dewdney Mar 22, 2010.
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy 1 APERTIF beamformer and correlator requirements Laurens Bakker.
Andrew Faulkner April 2016 STFC Industry Day: Low Frequency Aperture Array Andrew Faulkner Project Engineer.
Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy 1 ASTRON is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Square Kilometer Array Low Central.
Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute
ASKAP High Time Res Capabilities
The UniBoard A RadioNet FP7 Joint Research Activity, 9 partners
Phased Array Feeds SKANZ 2012 John O’Sullivan
Signal Processing for Aperture Arrays
Phased Array Feeds Wim van Cappellen
UniBoard2 applied in the Square Kilometer Array
Pulsar Timing with ASKAP Simon Johnston ATNF, CSIRO
5 Gsps ADC Developement and Future Collaboration
Aperture Array Station Processing
Technical Foundations & Enabling Technologies – DS4
SKADS White Paper - Technologies -
Aperture Array Simulations
Presentation transcript:

Casper Signal Processing Workshop 2009 SKA Signal Processing (Preliminary) Wallace Turner Domain Specialist for Signal Processing

SPDO Example Configuration (Phase 2) 2 of 35 Memo 100 identifies the following options: MHz: Sparse AA MHz: Sparse AA 500MHz-10GHz: m dishes Or 500MHz- 10GHz: m dishes with PAFs plus WBSPF Or 500MHz-10GHz: 250 Dense AA plus m dishes/ WBSPF Note: On going discussions 15m vs 12m dishes Example Configuration with Dense AA + SPF

SPDO Reference Design 3 of 35

SPDO Dishes+Single Pixel Feeds 4 of 35 American: 6m Hydroformed DishSouth Africa: 15m Composite Dish Canadian: 10m Composite Dish Note: On going discussions 12m vs. 15m dish Required sensitivity 10,000 m 2 K -1 Correlator processor and dump rate proportional to N ant 2 ADC likely to be at antenna (4 bit ?) O/P rate = fs.4bits = 160 G bits/s per antenna Where fs = sample rate likely to be split into smaller basebands

SPDO AGN Science Chapter Example 5 of 35 AGN Science Chapter Survey Speed: 1 x 10 5 m 4 K -2 deg 2 Frequency range 500 MHz to 8GHz Tsys now: Not achieved over bandwidth Target Tsys: 35K

SPDO Dishes+Phased Array Feeds 6 of 35 Apertif Netherlands: Vivaldi Array ASKAP Australia: Checkerboard Array PHAD Canada: Vivaldi Array Note: Some Channelization and Beamforming likely to be at antenna. Maximum Field of View limited by Array size and focal length of dish. Achievable field of view limited by network bandwidth.

SPDO Example Number PAFs Required 7 of 35 Wide Field Polarimetry Science Chapter Survey Speed: 5 x 10 8 m 4 K -2 deg 2 Max frequency 2GHz WBSPF would require over 15,000 dishes Tsys now: 100 K Target Tsys: 50 K

SPDO Simplistic View of PAF Processing Consider Frequency Domain Beamforming Channelisation: N chan ~ 64 –12 taps gives < 60db aliasing between channels –Processing load ~ (N taps + 3 * log 2 (N chan )) x N el x 2pol x f s –N taps = 12, N el = 96 x 2pol & f s = 1.4 GHz for 700MHz bandwidth Processing load= 8 x MACS Beamformer (per antenna): –Average beams per channel 30 –Processing Load = N bms.N el.2pol.f s. 4Multiplies = 3 x Macs O/P rate = N bms.2pol.f s.4bits.8B10B = 420 G bit/s –42 10 G bit/s optical cables per antenna –Includes 25 % extra bandwidth required for 8B/10B Encoding 2000 dishes with PAFs (total 840 T bits/s) Note :*FFT implementation dependent 8 of 35

SPDO Sparse Aperture Arrays 9 of 35 LOFAR: Netherlands et al LWA: USAMWA: USA & Australia Note: Two types of sparse AA required: 70MHz – 200 MHz 200MHz – 500 MHz Only solution for EoR HI Science Chapter

SPDO Dense Aperture Array Station 10 of 35 Assumed Dense Aperture Array ~256 tiles x 256 elements per tile 2 polarisations per element Sample rate ~ 2.5 G Hz 4 bits/ sample 56 m diameter 250 stations Tsys now 120K Target 35K Memo 100 Processing Bunker Dense AA Detail 300MHz to 1GHz i.e. 700MHz bandwidth fs=2 x 700 MHz 56m diameter array =>2463 m pol elements per m^2 (30 cm wavelength) = 110,000 elements x 2pol per station, about 2 x 64k elements. Array efficiency 80%, Bore efficiency 75% & Tsys = 35K -> 250 stations for 10,000m 2 K -1 sensitivity

SPDO Simplistic View of Dense Aperture Array Processing Consider Frequency Domain Beamforming –Delay is implemented as a phase slope in frequency domain. –Alternative time domain with tuned lengths of co-ax. Channelisation: N chan 1024, – 12 taps gives < 60db aliasing between channels –N taps = 12, N ant = 64k x 2pol & f s = 1.4 GHz for 700MHz bandwidth –Processing ~ (N taps + 3 * log 2 (N chan )) x N ant x 2pol x f s** =8 x MACS Beamformer (per station): –Average 1437 beams per channel to cover 250 sq degrees FoV –Processing Load = N ant.2pol.N bms.f s. 4MACS = 1 x MACS O/P rate** = N bms.2 pol.f s.4bits.8B10B = 20 T bit/s –Over G bit/s optical cables, 8B/10B Encoding factor 1.25 Up to 250 Dense AA Stations (total 10 peta bits/s) Note :*FFT implementation dependent **Ignores upsampling of channelizer 11 of 35

SPDO Correlator Processing Loads Channelisation (700MHz bandwidth): –SPF 4 x (10 5 channels) –PAF 4 x (4096 fine channels giving ~ 10 5 total) –Dense AA 6 x (128 fine channels ~ 10 5 total) Correlation load (700 MHz bandwidth) –SPF load = 6 x MACS –PAF load = 1 x MACS –Dense AA = 2 x MACS Correlator Dump Rate (Dish Solution) – m dishes + 40 x 18 dish stations and 3000 km baseline: –Integration time ~ 200ms for < 1% smearing 5 x 10 6 /2 baselines x 10 5 channels x 4 bytes x 5 Hz = 9 T Bytes/s Not calculated for other configurations yet 12 of 35

SPDO Signal Processing Overview Memo 100 Option a* 13 * Sparse AAs m dishes with SPFs

SPDO Signal Processing Overview Memo 100 option b* 14 of 35 * Sparse AAs m dishes with PAFS & WBSPF Possibly include a beam former for the core

SPDO Signal Processing Overview Memo 100 option c* 15 of 35 * Sparse AAs Dense AA m dishes with SPFs

SPDO Technology Options FPGA –Virtex 6 (available 2010): 2016 x DSP slices clocked at 600 MHz -> 1200 G MACS ~ 25 G MACs per Watt MACS requires ~ 10 6 FPGAS => 48 W per device and ~ 48 M Watts for MACS Operating cost 1$ per Watt per year => $48M per annum Plus cost of cooling and delivering power ASIC –22nm (available 2010): 2.5 nW/MHz/Gate > 40 T MACS (4 bit) per device => 25,000 devices Assuming < 50 % gates switching at any one time: 600kW Operating cost $600k per annum 16 of 35

SPDO What would F or X unit look like? 17 of 35 Baseline Board (front) Station BoardBaseline Board (rear) Pictures courtesy Brent Carlson EVLA style boards might be an optiton ? 64 ASICS or FPGAs on board (~1.5 kW card) ~ 190 boards for Dense AA ASIC correlator 14 cards per shelf -> 14 shelves Is production yield an issue? Could use smaller 8 processor chip board As per ASKAP or Uniboard Inter-board Communication links increase

SPDO Multichip Module 18 of 35 SKADS have developed a promising Multichip Module: 4 x 4 antenna array currently, Current RFI Protection shows -57dB per M (in air) Picture courtesy of Kris Zarb Adami Could be developed and used in several areas of the SKA (Note that the key components are ADC and Optical I/O, although the others could be useful in some applications.)

SPDO Correlator Centre Build Cost 19 of 35 Kevin Wohlever 2006 ASIC solution 1 cabinet per 30 sq ft Between 80 & 160 cabs? Factor of 4 for air con &PSU units, offices ~ 50 W per sq ft

SPDO SPDO Team Project DirectorRichard Schilizzi Project Engineer Peter Dewdney Executive OfficerColin Greenwood Project ScientistJoe Lazio System EngineerKobus Cloete Domain Specialist Receptors Neil Roddis Domain Specialist Signal TransportRoshene McCool Domain Specialist Computing & SoftwareDuncan Hall Domain Specialist Signal ProcessingWallace Turner Site EngineerRob Millenaar Project Management OfficerBilly Adams Industry Relations ManagerPhil Crosby Office ManagerLisa Bell 20