Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller, 785-296-5081.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress. TEA-USDE Flexibility Agreement
Advertisements

USDE Decisions on 2006 Amendments to the Texas AYP Handbook.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Accountability Policy Update (Schools) Changes to Bulletin 111 From Sept 2003 – June 2004 Louisiana Department of Education.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Instructional Core Adapted from Harvard University PELP Framework.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
10/29/071 Opportunity to Learn (OTL) Kansas State Department of Education October 29, 2007.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Initiatives Updates May 24, 2012.
Dropout/Graduation Summary Report Jessica Noble, Education Program Consultant October
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Rev ACCOUNTABILITY TOOLS Section 1. “All effective accountability systems are dynamic.” “Accountability is not about measurement; it is about.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
1 Reporting Section Update North Carolina Accountability Conference February 11-13, 2008 Greensboro, NC.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Precodes for the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA)
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Getting Started with the INDIVIDUAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT SYSTEM Segment 1 (revised July 1, 2006)
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Data Quality in the Dropout Graduation Summary Report Jessica Noble Education Program Consultant Kansas State Department of Education.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
2012 Accountability Determinations
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
AYP and Report Card.
New Statewide Accountability System
2013 Texas Accountability System
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller,

No Child Left Behind (NCLB)— Purpose: Ensure all children have an opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging state assessments

Defining Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Method for making judgment about progress toward reaching goal

AYP is calculated on the percent of students at “Meets Standard” and above on state reading and mathematics assessments.

Changes KSDE will do AYP calculations rather than CETE Clarification—Science is not part of AYP Reauthorization may change this

Changes Apply remainder of 1% cap to 2% cap—not to exceed 3% Included former students with disabilities for 2 additional years

1% Cap What does the 1% cap for alternate assessments mean? Limitation set by USDE Does not limit % taking alternate assessments Limits the % included in calculating AYP as meets standard and above at district and State levels Waiver process

What happens to those above the 1% cap? Reassigned at all levels as below standard for AYP Report to parents actual results Consider students in fewest subgroups Schools already not making AYP Submit waiver

KAMM and 2% Cap No limit on number of SWD’s taking KAMM 2% limitation on counting student results as proficient Reassigned in same manner as 1% cap No waiver or appeal on 2%

AYP Targets Changed May 2007 by SBOE Approved by USDE

Challenges Accountability data reside in multiple systems Data are sometimes not provided on a timely basis Federal timelines impact process Review & verification of data

Data Sources for AYP--CETE Assessment results General assessments General assessments with accommodations KAMM Alternate assessments KELPA--for recently arrived ELLs--participation Special circumstances (SC) codes—previously NT codes Accommodations

Data Sources--KIDS Disaggregated student groups: Race/ethnicity, lunch status, ELL, SWD AYP school Full academic year; exit information ELLs-recently arrived; monitored Test type

KIDS “TEST” Submission Upload replaces “PSLG” and “AUPD” Completed prior to any OTL testing Grade 10 & 11 student data uploaded to generate OTL reports Deadlines: 1/18/08 Math and Reading 2/18/08 Science and History

Data Sources--PBR Graduation and drop out data

System Changes What did you use? What worked well for you? What would have helped? What is missing?

KSDE Online Authentication AYP/QPA Accountability Principal’s Building Report QPA Quality Criteria Draft Report Card

AYP/QPA Accountability Application Implemented in Included: Updates Information Reports Tools

AYP/QPA Accountability - UPDATES

AYP/QPA Accountability - INFORMATION

AYP/QPA Accountability - REPORTS

AYP/QPA Reports AYP Report Participation Details & Proficiency by Test Type Participation & Proficiency Comparisons Performance by Grade Student Test Categories

AYP/QPA Reports cont’d Individual Assessment Report Student Subgroups & Reclassifications Complete Student Test File Writing Performance Report QPA

AYP/QPA Accountability - REPORTS

Reading Student by Subgroups Includes reclassification of 1%, 2% Can sort each field Can export to Excel

AYP/QPA Accountability - TOOLS Data Checklist/Signoff Data Correction Request Reclassification Decision Appeal

Data Checklist/Signoff Helps ensure quality of data Principals verify their school’s data Superintendents verify district data Required prior to reclassifying Required prior to waivers & appeals

Reclassification Tool Way to change the reclassifications automatically done by the sytem

1% Waiver Tool Request to exceed the 1% cap on alternate assessments

AYP/QPA Appeals To change a determination Doesn’t change data but reflects change in status

Timelines What changes do you recommend? Order of reports & tools? Dates?

Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Submit KIDS AUPD, EOYA & EXIT Data The Road to Data Accuracy 2007 AYP and QPA Submit QPA Quality Criteria Return Assessments to CETE Data Collection & Review *Review KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT Reports *Provide accurate NT & Accommodations to CETE 2007 Use AYP/QPA Verification Check to review and signoff on data sets used for AYP reporting and QPA determination Media Briefings and Release to SBOE Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct 2007

Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Submit KIDS AUPD, EOYA & EXIT Data The Road to Data Accuracy AYP and QPA Submit QPA Quality Criteria Return Assessments to CETE Data Collection & Review *Review KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT Reports *Provide accurate NT & Accommodations to CETE 2007 Data Correction * KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT *CETE NT & Accommodations Use AYP/QPA Data Correction Request to request a window for submitting to KIDS (AUPD, EOYA, EXIT) to correct your data Use AYP/QPA Verification Check to review and signoff on data sets used for AYP reporting and QPA determination Media Briefings and Release to SBOE Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct 2007

Submit KIDS AUPD, EOYA & EXIT Data The Road to Data Accuracy AYP and QPA Submit QPA Quality Criteria Return Assessments to CETE Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Data Collection & Review *Review KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT Reports *Provide accurate NT & Accommodations to CETE 2007 Data Correction * KIDS AUPD, EOYA, EXIT *CETE NT & Accommodations Decision Appeals *AYP *QPA Use AYP/QPA Data Correction Request to request a window for submitting to KIDS (AUPD, EOYA, EXIT) to correct your data Use AYP/QPA Verification Check to review and signoff on data sets used for AYP reporting and QPA determination Use AYP/QPA Decision Appeal tool to file your appeal for a change in your AYP status or QPA determination. Media Briefings and Release to SBOE

2008 Timelines--Draft 6/13 End of data collection submissions 6/13 QPA Quality Criteria due 6/16 -7/11 Data correction window 7/11 Data Checklist/Signoff 7/14 – 7/25 Reclassification 8/1 Appeals close

CELEBRATE! Thank you! Student achievement is increasing! Our schools and districts are doing well! The quality of data is improving. Your reviews are tremendously important. Your patience is appreciated.