Looking Forward: Costing for Scale Up Kate Rademacher & John Bratt October 5, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Value for Money: Easier or Harder than it looks? Andrew Rowell, CARE Australia DevPol Conference Feb 2014.
Advertisements

Explanation of slide: Logos, to show while the audience arrive.
PEPFAR’s Approach to Maximize Efficiency, Effectiveness and Impact
Calculating & Reporting Healthcare Statistics
"The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease.
Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation for National TB Programs 20 September 2005.
Productivity Prepared by Dr. Manal Moussa. Productivity Prepared by Dr. Manal Moussa.
Secretariat to the Espoo Convention and its Protocol on SEA
Unit 4: Monitoring Data Quality For HIV Case Surveillance Systems #6-0-1.
Efficiency is a level of performance that describes a process that uses the lowest amount of inputs to create the greatest amount of inputs. 2.
NGO Management Lesson 3 NGO Strategy
Chapter 1 Managerial Medical Cost Accounting, Structure, Modeling, and Behavior.
Development and Implementation of a National Multisectoral Output Monitoring System (SHAPMoS) for HIV Responses in Swaziland:  Challenges and lessons learned.
What is our understanding of the 'reality on the ground' ?
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Considering the Costs of MUS Interventions. Direct Costs v. Opportunity Costs Direct Costs Expenditures and investments to achieve a particular outcome.
1 The budgeting process The traditional goals of the planning and control process are: - to identify the economic goals and how to achieve them - to measure.
Introduction to the Sustainability Framework Karl Blanchet, 2009 Adapted from Ricca J., 2009, CSTS.
Higher Education Capital Facilities Studies: Expanding The Comparable Framework Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee May 18, 2005.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 2o th November Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Introducing QI Tools and Approaches Taking QI & PI Approaches and Tools to Scale APPENDIX F Session G Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement.
3 rd session: Accessibility of the project to the target groups 1.CONTEXT 2.NEED BASED ANALYSIS 3.METHODOLOGY 4.IDENTIFYING AND REACHING TARGETED GROUPS.
1 Webinar: Challenges in Clinical Training Ben Wallace, Executive Director, Clinical Training Reform Health Workforce Australia.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
Essex County Council Developing Single Funding Formula for Early Years Education in Essex Annex B.
Economic growth Chapter 8 4/23/2017 4/23/
1 Second Regional Workshop on gender and Poverty Reduction Strategies, September 2003, Siem Reap Gender responsive costing and budgeting Nalini Burn.
Social and economic impacts of broadband- the importance of broadband investments PPP4Broadband days- Bled, Slovenia,14 November 2013.
Epilepsy and WHO | 17 Oct |1 | WHO's six-point agenda The overarching health needs 1.Promoting development 2.Fostering health security The strategic.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Outline How costing pilot interventions differs from costing services Phases of pilot interventions From phases to resources Converting resources into.
Ministry of Healthcare & Nutrition Broader Approaches to Health Strategic Frame Work for Health Development.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Workshop on ICT Policy reform and rural communications infrastructure 22August – 2 nd Sept 2004 Tokyo, Japan Rural Communications Development – Uganda.
Fiscal Planning (Budgeting). Fiscal Planning Fiscal planning is not intuitive; it is a learned skill that improves with practice. Fiscal planning requires.
The Experiment of Tobacco Substitute Plantation at Village Level Zhao Yaqiao College of Economics & Management Yunnan Agricultural University.
Towards a National Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases Nikolai Khaltaev, MD, PhD March 2006, GARD General Meeting, Beijing, China.
Social inclusion of excluded young people and prevention of re-offending behavior
11 Reaching adolescents through health services Dr V Chandra-Mouli Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive.
Bell Ringer!  In your mind, what defines “success” for a business ?  What non-financial factors might determine success for a particular business?
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
The importance of engaging in Health systems strengthening to ensure Nutrition interventions are truly delivered within the health system TECHNICAL MEETING.
SIMONA MURRONI Bruxelles - June 27th 2013 Bridging lessons learned from the past with new planning and delivery approaches in the energy sector.
ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING (ABC)
The Production Possibilities Frontier
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Strategic Information Systems Planning
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
HEALTH ECONOMICS BASICS
Literacy Situation in Afghanistan
a New Focus for External Validity
Government Policy Instruments
Right-sized Evaluation
Module 1: Introducing Development Evaluation
Action for Children 'Buy Now, Pay Later’ – Social Impact Bonds
Evaluation of Nutrition-Sensitive Programs*
Bell Ringer! In your mind, what defines “success” for a business ?
Impact Evaluation Terms Of Reference
Cornerstones of Managerial Accounting, 5e
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
Flexible Budgets, Standard Costs, and Variances Analysis Chapter 8
Flexible Budgets, Standard Costs, and Variances Analysis Chapter 8
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How can we make healthcare purchasing in Kenya more strategic?
Presentation transcript:

Looking Forward: Costing for Scale Up Kate Rademacher & John Bratt October 5, 2009

Introduction Our last session introduced an approach to costing out pilot interventions Phases, activities, resources, costs Identify and cost resources used to carry out activities Cost of phase = sum of costs of activities Cost of pilot intervention = sum of costs of phases

Today’s Agenda Introduction to a simple typology of scale-up Incremental vs. full cost analysis review Reasons why scale-up costs differ from costs of pilot projects Practice with Part 2 of the Case

ExpandNet Definition: Scaling Up “Deliberate efforts to increase the impact of health service innovations successfully tested in pilot or experimental projects so as to benefit more people and to foster policy and program development on a lasting basis.”

Three Types of Scaling Up Adapted from ExpandNet and MSI frameworks 1. 1.Diversification: Adding additional services at existing service delivery points Increase frequency of service (more hours per week) Reach additional beneficiaries in same area Deliver additional services to same beneficiaries

Three Types of Scaling Up cont’ 2. Expansion to new service delivery points in same organization Growth by branching out into new locations Franchising the model to organizations operating as clones of the originating organization

Three Types of Scaling Up cont’ 3. Replication in Different Organizations and Contexts Can occur between organizations of the same type (e.g., NGO to NGO) or between organizations of different types Involves crossing geographic and/or sectoral boundaries Policy adoption

Estimating Costs of Scale-up Can we estimate scale-up costs simply by multiplying per-site costs of the pilot by the number of scale-up sites? For example: assume that a pilot project cost $2500/clinic, and plans are to scale up to 40 clinics. Therefore, can we assume that the cost would be $2500 x 40 clinics = $100,000?

Take Away Message …. Scale-up Costs are Not Simple Multipliers of the Costs of Pilot Projects!!

Incremental Cost Analysis Approach:Average Cost Calculations Incremental Cost Calculations Main task:Deciding what basis and method of allocation of indirect costs to use Identifying marginal costs of one or more alternatives

What costs do we care about? Additional Costs Associated with Interventions Pilot projects often carried out within an existing program so we are concerned about “incremental” costs Existing Program Costs Additional Costs

What costs do we care about? During scale up: Additional costs of expanding Existing Pilot Costs Additional Costs of Scale Up Now, if were are taking a program to scale, which costs would be considered “incremental”?

Importance of marginal benefit and cost

Reasons why Scale-up Costs are not Simple Multipliers of Pilot Costs Pilot components not repeated in scale-up Economies of scale Differences in entity providing inputs Changes in intervention content or program

Pilot Components Not Repeated in Scale-up Some planning elements are one-time activities and do not need to be repeated –Curriculum design –Stakeholder buy-in meetings with national health authorities

Economies of Scale Definition: Reduction in cost per unit resulting from increased production and operational efficiencies –Example: if you trained 10 individuals per training in the pilot, but can actually train 30 individuals per training, you will have realized economies of scale. Average cost per trained promoter = 1/3 of Pilot cost Diseconomies of scale also possible

Differences in Inputs Inputs costs may differ at scale than in the pilot projects – – For example, if pilot used expensive international consultants for TOT, but the MOH will run activities when taken to scale, lower-cost staff are substituted for higher-cost staff – – Non-financial costs in the pilot (‘economic costs’) may become financial costs at scale.

Changes in the Intervention Learning from experience Different priorities in new context –Scale-up may choose to emphasize certain activities based on relative effectiveness and/or changes in priorities. –As mix of activities changes, so will the costs of scaling up a modified intervention Some activities are deemed as not financially realistic at scale –Agency implementing scale-up cannot afford intensive supervision during service delivery

Review: Costs of a Pilot Project Inputs Outputs Processes (activities) Labor Supplies Capital Planning the intervention Preparing for Service Delivery Carrying out new service delivery Increased or improved provision of services Outcomes Improved health outcomes

Review: How to compute costs Phase Activity – Resource » Cost Three phases: Planning the intervention Preparing for Service Delivery Carrying out new service delivery

Lessons Learned Remember, we can not calculate costs of scale up simply by multiplying pilot costs at a proportional rate.