Marc Bonin Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Charité University Hospital Charitéplatz 1 D-10117 Berlin Germany Tel: +49(0) 30 450 513.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases An Introduction.
Advertisements

Original Figures for "Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring"
Treatment Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Findings and In Depth Analysis.
Clinical Trial Designs for the Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Classifiers Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
DISSECTING DISEASE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN RA AND OA BY TRANSCRIPTOME ANALYSES OF SYNOVIAL TISSUE, BLOOD AND BONE MARROW MONOCYTES Biljana Smiljanovic.
Author: Jim C. Huang etc. Lecturer: Dong Yue Director: Dr. Yufei Huang.
Microarray technology and analysis of gene expression data Hillevi Lindroos.
Model and Variable Selections for Personalized Medicine Lu Tian (Northwestern University) Hajime Uno (Kitasato University) Tianxi Cai, Els Goetghebeur,
Microarrays and Gene Expression Analysis. 2 Gene Expression Data Microarray experiments Applications Data analysis Gene Expression Databases.
Office hours Wednesday 3-4pm 304A Stanley Hall Review session 5pm Thursday, Dec. 11 GPB100.
Guidelines on Statistical Analysis and Reporting of DNA Microarray Studies of Clinical Outcome Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National.
Using Random Peptide Phage Display Libraries for early Breast cancer detection Ekaterina Nenastyeva.
Thoughts on Biomarker Discovery and Validation Karla Ballman, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics October 29, 2007.
Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis of Prostate Cancer Reveals Distinct Transcriptional Programs Associated With Metastatic Disease Kevin Paiz-Ramirez.
JAVED KHAN ET AL. NATURE MEDICINE – Volume 7 – Number 6 – JUNE 2001
Expression profiling of peripheral blood cells for early detection of breast cancer Introduction Early detection of breast cancer is a key to successful.
Gene expression profiling identifies molecular subtypes of gliomas
Rituximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Background and Objective:Materials and Methods: Results: Conclusion: Samples were collected before Methotrexate treatment. The transcriptomes were determined.
Automated analysis of cytometric profiles of synovial fluid and peripheral blood in rheumatoid arthritis Till Sörensen 1, Ursula Schulte-Wrede 2, Silvia.
A 14-gene prognosis signature predicts metastasis risk in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, Tamoxifen-treated breast cancer in different ethnogeographic.
From motif search to gene expression analysis
Molecular classification of renal cell carcinoma subtypes using microRNA signatures Zaravinos A 1, Lambrou GI 2, Mourmouras N 3, Delakas D 3, Deltas C.
Amandine Bemmo 1,2, David Benovoy 2, Jacek Majewski 2 1 Universite de Montreal, 2 McGill university and Genome Quebec innovation centre Analyses of Affymetrix.
Acknowledgement: BTCure IMI grant agreement no ArthroMark grant no 01EC1009A Identification of co-expression networks of inflammatory response.
Cell-specific type I Interferon signatures in autoimmunity and viral infection: what makes the difference? Chieko Kyogoku 1, Biljana Smiljanovic 1, Joachim.
Probe-Level Data Normalisation: RMA and GC-RMA Sam Robson Images courtesy of Neil Ward, European Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Dongyun Yang 2, Marinella Carpanu 3, Ellen Hollywood 3, Michael Lue-Yat 3, Wu Zhang 1, Kathleen D. Danenberg 4, Peter V. Danenberg 5,
Microarrays.
Differential Protein Expression Analysis for Biomarker Discovery.
SYNOVIAL TISSUE TRANSCRIPTOME AND SYNOVIAL FLUID PROTEOME HAVE STRONGER DISCRIMINATORY POWER THAN SERUM IN DISSECTING INFLAMMATION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS.
Apostolos Zaravinos and Constantinos C Deltas Molecular Medicine Research Center and Laboratory of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Department of Biological.
A Short Overview of Microarrays Tex Thompson Spring 2005.
Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks From Nature Medicine 7(6) 2001 By Javed.
Microarrays and Gene Expression Analysis. 2 Gene Expression Data Microarray experiments Applications Data analysis Gene Expression Databases.
Comparative analysis between Rheumatoid arthritis and arthritis model – study of the functional components in expression profiles of synovitis Irene Ziska.
1 FINAL PROJECT- Key dates –last day to decided on a project * 11-10/1- Presenting a proposed project in small groups A very short presentation (Max.
Evolutionary Algorithms for Finding Optimal Gene Sets in Micro array Prediction. J. M. Deutsch Presented by: Shruti Sharma.
Identification of gene co-expression networks associated with different cellular and immunological states Marc Bonin 1, Jekaterina Kokatjuhha 1, Stephan.
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
Introduction to Microarrays Kellie J. Archer, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Biostatistics
Artificial Intelligence Project #3 : Diagnosis Using Bayesian Networks May 19, 2005.
Molecular Classification of Cancer Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring.
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
A clinical database for networking in multicenter studies Ulrike Haase 1, Marc Bonin 1, Stephan Flemming 2, Frank Buttgereit 1, Till Sörensen 1, Thomas.
Identification of co-expression networks by comparison of a multitude of different functional states of genome activity Marc Bonin 1, Stephan Flemming.
1 EFFICACY OF SHORT COURSE AMOXICILLIN FOR NON-SEVERE PNEUMONIA IN CHILDREN (Hazir T*, Latif E*, Qazi S** AND MASCOT Study Group) *Children’s Hospital,
Establishment and verification of miRNAs expression molecules for breast cancer and its distant metastasis Yanhong Gao Associate Professor Department of.
Copyright © 2001, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Data Mining Methods: Applications, Problems and Opportunities in the Public Sector John Stultz,
Gene expression. Gene Expression 2 protein RNA DNA.
Pan-cancer analysis of prognostic genes Jordan Anaya Omnes Res, In this study I have used publicly available clinical and.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
BIOCONPAGES Comparison of DNA-methylation and gene expression in different immune cells Marc Bonin 1, Lorette Weidel 1, Pascal Schendel 1, Sascha Johannes.
 Gene-expression profiles from synovial tissue biopsies and blood monocytes were generated from patients with RA and OA.  Transcriptome analysis of synovial.
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
NCode TM miRNA Analysis Platform Identifies Differentially Expressed Novel miRNAs in Adenocarcinoma Using Clinical Human Samples Provided By BioServe.
Affymetrix User’s Group Meeting Boston, MA May 2005 Keynote Topics: 1. Human genome annotations: emergence of non-coding transcripts -tiling arrays: study.
SaliMark™ OSCC Investigator Meeting Salivary Transcriptome Markers for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Detection SaliMark™ OSCC.
Date of download: 6/20/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Precision Medicine in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.
Prevalence and clinical risk factors for interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis in a resource limited setting A Dasgupta, P Bhattacharyya, S.
Classifiers!!! BCH364C/391L Systems Biology / Bioinformatics – Spring 2015 Edward Marcotte, Univ of Texas at Austin.
Serum Dickkopf-1 ( DKK-1) and Arthritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients S. I. Nasef, H. H. Omar Samah Ismail Nasef MD, MRCP Rheumatology UK Lecturer.
Combined analysis of DNA-methylation and transcription profiles in different immune cells identifies hot spots of gene regulation by DNA methylation Marc.
Biomarkers.
miRNA-targets cross-talks: key players in glioblastoma multiforme
Fig. 1.  Drug survival curve for patients treated with a fully human anti‐TNF moAb (D2E7; n=61) or MTX (n=137). Percentage of patients still on therapy.
Gene expression.
Integrated microRNA-mRNA profiling identifies molecular biomarkers in bladder outlet obstruction-induced lower urinary tract dysfunction Fiona C. Burkhard1,
Influence of RNA Labeling on Expression Profiling of MicroRNAs
Differential gene expression in whole blood from SJIA patients and healthy controls. A. Data were normalized in Beadstudio using the "average" method and.
Presentation transcript:

Marc Bonin Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Charité University Hospital Charitéplatz 1 D Berlin Germany Tel: +49(0) Fax: +49(0) Web: Introduction: Methods: Results: Conclusion: Whole blood samples of 28 patients (test group) from the clinical trial HIT HARD were collected in PAXgene® Blood RNA Tubes (PreAnalytiX GmbH, Switzerland) prior to treatment with MTX. A second RA patient cohort (validation group, n=11) receiving MTX monotherapy was assembled from donors recruited at the Rheumatology Clinic of the Charité. Intracellular total RNA including miRNA was extracted according to the PAXgene® Blood miRNA Kit protocol (PreAnalytiX GmbH, Switzerland). Extracted total RNA samples were labeled using the FlashTag™ Biotin HSR RNA Labeling Kit for Affymetrix® GeneChip® miRNA Arrays (Genisphere, LLC., USA) and hybridized onto GeneChip® miRNA 2.0 Arrays (Affymetrix, Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer protocol. The generated signal data were background corrected (RMA), normalized (quantile) and summarized (median polish) utilizing the miRNA QC Tool v (Affymetrix, Inc., USA). Biomarker candidates to predict MTX treatment effectiveness were determined in the well defined HIT HARD patient cohort and then validated in the second patient group recruited separately at the Rheumatology Clinic of the Charité (own observational group) to asses the applicability of the miRNA predictor set. Classification of RA patients into good (R), moderate (MR) and non-responders (NR) was performed based on the DAS28 and EULAR response criteria after three to four months of MTX treatment. Differential expression of human miRNAs among four non-responders versus 14 good responders of the HIT HARD test group was determined by calculating the fold changes (FC) and p-values (one-tailed Welch’s t- test) for the miRNA expression signals between the two groups. Only miRNAs that were detected (TRUE) in all patients were included in the analysis. Hierarchical clustering for visualization was performed using Genesis (IGB TU-Graz, Austria). In a second step all responders and non-responders from the test and the validation group were used to predict MTX response with a nearest prototype classification model. A leave-one-out cross-validation was performed instead of splitting the data into training and test group. In total PAXgene® whole blood samples of 39 RA patients were analyzed. The 28 patients enrolled in the HIT HARD clinical trial (test group) all showed active early RA with a DAS28 >5.1 and a disease duration less that one year prior to treatment. The 11 patients recruited separately at Rheumatology Clinic of the Charité (validation group) showed a disease duration of less than two years except for two moderate responders. Patients were selected which had received no or only low doses of steroids at the time of blood sampling preceding the MTX treatment to avoid highly changed expression patterns caused by high doses of steroids to distort the intended Prediction of response to MTX therapy using microarray analyses allows reducing costs, preventing side effects and is an opportunity for effective „individualized medicine“. Next to mRNA expression analysis the investigation of miRNAs as posttranscriptional regulators could prove helpful to better understand physiological and pathological processes, to define miRNA biomarkers and predict response to medication. Methotrexate (MTX) is the standard medication to treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). It is generally efficient and affordable. Nevertheless, some patients suffer from significant adverse effects and about 30-40% of patients do not show adequate improvement under MTX treatment 1. Therefore predictors for treatment response would be useful which enable the clinician to only treat patients that will benefit from MTX. Loss of valuable time and unnecessary side effects in MTX non-responders could thus be avoided. A novel and promising class of potential biomarkers are miRNAs which exhibit several advantages such as higher stability than mRNA and abundance in many easily accessible body fluids. microRNAs are short, single-stranded, non- coding RNAs that regulate a multitude of physiological and pathological processes through posttranscriptional repression of protein-coding genes. Goal of this study was to define miRNA biomarkers to predict response to methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Contacts: Prediction of Methotrexate Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis via Affymetrix miRNA Microarray Profiling Marc Bonin, Stephan Peter, Karsten Mans, Carolin Sohnrey, Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester, Thomas Häupl, Bruno Stuhlmüller Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany Fig. 1: Hierarchical cluster of the test group based on four miRNAs Patients of the HIT HARD group were clustered (euclidean distance, average linkage) based on four miRNAs statistically determined between good responders (R) and non-responders (NR) to MTX as potential response biomarkers. (MR: moderate responder) Tab. 1: Patient characteristics Shown are the gender, age, disease duration and disease activity (DAS28) prior to MTX treatment for the analyzed patients of the HIT HARD group and our own observational group split up based on the response to MTX after 3-4 months (EULAR response criteria). analysis. According to the EULAR response criteria 14 patients of the HIT HARD group were categorized as good responders, 10 patients as moderate responders and four patients as non-responders. The own observational group comprises four good responders, four moderate and four non-responders. In both groups responders and non-responders showed a comparable mean disease activity before MTX treatment (Tab. 1). miRNA predictor selection and validation via Microarray analysis Only good responders and non-responders were included in the statistical analysis to select miRNA candidates predictive for patient response to MTX treatment. Moderate responders were excluded for the calculations. Comparing only the good responders and non-responders of the HIT HARD group four miRNA candidates were selected below a threshold of p<0.01 allowing a good discrimination of responders and non- responders by hierarchical clustering (Fig. 1). Only one out of 14 good responders is classified incorrectly as non-responder while all non-responders were identified correctly (Sensitivity: 100%, Specificity: 93%). Moderate responders which were included in the clustering are distributed among both of the distinguishable groups (Fig.1). While three of the miRNA candidates are higher expressed in non-responders, one shows a lower expression in this group compared to good responders. The four miRNA candidates were validated as predictive markers for MTX treatment ineffectiveness by clustering a separate group of RA patients (own observational group) according to the expression levels of the four candidate miRNAs prior to MTX treatment (Fig. 2). Hierarchical clustering again shows a good discrimination between responders and non-responders. All patients except one non-responder are classified correctly (Sensitivity: 75%, Specificity: 100%) Moderate responders again are divided between both main groups in the cluster (Fig. 2). With reference to the MTX response prediction the leave-one-out crossvalidation showed a Sensitivity up to 65 % and a Specificityup to 95 %. Fig. 2: Validation group Our own observational patient group was clustered (euclidean distance, average linkage) for validation based on the four miRNA candidates determined using the HIT HARD patient group. (R: good responder, MR: moderate responder, NR: non-responder to MTX) The leave-one-out crossvalidation uses up to 428 genes for the prediction. (91 of the genes are in all of the different cross-validation groups (p-value < 0,04), 0-25% (249 genes), 26-50% (26 genes) % (28 genes), 76-99% (34 genes)). The overlap between this two different prediction models are two genes, which were used in all of the crossvalidation grpups.